29.03.2013 Views

A Natural Areas Inventory of the - Kansas Natural Heritage Inventory ...

A Natural Areas Inventory of the - Kansas Natural Heritage Inventory ...

A Natural Areas Inventory of the - Kansas Natural Heritage Inventory ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF THE<br />

FT. LEAVENWORTH MILITARY RESERVATION,<br />

LEAVENWORTH COUNTY, KANSAS. II<br />

Open-file Report No. 117<br />

December 31, 2003<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Inventory</strong><br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> Biological Survey<br />

2101 Constant Avenue<br />

Lawrence, KS 66047-3759


A NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF THE<br />

FT. LEAVENWORTH MILITARY RESERVATION,<br />

LEAVENWORTH COUNTY, KANSAS. II<br />

Cover Photo: Understory <strong>of</strong> Pecan-Hackberry Floodplains Forest on Ft. Leavenworth Military<br />

Reservation. Photo by Craig. C. Freeman, 2003.<br />

Citation:<br />

Freeman, C. C, W. H. Busby, J. Delisle, W. D. Kettle, K. Kindscher, H. Loring, C. A.<br />

Morse, and V. B. Salisbury. 2003. A natural areas inventory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ft. Leavenworth<br />

Military Reservation, Leavenworth County, <strong>Kansas</strong>. II. Open-file Report No. 117. <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

Biological Survey. Lawrence, KS. 199 pp.<br />

Assume corporate authorship for chapters and appendices except where stated o<strong>the</strong>rwise.<br />

Chapters and appendices with individual authors may be cited as in <strong>the</strong> following example:<br />

Loring, H. 2003. <strong>Natural</strong> communities. Pp. 13–46. In: Freeman, C. C., W. H. Busby, J.<br />

Delisle, W. D. Kettle, K. Kindscher, H. Loring, C. A. Morse, and V. B. Salisbury. <strong>Natural</strong><br />

areas inventory <strong>of</strong> Ft. Leavenworth Military Reservation, Leavenworth County, <strong>Kansas</strong>. II.<br />

Open-file Report No. 117. <strong>Kansas</strong> Biological Survey. Lawrence, KS. 199 pp.


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

List Of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................. iii<br />

List Of Tables ................................................................................................................................................................ v<br />

Acknowledgments ....................................................................................................................................................... vii<br />

Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................................... viii<br />

Chapter 1. Background ................................................................................................................................................. 1<br />

1.2. DETAILED STUDY OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................ 2<br />

1.3. STUDY AREA ................................................................................................................................................. 4<br />

1.4. LAND USE HISTORY AND VEGETATION ................................................................................................. 6<br />

1.5. PROTECTED AND RARE SPECIES .............................................................................................................. 7<br />

1.6. PREVIOUS STUDIES ..................................................................................................................................... 8<br />

Chapter 2. <strong>Natural</strong> Communities ................................................................................................................................ 13<br />

2.1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 13<br />

2.2. METHODS ..................................................................................................................................................... 13<br />

2.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................................... 14<br />

Forest Communities ........................................................................................................................................... 15<br />

Herbaceous Communities .................................................................................................................................. 33<br />

Sparse Vegetation Communities ........................................................................................................................ 37<br />

Successional <strong>Areas</strong> ............................................................................................................................................. 38<br />

2.4. SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................... 39<br />

Chapter 3. Animals ..................................................................................................................................................... 44<br />

3.1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 44<br />

3.2. METHODS ..................................................................................................................................................... 46<br />

3.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................................... 48<br />

Species Accounts–Federal-listed Species ........................................................................................................... 50<br />

Species Accounts–State-listed Species ............................................................................................................... 55<br />

Species Accounts–<strong>Kansas</strong> Species in Need <strong>of</strong> Conservation (SINC).................................................................. 58<br />

Species Accounts–Former Federal Candidate Species ...................................................................................... 63<br />

Species Accounts–O<strong>the</strong>r Rare Species ............................................................................................................... 64<br />

Faunistic Surveys ............................................................................................................................................... 65<br />

3.4. SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................... 67<br />

Chapter 4. Plants ......................................................................................................................................................... 77<br />

4.1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................... 77<br />

4.2. METHODS ..................................................................................................................................................... 78<br />

4.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ..................................................................................................................... 78<br />

Floristic Surveys ................................................................................................................................................ 80<br />

Federal-listed Species ........................................................................................................................................ 85<br />

State-rare Species .............................................................................................................................................. 85<br />

4.4. SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................................... 92<br />

Chapter 5. Management Recommendations .............................................................................................................. 110<br />

5.1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 110<br />

5.2. LANDSCAPE ISSUES AND FACTORS INFLUENCING THE BIODIVERSITY OF THE FT.<br />

LEAVENWORTH MILITARY RESERVATION ............................................................................................... 110<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II i


5.3. RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................................................................. 112<br />

Chapter 6. Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 120<br />

Literature Cited .......................................................................................................................................................... 124<br />

Appendix A. Directions to vegetation plots. ............................................................................................................. 131<br />

Appendix B. Checklist <strong>of</strong> vertebrates known to occur or possibly occurring on <strong>the</strong> Ft. Leavenworth Military<br />

Reservation. ............................................................................................................................................................... 135<br />

Appendix C. Annotated checklist <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vascular plants <strong>of</strong> Leavenworth County and <strong>the</strong> Ft. Leavenworth Military<br />

Reservation (FLMR). ................................................................................................................................................. 146<br />

Appendix D. A report on a field survey <strong>of</strong> summer bats on FLMR. ......................................................................... 178<br />

Appendix E. Report on a 2003 field survey <strong>of</strong> snakes on FLMR. ............................................................................ 183<br />

Appendix F. Exotic and Invasive Plant Species <strong>of</strong> Concern. .................................................................................... 187<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II ii


LIST OF FIGURES<br />

FIGURE 1.1. Location <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ft. Leavenworth Military Reservation ......................... Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 1.2. Locations and names <strong>of</strong> trails referenced in this report. ....................................................................... 12<br />

FIGURE 2.1. Locations <strong>of</strong> vegetation plots within natural communities on FLMR ... Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 2.2. High-quality forest communities .......................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 2.3. Prairie remnants on FLMR ................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 3.1. Sou<strong>the</strong>rn flying squirrel trap arrays (1–3), capture location (square), and unconfirmed sightings<br />

(circles) on FLMR in 2002 and 2003 ................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 3.2. Locations <strong>of</strong> baiting stations for American burying beetle on FLMR in September 2003 ........... Error!<br />

Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 3.3. Locations <strong>of</strong> point counts for breeding birds in old-growth, mid-successional, and early successional<br />

floodplain forests on FLMR in June 2003 .......................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 3.4. Element occurrence polygons for cerulean warbler and yellow-throated warbler. Both species are<br />

known to occur at multiple sites within <strong>the</strong> delimited areas, but populations are not continuous. Yellowedthroated<br />

warbler polygon includes that <strong>of</strong> cerulean warbler ............................... Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 3.5. Locations <strong>of</strong> eastern chipmunk sightings on FLMR from 1995–2003.. Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 3.6. Element occurrence centroids for great egret, broad-winged hawk, red-shouldered hawk, and<br />

ovenbird on FLMR ............................................................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 3.7. Sites where reptiles and amphibians were encountered on FLMR in 2002 and 2003.Error! Bookmark<br />

not defined.<br />

FIGURE 4.1. Generalized distribution <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat for Aster lateriflorus var. lateriflorus on FLMR ...... Error!<br />

Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 4.2. Generalized distribution <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat for Brachyelytrum erectum on FLMR ...Error! Bookmark<br />

not defined.<br />

FIGURE 4.3. Distribution map <strong>of</strong> known extent <strong>of</strong> Bromus nottowayanus on FLMR Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 4.4. Generalized distribution <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat for Carex crus-corvi on FLMR ........................................ 97<br />

FIGURE 4.5. Generalized distribution <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat for Carex hirtifolia on FLMR ......... Error! Bookmark not<br />

defined.<br />

FIGURE 4.6. Generalized distribution <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat for Carex hitchcockiana, Carex rosea, Osmorhiza<br />

claytonii, and Uvularia grandiflora on FLMR .................................................. Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 4.7. Generalized distribution <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat for Carex normalis on FLMR ......... Error! Bookmark not<br />

defined.<br />

FIGURE 4.8. Generalized distribution <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat for Carex radiata on FLMR ........... Error! Bookmark not<br />

defined.<br />

FIGURE 4.9. Generalized distribution <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat for Carex tribuloides var. sangamonensis on FLMR .... 102<br />

FIGURE 4.10. Generalized distribution <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat for Hydrophyllum appendiculatum on FLMR ....... Error!<br />

Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 4.11. Distribution map <strong>of</strong> known extent <strong>of</strong> Hypericum ascyron on FLMR . Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 4.12. Generalized distribution <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat for Lipocarpha micrantha on FLMR ...Error! Bookmark<br />

not defined.<br />

FIGURE 4.13. Generalized distribution <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat for Packera glabella on FLMR .... Error! Bookmark not<br />

defined.<br />

FIGURE 4.14. Generalized distribution <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat for Ranunculus recurvatus var. recurvatus on FLMR<br />

........................................................................................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 4.15. Generalized distribution <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat for Rubus alumnus on FLMR ....... Error! Bookmark not<br />

defined.<br />

FIGURE 4.16. Generalized distribution <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat for Stachys pilosa var. arenicola on FLMR........... Error!<br />

Bookmark not defined.<br />

FIGURE 5.1. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> small remnant prairies at FLMR. Woody vegetation within and surrounding <strong>the</strong> site should<br />

be removed and a prescribed burning plan implemented to preserve biodiversity ........................................... 119<br />

FIGURE D.1. Locations <strong>of</strong> bat netting stations on FLMR ......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II iii


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II iv


LIST OF TABLES<br />

TABLE 2.1. Summary <strong>of</strong> natural community survey activities on FLMR in 2003 ..................................................... 15<br />

TABLE 2.2. <strong>Natural</strong> communities documented on FLMR ......................................................................................... 16<br />

TABLE 2.3. Locations <strong>of</strong> vegetation plots and community types in which <strong>the</strong>y occur .............................................. 17<br />

TABLE 2.4. Average basal area (cm 2 /400 m 2 ) and sapling count (number/400 m 2 ) <strong>of</strong> overstory trees and vines in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest in 1995–1996 and 2003 ...................................................................... 18<br />

TABLE 2.5. Average cover (%) <strong>of</strong> understory species in <strong>the</strong> Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest in 1995–1996 and<br />

2003 ................................................................................................................................................................... 19<br />

TABLE 2.6. Average basal area (cm 2 /400 m 2 ) and sapling count (number/400 m 2 ) <strong>of</strong> overstory trees and vines in<br />

<strong>the</strong> mature to old-growth Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest in 1995–1996 and 2003 ........................... 22<br />

TABLE 2.7. Average basal area (cm 2 /400 m 2 ) and sapling count (number/400 m 2 ) <strong>of</strong> overstory trees and vines in<br />

<strong>the</strong> early to mid-successional Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest in 1995–1996 and 2003 .................... 22<br />

TABLE 2.8. Average cover (%) <strong>of</strong> understory species in <strong>the</strong> old-growth Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest in<br />

1995–1996 and 2003 .......................................................................................................................................... 23<br />

TABLE 2.9. Average cover (%) <strong>of</strong> understory species in <strong>the</strong> early to mid-successional Cottonwood-Sycamore<br />

Floodplain Forest in 1995–1996 and 2003 ......................................................................................................... 25<br />

TABLE 2.10. Average basal area (cm 2 /400 m 2 ) and sapling count (number/400 m 2 ) <strong>of</strong> overstory trees and vines in<br />

<strong>the</strong> White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest in 1995–1996 and 2003 ...................................................................... 27<br />

TABLE 2.11. Average cover (%) <strong>of</strong> understory species in <strong>the</strong> White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest in 1995–1996 and<br />

2003 ................................................................................................................................................................... 28<br />

TABLE 2.12. Average basal area (cm 2 /400 m 2 ) and sapling count (number/400 m 2 ) <strong>of</strong> overstory trees and vines in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Maple-Basswood Forest in 1995–1996 and 2003 ........................................................................................ 32<br />

TABLE 2.13. Average cover (%) <strong>of</strong> understory species in <strong>the</strong> Maple-Basswood Forest in 1995–1996 and 2003 .... 32<br />

TABLE 2.14. Vascular plant species observed on prairie remnants on FLMR .......................................................... 34<br />

TABLE 3.1. Animal species protected by federal and/or state laws with historical or extant occurrences in<br />

Leavenworth County, <strong>Kansas</strong> ............................................................................................................................. 45<br />

TABLE 3.2. Summary <strong>of</strong> areas surveyed for plants and animals in 2002 and 2003 on FLMR .................................. 49<br />

TABLE 3.3. Element occurrence records for state-rare animals on FLMR ................................................................ 50<br />

TABLE 3.4. Carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae) collected on FLMR 3–6 September 2003 .............................. 51<br />

TABLE 3.5. Carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae) collected at FLMR on 9–12 September 2003 .......................... 51<br />

TABLE 3.6. Aerial surveys for bald eagles conducted by KDWP from 1991–1993.................................................. 52<br />

TABLE 3.7. Results <strong>of</strong> strip-plot surveys for canopy-dwelling warblers in old-growth forest at FLMR in 2002–2003<br />

........................................................................................................................................................................... 59<br />

TABLE 3.8. Results <strong>of</strong> point counts for birds conducted in June 2003 in three floodplain forest types on FLMR .... 66<br />

TABLE 3.9. Number <strong>of</strong> vertebrate species known to occur or potentially occurring on FLMR based on data in<br />

Appendix B ........................................................................................................................................................ 68<br />

TABLE 4.1. Summary <strong>of</strong> dates, areas surveyed for vascular plant species, effort, and results during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field<br />

season on FLMR ................................................................................................................................................ 78<br />

TABLE 4.2. Number <strong>of</strong> taxa and cumulative percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 10 most species-rich vascular plant families known<br />

from Leavenworth County and FLMR ............................................................................................................... 81<br />

TABLE 4.3. Number and cumulative percentage <strong>of</strong> introduced and native taxa in Leavenworth County and on<br />

FLMR ................................................................................................................................................................. 83<br />

TABLE 4.4. Number and cumulative percentage <strong>of</strong> annual, biennial, and perennial taxa in Leavenworth County and<br />

on FLMR ............................................................................................................................................................ 83<br />

TABLE 4.5. Number <strong>of</strong> instances and cumulative percentage in which taxa were reported from different habitat<br />

types in Leavenworth County and on FLMR ..................................................................................................... 84<br />

TABLE 4.6. Number <strong>of</strong> instances and cumulative percentage in which taxa were reported from different habitat<br />

types in Leavenworth County and on FLMR ..................................................................................................... 84<br />

TABLE 4.7. Summary <strong>of</strong> element occurrence records for 21 state-rare vascular plant species on FLMR ................. 90<br />

TABLE D.1. Species <strong>of</strong> bats captured at FLMR in 2002 and 2003 .......................................................................... 179<br />

TABLE D.2. Numbers <strong>of</strong> each bat species collected at each net site ....................................................................... 179<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II v


TABLE D.3. UTM coordinates for net locations ..................................................................................................... 180<br />

TABLE E.1. Reptiles and amphibians observed on FLMR between May and October 2003 .................................. 185<br />

TABLE F.1. Exotic plant species <strong>of</strong> concern at FLMR ............................................................................................ 188<br />

TABLE F.2. Life forms (habit) <strong>of</strong> exotic plant species <strong>of</strong> concern at FLMR ........................................................... 189<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II vi


ACKNOWLEDGMENTS<br />

This work was carried out under Cooperative Agreement No. DAMD17-02-2-0050 awarded by<br />

<strong>the</strong> U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity in Ft. Detrick, Maryland (under <strong>the</strong> project<br />

title “A natural features inventory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fort Leavenworth Military Reservation”) to <strong>the</strong><br />

University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>, <strong>Kansas</strong> Biological Survey. It builds on <strong>the</strong> earlier studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

Biological Survey, which were supported by Cooperative Agreement No. DAMD17-94-V-4019<br />

awarded by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Army Medical Research Acquisition Activity in Ft. Detrick, Maryland<br />

(under <strong>the</strong> project title “Managing bottomland hardwoods for neotropical migratory birds, project<br />

#94-0614") and Cooperative Agreement No. 14-48-0006-95-3006, awarded by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Fish and<br />

Wildlife Service in Denver, Colorado.<br />

We are grateful to Judy Wimberg and Matt Nowak at Ft. Leavenworth, who provided logistical<br />

assistance and information about management issues. Both have been enthusiastic supporters <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Survey’s work.<br />

Many individuals assisted with various aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> field work and processing <strong>of</strong> data. Special<br />

thanks go to Dr. Lynn Robbins, Southwest Missouri State University, who conducted surveys <strong>of</strong><br />

bats, and Hank Guarisco, Lawrence, <strong>Kansas</strong>, who conducted American burying beetle and<br />

herpetological surveys. Erika Noguera and Todd Aschenbach assisted Hillary Loring in <strong>the</strong> field.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II vii


ABSTRACT<br />

A two-year field study was initiated in 2002 on <strong>the</strong> Ft. Leavenworth Military Reservation<br />

(FLMR) as a follow-up to research conducted <strong>the</strong>re by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> Biological Survey in 1995 and<br />

1996. The project had four primary objectives: 1) conduct surveys to update information about<br />

biotic assemblages, outstanding natural areas, and protected species, 2) identify <strong>the</strong> primary<br />

threats from exotic plants to native biodiversity, 3) make <strong>the</strong>se data available in a geographic<br />

information system format, and 4) develop management recommendations to assist resource<br />

managers with maintenance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> installation’s biodiversity assets.<br />

Seven kinds <strong>of</strong> terrestrial natural communities were confirmed. Riverine communities were not<br />

examined or evaluated. One occurrence each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four forest types was updated in <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

<strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Inventory</strong>’s database. The floodplain forest on FLMR remains one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

largest old-growth stands in <strong>the</strong> lower Missouri River valley, and upland forests and associated<br />

communities are regionally important. Visual analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floodplain forests suggests<br />

significant changes have occurred since 1995–1996, but analysis <strong>of</strong> data did not reveal any<br />

statistically significant differences. Threats to biodiversity include degradation, fragmentation,<br />

isolation, and destruction <strong>of</strong> natural areas both on-site and <strong>of</strong>f-site. Riparian forests are<br />

especially significant to native biodiversity, providing routes for <strong>the</strong> movement <strong>of</strong> wildlife and<br />

helping to maintain water quality. Degraded prairies, forests, and wetlands may serve as buffer<br />

areas and connectors between high-quality sites, and many areas have restoration potential.<br />

Animal surveys revealed few changes from <strong>the</strong> earlier findings. One federally protected species<br />

is a regular migrant and winter resident. Four species <strong>of</strong> federally protected birds may migrate<br />

through <strong>the</strong> area, but nesting and/or foraging habitat for <strong>the</strong>se species is limited or absent. No<br />

state-listed threatened or endangered species were documented, but several migratory species<br />

may make brief stops. Five <strong>Kansas</strong> Species In Need <strong>of</strong> Conservation (SINC) were documented<br />

on <strong>the</strong> installation and two species may use habitat on <strong>the</strong> installation. Four state-rare bird<br />

species also were documented. Of 428 vertebrate species potentially occurring on <strong>the</strong><br />

installation, 292 species have been confirmed since 1995.<br />

No populations <strong>of</strong> federal-listed plant species were observed. However, nine <strong>of</strong> 11 state-rare<br />

vascular plant taxa documented earlier were confirmed persisting. Populations <strong>of</strong> two state-rare<br />

species were not relocated but may persist. Ten species were added to <strong>the</strong> list <strong>of</strong> state-rare taxa<br />

occurring on FLMR. Plant surveys yielded 267 specimens <strong>of</strong> vascular plants and bryophytes,<br />

including 55 taxa previously undocumented on FLMR. Currently, 585 species <strong>of</strong> vascular plants<br />

and 43 species <strong>of</strong> bryophytes are confirmed at <strong>the</strong> site. A number <strong>of</strong> exotic plant species appear<br />

to have increased in abundance since <strong>the</strong> initial study, and several <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se represent threats to <strong>the</strong><br />

native biodiversity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> site.<br />

Seventeen recommendations are made to help maintain and enhance <strong>the</strong> native biodiversity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

installation. The recommendations fall into one <strong>of</strong> three general categories: land management,<br />

education/promotion, and future studies.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II viii


1.1. INTRODUCTION<br />

CHAPTER 1. BACKGROUND<br />

Craig C. Freeman<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> Biological Survey<br />

2101 Constant Avenue<br />

Lawrence, KS 66047-3759<br />

ccfree@ku.edu<br />

In 1997, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Inventory</strong> (KSNHI), a program <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> Biological<br />

Survey (KBS) at <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>, completed a two-year field study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> terrestrial<br />

natural environment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ft. Leavenworth Military Reservation (FLMR) in extreme nor<strong>the</strong>ast<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> (Freeman et al. 1997). That study had five objectives: 1) compile a list <strong>of</strong> protected and<br />

rare species <strong>of</strong> plants and animals potentially occurring on FLMR, 2) plan and conduct surveys<br />

for <strong>the</strong>se species, 3) document and map all findings <strong>of</strong> threatened and endangered species, 4)<br />

compile a comprehensive report detailing all occurrences <strong>of</strong> protected and rare species and<br />

describing exceptional biological natural areas on FLMR, and 5) assist in <strong>the</strong> formulation <strong>of</strong><br />

management recommendations based on <strong>the</strong> survey results. The <strong>Kansas</strong> Cooperative Fish and<br />

Wildlife Research Unit at <strong>Kansas</strong> State University also conducted fish surveys in <strong>the</strong> Missouri<br />

River along <strong>the</strong> north and east side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fort in 1996 as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> overall effort to inventory <strong>the</strong><br />

FLMR biota.<br />

The <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Inventory</strong> identified nine kinds <strong>of</strong> natural communities on FLMR<br />

during its study: four forest types, two herbaceous types, one sparse vegetation type, and two<br />

riverine types. One occurrence each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four forest types was added to KSNHI’s database <strong>of</strong><br />

outstanding natural community occurrences in <strong>Kansas</strong>. Field surveys confirmed that <strong>the</strong><br />

floodplain forest at FLMR is globally significant and among <strong>the</strong> largest old growth stands left in<br />

<strong>the</strong> lower Missouri River valley. Upland forests and smaller natural communities associated with<br />

<strong>the</strong>m were found to be regionally important, collectively providing habitat for nearly two-dozen<br />

globally rare or state-rare species and a rich assemblage <strong>of</strong> plants and animals representative <strong>of</strong><br />

forest and grassland communities in nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong>. Floristic and faunistic surveys greatly<br />

expanded <strong>the</strong> list <strong>of</strong> organisms known to use habitat on FLMR. A total <strong>of</strong> 253 species <strong>of</strong><br />

vertebrates was confirmed on <strong>the</strong> installation, including 179 birds, 33 mammals, 28 reptiles, and<br />

13 amphibians. Surveys for fishes in <strong>the</strong> Missouri River yielded 21 species. Five hundred thirtytwo<br />

species <strong>of</strong> vascular plants were documented, including 460 that were confirmed during <strong>the</strong><br />

study. Seven vascular plant species were documented in <strong>Kansas</strong> for <strong>the</strong> first time. Bryophyte<br />

surveys yielded 42 species, including 15 county records and one state record. Primary threats to<br />

<strong>the</strong> biodiversity included destruction and degradation <strong>of</strong> natural areas (both on and <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong><br />

installation) and establishment and spread <strong>of</strong> several species <strong>of</strong> exotic plants. Based on its<br />

findings, KBS made 15 recommendations to help maintain and enhance <strong>the</strong> biodiversity <strong>of</strong><br />

FLMR. Among <strong>the</strong>m was a recommendation to conduct periodic surveys to monitor <strong>the</strong><br />

condition <strong>of</strong> populations and natural communities and to assess environmental trends.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 1


In response to that recommendation, in 2002 <strong>the</strong> FLMR Directorate <strong>of</strong> Installation Support,<br />

Environmental Division, requested a proposal from KSNHI for fieldwork to update <strong>the</strong> 1997<br />

study. A proposal was prepared and submitted, and an award was made in July 2002.<br />

There were four primary objectives. First, new surveys were conducted to update information<br />

concerning floristic and faunistic assemblages, outstanding natural areas, and species protected<br />

by federal and state laws. <strong>Natural</strong> communities identified during <strong>the</strong> first survey were reevaluated<br />

to document any significant changes in extent, structure, or species composition.<br />

Systematic surveys were conducted for protected species known to occur on <strong>the</strong> installation and<br />

several o<strong>the</strong>r species that potentially might use habitat <strong>the</strong>re. Second, because some rare species<br />

and natural communities are vulnerable to <strong>the</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> exotic species, <strong>the</strong> most serious threats<br />

from non-native species (mostly exotic plants) also were identified. Third, based on <strong>the</strong><br />

cumulative findings, management recommendations were developed to assist resource managers<br />

with maintenance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> installation’s biodiversity assets. Fourth, locations <strong>of</strong> rare species,<br />

aggressive exotic species, and outstanding natural community occurrences were mapped using a<br />

geographic information system (GIS) and made available to <strong>the</strong> natural resources staff at FLMR.<br />

Field studies were initiated in July 2002 and were completed in November 2003. This report<br />

summarizes our work and compares current conditions to those described five years earlier<br />

(Freeman et al. 1997).<br />

1.2. DETAILED STUDY OBJECTIVES<br />

Objective 1. Surveys and Assessments <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> Communities and Rare Species. A primary<br />

objective was to update element occurrence records compiled by KSNHI and summarized in<br />

Freeman et al. (1997). <strong>Natural</strong> communities identified previously were revisited to document any<br />

significant changes in <strong>the</strong>ir distribution, structure, or species composition. <strong>Natural</strong> community<br />

quality grades assigned during <strong>the</strong> first study were re-evaluated qualitatively with data generated<br />

from new field surveys. Additionally, areas <strong>of</strong> FLMR that were not accessible during <strong>the</strong> first study<br />

(e.g., <strong>the</strong> farm area) were visited and surveyed for <strong>the</strong> first time.<br />

Similarly, zoological and botanical surveys were conducted to update data compiled during <strong>the</strong> first<br />

survey. At <strong>the</strong> request <strong>of</strong> FLMR personnel, surveys were carried out for one species not<br />

investigated during <strong>the</strong> first survey—<strong>the</strong> Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis). The Indiana bat is a federal<br />

endangered species that inhabits cave regions in <strong>the</strong> eastern United States. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world’s<br />

populations are found in Missouri. The species has not been documented in <strong>Kansas</strong>. Females<br />

disperse to maternity roosts in late spring, and it is at this time that <strong>the</strong>y have <strong>the</strong> potential to occur<br />

on FLMR. Dr. Lynn Robbins, Southwestern Missouri State University, an expert on this species,<br />

was contracted to conduct surveys for <strong>the</strong> bat. Information on o<strong>the</strong>r bat species encountered on<br />

FLMR was recorded during surveys for <strong>the</strong> Indiana bat, and this information is presented herein.<br />

Populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 11 state-rare plants documented on <strong>the</strong> installation were revisited and assessed.<br />

Occurrences for nine <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se were updated in <strong>the</strong> KSNHI database.<br />

Objective 2. Surveys for Exotic Species. More than 40% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plant species documented on<br />

FLMR by Freeman et al. (1997) grow in disturbed habitats. Many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se were introduced<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 2


intentionally or accidentally from Europe or Asia. While many non-native plants rarely persist very<br />

long outside <strong>of</strong> cultivation, some have become naturalized in North America, and a few have<br />

become serious threats to native biodiversity. Freeman et al. (1997) identified Garlic mustard<br />

(Alliaria petiolata) as a serious pest in floodplain forests on <strong>the</strong> installation. More than a dozen<br />

non-native, woody species also were listed as potential threats and monitoring <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir status was<br />

recommended.<br />

As part <strong>of</strong> this study, we attempted to determine <strong>the</strong> distribution and abundance <strong>of</strong> exotic plants<br />

that represent <strong>the</strong> most serious threats to native biodiversity on FLMR. Our initial interested was<br />

garlic mustard, Japanese barberry (Berberis thunbergii DC.), Chinese spindle-tree (Euonymus<br />

fortunei (Turcz.) Hand.-Mazz.), autumn-olive (Elaeagnus umbellata Thunb.), Amur honeysuckle<br />

(Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Maxim.), multiflora rose (Rosa multiflora Thunb.), and common<br />

privet (Ligustrum vulgare L.). In addition, sericea lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata (Dum. Cours.)<br />

G. Don), added to <strong>the</strong> state noxious weed list in 2000, was documented on FLMR during <strong>the</strong> first<br />

survey. Surveys for it were conducted and are summarized.<br />

Objective 3. Data Management. Data about each population <strong>of</strong> rare plant and animal were<br />

entered into KSNHI's databases using standard <strong>Heritage</strong> methodology. Locations <strong>of</strong> rare species<br />

were mapped onto topographic maps maintained in <strong>the</strong> KSNHI map file. <strong>Natural</strong> community<br />

occurrences that meet KSNHI database criteria also were mapped and added to <strong>the</strong> databases.<br />

<strong>Natural</strong> community locations and plant and animal locations were digitized using ArcView GIS<br />

s<strong>of</strong>tware. Attributes describing <strong>the</strong> species and plant community occurrences were attached to<br />

<strong>the</strong>se polygon and point coverages.<br />

Objective 4. Management Recommendations. Preservation <strong>of</strong> native biological diversity is<br />

mandated for Army installations and must be undertaken in ways consistent with military<br />

mission. Effective preservation efforts will require that conservation goals are science-based and<br />

fully integrated with current and planned military activities, recreational and education programs,<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>r endeavors. The linchpin <strong>of</strong> an effective preservation program is a set <strong>of</strong> sound<br />

management recommendations, targeted to specific sites, which can be referenced by natural<br />

resource personnel to accomplish well-defined conservation and restoration objectives.<br />

Freeman et al. (1997) <strong>of</strong>fered 15 recommendations intended to maintain and enhance <strong>the</strong><br />

biodiversity <strong>of</strong> natural communities documented on FLMR. The recommendations fell into three<br />

categories: land management, education and promotion, and additional studies. Based on recent<br />

surveys, we have built on <strong>the</strong>se original management recommendations by developing and<br />

expanding <strong>the</strong> management strategies to preserve and enhance <strong>the</strong> natural features <strong>of</strong> FLMR.<br />

Broadly defined, <strong>the</strong> objectives <strong>of</strong> this part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> study were: 1) maintain and enhance highquality<br />

native communities on <strong>the</strong> installation, 2) improve habitat condition and quality <strong>of</strong><br />

degraded sites, and 3) identify opportunities to restore o<strong>the</strong>r communities and populations. The<br />

methods used in planning require several integrated steps including: 1) establishing clear goals<br />

and objectives; 2) delineating management units; 3) identifying management issues and<br />

concerns; 4) developing recommendations and alternatives for different levels <strong>of</strong> management;<br />

and 5) outlining methods to assess <strong>the</strong> effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plan in meeting objectives.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 3


The over-arching goal <strong>of</strong> this aspect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project was to provide recommendations for<br />

maintaining native communities and rare species at FLMR, and enhancing <strong>the</strong>m wherever<br />

possible. Resource managers and o<strong>the</strong>r personnel may <strong>the</strong>n use this information as guidance to<br />

preserve and enhance native biodiversity at FLMR. Although <strong>the</strong> scope <strong>of</strong> this project focuses on<br />

native biodiversity, o<strong>the</strong>r base activities—such as landscaping programs, golf course<br />

maintenance, recreation (hunting, fishing, hiking, birding), and infrastructure development—may<br />

impinge upon native communities and should be at some point integrated into <strong>the</strong> planning<br />

process.<br />

1.3. STUDY AREA<br />

Freeman et al. (1997) provide a detailed description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> physical setting, history, environment,<br />

and biota <strong>of</strong> FLMR and surrounding areas. The history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> post is not discussed here, but<br />

information about <strong>the</strong> physical setting, environment, and biota is summarized from Freeman et<br />

al. (1997) to provide context for <strong>the</strong> chapters that follow.<br />

The 2,399-ha (5,927-ac) Ft. Leavenworth Military Reservation is located in nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong> in<br />

eastern Leavenworth County (Figure 1.1). Situated on <strong>the</strong> north side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> city <strong>of</strong> Leavenworth,<br />

FLMR is roughly 40 km (25 mi) northwest <strong>of</strong> downtown <strong>Kansas</strong> City, <strong>Kansas</strong>. It is <strong>the</strong> oldest<br />

continuously-active Army post west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mississippi River. Ft. Leavenworth today is <strong>the</strong> home<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. Army Command and General Staff College within <strong>the</strong> U.S. Army Combined Arms<br />

Center (Edgerton 1995). It is considered to be among <strong>the</strong> finest senior tactical schools in <strong>the</strong><br />

world for advanced military education.<br />

The Ft. Leavenworth Military Reservation lies completely within <strong>the</strong> Glaciated Region<br />

physiographic province <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> (Schoewe 1949, Zavesky and Boatright 1977). It encompasses<br />

two distinct landscape features: rolling hills and uplands above <strong>the</strong> Missouri River, and an area <strong>of</strong><br />

nearly level river floodplain. Elevations range from 232 m msl (760 ft) along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River<br />

at <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>ast corner to 329 m msl (1080 ft) at Hancock Hill near <strong>the</strong> northwest corner.<br />

Slightly more than half <strong>of</strong> FLMR is situated on rolling hills above <strong>the</strong> Missouri River. Most<br />

upland areas south and east <strong>of</strong> a line extending from a point where Quarry Creek empties onto<br />

<strong>the</strong> Missouri River floodplain (in <strong>the</strong> center <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> installation) southwest through <strong>the</strong> National<br />

Cemetery and <strong>the</strong>n along Hancock Avenue to its junction with US 73 and KS 7 (at <strong>the</strong> fort’s<br />

southwest entrance) has been developed. This area, which lies mostly between 244–274 m msl<br />

(800–900 ft), supports much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fort’s infrastructure. North and west <strong>of</strong> this line are a series<br />

<strong>of</strong> forested ridges and valleys.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> Sheridan Drive (Figure 1.2) sits atop a prominent, sinuous ridge on <strong>the</strong> west side <strong>of</strong><br />

FLMR that is part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Oread Escarpment (Brumwell 1951). This ridge, which rises to an<br />

elevation <strong>of</strong> 323–329 m msl (1060–1080 ft) and extends from Government Hill in <strong>the</strong> south to<br />

Hancock Hill in <strong>the</strong> north, separates <strong>the</strong> major drainage basins <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fort. West <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ridge,<br />

streams flow west to Salt Creek, which flows north-nor<strong>the</strong>ast and joins Plum Creek 0.8 km (0.5<br />

mi) northwest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> northwest corner <strong>of</strong> FLMR. Roughly 0.6 km (0.4 mi) nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

confluence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se two streams, <strong>the</strong>y join <strong>the</strong> Missouri River. East <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ridge, streams flow<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 4


east toward <strong>the</strong> Missouri River. Two intermittent streams drain most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> uplands. Corral<br />

Creek drains <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn quarter while Quarry Creek and its tributaries drain interior sections.<br />

Between <strong>the</strong>se two creeks is One Mile Creek, an intermittent stream that was dammed to form<br />

Merritt and Smith Lakes. Uplands in <strong>the</strong> northwest corner are drained by a series <strong>of</strong> short, highgrade,<br />

intermittent streams that drop quickly from <strong>the</strong> bluffs to <strong>the</strong> Missouri River floodplain.<br />

The remainder <strong>of</strong> FLMR lies on <strong>the</strong> broad, flat to gently undulating floodplain <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri<br />

River. At FLMR, <strong>the</strong> floodplain is 4.3 km (2.5 mi) wide and lies on <strong>the</strong> inside <strong>of</strong> a large, tight<br />

meander. This meander begins on <strong>the</strong> west side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floodplain at <strong>the</strong> northwest corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

installation. From <strong>the</strong>re, <strong>the</strong> river arcs eastward to <strong>the</strong> east side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floodplain, creating a loop<br />

called Weston Bend, and <strong>the</strong>n it swings back to <strong>the</strong> southwest to <strong>the</strong> west side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floodplain<br />

near <strong>the</strong> site <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> old Fort Bridge.<br />

The southwest third <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floodplain is surrounded by artificial levees and dominated by open,<br />

grassy fields and former crop land around <strong>the</strong> Sherman Army Airfield. Outside <strong>the</strong> levees is a<br />

mix <strong>of</strong> floodplain forest and marshy, backwater areas. Most historical drainage patterns in <strong>the</strong><br />

floodplain were obscured long ago due to human activities.<br />

Brumwell’s (1951) description <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floodplain vegetation in 1939 and 1940 is very similar to<br />

<strong>the</strong> way it appears today. The eastern half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floodplain supported oak-hickory-pecan forest<br />

surrounded by a fringe <strong>of</strong> cottonwood-sycamore forest. The southwest section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floodplain<br />

was cleared <strong>of</strong> its forest in <strong>the</strong> late 1800s. In <strong>the</strong> north part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floodplain were numerous<br />

oxbow lakes and marshes that filled with water during floods and periods <strong>of</strong> heavy precipitation.<br />

A railroad right-<strong>of</strong>-way runs <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fort at <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> river bluff.<br />

Uplands on FLMR, which lie along <strong>the</strong> Oread Escarpment (Brumwell 1951), consist <strong>of</strong> a mixture<br />

<strong>of</strong> rolling hills and inconspicuous limestone bluffs protruding from thick accumulations <strong>of</strong> loess<br />

or eroded slopes above <strong>the</strong> Missouri River. The oldest exposed bedrock is limestone and shale <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Douglas, Shawnee, and Lansing Groups <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pennsylvanian system (Ross 1991). Most<br />

upland areas are overlain by unconsolidated till and windblown loess <strong>of</strong> Pleistocene age. The<br />

broad, fan-shaped area <strong>of</strong> floodplain along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River is covered by Recent alluvium<br />

(Brumwell 1951, Zavesky and Boatright 1977).<br />

Three main soil associations are represented on FLMR (Zavesky and Boatright 1977). The<br />

Onawa-Haynie-Eudora association comprises nearly level soils formed in alluvium on<br />

floodplains and terraces. These soils are deep, well drained to somewhat poorly drained, nearly<br />

level, and have a loamy to clayey surface layer. Soils <strong>of</strong> this association cover an extensive area<br />

<strong>of</strong> floodplain along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River near Sherman Army Airfield.<br />

The Gosport-Sogn association includes soils on moderate to steep slopes on uplands. They<br />

formed in silty to loamy loess and in material wea<strong>the</strong>red from shale and limestone. These soils<br />

are moderately deep, moderately well drained, and have a silty clay subsoil. They cover a fairly<br />

narrow area along <strong>the</strong> ridge extending along <strong>the</strong> west side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> installation roughly from<br />

Hancock Hill south to Wagner Point and Government Hill.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 5


The Marshall-Sharpsburg association comprises soils on gentle to steep slopes on uplands in<br />

loess. These soils are deep, well drained to moderately well drained, and have a silty clay-loam<br />

subsoil. This association covers <strong>the</strong> remainder <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> installation and covers <strong>the</strong> largest area <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> three associations.<br />

The climate <strong>of</strong> FLMR is classified as humid continental and is characterized by warm to hot<br />

summers, cold winters, moderate surface winds, maximum precipitation in <strong>the</strong> warm season, and<br />

frequent day-to-day changes in <strong>the</strong> wea<strong>the</strong>r (Zavesky and Boatright 1977). Average precipitation<br />

is roughly 89 cm (35 in) per year, 70% <strong>of</strong> which falls from April through September during<br />

evening or early morning showers or thunderstorms (Zavesky and Boatright 1977). Extended<br />

periods <strong>of</strong> below-average precipitation occur at irregular intervals. Average daily maximum and<br />

minimum temperatures for <strong>the</strong> year for <strong>the</strong> period 1910–1960 were 19.3 C (66.5 F) and 7 C<br />

(44.5 F), respectively. The growing season generally lasts 180–185 days, from mid-April<br />

through late October (Zavesky and Boatright 1977).<br />

1.4. LAND USE HISTORY AND VEGETATION<br />

Before Euro-Americans settled in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong>, <strong>the</strong> landscape <strong>of</strong> this region was dominated by<br />

a mosaic <strong>of</strong> tallgrass prairie and deciduous forest vegetation. Küchler (1974) used historical and<br />

recent evidence to map <strong>the</strong> potential natural vegetation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state. Upland sites in nor<strong>the</strong>ast<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> were dominated by tall and medium-tall grasses and a rich variety <strong>of</strong> graminoids and<br />

herbaceous plants, broadleaf deciduous forests dominated by oaks and hickories, or a mosaic <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se vegetation types. Floodplains comprised a mix <strong>of</strong> floodplain forests, low prairies, and<br />

freshwater marshes. Herbaceous vegetation dominated poorly drained floodplain sites.<br />

In Leavenworth County, Küchler (1974) mapped floodplain vegetation along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River<br />

and large streams, oak-hickory forest on uplands in a 10-km wide band paralleling <strong>the</strong> Missouri<br />

River, and a mosaic <strong>of</strong> tallgrass prairie and oak-hickory forest in <strong>the</strong> western and sou<strong>the</strong>rn parts<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> county. On FLMR, only <strong>the</strong> former two types were mapped.<br />

He described <strong>the</strong> floodplain vegetation as comprising a mixture <strong>of</strong> forests, savannas, and<br />

freshwater marshes. Floodplain forests were dominated by medium-tall to tall broadleaf tree<br />

species and <strong>of</strong>ten with a dense understory and many vines. Dominant species included<br />

hackberry, cottonwood, American elm, and willow. Characteristic species included mulberry,<br />

honey-locust, common sycamore, ash, and maple. Oak-hickory forest on <strong>the</strong> uplands and steep<br />

slopes <strong>of</strong> valleys consisted <strong>of</strong> medium-tall deciduous trees dominated by bitter-nut and shag-bark<br />

hickory and red, white, and black oak. Secondary species included ash, walnut, ironwood, and<br />

common pawpaw.<br />

A detailed review <strong>of</strong> Public Land Survey records from <strong>the</strong> mid-1850s has not been conducted to<br />

determine <strong>the</strong> general vegetation patterns in Leavenworth County as <strong>the</strong>y existed 150 years ago.<br />

However, anecdotal reports hint at <strong>the</strong> extent and rate <strong>of</strong> change in <strong>the</strong> coverage <strong>of</strong> natural<br />

communities once Euro-Americans began to settle in <strong>the</strong> area. In <strong>the</strong> mid-1870s, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

State Board <strong>of</strong> Agriculture estimated that 90% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> county was prairie and 10% was<br />

forest (<strong>Kansas</strong> State Board <strong>of</strong> Agriculture 1877). According to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> State Board <strong>of</strong><br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 6


Agriculture figures (1874), <strong>the</strong>re were 3,890 ha (9,612 ac) <strong>of</strong> prairie meadow and 4,189 ha<br />

(10,352 ac) <strong>of</strong> prairie pasture in <strong>the</strong> county in 1873, but none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se acres was in Kickapoo<br />

Township, which includes <strong>the</strong> FLMR. By 1946, <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> wild (prairie) hay harvested in <strong>the</strong><br />

county dropped to 1,064 ha (2,630 ac) (<strong>Kansas</strong> State Board <strong>of</strong> Agriculture 1948).<br />

Fire and large grazing animals played important roles in <strong>the</strong> ecology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> North American<br />

tallgrass prairie before <strong>the</strong> arrival <strong>of</strong> Euro-Americans (Axelrod 1985, Shelford 1963). The<br />

suppression <strong>of</strong> fires formerly caused by lightning or set by Native Americans permitted woody<br />

species to spread onto grasslands, gradually shifting <strong>the</strong> boundary between prairie and forest<br />

(Axelrod 1985, Bragg and Hulbert 1976). The elimination <strong>of</strong> most large, native, grazing animals<br />

on <strong>the</strong> plains before 1900 also affected <strong>the</strong> vegetation (Shelford 1963).<br />

Forested river valleys were settled quickly because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir accessibility from rivers, reliable<br />

water supplies, and <strong>the</strong> widely held but erroneous belief among Euro-American settlers that only<br />

forested land could be farmed successfully (Ware and Smith 1939). Forests provided<br />

construction materials, fuel, fertile soil, and abundant wildlife. Associated waterways were foci<br />

for transportation and <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> commerce. Forests along <strong>the</strong> Missouri and <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

Rivers were cleared for agricultural and urban development, and <strong>the</strong>ir banks were stabilized and<br />

channels straightened (Bragg and Tatschl 1977). As human populations grew, upland areas<br />

gradually were settled and <strong>the</strong> prairie quickly was plowed to support annual row crops. Most<br />

areas that historically supported tallgrass prairie were plowed before <strong>the</strong> turn <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> century.<br />

1.5. PROTECTED AND RARE SPECIES<br />

The federal Endangered Species Act <strong>of</strong> 1973 is administered by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Fish and Wildlife<br />

Service <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Interior. The Act provides federal protection for plants and<br />

animals listed as endangered or threatened. Previous studies (Freeman et al. 1997) confirmed<br />

that one federally-protected species, <strong>the</strong> bald eagle, is a regular migrant and winter resident on<br />

FLMR. Five species <strong>of</strong> federally protected birds were determined to migrate through <strong>the</strong> area,<br />

but nesting and/or foraging habitat for <strong>the</strong>se species was determined to be limited or absent.<br />

They include <strong>the</strong> Eskimo curlew, least tern, peregrine falcon, piping plover, and whooping crane.<br />

No threatened or endangered plant species were found on <strong>the</strong> installation.<br />

The <strong>Kansas</strong> Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation Act (K.S.A. 32-501 through 32-<br />

510) places responsibility for identifying and undertaking conservation measures for threatened<br />

and endangered wildlife species with <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Wildlife and Parks (KDWP).<br />

Specifically, <strong>the</strong> Act requires KDWP to determine which species in <strong>Kansas</strong> are threatened or<br />

endangered because <strong>of</strong> habitat destruction or alteration, overutilization, disease or predation,<br />

inadequacy <strong>of</strong> existing regulatory mechanisms, or o<strong>the</strong>r natural or anthropogenic factors. It<br />

fur<strong>the</strong>r directs KDWP to undertake conservation efforts for <strong>the</strong>se species, including <strong>the</strong><br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> mechanisms to protect <strong>the</strong> habitats <strong>of</strong> threatened and endangered species. The<br />

Act provides protection for rare and declining animal species but not native <strong>Kansas</strong> plants. All<br />

federal-listed animal species also are state-listed.<br />

The Department also maintains a list <strong>of</strong> Species in Need <strong>of</strong> Conservation (SINC). Species on <strong>the</strong><br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 7


SINC list receive no legal protection from habitat impacts under <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> Nongame and<br />

Endangered Species Conservation Act, but <strong>the</strong>y are rare or threatened enough to be monitored by<br />

KDWP. In addition, KDWP may <strong>of</strong>fer suggestions about how projects can proceed while<br />

minimizing impacts to SINCs.<br />

Previous studies (Freeman et al. 1997) suggested that <strong>the</strong> white-faced ibis, a state-listed bird, may<br />

make infrequent, brief stops at FLMR during migration. Three SINCs also infrequently may use<br />

habitat on <strong>the</strong> installation: black tern, blue sucker, and red-shouldered hawk. The eastern<br />

chipmunk, a SINC, is a resident, and three neotropical migratory SINC birds breed on <strong>the</strong><br />

installation: cerulean warbler, yellow-throated warbler, and whip-poor-will.<br />

One population each <strong>of</strong> 11 state-rare plants were documented on FLMR (Freeman et al. 1997):<br />

white woodland aster, hairy wood-mint, upright shorthusk, Nottoway brome, notchbract<br />

waterleaf, American gromwell, hairy sweet-cicely, eastern hooked buttercup, floodplain ragwort,<br />

marsh hedge-nettle, and large-flowered bellwort. State-rare animals with no protection status<br />

documented on FLMR during that study were broad-winged hawk, Cooper’s hawk, great egret,<br />

and ovenbird (Freeman et al. 1997).<br />

1.6. PREVIOUS STUDIES<br />

The purchase <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Louisiana Territory by <strong>the</strong> United States from France in 1803 ushered in an<br />

exciting period <strong>of</strong> scientific exploration and study in <strong>the</strong> American West. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 19th<br />

century’s most prominent natural historians and explorers passed through Ft. Leavenworth in <strong>the</strong><br />

early 1800s, but few recorded <strong>the</strong>ir observations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area. Among <strong>the</strong> first written records<br />

concerning <strong>the</strong> flora and fauna <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ft. Leavenworth environs were those made by Meriwe<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Lewis and William Clark on <strong>the</strong>ir famous expedition to look for a route to <strong>the</strong> Pacific Ocean in<br />

1804-1806. On 2 July 1804, on <strong>the</strong>ir way upstream, <strong>the</strong>y stopped in <strong>the</strong> vicinity <strong>of</strong> present-day<br />

Leavenworth. From a vantage point, Clark wrote, “The plains <strong>of</strong> this countrey are covered with a<br />

Leek green Grass...Groops <strong>of</strong> Shrubs covered with <strong>the</strong> most delecious froot is to be seen in every<br />

derection and have exerted herself to butify <strong>the</strong> senery by <strong>the</strong> variety <strong>of</strong> flours...which strikes &<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>umes <strong>the</strong> Sensation.” (Cuttright 1969). On 14 September 1806, on <strong>the</strong>ir return trip, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

collected <strong>the</strong> last botanical specimen <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expedition in <strong>the</strong> vicinity <strong>of</strong> Leavenworth; a<br />

specimen <strong>of</strong> heart-leaf raccoon-grape (Ampelopsis cordata Michx.) (Coues 1898, Cuttright<br />

1969). The next day, near <strong>the</strong> mouth <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> River, <strong>the</strong>y stopped to collect pawpaw fruits<br />

(Asimina triloba (L.) Dunal) (Cuttright 1969), a species common today in floodplain forests in<br />

<strong>the</strong> area.<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r observation pertinent to <strong>the</strong> natural history to FLMR was made by John James Audubon.<br />

On a trip up <strong>the</strong> Missouri River to collect and observe animals in 1843, he briefly visited Ft.<br />

Leavenworth. On 3 May he observed and collected a specimen <strong>of</strong> Carolina parakeet, Conuropis<br />

carolinensis, (Barry 1972, Peterson 1987), a species formerly common in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong> but that<br />

was decimated by <strong>the</strong> mid-1850s (Anonymous 1966). The bird now is extinct.<br />

The most comprehensive study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> biota and ecology <strong>of</strong> FLMR prior to studies by KSNHI was<br />

conducted by Brumwell (1951). His work, conducted from January 1939 to November 1940,<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 8


examined <strong>the</strong> status and ecological associations <strong>of</strong> amphibians, reptiles, mammals, and birds on<br />

<strong>the</strong> installation. Brumwell (1951) reported 259 vertebrate species on or near Ft. Leavenworth,<br />

including 12 amphibians, 36 reptiles, 47 mammals, and 164 birds. He also classified and<br />

described six major terrestrial natural communities (associations) on <strong>the</strong> installation: prairie,<br />

buckbrush (Symphoricarpos)-sumac, oak-hickory, cottonwood-elm, sedge-willow, and littoral.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> past six decades, scientists from <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> sporadically collected plant<br />

and animal specimens on and around FLMR. Most voucher collections are deposited in <strong>the</strong><br />

research collections <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> History Museum and Biodiversity Research Center at <strong>the</strong><br />

University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>. These collections provide useful baseline information about certain<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> flora and fauna.<br />

O<strong>the</strong>r studies have examined various aspects <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ecology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri River basin and have<br />

some relevance to FLMR. Weaver (1960) studied <strong>the</strong> vegetation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central Missouri valley<br />

and contacts <strong>of</strong> woodland with prairie in this area. The portion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri River along<br />

FLMR was on <strong>the</strong> fringe <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area covered in his study and received very little mention.<br />

Funk and Robinson (1974) examined changes in <strong>the</strong> channel <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower Missouri River<br />

between 1879 and 1972. In a 36-mile reach <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> river that includes Ft. Leavenworth, <strong>the</strong>y<br />

reported a 57% reduction in water surface area. Most islands and chutes were eliminated and<br />

river bends were smoo<strong>the</strong>d during <strong>the</strong> period. The authors also summarized anecdotal reports <strong>of</strong><br />

changes in wildlife and riparian habitat along <strong>the</strong> river.<br />

Bragg and Tatschl (1977) examined changes in <strong>the</strong> vegetation on <strong>the</strong> lower Missouri River<br />

floodplain from 1826 to 1972. Their study focused on <strong>the</strong> river in <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> Missouri, but<br />

many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir observations probably hold true for <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> river in <strong>Kansas</strong>. They found<br />

that floodplain forest decreased in coverage from 76% in 1826 to 13% in 1972. Cultivated<br />

ground increased from 18% to 83% during <strong>the</strong> same period. These changes occurred coincident<br />

with bank stabilization and channelization efforts initiated by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers.<br />

Woody species composition in mature floodplain forests evaluated in 1972 was observed to be<br />

similar to composition data derived from General Land Office Survey reports from 1826.<br />

Stevens and Dill (1942) and Kramer and Wagenknecht (1957) focused on <strong>the</strong> habitat and<br />

occurrence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> puttyroot orchid, Aplectrum hyemale (Muhl. ex Willd.) Torr., in <strong>Kansas</strong>. Both<br />

papers reported on occurrences <strong>of</strong> this perennial forest plant on or near <strong>the</strong> Missouri River<br />

floodplain on FLMR.<br />

Information about reptiles and amphibians was provided in unpublished reports by Simon (1988)<br />

and Simon and Dorlac (1990). In <strong>the</strong> latter study, <strong>the</strong> authors reported seven species <strong>of</strong><br />

amphibians and six species <strong>of</strong> reptiles on FLMR.<br />

Several previous and ongoing studies have focused on <strong>the</strong> avifauna <strong>of</strong> FLMR. Zimmerman and<br />

Tatschl (1975) examined species diversity and density <strong>of</strong> birds in floodplain habitats on FLMR.<br />

Canopy warblers inhabiting mature bottomland forest were studied by Schukman and Mouras<br />

(1992) and Schukman (1966). The Institute for Bird Populations (2003) conducted <strong>the</strong> MAPS<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 9


(Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship) program on FLMR from 1993–2002. MAPS<br />

used point counts and constant-effort mist-netting during <strong>the</strong> breeding season to study<br />

reproductive success and population demography. Four sites, two in upland forest and two in<br />

bottomland forest, were studied during <strong>the</strong> 8-year effort. A checklist <strong>of</strong> birds <strong>of</strong> Ft. Leavenworth<br />

was produced in 1996, based largely on observations by J. Schukman, C. Hobbs, and o<strong>the</strong>rs.<br />

In 1990, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> Ornithological Society initiated <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> Breeding Bird Atlas (KBBAT)<br />

project (<strong>Kansas</strong> Biological Survey et al. 1992). The project provides basic information about <strong>the</strong><br />

breeding status <strong>of</strong> birds throughout <strong>Kansas</strong>, and data collection began in 1992. For KBBAT, <strong>the</strong><br />

state was divided into 748 survey blocks, each nine square miles in size. Detailed records <strong>of</strong><br />

breeding birds were compiled in each block, and one special survey block was located on FLMR.<br />

Busby and Zimmerman (2001) summarized <strong>the</strong> statewide results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project.<br />

The most comprehensive examination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ecology and biota <strong>of</strong> FLMR was carried out by<br />

KSNHI from 1995–1997 (Freeman et al. 1997). That study, which provides a baseline for<br />

assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> condition <strong>of</strong> natural communities and populations <strong>of</strong> rare species on <strong>the</strong><br />

installation, is <strong>the</strong> foundation <strong>of</strong> this report. In <strong>the</strong> chapters that follow, we examine <strong>the</strong> current<br />

conditions on FLMR and compare <strong>the</strong>m to our findings <strong>of</strong> five years ago (Freeman et al. 1997).<br />

Trails and roads are referenced in various chapters <strong>of</strong> this report using names coined by KBS<br />

staff during various studies. Their locations are shown in Figure 1.2.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 10


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 11


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 12


CHAPTER 2. NATURAL COMMUNITIES<br />

2.1. INTRODUCTION<br />

Hillary Loring<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> Biological Survey<br />

2101 Constant Avenue<br />

Lawrence, KS 66047-3759<br />

hillaryloring@netscape.net<br />

Freeman et al. (1997) documented nine kinds <strong>of</strong> natural communities on FLMR: four forest types<br />

(Maple-Basswood Forest, White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest, Cottonwood-Sycamore<br />

Floodplain Forest, and Pecan-Sugarberry Floodplain Forest); two herbaceous types (Big<br />

bluestem-Indian grass Tallgrass Prairie and Bulrush-Cattail Marsh); one sparse vegetation type<br />

(Limestone Caprock Butte Sparse Vegetation); and two riverine types (Glaciated Region<br />

Headwater and Big River). Their surveys confirmed that FLMR supports several large and<br />

globally significant forest remnants. Floodplain forests on <strong>the</strong> installation were believed to be<br />

<strong>the</strong> largest old-growth stands remaining in <strong>the</strong> lower Missouri River valley. Upland forests and<br />

smaller natural communities associated with <strong>the</strong>m were determined to be regionally important.<br />

Collectively, <strong>the</strong>se natural communities were found to provide habitat for nearly two-dozen<br />

globally rare or state-rare species and support a rich biota characteristic <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forest-grassland<br />

ecotone.<br />

Surveys undertaken in 2003 updated earlier studies by: 1) re-examining <strong>the</strong> boundaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

significant community types; 2) ga<strong>the</strong>ring additional species composition and cover data to<br />

permit more accurate characterization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> community types; and 3) searching for and<br />

describing previously unreported, exceptional natural areas on <strong>the</strong> installation. It should be noted<br />

that surveys conducted in 1995–1996 occurred soon after <strong>the</strong> massive floods <strong>of</strong> 1993. The<br />

disturbance, seed dispersal, and flood-induced germination associated with that event likely<br />

caused significant and continuing changes in <strong>the</strong> distribution, composition, and structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

floodplain forest communities. It was hoped that our follow-up studies would help characterize<br />

<strong>the</strong>se changes.<br />

2.2. METHODS<br />

During <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field seasons, vegetation samples were obtained from six upland sites and<br />

14 floodplain sites, all dominated by forest vegetation. Four plots were established at each site<br />

for a total <strong>of</strong> 24 sample plots on <strong>the</strong> uplands and 56 sample plots in <strong>the</strong> floodplain. Our hope was<br />

to resample each plot in 2003, but many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot markers could not be located, apparently<br />

having been removed by floods or humans. New plots were established as close as possible to<br />

<strong>the</strong> old plots.<br />

Six upland sites (AA through FF) and 23 floodplain sites (A through W) were sampled (Figure<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 13


2.1). One plot was measured per site (compared to four per site during <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field<br />

seasons) except at three floodplain sites, where four plots were measured per site. This yielded a<br />

total <strong>of</strong> 38 plots: 32 in <strong>the</strong> floodplain, and six on <strong>the</strong> upland. Sampling procedures described in<br />

Freeman et al. (1997) were followed. A 20 x 20 m plot was established at each site. Within each<br />

plot, all trees and shrubs greater than 5 cm diameter at breast height (DBH) were measured and<br />

identified to species. Tree saplings less that 5 cm DBH were counted and identified to species.<br />

Herbaceous cover was estimated for each species within a 20 x 5 m subplot established within<br />

each 20 x 20 m plot.<br />

Following standard <strong>Heritage</strong> methodology, a letter grade was assigned to each natural community<br />

occurrence and species occurrence to summarize its quality, condition, viability, and<br />

defensibility. Four grades were used, ranging from A–D. An A-grade was assigned to pristine or<br />

relatively undisturbed occurrences, while a D-grade occurrence was severely disturbed but still<br />

retained some semblance <strong>of</strong> its pre-European settlement character. Detailed information<br />

typically is ga<strong>the</strong>red only for A- or B-grade community occurrences. Limited data generally are<br />

ga<strong>the</strong>red for C-grade occurrences, and D-grade sites rarely receive attention beyond that needed<br />

to assign a grade or if <strong>the</strong>y border an area <strong>of</strong> higher quality. Information about lower quality sites<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten is useful when attempting to identify buffers for high-quality core areas <strong>of</strong> nature preserves,<br />

links between high-quality sites, restoration projects, and public use areas. C- and D-grade sites<br />

sometimes are identified and characterized if <strong>the</strong> information is deemed potentially useful, but<br />

normally <strong>the</strong>y are not added to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Heritage</strong> database.<br />

2.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Surveys during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season involved 228 person-hours <strong>of</strong> field work (Table 2.1) and<br />

confirmed <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> seven types <strong>of</strong> terrestrial plant communities on FLMR (Table 2.2.).<br />

Vegetation samples from 38 plots at 29 sites (Figure 2.1, Table 2.3) were used to characterize <strong>the</strong><br />

forest communities. Directions (Appendix A) and GPS coordinates (Table 2.3) were recorded<br />

for all plots. <strong>Natural</strong> community nomenclature follows Lauver et al. (1999) and North America<br />

(NatureServe 2003). In general, each name reflects <strong>the</strong> dominant species <strong>of</strong> a community type<br />

and also may contain references to a specific climate, soil type, topography, or o<strong>the</strong>r important<br />

factor. Plant nomenclature follows Freeman (2003). Survey results are discussed below in <strong>the</strong><br />

context <strong>of</strong> specific natural community types.<br />

The seven terrestrial community types currently represented FLMR (Table 2.2) include four<br />

forest types, one prairie type, and two sparse vegetation communities. Riverine types, which<br />

were examined briefly by Freeman et al. (1997) are not discussed here because no new data were<br />

ga<strong>the</strong>red about <strong>the</strong>m. It is likely that o<strong>the</strong>r community types existed in <strong>the</strong> neighborhood <strong>of</strong><br />

FLMR prior to Euro-American settlement. Brumwell (1951) described <strong>the</strong> western part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

river floodplain on FLMR as a mosaic <strong>of</strong> oxbow lakes, sandbars, and various types <strong>of</strong> marsh<br />

communities, mostly dominated by sedges and willows. At that time, spring floods and<br />

occasional heavy rains <strong>of</strong>ten inundate <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floodplain. Although many<br />

community types may have been lost, FLMR today remains a significant regional refuge for<br />

species and natural communities.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 14


TABLE 2.1. Summary <strong>of</strong> natural community survey activities on FLMR in 2003. Hours are<br />

number <strong>of</strong> person-hours per survey.<br />

Date Location Hours Personnel Notes<br />

2003-05-30 Floodplain<br />

forest<br />

18<br />

H. Loring & E.<br />

Noguera<br />

Collected data on vegetation survey plots<br />

A1, A2, A2<br />

2003-06-09 Floodplain<br />

forest<br />

18<br />

H. Loring & E.<br />

Noguera<br />

Collected data on vegetation survey plots<br />

A4, B1, B3<br />

2003-06-10 Floodplain<br />

forest<br />

18<br />

H. Loring & E.<br />

Noguera<br />

Collected data on vegetation survey plots<br />

B2, B4, M<br />

2003-06-11 Floodplain<br />

forest<br />

16<br />

H. Loring & E.<br />

Noguera<br />

Collected data on vegetation survey plots<br />

L1, L2<br />

2003-06-12 Floodplain<br />

forest<br />

16<br />

H. Loring & E.<br />

Noguera<br />

Collected data on vegetation survey plots<br />

L3, L4<br />

2003-06-13 Floodplain<br />

forest<br />

17<br />

H. Loring & E.<br />

Noguera<br />

Collected data on vegetation survey plots<br />

E, D<br />

2003-08-25 Floodplain<br />

forest<br />

18<br />

H. Loring & J.<br />

Delisle<br />

Collected data on vegetation survey plots<br />

F, K, N<br />

2003-09-16 Floodplain<br />

forest<br />

18<br />

H. Loring & J.<br />

Delisle<br />

Collected data on vegetation survey plots<br />

G, I, J<br />

2003-09-18 Floodplain<br />

forest<br />

16<br />

H. Loring & T.<br />

Aschenbach<br />

Collected data on vegetation survey plots<br />

C, H<br />

2003-09-05 Upland<br />

forest<br />

9<br />

H. Loring Collected data on vegetation survey plots<br />

AA, CC<br />

2003-09-19 Upland<br />

forest<br />

16<br />

H. Loring & T.<br />

Aschenbach<br />

Collected data on vegetation survey plots<br />

BB, EE<br />

2003-09-10 Upland<br />

forest<br />

16<br />

H. Loring & J.<br />

Delisle<br />

Collected data on vegetation survey plots<br />

DD, FF<br />

2003-09-02 Floodplain<br />

forest<br />

16<br />

H. Loring &<br />

W.H. Busby<br />

Collected data on vegetation survey plots<br />

O, P, Q, R, S<br />

2003-09-08 Floodplain<br />

forest<br />

16<br />

H. Loring &<br />

W.H. Busby<br />

Collected data on vegetation survey plots<br />

T, U, V, W<br />

Forest Communities<br />

Forests are dominated by trees greater than 5 m tall with overlapping crowns, generally forming<br />

60–100% cover (Lauver et al. 1999). Forest communities may occupy upland and floodplain<br />

sites. The largest forested areas on FLMR occur in two distinctly different sites: on uplands<br />

where topographic relief is <strong>the</strong> greatest, especially in <strong>the</strong> north half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> installation, and on <strong>the</strong><br />

Missouri River floodplain north and east <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sherman Army Airfield. These forests figure<br />

prominently in <strong>the</strong> long-term maintenance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> biological diversity and <strong>the</strong> ecological health <strong>of</strong><br />

FLMR. They provide habitat essential to neotropical migrant birds and many o<strong>the</strong>r animals and<br />

plants, help maintain water quality, provide corridors for <strong>the</strong> movement <strong>of</strong> wildlife, and<br />

contribute significantly to <strong>the</strong> aes<strong>the</strong>tics <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> area.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 15


TABLE 2.2. <strong>Natural</strong> communities documented on FLMR. Nomenclature follows Laver et al.<br />

(1999). Patterns are: LP = large patch (on subdominant landform features, large but interrupted<br />

cover, 8–400 ha), M = matrix (on dominant landform features, large and <strong>of</strong>ten uninterrupted,<br />

>400 ha), and SP = small patch (on specialized landforms or microhabitats,


TABLE 2.3. Locations <strong>of</strong> vegetation plots and community types in which <strong>the</strong>y occur.<br />

Plot # Latitude Longitude Community Type<br />

A1 39.38280 N 94.89471 W Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest<br />

A2 39.38299 N 94.89440 W Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest<br />

A3 39.38282 N 94.89417 W Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest<br />

A4 39.38253 N 94.89447 W Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest<br />

B1 39.38557 N 94.89910 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

B2 39.38566 N 94.89813 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

B3 39.38547 N 94.89888 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

B4 39.38538 N 94.89883 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

C 39.36872 N 94.88852 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

D 39.37718 N 94.88948 W Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest<br />

E 39.38174 N 94.88783 W Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest<br />

F 39.38651 N 94.89428 W Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest<br />

G 39.37805 N 94.88773 W Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest<br />

H 39.37750 N 94.88320 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

I 39.37945 N 94.88964 W Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest<br />

J 39.36643 N 94.89248 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

K 39.38820 N 94.88701 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

L1 39.39095 N 94.89393 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

L2 39.39114 N 94.89355 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

L3 39.39095 N 94.89331 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

L4 39.39079 N 94.89365 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

M 39.38952 N 94.89716 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

N 39.38926 N 94.89079 W Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest<br />

O 39.37255 N 94.90057 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

P 39.37241 N 94.89834 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

Q 39.37522 N 94.89781 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

R 39.37468 N 94.90266 W Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest<br />

S 39.37490 N 94.90154 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

T 39.37296 N 94.89406 W Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest<br />

U 39.37860 N 94.90697 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

V 39.38023 N 94.90688 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

W 39.37969 N 94.91080 W Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest<br />

AA 39.35463 N 94.93615 W White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest<br />

BB 39.36961 N 94.93415 W White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest<br />

CC 39.35297 N 94.93610 W White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest<br />

DD 39.36179 N 94.93494 W White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest<br />

EE 39.36742 N 94.93317 W White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest<br />

FF 39.38149 N 94.93571 W Maple-Basswood Forest<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 17


Although <strong>the</strong> age and detailed management history <strong>of</strong> this floodplain forest has not been<br />

determined, it seems likely that <strong>the</strong> shape and location <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> river meander in which it is located<br />

have changed even in recent history. However, <strong>the</strong> journals <strong>of</strong> Lewis and Clark noted <strong>the</strong><br />

presence <strong>of</strong> a woodland and an abundance <strong>of</strong> pecan trees in <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> present-day Leavenworth<br />

(Pavri et al. 2003), suggesting that Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest has been a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

mosaic <strong>of</strong> floodplain communities in <strong>the</strong> vicinity <strong>of</strong> FLMR for at least 200 years.<br />

TABLE 2.4. Average basal area (cm 2 /400 m 2 ) and sapling count (number/400 m 2 ) <strong>of</strong> overstory<br />

trees and vines in <strong>the</strong> Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest in 1995–1996 and 2003. Empty cell<br />

indicates species not recorded. Totals are approximate due to rounding.<br />

Genus Species Common Name<br />

1995-‘96<br />

Saplings<br />

(n = 24)<br />

1995-‘96<br />

Basal<br />

Area<br />

(n = 24)<br />

2003<br />

Saplings<br />

(n = 12)<br />

2003<br />

Basal<br />

Area<br />

(n = 12)<br />

Acer negundo boxelder 62.5 1184.2 253.7 1608.6<br />

Ampelopsis cordata heart-leaf raccoon-grape 0.4<br />

Asimina triloba common pawpaw 32.4 5.5 22.7<br />

Carya cordiformis bitter-nut hickory 17.1<br />

Carya illinoinensis pecan 3811.8 5702.8<br />

Celtis occidentalis common hackberry


green ash seedlings, and silver maple (Acer saccharinum L.) seedlings. Tree seedlings have<br />

since grown into thickets <strong>of</strong> young saplings, which in many instances shade out most herbaceous<br />

cover. While no pecan saplings were recorded in plots ei<strong>the</strong>r during <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 or 2003 field<br />

seasons, younger pecan trees do occur in areas southwest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> older forest. Thus, it appears<br />

some recruitment <strong>of</strong> this co-dominant may be occurring. It is not clear if <strong>the</strong> dramatic increase in<br />

<strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> bare ground in 2003 as compared to <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field seasons was <strong>the</strong> result <strong>of</strong><br />

phenological differences, recent drought conditions that affected <strong>the</strong> survival <strong>of</strong> understory<br />

species, or some o<strong>the</strong>r factor. It was observed in all forest types.<br />

TABLE 2.5. Average cover (%) <strong>of</strong> understory species in <strong>the</strong> Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest<br />

in 1995–1996 and 2003. Empty cell indicates species not recorded. Total average covers are<br />

approximate due to rounding.<br />

Genus Species Common Name<br />

1995-‘96<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 24)<br />

2003<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 12)<br />

Acalypha virginica Virginia copperleaf 0.2<br />

Acer negundo boxelder 14.6<br />

Acer saccharinum silver maple 4.2<br />

Agastache nepetoides catnip giant-hyssop 0.3<br />

Ageratina altissima tall snakeroot


Genus Species Common Name<br />

1995-‘96<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 24)<br />

2003<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 12)<br />

Carya illinoinensis pecan


Genus Species Common Name<br />

1995-‘96<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 24)<br />

2003<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 12)<br />

Rosa multiflora multiflora rose


A visual analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floodplain forests seemed to indicate significant changes, possibly<br />

resulting from <strong>the</strong> 1993 flood. However, plot data analyzed by analysis <strong>of</strong> variance did not reveal<br />

statistically significant differences between cover data ga<strong>the</strong>red in 1995–1996 and 2003. We<br />

believe this is due to <strong>the</strong> inherent stability <strong>of</strong> dominant trees in mature forest communities and<br />

unavoidable methodological inconsistencies, which made comparisons <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> two data sets<br />

difficult. A floodplain forest tolerates and thrives under a regime <strong>of</strong> occasional flooding,<br />

siltation, and erosion. In terms <strong>of</strong> basal area, it appears that a natural variability in tree size and<br />

number <strong>of</strong> trees from plot to plot affected <strong>the</strong> statistical analysis. The presence or absence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

single massive tree within randomly located plots can dramatically affect measurements in a 20 x<br />

20 m plot. Differences in species cover and composition might be tracked more easily with a<br />

larger number <strong>of</strong> samples obtained from permanent plots.<br />

Grades assigned to this forest type on FLMR range from A-C. Eleven high-quality occurrences<br />

<strong>of</strong> Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest have been documented in <strong>Kansas</strong> by KSNHI, most<br />

along <strong>the</strong> Republican River in <strong>the</strong> north-central part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state. The occurrence on FLMR is <strong>the</strong><br />

only one documented along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River in <strong>Kansas</strong>.<br />

TABLE 2.6. Average basal area (cm 2 /400 m 2 ) and sapling count (number/400 m 2 ) <strong>of</strong> overstory<br />

trees and vines in <strong>the</strong> mature to old-growth Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest in 1995–<br />

1996 and 2003. Empty cell indicates species not recorded. Totals are approximate due to<br />

rounding.<br />

Genus Species Common Name<br />

1995–‘96<br />

Saplings<br />

(n = 16)<br />

1995–‘96<br />

Basal Area<br />

(n = 16)<br />

2003<br />

Saplings<br />

(n = 4)<br />

2003<br />

Basal Area<br />

(n = 4)<br />

Acer negundo boxelder 0.3 2622.3 10.2 2014.3<br />

Acer saccharinum silver maple 70.1 172.1<br />

Asimina triloba common pawpaw 0.4 32.2 1.1 17.9<br />

Carya cordiformis bitternut hickory 4.5<br />

Carya illinoinensis pecan 1.8


ounding.<br />

Genus Species Common Name<br />

1995–‘96<br />

Saplings<br />

(n = 12)<br />

1995–‘96<br />

Basal Area<br />

(n = 12)<br />

2003<br />

Saplings<br />

(n = 16)<br />

2003<br />

Basal Area<br />

(n = 16)<br />

Acer negundo boxelder 0.2 1989.7 159.3 1457.5<br />

Acer saccharinum silver maple 0.7 70.0 0.3<br />

Ampelopsis cordata raccoon grape 0.1<br />

Asimina triloba common pawpaw 0.2<br />

Celtis occidentalis common hackberry 10.2 21.4 387.2<br />

Cephalanthus occidentalis common buttonbush


Genus Species Common Name<br />

1995–‘96<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 16)<br />

2003<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 4)<br />

Carex frankii Frank’s sedge 0.13<br />

Carex grisea narrow-leaf sedge


Genus Species Common Name<br />

1995–‘96<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 16)<br />

2003<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 4)<br />

Solanum ptycanthum black nightshade


Genus Species Common Name<br />

1995–‘96<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 12)<br />

2003<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 16)<br />

Chenopodium berlandieri pit-seed goosefoot


Genus Species Common Name<br />

1995–‘96<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 12)<br />

2003<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 16)<br />

Solanum carolinense Carolina horse nettle


Genus Species Common Name<br />

1995–’96<br />

Saplings<br />

(n = 20)<br />

1995–’96<br />

Saplings<br />

(n = 20)<br />

2003<br />

Saplings<br />

(n = 5)<br />

2003<br />

Saplings<br />

(n = 5)<br />

Acer saccharum sugar maple 24.3<br />

Asimina triloba common pawpaw 10.4 30.7 35.8<br />

Carya cordiformis bitter-nut hickory 2.5 430.2 13.0 183.3<br />

Carya laciniosa king-nut hickory


Genus Species Common Name<br />

1995–‘96<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 20)<br />

2003<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 5)<br />

Aplectrum hyemale puttyroot 0.1<br />

Arisaema triphyllum Jack-in-<strong>the</strong>-pulpit


Genus Species Common Name<br />

1995–‘96<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 20)<br />

2003<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 5)<br />

Hackelia virginiana Virginia bracted-stickseed


Genus Species Common Name<br />

1995–‘96<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 20)<br />

2003<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 5)<br />

Staphylea trifolia American bladdernut 3.6<br />

Symphoricarpos orbiculatus coral-berry 1.6 2.9<br />

Thalictrum dasycarpum purple meadow-rue 0.1<br />

Toxicodendron radicans poison-ivy 1.5 6.5<br />

Tridens flavus purpletop 0.1<br />

Triosteum perfoliatum clasping horse-gentian 0.6<br />

Ulmus americana American elm 2.3<br />

Ulmus rubra slippery elm 0.2 1.8<br />

Urtica dioica American stinging nettle 0.1<br />

Uvularia grandiflora large-flower bellwort 0.2 0.1<br />

Verbesina alternifolia wing-stem crownbeard


TABLE 2.12. Average basal area (cm 2 /400 m 2 ) and sapling count (number/400 m 2 ) <strong>of</strong> overstory<br />

trees and vines in <strong>the</strong> Maple-Basswood Forest in 1995–1996 and 2003. Empty cell indicates<br />

species not recorded. Totals are approximate due to rounding.<br />

Genus Species Common Name<br />

1995–‘96<br />

Saplings<br />

(n = 4)<br />

1995–‘96<br />

Basal Area<br />

(n = 4)<br />

2003<br />

Saplings<br />

(n = 1)<br />

2003<br />

Basal Area<br />

(n = 1)<br />

Acer saccharum sugar maple 6.3 3624.1 3319.9<br />

Asimina triloba common pawpaw 14.8 13.0 350.0 44.7<br />

Carya cordiformis bitter-nut hickory 0.3 156.8 2287.1<br />

Celtis occidentalis common hackberry 0.5 456.2 5.0<br />

Cercis canadensis eastern redbud 5.1<br />

Juglans nigra black walnut 1066.5<br />

Morus rubra red mulberry 0.8 319.4<br />

Quercus macrocarpa bur oak 1385.4<br />

Quercus muehlenbergii chinquapin oak 5182.6<br />

Quercus rubra nor<strong>the</strong>rn red oak 4500.9 7598.1<br />

Tilia americana American basswood 4446.5 274.2<br />

Ulmus americana American elm 0.3<br />

Ulmus rubra slippery elm 20.0<br />

Standing dead 61.9<br />

Total 23.0 15973.9 375.0 18768.5<br />

TABLE 2.13. Average cover (%) <strong>of</strong> understory species in <strong>the</strong> Maple-Basswood Forest in 1995–<br />

1996 and 2003. Empty cell indicates species not recorded. Totals are approximate due to<br />

rounding.<br />

Genus Species Common Name<br />

1995–‘96<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 4)<br />

2003<br />

Cover (%)<br />

(n = 1)<br />

Acalypha rhomboidea rhombic copperleaf 0.1<br />

Acer saccharum sugar maple 6.5<br />

Alliaria petiolata garlic mustard 0.3<br />

Asarum canadense Canadian wild-ginger 1.1 0.5<br />

Asimina triloba common pawpaw 17.5<br />

Asplenium rhizophyllum walking fern 0.1<br />

Boehmeria cylindrica small-spike false-nettle 0.5<br />

Carex sp. sedge 0.1<br />

Carya cordiformis bitter-nut hickory 1.4<br />

Celtis occidentalis common hackberry 0.3<br />

Cystopteris fragilis fragile fern 3.8<br />

Fraxinus pennsylvanica green ash 0.1<br />

Galium circaezans forest bedstraw 0.1<br />

Hackelia virginiana Virginia bracted-stickseed


Phryma leptostachya American lopseed 0.3<br />

Pilea pumila dwarf clearweed 1.4<br />

Poa sylvestris woodland blue grass 0.8<br />

Podophyllum peltatum May-apple 0.1<br />

Quercus borealis nor<strong>the</strong>rn red oak 0.4<br />

Sambucus canadensis American elderberry 0.9<br />

Sanicula odorata fragrant sanicle 0.3<br />

Smilax lasioneura Blue Ridge greenbrier 0.1<br />

Smilax tamnoides bristly greenbrier 0.4<br />

Solidago ulmifolia elm-leaf goldenrod 0.3<br />

Staphylea trifolia American bladdernut 6.4 5.0<br />

Symphoricarpos orbiculatus coral-berry 0.5<br />

Toxicodendron radicans poison-ivy 0.4<br />

Ulmus americana American elm 0.3<br />

Ulmus rubra slippery elm 0.1<br />

Uvularia grandiflora large-flower bellwort 0.1<br />

Viola pratincola meadow violet 0.4<br />

Vitis cinerea gray-bark grape 0.3<br />

Bare ground 70.0<br />

Total 52.1 102.5<br />

Herbaceous Communities<br />

Herbaceous communities are dominated by graminoids and forbs (broadleaf, non-woody plants),<br />

which generally form at least 25% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cover. Trees, shrubs, and dwarf shrubs constitute less<br />

that 25% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cover (Lauver et al. 1999). Freeman et al. (1997) reported a Bulrush-Cattail<br />

Marsh <strong>of</strong> approximately 6 ha (15 ac) between <strong>the</strong> Missouri Pacific Railroad right <strong>of</strong> way and<br />

Chief Joseph Loop Road, extending from near <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Chief Joseph Loop Road and<br />

Warehouse Road north to where Chief Joseph Loop road turns sou<strong>the</strong>ast onto <strong>the</strong> floodplain.<br />

Recent construction along <strong>the</strong> railroad has altered that area and has destroyed this already<br />

degraded community. It is likely that Bulrush-Catttail Marshes were fairly common along <strong>the</strong><br />

Missouri River floodplain prior to construction <strong>of</strong> levees.<br />

Glaciated Tallgrass Prairie. One herbaceous natural community type, Glaciated Tallgrass<br />

Prairie, was confirmed. In <strong>Kansas</strong>, this community occurs on level to steep slopes on uplands in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Glaciated Region, essentially that area north <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> River and east <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Little Blue<br />

River. Soils generally are deep, somewhat poorly drained to well drained, and silty to loamy,<br />

having formed from loess, glacial till, or colluvium (Lauver 1989). Prairie was <strong>the</strong> dominant<br />

vegetation type in nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong> when Public Land Surveys were conducted in <strong>the</strong> mid-1850s.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong>re is no evidence that prairies ever were abundant on FLMR. Brumwell (1951)<br />

reported that prairie surrounded Merritt and Smith Lakes in 1939 and 1940, but most <strong>of</strong> this area<br />

now is developed as part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> golf course. The few tracts <strong>of</strong> remaining prairie are less than 0.2<br />

ha (0.5 acre) in size, isolated within <strong>the</strong> White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest, and moderately to<br />

severely degraded due to woody plant encroachment resulting from fire suppression. They may<br />

indicate that some upland areas once supported woodlands or savannas—natural communities in<br />

which <strong>the</strong>re were large, open-grown trees with crowns not usually touching and understory<br />

vegetation dominated by prairie plants(Lauver et al. 1999).<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 33


Vegetation plot data were not ga<strong>the</strong>red from this herbaceous natural community because <strong>the</strong><br />

existing five remnants (Figure 2.3) are too small. A species list was compiled for each remnant<br />

(Table 2.14), which collectively contain 129 species <strong>of</strong> vascular plants. Dominant plants are big<br />

bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), yellow Indian grass (Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash),<br />

and little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash). Common shrubs are inland<br />

ceanothus (Ceanothus herbaceus Raf.), smooth sumac (Rhus glabra L.), and prairie willow<br />

(Salix humilis Marshall).<br />

The best remnants <strong>of</strong> Glaciated Tallgrass Prairie are in <strong>the</strong> southwest part <strong>of</strong> FLMR along <strong>the</strong><br />

horse trail that extends from Sheridan Drive east and nor<strong>the</strong>ast along <strong>the</strong> north edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

National Cemetery. Two small areas are situated on <strong>the</strong> north side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trail roughly 100 m<br />

(330 ft) east <strong>of</strong> Sheridan Drive and extend discontinuously for 50–75 m (160–250 ft). Additional<br />

areas parallel <strong>the</strong> extreme south end <strong>of</strong> Sheridan Drive. Surveys <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forest immediately<br />

surrounding <strong>the</strong>se prairies reveal that many prairie plants persist in <strong>the</strong> understory, suggesting<br />

that <strong>the</strong> remnants once were larger but have been reduced due to encroachment by woody<br />

vegetation. Presumably, <strong>the</strong>se prairies could be recovered with proper management. No rare<br />

species were documented in this natural community. Despite <strong>the</strong>ir size, <strong>the</strong> prairie remnants <strong>of</strong><br />

FLMR contribute significantly to <strong>the</strong> plant species richness on <strong>the</strong> installation.<br />

Along <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>ast edge <strong>of</strong> Government Hill, prairie remnants with a slightly different species<br />

composition occur on <strong>the</strong> steep slopes. Plants <strong>of</strong> interest at this location include leadplant<br />

(Amorpha canescens Pursh), plaintain-leaf pussy’s-toes (Antennaria parlinii Fernald), and blue<br />

wild-indigo (Baptisia australis (L.) R. Br.). The three woodland sedges <strong>the</strong>re; white-tinge sedge<br />

(Carex albicans Willd. ex Spreng.), oval-leaf sedge (Carex cephalophora Muhl. ex Willd.), and<br />

Muhlenberg’s sedge (Carex muehlenbergii Schkuhr ex Willd.), suggest that this area once was a<br />

savanna or woodland. Post oak (Quercus stellata Wangenh.) and sandstone outcrops on <strong>the</strong>se<br />

bluffs also suggest that a savanna once may have covered this hill instead <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> White oak-<br />

Shagbark hickory Forest that now dominates.<br />

TABLE 2.14. Vascular plant species observed on prairie remnants on FLMR. Numbers<br />

correspond to sites shown in Figure 2.3. Dots (●) indicate known occurrences.<br />

1 2 3 4 5 Family Scientific name Common name<br />

● ● ● ● ● Cypressaceae Juniperus virginiana L. var. virginiana eastern red-cedar<br />

● ● ● ● Acanthaceae Ruellia humilis Nutt. fringe-leaf ruellia<br />

● ● ● ● Anacardiaceae Rhus glabra L. smooth sumac<br />

● ● ● ● Anacardiaceae<br />

Toxicodendron radicans (L.) Kuntze subsp. negundo<br />

(Greene) Gillis<br />

poison-ivy<br />

● ● ● ● Apiaceae Daucus carota L. subsp. carota wild carrot<br />

● Apiaceae Sanicula odorata (Raf.) Pryer & Phillippe fragrant sanicle<br />

● ● ● Apocynaceae Apocynum cannabinum L. hemp dogbane<br />

● Asclepiadaceae Asclepias verticillata L. whorled milkweed<br />

● ● ● Asteraceae Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. common ragweed<br />

● Asteraceae<br />

Antennaria parlinii Fernald subsp. fallax (Greene) R.J.<br />

Bayer & Stebbins<br />

plantain-leaf pussy’s-toes<br />

● ● ● Asteraceae Aster drummondii Lindl. subsp. drummondii Drummond's aster<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 34


1 2 3 4 5 Family Scientific name Common name<br />

● ● ● Asteraceae Aster ericoides L. subsp. ericoides var. ericoides heath aster<br />

● ● ● ● ● Asteraceae Aster laevis L. var. laevis smooth blue aster<br />

● ● ● Asteraceae Aster oblongifolius Nutt. aromatic aster<br />

● Asteraceae Aster oolentangiensis Riddell var. oolentangiensis azure aster<br />

● ● ● ● ● Asteraceae Aster pilosus Willd. var. pilosus hairy aster<br />

● ● Asteraceae Aster praealtus Poir. var. praealtus willow-leaf aster<br />

● Asteraceae Cirsium altissimum (L.) Hill tall thistle<br />

● ● ● ● ● Asteraceae Echinacea pallida (Nutt.) Nutt. pale purple coneflower<br />

● ● ● Asteraceae Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers. annual fleabane<br />

● Asteraceae Erigeron philadelphicus L. Philadelphia fleabane<br />

● Asteraceae Erigeron strigosus Muhl. ex Willd. daisy fleabane<br />

● ● ● ● ● Asteraceae Eupatorium altissimum L. tall joe-pye-weed<br />

● ● ● ● ● Asteraceae Helianthus hirsutus Raf. hairy sunflower<br />

● ● Asteraceae Helianthus pauciflorus Nutt. var. pauciflorus stiff sunflower<br />

● Asteraceae<br />

Heliopsis helianthoides (L.) Sweet var. scabra (Dunal)<br />

Fernald<br />

sunflower heliopsis<br />

● Asteraceae Lactuca canadensis L. Canadian lettuce<br />

● ● ● ● ● Asteraceae Liatris aspera Michx. button gayfea<strong>the</strong>r<br />

● ● ● Asteraceae Liatris squarrosa (L.) Michx. var. hirsuta (Rydb.) Gaiser plains gayfea<strong>the</strong>r<br />

● ● ● ● Asteraceae Ratibida pinnata (Vent.) Barnhart gray-head prairie-coneflower<br />

● Asteraceae Rudbeckia triloba L. var. triloba brown-eyed-Susan<br />

● ● ● Asteraceae Silphium integrifolium Michx. var. integrifolium whole-leaf rosinweed<br />

● ● ● ● ● Asteraceae Silphium laciniatum L. compassplant<br />

● ● Asteraceae<br />

Solidago canadensis L. var. scabra (Muhl. ex Willd.) Torr.<br />

& A. Gray<br />

Canadian goldenrod<br />

● ● Asteraceae Solidago gigantea Ait. late goldenrod<br />

● Asteraceae<br />

Solidago nemoralis Ait. subsp. decemflora (DC.)<br />

Brammall<br />

oldfield goldenrod<br />

● ● ● ● Asteraceae Solidago rigida L. subsp. rigida stiff goldenrod<br />

● ● Asteraceae Solidago ulmifolia Muhl. ex Willd. var. ulmifolia elm-leaf goldenrod<br />

● ● ● ● ● Asteraceae<br />

Vernonia baldwinii Torr. subsp. interior (Small) W.Z.<br />

Faust<br />

inland ironweed<br />

● ● Betulaceae Corylus americana Walter American hazelnut<br />

● ● ● ● Betulaceae Ostrya virginiana (Mill.) K. Koch American hop-hornbeam<br />

● ● ● Boraginaceae Lithospermum canescens (Michx.) Lehm. hoary gromwell<br />

● Boraginaceae<br />

Onosmodium bejariense A. DC. var. occidentale (Mack.)<br />

B.L. Turner<br />

western marbleseed<br />

● ● Campanulaceae Lobelia spicata Lam. pale-spike lobelia<br />

● ● ● ● Caprifoliaceae Symphoricarpos orbiculatus Moench coral-berry<br />

● ● Caprifoliaceae Triosteum perfoliatum L. clasping horse-gentian<br />

● Caprifoliaceae Viburnum prunifolium L. black-haw viburnum<br />

● Celastraceae Celastrus scandens L. American bittersweet<br />

● ● ● ● ● Cornaceae Cornus drummondii C.A. Mey. rough-leaf dogwood<br />

● Cyperaceae Carex albicans Willd. ex Spreng. var. albicans white-tinge sedge<br />

● Cyperaceae Carex cephalophora Muhl. ex Willd. oval-leaf sedge<br />

● Cyperaceae Carex frankii Kunth Frank's sedge<br />

● ● ● ● ● Cyperaceae Carex meadii Dewey Mead's sedge<br />

● ● ● Cyperaceae Carex molesta Mack. ex Bright pest sedge<br />

● Cyperaceae Carex muehlenbergii Schkuhr ex Willd. var. inermis Boott Muhlenberg’s sedge<br />

● ● Cyperaceae Carex pellita Muhl. ex Willd. woolly sedge<br />

● Cyperaceae Carex umbellata Schkuhr ex Willd. low sedge<br />

● Cyperaceae<br />

Eleocharis compressa Sull. var. acutisquamata (Buckley)<br />

S.G. Sm.<br />

flat-stem spike-rush<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 35


1 2 3 4 5 Family Scientific name Common name<br />

● Cyperaceae Scirpus atrovirens Willd. green bulrush<br />

● ● Cyperaceae Scirpus pendulus Muhl. drooping bulrush<br />

● Dioscoreaceae Dioscorea villosa L. Atlantic yam<br />

● ● ● Ebenaceae Diospyros virginiana L. common persimmon<br />

● Euphorbiaceae Acalypha virginica L. Virginia copperleaf<br />

● ● Euphorbiaceae Croton monanthogynus Michx. one-seed croton<br />

● ● ● ● ● Euphorbiaceae Euphorbia corollata L. flowering spurge<br />

● ● ● ● ● Fabaceae Amorpha canescens Pursh leadplant<br />

● Fabaceae Baptisia alba (L.) Vent. var. macrophylla (Larisey) Isely white wild-indigo<br />

● ● ● ● ● Fabaceae Cercis canadensis L. var. canadensis eastern redbud<br />

● Fabaceae Chamaecrista fasciculata (Michx.) Greene var. fasciculata showy partridgepea<br />

● ● ● ● Fabaceae Dalea purpurea Vent. var. purpurea purple prairie-clover<br />

● ● ● ● ● Fabaceae<br />

Desmanthus illinoensis (Michx.) MacMill. ex Rob. &<br />

Fernald<br />

Illinois bundle-flower<br />

● ● Fabaceae Desmodium glutinosum (Muhl. ex Willd.) A.W. Wood large-flower tick-clover<br />

● ● ● Fabaceae Desmodium paniculatum (L.) DC. panicled tick-clover<br />

● Fabaceae Desmodium sessilifolium (Torr.) Torr. & A. Gray sessile-leaf tick-cover<br />

● Fabaceae Gleditsia triacanthos L. common honey-locust<br />

● ● Fabaceae Kummerowia stipulacea (Maxim.) Makino Korean low bush-clover<br />

● Fabaceae Lespedeza capitata Michx. round-head bush-cover<br />

● ● Fabaceae Lespedeza violacea (L.) Pers. violet bush-clover<br />

● Fabaceae Medicago lupulina L. black medick<br />

● ● ● ● Fabaceae Melilotus albus Medik. white sweet-clover<br />

● Fabaceae Robinia pseudoacacia L. black locust<br />

● Fabaceae Trifolium pratense L. red clover<br />

● Fagaceae Quercus alba L. white oak<br />

● ● ● ● ● Fagaceae Quercus prinoides Willd. dwarf chinquapin oak<br />

● ● Fagaceae Quercus rubra L. nor<strong>the</strong>rn red oak<br />

● Fagaceae Quercus stellata Wangenh. post oak<br />

● Fagaceae Quercus velutina Lam. black oak<br />

● Iridaceae Sisyrinchium campestre E.P. Bicknell prairie blue-eyed-grass<br />

● ● ● Juglandaceae Carya ovata (Mill.) K. Koch shag-bark hickory<br />

● ● Juglandaceae Juglans nigra L. black walnut<br />

● Juncaceae Juncus tenuis Willd. path rush<br />

● ● Lamiaceae Mentha arvensis L. field mint<br />

● Lamiaceae Monarda fistulosa L. var. fistulosa wild bergamot<br />

● ● Lamiaceae Prunella vulgaris L. common selfheal<br />

● Lamiaceae<br />

Scutellaria parvula Michx. var. missouriensis (Torr.)<br />

Goodman & C.A. Lawson<br />

Leonard's small skullcap<br />

● Lamiaceae Teucrium canadense L. var. canadense American germander<br />

● Nyctaginaceae Mirabilis albida (Walter) Heimerl white four-o'clock<br />

● ● ● ● Oleaceae Fraxinus americana L. white ash<br />

● Phytolaccaceae Phytolacca americana L. var. americana American pokeweed<br />

● ● Plantaginaceae Plantago lanceolata L. English plantain<br />

● ● ● Plantaginaceae Plantago rugelii Decne. Rugel's plantain<br />

● Poaceae Agrostis stolonifera L. creeping bent grass<br />

● ● ● ● ● Poaceae Andropogon gerardii Vitman big bluestem<br />

● ● ● Poaceae Aristida oligantha Michx. old-field threeawn<br />

● ● Poaceae Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr. var. curtipendula side-oats grama<br />

● ● Poaceae Bromus japonicus Thunb. Japanese brome<br />

● Poaceae Bromus pubescens Muhl. ex Willd. Canadian brome<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 36


1 2 3 4 5 Family Scientific name Common name<br />

● Poaceae<br />

Dichan<strong>the</strong>lium acuminatum (Sw.) Gould & C.A. Clark<br />

var. implicatum (Scribn.) Gould & C.A. Clark<br />

pointed dichan<strong>the</strong>lium<br />

● ● ● Poaceae<br />

Dichan<strong>the</strong>lium oligosan<strong>the</strong>s (Schultes) Gould var.<br />

scribnerianum (Nash) Gould<br />

Scribner's dichan<strong>the</strong>lium<br />

● ● Poaceae Elymus canadensis L. var. canadensis Canadian wild-rye<br />

● ● Poaceae Elymus villosus Muhl. ex Willd. var. villosus hairy wild-rye<br />

● ● Poaceae Elymus virginicus L. var. virginicus Virginia wild-rye<br />

● ● Poaceae Leersia oryzoides (L.) Sw. rice cut grass<br />

● Poaceae Leersia virginica Willd. white grass<br />

● ● ● ● Poaceae Lolium pratense Huds. meadow rye grass<br />

● Poaceae Muhlenbergia frondosa (Poir.) Fernald wire-stem muhly<br />

● ● ● ● Poaceae Panicum virgatum L. var. virgatum switchgrass<br />

● ● Poaceae Poa compressa L. Canadian blue grass<br />

● ● Poaceae Poa pratensis L. Kentucky blue grass<br />

● ● ● Poaceae Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash little bluestem<br />

● Poaceae Setaria faberi R.A.W. Herrm. Chinese bristle grass<br />

● ● ● ● Poaceae Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash yellow Indian grass<br />

● Poaceae Spartina pectinata Link prairie cordgrass<br />

● ● ● ● Poaceae Sporobolus compositus (Poir.) Merr. var. compositus rough dropseed<br />

● ● Poaceae Sporobolus neglectus Nash puff-sheath dropseed<br />

● ● ● Poaceae Tridens flavus (L.) Hitchc. var. flavus purpletop<br />

● Polygonaceae Rumex crispus L. curly dock<br />

● ● Ranunculaceae Anemone virginiana L. var. virginiana tall anemone<br />

● Ranunculaceae<br />

Delphinium carolinianum Walter subsp. virescens (Nutt.)<br />

R.E. Brooks<br />

plains larkspur<br />

● ● ● Rhamnaceae Ceanothus americanus L. American ceanothus<br />

● ● ● Rhamnaceae Ceanothus herbaceus Raf. inland ceanothus<br />

● ● Rosaceae Agrimonia pubescens Wallr. downy agrimony<br />

● Rosaceae Prunus mexicana S. Watson big-tree plum<br />

● Rosaceae Prunus serotina Ehrh. var. serotina black cherry<br />

● ● ● ● Rosaceae Rosa arkansana Porter ex Porter & J.M. Coult. Arkansas rose<br />

● Rosaceae Rubus enslenii Tratt. small dewberry<br />

● ● ● ● Rubiaceae Galium circaezans Michx. forest bedstraw<br />

● Rubiaceae Galium concinnum Torr. & A. Gray shining bedstraw<br />

● ● ● ● ● Rutaceae Zanthoxylum americanum P. Mill. common prickly-ash<br />

● Salicaceae Salix humilis Marshall var. humilis prairie willow<br />

● ● ● ● Santalaceae Comandra umbellata (L.) Nutt. subsp. umbellata umbellate bastard-toadflax<br />

● Scrophulariaceae Dasistoma macrophylla (Nutt.) Raf. big-leaf mullein-foxglove<br />

● Scrophulariaceae Veronica arvensis L. corn speedwell<br />

● Smilacaceae Smilax tamnoides L. bristly greenbrier<br />

● Tiliaceae Tilia americana L. var. americana American basswood<br />

● Ulmaceae Celtis occidentalis L. common hackberry<br />

● ● ● Ulmaceae Ulmus americana L. American elm<br />

● Ulmaceae Ulmus pumila L. Siberian elm<br />

● Vitaceae Par<strong>the</strong>nocissus quinquefolia (L.) Planch. var. quinquefolia Virginia creeper<br />

● ● ● Vitaceae Vitis cinerea (Engelm.) Engelm. ex Millardet gray-bark grape<br />

Sparse Vegetation Communities<br />

Sparse Vegetation communities are areas where vegetation is scattered or nearly absent; total<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 37


vegetation cover is less than 25% and generally 1 to 10% (Lauver et al. 1999). These early<br />

successional communities are characterized by parent material that is at or near <strong>the</strong> surface, with<br />

soil thin or absent (Nelson 1985). Examples include cliffs, talus slopes, gravel washes, and sand<br />

bars.<br />

Limestone-Dolostone Midwest Moist Cliff Sparse Vegetation. <strong>Areas</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Limestone-<br />

Dolostone Midwest Moist Cliff Sparse Vegetation extend discontinuously along <strong>the</strong> steep bluffs<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri River in <strong>the</strong> north part <strong>of</strong> FLMR. All are contained almost entirely within <strong>the</strong><br />

Maple-Basswood Forest. In some areas, 5–10 m <strong>of</strong> limestone are exposed on <strong>the</strong> lower parts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> slope, and scattered limestone boulders have broken free and rolled down slope.<br />

Sugar maple and American bladdernut are characteristic woody species in this community.<br />

Characteristic herbaceous plants are walking fern (Asplenium rhizophyllum L.), nor<strong>the</strong>rn maidenhair<br />

fern (Adiantum pedatum L.), and American columbine (Aquilegia canadensis L.). Short’s<br />

rockcress (Arabis shortii (Fernald) Gleason), sou<strong>the</strong>rn bladder fern (Cystopteris protrusa<br />

(Weath.) Blasdell), and dwarf clearweed (Pilea pumila (L.) A. Gray) are o<strong>the</strong>r typical vascular<br />

plants. Mosses, liverworts, and lichens also are common. Little is known about this natural<br />

community in <strong>Kansas</strong>, and element occurrence criteria for it have not been established.<br />

Consequently, occurrence records were not processed for <strong>the</strong>se small areas.<br />

Riverine Sand Flats-Bars Sparse Vegetation. Riverine Sand Flats-Bars Sparse Vegetation<br />

occurs on shifting sand and mud flats along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River. The hydrologic regime <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Missouri River has changed drastically since Euro-American settlement. Historically, <strong>the</strong> river<br />

was one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most turbid large streams in North America and was characterized by a wide,<br />

braided channel, rapid current, heavy bedload <strong>of</strong> fine sediments, and wide fluctuation in flow<br />

volume (Pflieger 1989). The construction <strong>of</strong> dikes and revetments, and river dredging has<br />

confined flow to a single, relatively narrow (300 m wide) channel and eliminated many<br />

backwater habitats (Funk and Robinson 1974, Pflieger 1989, Water Science and Technology<br />

Board 2002). <strong>Natural</strong> stream flow also has been modified due to construction <strong>of</strong> six large<br />

reservoirs on <strong>the</strong> mainstem upstream from <strong>Kansas</strong>. These changes have greatly affected <strong>the</strong> biota<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> river, especially fishes and terrestrial animals that rely on riparian habitats (Funk and<br />

Robinson 1974, Pflieger 1989). As with many o<strong>the</strong>r Sparse Vegetation communities in <strong>Kansas</strong>,<br />

systematic surveys for this community type have not been carried out, evaluation criteria have<br />

not been established, and occurrence records were not processed. Casual observations indicate<br />

that on FLMR representative species are annual flat-sedges (Cyperus spp.), beggar-ticks (Bidens<br />

spp.), yellow false-pimpernel (Lindernia dubia (L.) Pennell), small-flower dwarf-bulrush<br />

(Lipocarpha micrantha (Vahl) G.C. Tucker), and teal love grass (Eragrostis hypnoides (Lam.)<br />

Britton et al.). This community was not reported in Freeman et al. (1997).<br />

Successional <strong>Areas</strong><br />

Successional areas include roadsides, ditches, forest clearings, and open sites dominated by forbs<br />

and non-native, cool-season grasses (i.e., brome, fescue, or bluegrass). They have been altered<br />

by major ecosystem disturbances, but if allowed to undergo succession, <strong>the</strong>y pass through a<br />

predictable series <strong>of</strong> vegetative stages. Disturbed areas are dominated by weedy, herbaceous<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 38


annuals initially. Eventually, herbaceous biennial and perennial plants replace <strong>the</strong>se. Ultimately,<br />

in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r human perturbation, woody species may come to dominate.<br />

Common species in recently disturbed sites on FLMR include common ragweed (Ambrosia<br />

artemisiifolia L.), giant ragweed (A. trifida L.), smooth brome (Bromus inermis Leyss.), Japanese<br />

brome (B. japonicus Thunb.), Canadian horseweed (Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist), stink<br />

grass (Eragrostis cilianensis (All.) Vignolo ex Janch.), Carolina love grass (E. pectinacea<br />

(Michx.) Nees), white sweet-clover (Melilotus albus Medik.), yellow sweet-clover (M. <strong>of</strong>ficinalis<br />

(L.) Lam.), Kentucky blue grass (Poa pratensis L.), Chinese bristle grass (Setaria faberi R.A.W.<br />

Herrm.), yellow bristle grass (S. pumila (Poir.) Roem. & Schult.), common dandelion<br />

(Taraxacum <strong>of</strong>ficinale F.H. Wigg.), and common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.).<br />

Much <strong>of</strong> FLMR is vegetated by introduced grasses and forbs, but some areas contain remnant or<br />

colonizing prairie species. Common non-native species include smooth brome, meadow rye<br />

grass (Lolium pratensis Huds.), Kentucky blue grass, low hop clover (Trifolium campestre<br />

Schreb.), red clover (T. pratense L.), and white clover (T. repens L.). Common remnant or<br />

colonizing prairie species are big bluestem, showy partridgepea (Chamecrista fasciculata<br />

(Michx.) Greene), Illinois bundle-flower (Desmanthus illinoensis (Michx.) MacMill. ex Rob. &<br />

Fernald), switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), black-eyed-Susan (Rudbeckia hirta L.), fringe-leaf<br />

ruellia (Ruellia humilis Nutt.), and yellow Indian grass.<br />

2.4. SUMMARY<br />

Field studies in 2003 confirmed seven kinds <strong>of</strong> terrestrial natural communities on FLMR: four<br />

forest types (Maple-Basswood Forest, White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest, Cottonwood-<br />

Sycamore Floodplain Forest, and Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest), one herbaceous type<br />

(Glaciated Tallgrass Prairie), and two sparse vegetation types (Midwest Moist Limestone-<br />

Dolostone Cliff and Riverine Sand Flats-Bars Sparse Vegetation). Riverine communities were<br />

not examined or evaluated in this study. One occurrence each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four forest types was <strong>of</strong><br />

sufficient size and quality to be added to KSNHI’s database <strong>of</strong> outstanding natural community<br />

occurrences in <strong>Kansas</strong>. Detailed information for o<strong>the</strong>r natural community occurrences was not<br />

ga<strong>the</strong>red because <strong>the</strong>se communities are too small, too degraded, or too poorly known in <strong>the</strong> state<br />

to permit satisfactory evaluation. The name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest, reported<br />

by Freeman et al. (1997) as <strong>the</strong> Pecan-Sugarberry Floodplain Forest, was changed to reflect <strong>the</strong><br />

co-dominance <strong>of</strong> common hackberry, not sugarberry, in that community. A small, degraded<br />

remnant <strong>of</strong> Bulrush-Catttail Marsh reported in Freeman et al. (1997) was found to have been<br />

destroyed due to construction along <strong>the</strong> railroad on FLMR.<br />

<strong>Natural</strong> community surveys confirm that FLMR supports several large and globally significant<br />

forest remnants. The floodplain forest is believed to be <strong>the</strong> largest old-growth stand remaining in<br />

<strong>the</strong> lower Missouri River valley. Upland forests and smaller, associated natural communities are<br />

regionally important. Collectively, <strong>the</strong>se natural communities provide habitat for globally rare or<br />

state-rare species, and <strong>the</strong>y support a rich biota representative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forest-grassland ecotone <strong>of</strong><br />

central North America.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 39


Visual analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floodplain forests suggested significant changes since <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field<br />

seasons, probably <strong>the</strong> ongoing results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1993 flood. However, analysis <strong>of</strong> plot data from<br />

1995–1996 and 2003 did not reveal statistically significant differences, perhaps due to <strong>the</strong><br />

inherent stability <strong>of</strong> dominant trees in <strong>the</strong> community and methodological differences that<br />

affected <strong>the</strong> two data sets.<br />

While FLMR supports a diverse flora and fauna, <strong>the</strong> long-term maintenance <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> its<br />

ecosystems depends on a host <strong>of</strong> factors and influences outside <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resource<br />

managers at FLMR. The native species that inhabit FLMR year-round or seasonally face<br />

growing threats from degradation, fragmentation, isolation, and destruction <strong>of</strong> natural areas both<br />

on-site and <strong>of</strong>f-site. Many species depend on air, land, and water corridors to rest, feed, and<br />

reproduce, and as avenues for <strong>the</strong>ir movement. Human activities have disrupted and altered<br />

many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se terrestrial and aquatic corridors, jeopardizing <strong>the</strong> survival <strong>of</strong> some species.<br />

Riparian forests on FLMR are especially significant in this regard, providing routes for <strong>the</strong><br />

movement <strong>of</strong> wildlife, helping to maintain water quality, and contributing to <strong>the</strong> aes<strong>the</strong>tics <strong>of</strong><br />

FLMR. Efforts to maintain <strong>the</strong> ecological health <strong>of</strong> FLMR must begin by recognizing <strong>the</strong><br />

importance <strong>of</strong> natural habitats on FLMR and <strong>the</strong> role <strong>the</strong>y play in <strong>the</strong> local and regional<br />

movement <strong>of</strong> animals and plants.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> emphasis <strong>of</strong> this study was placed on <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> outstanding terrestrial<br />

natural areas supporting protected and rare species, o<strong>the</strong>r natural areas are vital to native plants<br />

and animals. Degraded prairies, forests, and wetlands can serve as buffer areas and connectors<br />

for high-quality sites, and many areas have restoration potential. Aquatic habitats were not<br />

studied in detail, but <strong>the</strong>y are extremely important. Clearly, humans have affected rivers and<br />

streams on and near FLMR, but detailed baseline studies are needed to determine <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se changes.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 40


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 41


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 42


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 43


3.1. INTRODUCTION<br />

CHAPTER 3. ANIMALS<br />

William H. Busby<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> Biological Survey<br />

2101 Constant Avenue<br />

Lawrence, KS 66047-3759<br />

wbusby@ku.edu<br />

Zoological studies on FLMR during <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field seasons consisted <strong>of</strong> five objectives: 1)<br />

compile a list <strong>of</strong> protected and rare species <strong>of</strong> animals, 2) plan and conduct surveys for <strong>the</strong>se<br />

species, 3) document all findings <strong>of</strong> all endangered, threatened, and special status species, 4)<br />

compile a report detailing all occurrences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species and describing exceptional biological<br />

natural areas on <strong>the</strong> installation, and 5) assist in <strong>the</strong> formulation <strong>of</strong> management ideas based on<br />

<strong>the</strong> survey results. In addition, baseline data about mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians<br />

were collected ancillary to targeted surveys for protected species.<br />

Federally and state-listed species were documented by Freeman et al. (1997). One federal<br />

threatened species, <strong>the</strong> bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus (Linnaeus)), was a regular winter<br />

resident. Four species <strong>of</strong> federally protected birds were determined possibly to migrate through<br />

<strong>the</strong> area, but nesting or foraging habitat is limited or absent on FLMR. They are <strong>the</strong> Eskimo<br />

curlew (Numenius borealis (Forster)), least tern (Sterna antillarum (Lesson)), piping plover<br />

(Charadrius melodus Ord), and whooping crane (Grus americana (Linnaeus)). The white-faced<br />

ibis (Plegadis chihi (Vieillot)) and peregrine falcon (Falco pereginus Tunstall), both state-listed<br />

birds, occasionally may appear during migration. Three <strong>Kansas</strong> Species in Need <strong>of</strong> Conservation<br />

(SINC) infrequently might use habitat on FLMR: black tern (Chlidonias niger (Linnaeus)), blue<br />

sucker (Cycleptus elongatus (LeSueur)), and red-shouldered hawk (Buteo lineatus Gmelin). One<br />

SINC mammal, <strong>the</strong> eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus (Linnaeus)), was a resident on FLMR,<br />

and three SINC migratory birds bred on FLMR: cerulean warbler (Dendroica cerulea (Wilson)),<br />

yellow-throated warbler (Dendroica dominica (Linnaeus)), and whip-poor-will (Caprimulgus<br />

vociferus Wilson). Several state-listed species that were not found during <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field<br />

seasons were thought possibly to occur on FLMR because suitable habitat was available: eastern<br />

spotted skunk (Spilogale putorius (Raf.)), redbelly snake (Storeria occipitomaculata (Storer)),<br />

and smooth earth snake (Virginia valeriae (Baird & Girard)).<br />

In this follow-up study, all federally and state-listed animal species identified in Freeman et al.<br />

(1997) excluding fishes were re-surveyed. The Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis Miller & G.M.<br />

Allen), was added to our survey list. Bat surveys were conducted by Dr. Lynn Robbins and<br />

students, Southwestern Missouri State University. Surveys for <strong>the</strong> American burying beetle<br />

(Nicrophorus americanus Olivier) and a survey <strong>of</strong> snakes were conducted by Hank Guarisco,<br />

Lawrence, KS. Information about floodplain forest bird communities was ga<strong>the</strong>red in <strong>the</strong> major<br />

forest tracts differing in successional stage on FLMR.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 44


TABLE 3.1. Animal species protected by federal and/or state laws with historical or extant<br />

occurrences in Leavenworth County, <strong>Kansas</strong>. Surveys were conducted in 2002–2003 for species<br />

followed by an asterisk.<br />

Common Name Scientific Name Survey Period Status 1<br />

Mammals<br />

eastern spotted skunk Spilogale putorius interrupta (Raf.) T<br />

eastern chipmunk* Tamias striatus (Linnaeus) All year S<br />

Franklin’s ground squirrel Spermophilus franklinii (Sabine) S<br />

sou<strong>the</strong>rn flying squirrel* Glaucomys volans (Linnaeus) All year S<br />

Birds<br />

bald eagle* Haliaeetus leucocephalus (Linnaeus) Dec-Mar LT, E<br />

black tern Chlidonias niger (Linnaeus) S<br />

cerulean warbler* Dendroica cerulea (Wilson) May-Jul S<br />

Eskimo curlew Numenius borealis (Forster) LE, E<br />

least tern Sterna antillarum (Lesson) LE, E<br />

peregrine falcon Falco peregrinus Tunstall E<br />

piping plover Charadrius melodus Ord LT, T<br />

red-shouldered hawk* Buteo lineatus Gmelin Apr-Aug S<br />

whip-poor-will Caprimulgus vociferus (Wilson) S<br />

white-faced ibis Plegadis chihi (Vieillot) T<br />

yellow-throated warbler* Dendroica dominica (Linnaeus) May-Jul S<br />

Reptiles<br />

redbelly snake* Storeria occipitomaculata (Storer) Apr-Jun; Sep-Oct T<br />

smooth earth snake* Virginia valeriae (Baird & Girard) Apr-Jun; Sep-Oct T<br />

timber rattlesnake* Crotalus horridus Linnaeus Apr-Oct S<br />

Amphibians<br />

spring peeper* Pseudacris crucifer (Wied) Mar-Apr T<br />

Fishes<br />

blue sucker Cycleptus elongatus (LeSeur) S<br />

brassy minnow Hybognathus hankinsoni Hubbs S<br />

chestnut lamprey Ichthyomyzon castaneus (Girard) T<br />

fla<strong>the</strong>ad chub Platygobio gracilis (Richardson) T<br />

pallid sturgeon Scaphirhynchus albus (Forbes & LE, E<br />

& Richardson)<br />

river shiner Notropis blennius (Girard) S<br />

sturgeon chub Macrhybopsis gelida (Girard) T<br />

sicklefin chub Macrhybopsis meeki (Jordan & Evermann) E<br />

silverband shiner Notropis shumardi (Girard) T<br />

tadpole madtom Noturus gyrinus (Mitchill) S<br />

western silvery minnow Hybognathus argyritis (Girard) T<br />

Invertebrates<br />

American burying beetle* Nicrophorus americanus Olivier May-Sep LE, E<br />

1 Status abbreviations, arranged by regulatory agency and threat level, are as follows:<br />

LE = listed as endangered by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.<br />

LT = listed as threatened by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.<br />

E = listed as endangered by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> Dept. <strong>of</strong> Wildlife and Parks.<br />

T = listed as threatened by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> Dept. <strong>of</strong> Wildlife and Parks.<br />

S = Species in Need <strong>of</strong> Conservation, listed by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> Dept. <strong>of</strong> Wildlife and Parks.<br />

3.2. METHODS<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 45


Field surveys for animals were initiated on 12 March 2002 and completed 11 November 2003.<br />

Techniques followed those described by Freeman et al. (1997) and consisted <strong>of</strong> taxon-specific<br />

methods for certain species listed in Table 3.1 and general surveys for amphibians, reptiles,<br />

mammals, and birds (Appendix B). Methods differing from those presented in Freeman et al.<br />

(1997) are provided below.<br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>rn flying squirrel<br />

Surveys for sou<strong>the</strong>rn flying squirrels (Glaucomys volans (Linnaeus)) were conducted by placing<br />

artificial nest boxes on trees in oak-hickory forest and in floodplain forest as described in<br />

Freeman et al. (1997). A total <strong>of</strong> 12 boxes was placed on trees at three sites (Figure 3.1), four<br />

boxes per site, on 5 December 2002. Boxes were checked on 14 April 2002 and 10 November<br />

2003 for squirrels and spoor.<br />

American burying beetle<br />

Site Selection. Guidelines for selection <strong>of</strong> survey sites were based upon experience over <strong>the</strong> past<br />

several years in <strong>Kansas</strong>, combined with information obtained from studies done in o<strong>the</strong>r parts <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> range <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus Olivier). Primary selection<br />

criteria were as follows:<br />

1. Relatively remote, undisturbed areas were chosen. Agricultural land and areas with bright<br />

lights were avoided.<br />

2. Seven <strong>of</strong> eight traplines were located on upland sites to ensure adequate dispersal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bait’s<br />

odor plume because many molecules generated by <strong>the</strong> decaying process are heavier than<br />

air and may travel downhill when <strong>the</strong>re is no appreciable wind. Upland sites also contain<br />

more areas <strong>of</strong> loess and loamy soil, which is associated with populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species in<br />

sou<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong> (Guarisco 1997). One trapline was placed on <strong>the</strong> side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> levee near<br />

<strong>the</strong> air field mainly for comparison.<br />

3. Prairie remnants, fields, and mixed woodlands were surveyed since <strong>the</strong> species has been found<br />

in <strong>the</strong>se habitat types.<br />

Survey Sites. On 2 September, four traplines were placed at locations 1-4 (Figure 3.2):<br />

Location 1: Boy Scout Camp. A trapline was placed in an open area in mixed woodland<br />

at this site because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> exceptional soil (friable, loamy loess).<br />

Location 2: Detention Barracks (DB) Farm area. A trapline was placed on a hill with<br />

open fields and forest just west <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> DB Farm.<br />

Location 3: Dump Area. A trapline was placed along a low ridge at <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> a disturbed<br />

field covered with rank vegetation. This is an elevated site with a view <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> railroad<br />

tracks and floodplain.<br />

Location 4: DB Road. A trapline was placed on both sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> road leading to <strong>the</strong> DB.<br />

It is surrounded by undisturbed forest with original understory vegetation. On <strong>the</strong><br />

immediate west side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> road is a large loess hill.<br />

These traplines were checked early each morning on 3–6 September and removed on 6<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 46


September.<br />

On 8 September, four traplines were placed at locations 5–8 (Figure 3.2):<br />

Location 5: Corner Area. A trapline was placed along <strong>the</strong> east edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> road nor<strong>the</strong>ast<br />

<strong>of</strong> Wagner Point. It is an upland, open area with nearby forest.<br />

Location 6: Hancock Hill. A trapline was placed along <strong>the</strong> east edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> road in a<br />

prairie remnant.<br />

Location 7: Sherman Army Airfield Area. A trapline was placed along <strong>the</strong> slope <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

levee just northwest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> air field.<br />

Location 8: McClellan Avenue Area. A trapline was placed along an old field at <strong>the</strong><br />

north end <strong>of</strong> McClellan Avenue and near <strong>the</strong> top <strong>of</strong> a hill.<br />

These traplines were checked each morning from 9–12 September and removed 12 September.<br />

Sampling Protocol. The American burying beetle is most active in Nebraska from June–<br />

August; however, one individual was discovered as late as 29 October (Ratcliffe 1996). Most<br />

beetles found in <strong>Kansas</strong> were encountered from late August to early September, and very little<br />

activity in any member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> genus was evident during mid-summer drought conditions<br />

(Guarisco 1997, 1998). Therefore, trapping at FLMR was begun after <strong>the</strong> 37.8˚C (100˚F)<br />

temperatures and drought conditions ended in early September. Nighttime low temperatures<br />

during <strong>the</strong> first trip (2–6 September) were around 14˚C (57˚F) except for <strong>the</strong> night <strong>of</strong> 4<br />

September when temperatures were ca 11˚C (52˚F). Temperatures during <strong>the</strong> second trip were<br />

higher, with low temperatures ranging from 14–22˚C (52–72˚F) during <strong>the</strong> nights preceding <strong>the</strong><br />

four consecutive survey days (9–12 September).<br />

The standard survey protocol outlined in <strong>the</strong> American burying beetle recovery plan (U.S. Fish<br />

and Wildlife Service 1991) was used with a slight modification recommended by B. Ratcliffe,<br />

<strong>the</strong> authority on this species in Nebraska. Sampling was conducted by under authority <strong>of</strong> permit<br />

#TEO43393-0 issued by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and as a subpermittee <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> scientific collecting and salvage wildlife permit.<br />

Traplines consisted <strong>of</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> containers (32-oz plastic cups and/or a 2.1-gallon plastic<br />

bucket) placed ca 27 m (30 yd) apart. Rotten chicken and road-killed squirrels were used as bait.<br />

Each container was placed in <strong>the</strong> ground so that its rim was flush with <strong>the</strong> soil surface. Aged bait<br />

was placed in an empty film canister and hung inside <strong>the</strong> containers. The carcass <strong>of</strong> a fresh,<br />

road-killed squirrel or a carcass that had been collected earlier, frozen, thawed, and allowed to rot<br />

was placed in <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> each container. A 30.5-cm (12-in) square piece <strong>of</strong> chicken wire<br />

(mesh openings ca 2.5 cm diameter) was placed over <strong>the</strong> trap and anchored at <strong>the</strong> corners with<br />

rocks. A plywood sun/rain shelter 30.5-cm (12-in) square was placed on top <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rocks and<br />

staked into <strong>the</strong> ground with two spikes driven through holes in <strong>the</strong> plywood. A 5-cm (2-in) layer<br />

<strong>of</strong> soil was placed in <strong>the</strong> bottom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trap to help prevent desiccation. Traplines were checked<br />

on <strong>the</strong> four consecutive mornings following <strong>the</strong>ir installation. Captured carrion beetles were<br />

identified using Ratcliffe (1996) and released 0.4–0.8 km (0.25–0.5 mi) away from <strong>the</strong> trapline.<br />

Traplines at locations 1, 3, and 7 each consisted only <strong>of</strong> cups; traplines at <strong>the</strong> remaining locations<br />

each consisted <strong>of</strong> five cups and a bucket.<br />

Floodplain Bird Communities<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 47


The old-growth floodplain forest was censused during spring and early summer <strong>of</strong> 2002 and 2003<br />

for canopy warblers, including two listed in <strong>Kansas</strong> as SINCs: cerulean warbler (Dendroica<br />

cerulea (Wilson) and yellow-throated warbler (Dendroica dominica (Linnaeus)). A strip-census<br />

method (Emlen 1984) was used following a route discussed in Schukman (1996). The walking<br />

route was covered from approximately 0700–1100h on days without rain or strong winds. The<br />

route followed a circuit beginning at <strong>the</strong> south end <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> River Trail, proceeding north on this<br />

trail to a point approximately due east <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> great blue heron rookery, <strong>the</strong>n following trails<br />

southwest into <strong>the</strong> Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest, eventually returning to <strong>the</strong> River Trail at<br />

<strong>the</strong> South Weston MAPS station. Locations <strong>of</strong> all canopy warblers that were detected were<br />

recorded on maps <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> route. Surveys were conducted on 5 and 26 May 2002 and on 24 April,<br />

25 May, and 13 June 2003.<br />

In addition, point count surveys <strong>of</strong> birds in three floodplain forest types were conducted from 5–<br />

14 June 2003. All species detected by sight or vocalization 1) within a 50-m (164-ft) fixedradius<br />

distance and 2) at unlimited distance were recorded for a period <strong>of</strong> 10 minutes (Ralph et<br />

al. 1993). In each forest type (Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest, and early-successional and<br />

mid-successional Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest) 13 point-counts were conducted at<br />

250 m (820 ft) or greater intervals along randomly placed transects (Figure 3.3). Censuses were<br />

conducted between 0600–1000h on days with light wind and no rain. All counts were made by<br />

W. H. Busby.<br />

Bat Surveys<br />

A survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis Miller & G.M. Allen) was conducted in 2002 and<br />

2003 by L. Robbins (Appendix D). This study yielded information about six species <strong>of</strong> summerresident<br />

bats on FLMR.<br />

Herpetological Surveys<br />

A survey <strong>of</strong> snakes was conducted in 2003 by H. Guarisco (Appendix E). Surveys for nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

spring peeper and o<strong>the</strong>r anurans were not conducted because drought conditions failed to fill<br />

temporary breeding pools with water. O<strong>the</strong>r herpetological records were obtained during general<br />

field surveys by W. H. Busby, a <strong>Kansas</strong> Herpetological Society field trip to FLMR on 11 October<br />

2002 (Collins 2003), and examination <strong>of</strong> specimens in <strong>the</strong> FLMR Entomology Office (Pest<br />

Control) (Appendix E).<br />

3.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

During this study, sites throughout <strong>the</strong> undeveloped portions <strong>of</strong> FLMR were surveyed for rare<br />

animals, involving an estimated 434-person-hours <strong>of</strong> field work (Table 3.2). Following on-site<br />

assessments <strong>of</strong> potential habitat for <strong>the</strong> species listed in Table 3.1, field surveys were conducted<br />

for <strong>the</strong> following species: Indiana bat, sou<strong>the</strong>rn flying squirrel, eastern chipmunk (Tamias<br />

striatus (Linnaeus), great egret (Ardea alba (Linnaeus)), red-shouldered hawk (Buteo lineatus<br />

Gmelin), broad-winged hawk (Buteo platypterus (Vieillot)), cerulean warbler, yellow-throated<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 48


warbler, ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapillus (Linneaus), redbelly snake (Storeria occipitomaculata<br />

(Storer), smooth earth snake (Virginia valeriae (Baird & Girard)), timber rattlesnake (Crotalus<br />

horridus Linnaeus), and American burying beetle. Element occurrences for nine species were<br />

documented (Table 3.3). Species accounts are presented below for animals listed in Table 3.1,<br />

except for fishes. Accounts are grouped by protection status and organized alphabetically by<br />

common name within each group.<br />

TABLE 3.2. Summary <strong>of</strong> areas surveyed for plants and animals in 2002 and 2003 on FLMR.<br />

Time is survey duration in person-hours.<br />

Date Location Time Notes<br />

2002-03-12 Bottomland Forest 8 W. H. Busby & S. Roth: visit Great Blue Heron rookery and count nests<br />

Bundel Road area 4 W. H. Busby & S. Roth: visit proposed road corridor along Missouri River with J.<br />

Wimberg<br />

2002-05-02 Bottomland Forest 4 W. H. Busby: census birds along River Trail with J. Schukman & D. Kilby<br />

Boy Scout area 1 W. H. Busby: census birds with J. Schukman<br />

2002-05-26 Bottomland Forest 4 W. H. Busby: census birds along River Trail with J. Schukman & D. Williams<br />

2002-07-08 Bottomland Forest 28 L. Robbins & field crew: initiate bat survey<br />

2002-07-09 various 28 L. Robbins & field crew: bat surveys<br />

2002-07-10 various 28 L. Robbins & field crew: bat surveys<br />

2002-07-11 various 28 L. Robbins & field crew: bat surveys<br />

2002-12-05 Pecan forest, McPherson Ave<br />

forest, Maple-Basswood Forest<br />

10 W. H. Busby, W. D. Kettle, and S. Roth: install flying squirrel boxes at three sites<br />

2003-04-03 various 21 W. H. Busby, S. Roth & G. Pisani: check flying squirrel boxes. Evaluate<br />

potential habitat for redbelly snake and earth snake at various sites.<br />

2003-04-24 Bottomland Forest 5 W. H. Busby: bird censuses along River Trail with J. Schukman<br />

Bundel Road area 2 W. H. Busby: visit old landfill site with M. Nowak, M. Sorenson, J. Harrington &<br />

C. Davis to evaluate habitat value<br />

2003-05-02 Bluff Forest 4 W. H. Busby & H. Guarisco: herp surveys<br />

2003-05-02 Pecan Forest 4 W. H. Busby & H. Guarisco: herp surveys<br />

2003-05-03 various 8 W. H. Busby: lead <strong>Kansas</strong> Ornithological Society field trip group with D.<br />

Williams; most <strong>of</strong> time spent in old-growth bottomland forest<br />

2003-05-22 Pecan Forest 6 W. H. Busby: bird censuses in old-growth bottomland forest<br />

2003-05-25 Bottomland Forest 5 W. H. Busby: bird censuses with J. Schukman along River Trail<br />

2003-05-27 various 6 W. H. Busby, C. C. Freeman & H. Loring: photos <strong>of</strong> natural communities<br />

2003-06-05 Bottomland Forest 5 W. H. Busby: point counts for birds<br />

2003-06-05 Ft. Cavagnial Picnic area 1 W. H. Busby: survey for ovenbird below picnic area<br />

2003-06-06 Bottomland Forest 6 W. H. Busby: point counts for birds<br />

2003-06-09 Bottomland Forest 6 W. H. Busby: point counts for birds<br />

2003-06-12 DB farm road 8 H. Guarisco: install herp shelters; herp surveys<br />

2003-06-13 Bottomland Forest 6 W. H. Busby: bird censuses in pecan forest with J. Schukman<br />

2003-06-13 DB farm 8 H. Guarisco: herp surveys<br />

2003-06-14 Bottomland Forest 6 W. H. Busby: point counts for birds<br />

2003-06-18 DB farm 8 H. Guarisco: herp surveys<br />

2003-06-23 upland sites 8 H. Guarisco: herp surveys<br />

2003-06-24 upland sites 8 H. Guarisco: herp surveys<br />

2003-07-01 DB farm 8 H. Guarisco: herp surveys<br />

2003-07-02 Hancock Hill 8 W. H. Busby: survey upland forest birds<br />

2003-07-11 DB farm 8 H. Guarisco: herp surveys<br />

2003-08-06 Government Hill, Wagner Point 6 W. H. Busby: survey upland forest birds<br />

2003-09-02 uplands 8 H. Guarisco: install herp trap arrays<br />

2003-09-02/06 various 31 H. Guarisco: burying beetle and herp surveys<br />

2003-09-08/12 various 31 H. Guarisco: burying beetle and herp surveys<br />

2003-09-21 Government Hill 8 H. Guarisco: herp surveys<br />

2003-09-22 upland sites 8 H. Guarisco: herp surveys<br />

2003-09-29 upland sites 8 H. Guarisco: herp surveys<br />

2003-10-08 upland sites 8 H. Guarisco: herp surveys<br />

2003-10-09 upland sites 8 H. Guarisco: herp surveys<br />

2003-10-10 upland sites 8 H. Guarisco: herp surveys<br />

2003-10-11 upland sites 8 H. Guarisco: herp surveys<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 49


Date Location Time Notes<br />

2003-11-03 Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain<br />

Forest, McPherson Ave Maple-<br />

Basswood Forest<br />

10 W. H. Busby, S. Roth & C. Davis: check flying squirrel boxes<br />

TABLE 3.3. Element occurrence records for state-rare animals on FLMR. For definitions <strong>of</strong><br />

state-ranks see NatureServe website (http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/ranking.htm).<br />

Latitude-longitude data are provided for an observation centroid (see maps for each species for<br />

more complete distribution information). Format is degrees, minutes, seconds (DDMMSS).<br />

Common Name Scientific Name<br />

Element<br />

Occurrence Code<br />

State<br />

Rank<br />

Latitude &<br />

Longitude<br />

sou<strong>the</strong>rn flying Glaucomys volans AMAFB09010.017 S3 392150 N<br />

squirrel<br />

945601 W<br />

eastern chipmunk Tamias striatus AMAFB02230.002 S2 392059 N<br />

945615 W<br />

great egret Ardea alba ABNGA04040.008 S2B, 392243 N<br />

S3N 945313 W<br />

Cooper’s hawk Accipiter cooperi ABNKC12040.026 S3B,<br />

SZN<br />

392308 N<br />

945334 W<br />

broad-winged Buteo platypterus ABNKC19050.004 S1B, 392150 N<br />

hawk<br />

SZN 945601 W<br />

red-shouldered Buteo lineatus ABNKC19030.019 S2S3 392308 N<br />

hawk<br />

945334 W<br />

ovenbird Seiurus aurocapillus ABPBX10010.005 S1B 392117 N<br />

945617 W<br />

cerulean warbler Dendroica cerulea ABPBX03240.002 S1B 392217 N<br />

945334 W<br />

yellow-throated Dendroica dominica ABPBX03130.004 S1B 392254 N<br />

warbler<br />

945302 W<br />

Species Accounts–Federal-listed Species<br />

American burying beetle: Nicrophorus americanus Olivier<br />

Notes on Status<br />

Widespread, low-density<br />

population; confirmed in 2003<br />

Widespread in wooded areas;<br />

multiple sites in 2003<br />

2–10 nesting pairs in great blue<br />

heron colony in 1995–‘96 not<br />

observed in 2002–‘03<br />

One breeding pair in 1994;<br />

present in 2003; species no<br />

longer tracked<br />

Probable nester; breeding not<br />

confirmed; observed in 2003<br />

Probable nester; breeding not<br />

confirmed; observed in 2003<br />

1–2 breeding pair in 1995–‘96;<br />

not observed in 2003<br />

1–4 breeding pairs; observed in<br />

2003<br />

Estimate 30+ breeding pairs;<br />

observed in 2003<br />

Past Records. The American burying beetle historically occurred throughout much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eastern<br />

U.S. including <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> counties <strong>of</strong> Doniphan, Douglas, Pottawatomie, and Shawnee (U.S.<br />

Fish and Wildlife Service 1991). Currently, it is known from six states: on Block Island <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong><br />

coast <strong>of</strong> Rhode Island, sou<strong>the</strong>rn South Dakota, central Nebraska, eastern Oklahoma, western<br />

Arkansas (Ratcliffe 1996), and sou<strong>the</strong>astern <strong>Kansas</strong> (Guarisco 1997, Miller and McDonald<br />

1997). In <strong>the</strong> past several years, this species has been found at eight sites in Wilson, Elk,<br />

Montgomery, and Chautauqua counties in <strong>the</strong> Chautauqua Hills physiographic province in<br />

sou<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong> (Guarisco 1998, 1999). No American burying beetles were found on FLMR by<br />

Freeman et al. (1997).<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 50


TABLE 3.4. Carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae) collected on FLMR 3–6 September 2003.<br />

See text for descriptions <strong>of</strong> locations.<br />

Species Location<br />

No. Collected<br />

3 rd –4 th –5 th –6 th<br />

Sum Total<br />

Nicrophorus marginatus 2 0–0–1–0 1<br />

3 0–0–0–2 2 3<br />

Nicrophorus orbicollis 1 1–1–0–0 2<br />

2 4–6–5–1 16<br />

3 1–0–0–0 1<br />

4 0–6–4–3 13 32<br />

Nicrophorus tomentosus 1 0–2–0–1 3<br />

2 0–36–12–14 62<br />

3 0–0–0–1 1<br />

4 0–5–1–6 12 78<br />

Necrophila americana 2 0–0–0–1 1<br />

4 0–1–0–0 1 2<br />

TABLE 3.5. Carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae) collected at FLMR on 9–12 September<br />

2003. See text for description <strong>of</strong> locations.<br />

Species Location<br />

No. Collected<br />

9th–10 th –11 th –12 th Sum Total<br />

Nicrophorus marginatus 6 0–0–1–0 1<br />

7 0–0–0–2 2 3<br />

Nicrophorus orbicollis 5 0–0–4–3 7<br />

6 1–2–2–4 9<br />

7 0–1–0–0 1<br />

8 1–0–0–1 2 19<br />

Nicrophorus tomentosus 5 0–0–20–24 44<br />

6 0–21–20–9 50<br />

7 0–23–21–0 44<br />

8 1–6–1–0 8 146<br />

Necrophila americana 5 0–1–0–0 1<br />

6 0–0–1–0 1<br />

7 0–1–0–0 1 3<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. Surveys for carrion beetles were conducted 2–6 and 8–12<br />

September 2003. Following a technique modified from Kozol (1990), a series <strong>of</strong> pitfall traps<br />

baited with carrion were placed at eight sites (Figure 3.2). Traps were checked each morning for<br />

adult beetles. A total <strong>of</strong> 311 specimens representing four species <strong>of</strong> carrion beetles was<br />

collected (Table 3.4, Table 3.5), but no American burying beetles were found.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. The recent decline and apparent extirpation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> American<br />

burying beetle over most <strong>of</strong> its former range may be due to multiple ecological factors and life<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 51


history attributes <strong>of</strong> this species. It is <strong>the</strong> largest member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> genus Nicrophorus in North<br />

America and requires larger carrion (80–300 gm; 3–11 oz) for best reproductive success (U.S.<br />

Fish and Wildlife Service 1991). This species is associated with specific soil types (Lomolino et<br />

al. 1995) and habitats with abundant small birds and mammals (Holloway and Schnell 1997).<br />

Only limited areas on <strong>the</strong> uplands <strong>of</strong> FLMR currently support habitat potentially suitable for<br />

American burying beetle populations. Extensive human activity, particularly agricultural<br />

development, in <strong>the</strong> historic past throughout <strong>the</strong> Glaciated Region <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> and Missouri has<br />

greatly reduced <strong>the</strong> amount <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat for this species. It is unlikely to occur on FLMR.<br />

Recommendations. If populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> American burying beetle are discovered close to FLMR,<br />

additional surveys should be conducted on <strong>the</strong> post.<br />

Bald eagle: Haliaeetus leucocephalus (Linnaeus)<br />

Past Records. The bald eagle is a large raptor that is a regular winter visitor and local breeder in<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> (Thompson and Ely 1989, Collins et al. 1995). It bred historically along major rivers in<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong>, but breeding populations were extirpated shortly after Euro-America settlement<br />

(Levenson and Bee 1980). The first confirmed nesting in more than a century occurred in <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

in 1989, and <strong>the</strong> breeding population continues to expand (Watkins et al. 1994). Winter<br />

populations also have been expanding for several decades and current winter populations<br />

sometimes exceed 600 birds. During aerial surveys <strong>of</strong> eagles in <strong>the</strong> winters <strong>of</strong> 1991–1993, <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Wildlife and Parks documented that, at times, <strong>the</strong> Missouri River hosts<br />

large numbers <strong>of</strong> bald eagles.<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. The preferred habitat <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bald eagle includes areas <strong>of</strong> open<br />

water and along large rivers. In <strong>Kansas</strong>, <strong>the</strong> greatest numbers in winter occur at large reservoirs<br />

and along <strong>the</strong> major rivers. Breeding pairs currently are found at large reservoirs in eastern<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> and in riparian areas in western <strong>Kansas</strong> (Watkins et al. 1994, 1996). No winter surveys<br />

were conducted due to <strong>the</strong> abundance <strong>of</strong> existing information (Table 3.6). No bald eagles were<br />

seen on FLMR during breeding season surveys, and <strong>the</strong>re is no evidence that eagles nest on <strong>the</strong><br />

post. Because <strong>of</strong> regular winter use by bald eagles, all lands and waters in a corridor along <strong>the</strong><br />

main stem <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri River from <strong>the</strong> Nebraska state line downstream to Wyandotte County,<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong>, are designated as critical habitat by KDWP.<br />

TABLE 3.6. Aerial surveys for bald eagles conducted by KDWP from 1991–1993. FLMR = Ft.<br />

Leavenworth; LC = Leavenworth County; and MR = Missouri River (in <strong>Kansas</strong>).<br />

Number <strong>of</strong> bald eagles<br />

Date FLMR LC MR<br />

1991-02-13 0 1 12<br />

1992-02-10 3 6 42<br />

1992-12-16 3 4 23<br />

1993-01-14 9 35 80<br />

1993-02-22 4 6 55<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 52


Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. Bald eagles are frequent winter visitors along <strong>the</strong> Missouri<br />

River on FLMR. This bird currently does not breed on <strong>the</strong> installation, but apparently suitable<br />

breeding habitat exists <strong>the</strong>re. As <strong>the</strong> breeding population expands, nest sites along <strong>the</strong> Missouri<br />

River on or near FLMR could be established. The known breeding site nearest to FLMR is at<br />

Perry Lake in Jefferson County, <strong>Kansas</strong>.<br />

Recommendations. Forested riparian habitat along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River should be monitored for<br />

breeding bald eagles.<br />

Eskimo curlew: Numenius borealis (Forster)<br />

Past Records. This shorebird was an abundant migrant in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong> in <strong>the</strong> 1800s, but by <strong>the</strong><br />

early 1900s it was nearly extinct due to hunting pressure (Thompson and Ely 1989). A historical<br />

record for <strong>the</strong> Eskimo curlew exists from Douglas County, <strong>Kansas</strong>, and <strong>the</strong>re is an unconfirmed<br />

1995 report from Anderson County.<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. The Eskimo curlew reportedly frequented wet meadows and<br />

open grassland in <strong>the</strong> Great Plains, especially recently burned prairie. FLMR does not contain<br />

suitable habitat, and no surveys were conducted during this study.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. Many biologists believe this species is extinct. If extant,<br />

exceedingly low population numbers and <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat on FLMR make <strong>the</strong><br />

probability <strong>of</strong> visits by this species remote.<br />

Recommendations. None.<br />

Indiana bat: Myotis sodalis Miller & G.M. Allen<br />

Past Records. The Indiana bat inhabits forested areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eastern U.S. westward to Missouri.<br />

This species has not been documented in <strong>Kansas</strong> (3D/Environmental Services 1993), but<br />

reproductively active individuals have been observed approximately 160 km (100 mi) east and<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>of</strong> FLMR in Caldwell and Nodaway counties, Missouri (Appendix D).<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. Suitable habitat consists <strong>of</strong> forest and forest edge where dead or<br />

dying trees with defoliated bark are present. Surveys were conducted in July 2002 and June-July<br />

2003 (Appendix D). No Indiana bats were detected during this study.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. Surveys efforts probably were sufficient to detect Indiana<br />

bats if <strong>the</strong>y were present. However, it is possible that <strong>the</strong> species occurs irregularly on FLMR.<br />

Recommendations. Mature upland and lowland forests should be managed without removing<br />

dead trees or snags to maintain habitat potentially suitable for this species.<br />

Least tern: Sterna antillarum (Lesson)<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 53


Past Records. Least terns nest in riparian and wetland areas with large patches <strong>of</strong> bare soil or<br />

sparse vegetation. Nesting colonies are found along <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> River in nor<strong>the</strong>astern <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

(Busby et al. 1997) and along <strong>the</strong> Platte River in Nebraska (Sidle and Harrison 1990). Least<br />

terns nested historically on sandbars along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River, but most <strong>of</strong> this habitat has been<br />

compromised due to alteration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> river’s hydrology. The species was observed on FLMR in<br />

<strong>the</strong> late 1980s when low water in <strong>the</strong> Missouri River exposed many sandbars (J. Schukman<br />

personal comm.), but <strong>the</strong>re are no known nesting records.<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. The Missouri River provided ideal nesting habitat prior to<br />

hydrological modifications. Construction <strong>of</strong> large reservoirs upstream and channelization <strong>of</strong><br />

most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> river reduced breeding habitat for least tern. Among <strong>the</strong> changes was a reduction in<br />

<strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> sandbars and open, sparsely vegetated sites frequented by this and o<strong>the</strong>r species for<br />

nesting (Haig et al. 1988). Good nesting sites currently do not exist on FLMR, and no breeding<br />

colonies are present on or near <strong>the</strong> installation. No systematic surveys were conducted during<br />

this study, and no least terns were seen during o<strong>the</strong>r field work on FLMR.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. Least terns wander widely during <strong>the</strong> spring and late<br />

summer, and probably migrate along <strong>the</strong> river near FLMR. Nesting along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River on<br />

or near FLMR is unlikely given current river management.<br />

Recommendations. The absence <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat is due largely to hydrological changes in <strong>the</strong><br />

Missouri River. Restoration <strong>of</strong> habitat will require modifications in <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> river is managed<br />

by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers. If future management changes result in <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong><br />

large sandbars in <strong>the</strong> river, <strong>the</strong>se should be monitored during June and July for least terns.<br />

Piping plover: Charadrius melodus Ord<br />

Past Records. This small shorebird breeds in <strong>the</strong> central and nor<strong>the</strong>rn Great Plains; it is a rare<br />

spring and fall migrant in <strong>Kansas</strong> (Thompson and Ely 1989). Piping plovers routinely nest along<br />

<strong>the</strong> Platte River and upper Missouri River (Haig et al. 1994). Small numbers <strong>of</strong> individuals also<br />

nest along <strong>the</strong> upper <strong>Kansas</strong> River (Busby et al. 1997).<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. Similar to <strong>the</strong> least tern, piping plovers breed on sparsely<br />

vegetated sandbars along rivers, along sandy shores <strong>of</strong> marshes and lakes, and on open flats<br />

(Collins et al. 1995). Formerly, <strong>the</strong> Missouri River provided suitable nesting habitat. However,<br />

channelization and reservoir construction has altered <strong>the</strong> river’s hydrology, resulting in fewer<br />

sandbars and open, sparsely vegetated sites that might be used by nesting individuals (Haig et al.<br />

1988). No nesting habitat currently exists on FLMR, and no breeding colonies are present on or<br />

near FLMR. Systematic surveys were not conducted during this study, and no piping plovers<br />

were seen during o<strong>the</strong>r field work on <strong>the</strong> installation.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. Migrating birds may fly over <strong>the</strong> area and occasionally may<br />

stop to forage along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 54


Recommendations. The lack <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat on FLMR is due largely to hydrological changes<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Missouri River. Restoration <strong>of</strong> habitat will require modifications in <strong>the</strong> way <strong>the</strong> river is<br />

managed by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers. Future surveys should be conducted if changes<br />

in river management result in <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> suitable nesting habitat.<br />

Whooping crane: Grus americana (Linnaeus)<br />

Past Records. Whooping cranes migrate through <strong>Kansas</strong> during spring and fall on <strong>the</strong>ir way<br />

between wintering grounds on <strong>the</strong> Texas coast and breeding grounds in Canada. Most cranes<br />

migrate through central <strong>Kansas</strong>, but individuals occasionally are reported far<strong>the</strong>r east in <strong>the</strong> state<br />

(Thompson and Ely 1989). Recent records exist for Jefferson and Douglas counties.<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. This large bird feeds mostly in wetlands, such as exist along <strong>the</strong><br />

central Platte River in Nebraska and at Cheyenne Bottoms in <strong>Kansas</strong>. During migration;<br />

however, small groups <strong>of</strong> birds or single individuals may stop to roost overnight at farm ponds<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>r aquatic sites that are not used for foraging. Whooping cranes generally pass quickly<br />

through <strong>Kansas</strong>.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. Individuals occasionally may migrate through extreme<br />

eastern <strong>Kansas</strong>, as happened at Clinton Lake Wildlife Area in November 1996. However, habitat<br />

at FLMR is marginal, and <strong>the</strong> probability <strong>of</strong> visits by whooping cranes is remote.<br />

Recommendations. None.<br />

Species Accounts–State-listed Species<br />

Eastern spotted skunk: Spilogale putorius interrupta (Rafinesque)<br />

Past Records. The eastern spotted skunk historically was common throughout <strong>Kansas</strong> and<br />

Missouri. Brumwell (1951) wrote in his annotated list <strong>of</strong> mammals <strong>of</strong> Ft. Leavenworth, “The<br />

spotted skunk is a common inhabitant <strong>of</strong> woodland and broken terrain about ledges, and railroad<br />

ballast. Evidence <strong>of</strong> this skunk was found in every association except prairie. From <strong>the</strong> number<br />

<strong>of</strong> dens found occupied <strong>the</strong>re could not be more than one Spilogale for every twenty or thirty<br />

acres.” The species has declined markedly during <strong>the</strong> past three decades (Collins et al. 1995),<br />

and <strong>the</strong>re are no recent records from nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong>.<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. This species inhabits a wide range <strong>of</strong> habitats. It frequented<br />

forest margin and upland prairie environments in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong>, especially where rock outcrops,<br />

abandoned buildings, and o<strong>the</strong>r cover existed (Bee et al. 1981). Suitable habitat exists on FLMR,<br />

but no trapping was conducted because <strong>of</strong> its rarity in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong>. Davis (2003) found no<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> spotted skunk during his work at FLMR.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. The potential for eastern spotted skunks to occur on FLMR<br />

is considered to be low.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 55


Recommendations. None.<br />

Peregrine falcon: Falco peregrinus Tunstall<br />

Past Records. This raptor is a rare to uncommon migrant in <strong>Kansas</strong> (Thompson and Ely 1989).<br />

In <strong>the</strong> last few years, peregrine falcons have been seen on FLMR (J. Schukman personal comm.)<br />

and elsewhere in nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong> along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River. Peregrine falcon populations,<br />

decimated by <strong>the</strong> effects <strong>of</strong> DDT contamination in <strong>the</strong> 1950–‘70s, have begun to recover. This<br />

species recently was delisted by <strong>the</strong> U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Nesting has occurred<br />

recently on tall buildings in <strong>Kansas</strong> City, Missouri, and in Topeka, <strong>Kansas</strong>.<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. This bird visits a variety <strong>of</strong> habitats during migration. Favored<br />

sites are wetlands, lakes, and large rivers where <strong>the</strong>re are concentrations <strong>of</strong> prey birds. The<br />

Missouri River valley provides good foraging habitat, but cliffs and tall buildings that might<br />

attract breeding falcons are limited. No surveys were conducted for <strong>the</strong> peregrine falcon, and no<br />

observations were made during o<strong>the</strong>r field work.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. Migrating and wandering individuals occasionally pass<br />

through <strong>the</strong> area. However, sufficiently tall structures to attract breeding birds to FLMR are not<br />

present.<br />

Recommendations. None.<br />

Redbelly snake: Storeria occipitomaculata (Storer)<br />

Past Records. This snake is at <strong>the</strong> western edge <strong>of</strong> its range in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong>. Records in<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong> come from Atchison, Jefferson, and Douglas counties (Collins 1993). No<br />

redbelly snakes were observed on FLMR by Freeman et al. (1997).<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. The redbelly snake inhabits woodlands and forests, most <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

those dominated by oaks and hickories, and with a dense layer <strong>of</strong> leaf litter. Sites with extensive<br />

rock in <strong>the</strong> substrate are preferred. Forested uplands on FLMR were surveyed from April–<br />

October 2003 (Table 3.2, Appendix E). Surveys involved searching in leaf litter and under logs<br />

and rocks.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. This secretive species is difficult to find using any survey<br />

technique because it occupies subterranean habitats. Individuals are most likely to be found<br />

above ground in <strong>the</strong> spring and fall. Even though individuals were not found during this survey,<br />

it is possible that <strong>the</strong> species inhabits large tracts <strong>of</strong> high-quality White oak-Shagbark hickory<br />

Forest and Maple-Basswood Forest on FLMR, especially around rock outcrops on slopes in <strong>the</strong><br />

north part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> installation.<br />

Recommendations. Existing stands <strong>of</strong> upland forest should be maintained. Not enough is known<br />

about <strong>the</strong> habitat requirements <strong>of</strong> this snake to permit specific management recommendations to<br />

be made. However, <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> redbelly snake generally is found in high-quality forests<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 56


suggests that practices that degrade this natural community, such as livestock grazing, extensive<br />

logging, and fragmentation due to development would be detrimental if <strong>the</strong> species occurs on <strong>the</strong><br />

site.<br />

Smooth earth snake: Virginia valeriae (Baird & Girard)<br />

Past Records. This small, secretive snake is at <strong>the</strong> western edge <strong>of</strong> its range in nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong>.<br />

There are documented occurrences from Leavenworth and all surrounding <strong>Kansas</strong> counties<br />

(Collins 1993). No smooth earth snakes were observed on FLMR by Freeman et al. (1997).<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. Similar to <strong>the</strong> redbelly snake, <strong>the</strong> smooth earth snake lives in<br />

forests and woodlands where it typically occupies rocky slopes and forest margins. Surveys in<br />

<strong>the</strong> forested uplands on FLMR were conducted from April–October 2003 (Table 3.2, Appendix<br />

E). Leaf litter and potential shelter sites (rocks and logs) were searched during periods <strong>of</strong> mild<br />

wea<strong>the</strong>r. No smooth earth snakes were found during this study.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. Habitat for <strong>the</strong> smooth earth snake is limited and<br />

fragmented at FLMR. None<strong>the</strong>less, this snake may occur in rocky woodlands. George Pisani<br />

(University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>), who has conducted research on <strong>the</strong> species in <strong>the</strong> eastern U.S. and who<br />

visited FLMR as part <strong>of</strong> this study, believes <strong>the</strong> rocky bluffs in <strong>the</strong> Maple-Basswood Forest<br />

provide <strong>the</strong> best potential habitat for <strong>the</strong> snake (personal comm.).<br />

Recommendations. Stands <strong>of</strong> upland forest and woodland with rocky substrates should be<br />

maintained. Because this species generally is found in high-quality forests, practices that degrade<br />

or fragment forest habitat are likely to be detrimental to smooth earth snake populations if <strong>the</strong><br />

exist on FLMR.<br />

Spring peeper: Pseudacris crucifer (Wied)<br />

Past Records. Collins (1993) states that Ft. Leavenworth is <strong>the</strong> type locality for this frog, but<br />

Rundquist (1977) suggests <strong>the</strong> type collection comes from ano<strong>the</strong>r location. O<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> type<br />

collection, <strong>the</strong>re are no o<strong>the</strong>r reports <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species from Leavenworth County. Recent surveys<br />

on FLMR yielded no populations <strong>of</strong> spring peepers (Simon 1988, Simon and Dorlac 1990). The<br />

populations nearest to FLMR are in Miami County, <strong>Kansas</strong> (Collins 1993).<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. The spring peeper inhabits woodlands and generally is found<br />

near ponds and marshes that lack fish (Collins 1993). Limited suitable habitat is present on<br />

FLMR. It was surveyed in 2003, but no chorusing frogs were heard. However, conditions during<br />

<strong>the</strong> spring were unusually dry, and few temporary wetlands held water. In general, breeding<br />

activity by all anurans was reduced or absent on FLMR in 2003.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. It is unlikely that this frog exists in Leavenworth County<br />

due to <strong>the</strong> fact that it is outside <strong>the</strong> known species range.<br />

Recommendations. None.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 57


White-faced ibis: Plegadis chihi (Vieillot)<br />

Past Records. This large waterbird has been recorded at scattered sites throughout <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

(Thompson and Ely 1989). It breeds at Cheyenne Bottoms and Quivira National Wildlife Refuge<br />

in central <strong>Kansas</strong>. Individuals recently summered at <strong>the</strong> Benedictine Bottoms along <strong>the</strong> Missouri<br />

River in Atchison County (Busby and Zimmerman 2001), and birds have been seen in May flying<br />

over FLMR (J. Schukman personal comm.).<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. The white-faced ibis normally inhabits open wetlands where it<br />

probes for food with its long bill. Cat-tail stands provide nesting sites. Little permanent, suitable<br />

habitat for this species occurs on FLMR, and no surveys were conducted.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. As with o<strong>the</strong>r migratory birds, this species occasionally may<br />

pass over <strong>the</strong> area. This is one <strong>of</strong> many wetland bird species that might breed at FLMR if<br />

bottomland wetlands were restored.<br />

Recommendations. Restoration <strong>of</strong> marsh habitat in <strong>the</strong> floodplain <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri River might<br />

attract this and o<strong>the</strong>r wetland birds to <strong>the</strong> area.<br />

Species Accounts–<strong>Kansas</strong> Species in Need <strong>of</strong> Conservation (SINC)<br />

Black tern: Chlidonias niger (Linnaeus)<br />

Past Records. This small tern is a regular migrant through <strong>Kansas</strong>, and <strong>the</strong>re are numerous<br />

records from nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong> (Thompson and Ely 1989). With few exceptions, this species<br />

breeds north <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>. Unconfirmed sightings <strong>of</strong> black terns have been made at FLMR during<br />

migration (J. Schukman personal comm.).<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. This prairie species and can be found during migration far from<br />

large lakes and wetlands. It <strong>of</strong>ten feeds on flying insects over ponds and streams (Thompson and<br />

Ely 1989). No surveys were conducted, and no incidental sightings <strong>of</strong> this species were made.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. The black tern probably passes over FLMR occasionally<br />

during migration.<br />

Recommendations. None.<br />

Cerulean warbler: Dendroica cerulea (Wilson)<br />

Past Records. The cerulean warbler is a rare migrant and local breeder in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

(Thompson and Ely 1992) where it is at <strong>the</strong> extreme western edge <strong>of</strong> its breeding range. The<br />

species is a summer resident and probable breeder at FLMR in mature Pecan-Hackberry and<br />

Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forests, where is occurs in low densities, <strong>of</strong>ten in association<br />

with two o<strong>the</strong>r canopy warblers, <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn parula and yellow-throated warbler (Schukman<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 58


1996, Freeman et al. 1997).<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. Breeding habitat in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong> consists <strong>of</strong> bottomland<br />

hardwood forest in areas with large trees and a broken canopy (Hands et al. 1989, Hamel 2000).<br />

J. Schukman and W. Busby conducted surveys in 2002 and 2003 using a strip-plot method<br />

(Emlen 1984) as implemented by Schukman (1996). Only one cerulean warbler was detected<br />

during <strong>the</strong> surveys (Table 3.7). During o<strong>the</strong>r 2003 visits to this same old-growth forest, cerulean<br />

warblers were encountered (3 May and 25 May-1 singing male; 9 June-2 singing males).<br />

Breeding season distribution <strong>of</strong> this species on FLMR is shown in Figure 3.4.<br />

TABLE 3.7. Results <strong>of</strong> strip-plot surveys for canopy-dwelling warblers in old-growth forest at<br />

FLMR in 2002–2003. Routes are described in Schukman (1996).<br />

Date American redstart nor<strong>the</strong>rn parula<br />

yellow-throated<br />

warbler<br />

cerulean warbler Route<br />

2002-05-02 44 10 5 0 standard<br />

2002-05-26 38 5 6 0 standard<br />

2003-04-24 1 12 9 0 standard<br />

2003-05-25 38 6 10 1 standard<br />

2003-06-13 Not counted 3 19 0 nor<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. This presence <strong>of</strong> this species on FLMR was confirmed.<br />

However, its numbers are low and it may not be present every year. This is <strong>the</strong> only known,<br />

regular breeding site for this bird in nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong> (KSNHI unpublished data).<br />

Recommendations. Maintenance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> large tracts <strong>of</strong> mature bottomland forest is essential.<br />

Cerulean warblers are sensitive to forest fragmentation. Extensive logging or disturbance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

mature bottomland forest probably would eliminate populations from FLMR.<br />

Eastern chipmunk: Tamias striatus (Linnaeus)<br />

Past Records. The eastern chipmunk ranges across much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> eastern U.S., west to extreme<br />

eastern <strong>Kansas</strong>. This species is known in <strong>Kansas</strong> counties along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River, including<br />

Leavenworth (Bee et al. 1981). Brumwell (1951) observed a single animal in oak-hickory forest<br />

in <strong>the</strong> vicinity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sherman Army Airfield. Chipmunks were reported at seven upland sites by<br />

Freeman et al. (1997).<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. The eastern chipmunk inhabits deciduous forest and forest edge<br />

habitat where fallen logs, rock ledges, rock outcrops, and o<strong>the</strong>r structures <strong>of</strong>fers protected sites<br />

for burrows. The White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest on FLMR is well suited to this species.<br />

Chipmunks were observed at a number <strong>of</strong> sites during this study (Figure 3.5). Most observations<br />

were from upland forest, although chipmunks occur in floodplain forests.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. The large number <strong>of</strong> sightings in recent years contrasts to<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 59


<strong>the</strong> single record reported by Brumwell (1951). This suggests that eastern chipmunk populations<br />

may have expanded greatly on FLMR during <strong>the</strong> past 50 years.<br />

Recommendations. Existing stands <strong>of</strong> oak-hickory forest on FLMR should be maintained. This<br />

species is fairly tolerant <strong>of</strong> forest fragmentation and may utilize habitat in disturbed woodlands.<br />

Franklin’s ground squirrel: Spermophilus franklinii (Sabine)<br />

Past Records. Franklin’s ground squirrel is known historically from scattered sites in more than<br />

a dozen counties in <strong>the</strong> eastern half <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>, including Leavenworth (Bee et al. 1981).<br />

Brumwell (1951) reported a colony <strong>of</strong> a dozen or fewer individuals on <strong>the</strong> bank <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri<br />

River opposite Grant Hill. This squirrel has experienced widespread declines in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn part<br />

<strong>of</strong> its range, including <strong>Kansas</strong> and Missouri (Pergrams and Nyberg 2003). No recent records are<br />

known from FLMR or from nor<strong>the</strong>astern <strong>Kansas</strong>.<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. This mammal typically occupies prairie-forest ecotones, building<br />

burrows in dense grass, weedy fields, wasteland, and shrubby forest edges (Bee et al. 1981,<br />

Schwartz and Schwartz 1981). Surveys were not conducted for this species, and no individuals<br />

were observed during this study. Davis (2003) was unable to find any Franklin’s ground<br />

squirrels in his study at FLMR.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. With <strong>the</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> most grassland vegetation on FLMR,<br />

suitable habitat virtually has been eliminated. It is probable that Franklin’s ground squirrel has<br />

been extirpated on <strong>the</strong> installation.<br />

Recommendations. If nearby populations are discovered, additional surveys for this species<br />

should be conducted on FLMR.<br />

Red-shouldered hawk: Buteo lineatus Gmelin<br />

Past Records. This hawk is a local, uncommon, summer resident and transient in <strong>the</strong> eastern<br />

quarter <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>. Records exist for Leavenworth and most surrounding counties (Thompson<br />

and Ely 1989). However, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se individuals probably are transients. Few summer records<br />

exist for nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong> (Busby and Zimmerman 2001, KSNHI unpublished data). Brumwell<br />

(1951) reported a nesting pair in a cottonwood tree near <strong>the</strong> upper reaches <strong>of</strong> Corral Creek on<br />

FLMR. Red-shouldered hawks were not observed by Freeman et al. (1997), but <strong>the</strong>y were<br />

recorded at MAPS banding stations in <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s, including one bird at <strong>the</strong> Weston Bend<br />

North site on 24 June 1995 and 15 June 1996, and at <strong>the</strong> Weston Bend South site on 11 June<br />

1996 (Institute for Bird Populations unpublished data).<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. This hawk favors wooded floodplains and wetlands, and FLMR<br />

appears to <strong>of</strong>fer excellent habitat. One bird was detected in <strong>the</strong> mature floodplain forest near <strong>the</strong><br />

great blue heron colony on 9 June 2003 (Figure 3.6). Observations <strong>of</strong> red-shouldered hawks<br />

during <strong>the</strong> breeding season suggest a breeding pair occurs on or near FLMR.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 60


Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. Red-shouldered hawks were confirmed on FLMR. It is<br />

unclear if <strong>the</strong> birds breeds on <strong>the</strong> installation or are transients. Suitable habitat is present, and<br />

surveys should continue to determine if this species breeds in <strong>the</strong> area.<br />

Recommendations. Floodplain forests on FLMR should be maintained. Floodplain pools and<br />

wetlands provide important foraging habitat for this species, and accordingly, <strong>the</strong>se features<br />

should be maintained and restored.<br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>rn flying squirrel: Glaucomys volans (Linnaeus)<br />

Past Records. The sou<strong>the</strong>rn flying squirrel is widespread in <strong>the</strong> eastern U.S., reaching <strong>the</strong><br />

western limit its range in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong>. About a dozen occurrences are known in <strong>Kansas</strong>, most<br />

<strong>of</strong> which are in <strong>the</strong> two easternmost tiers <strong>of</strong> counties (KSNHI unpublished data), including<br />

Leavenworth (Bee et al. 1981). Brumwell (1951) reported a squirrel killed by workmen while<br />

felling a tree on FLMR. Five specimens labeled “West bank Missouri River, Ft. Leavenworth”<br />

with collection dates <strong>of</strong> 1 January-14 March 1955 are deposited in <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

Museum <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> History.<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. This small, nocturnal squirrel inhabits deciduous and mixed<br />

forests, particularly beech-maple, oak-hickory, and poplar. Mature, closed-canopy forests near<br />

water are preferred. Squirrels readily use nest boxes and abandoned bird and squirrel nests. Nest<br />

boxes were used to survey for <strong>the</strong> species in floodplain and upland forests on FLMR. Three<br />

series <strong>of</strong> nest boxes (four boxes per site) were installed on 5 December 2002 and checked in<br />

April and November 2003 (Figure 3.1). No flying squirrels were found using nest boxes. Davis<br />

(2003) trapped unsuccessfully for this species on <strong>the</strong> installation. However, one sou<strong>the</strong>rn flying<br />

squirrel was captured while netting bats near <strong>the</strong> Boy Scout Camp on 2 June 2003 (C. Davis<br />

personal comm.). Sightings in 2003 include one animal on 3 May on <strong>the</strong> River Trail by S.<br />

Seltman (personal comm.) and reports by bow hunters in <strong>the</strong> cottonwood forest north <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

airfield (C. Davis personal comm.).<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. Flying squirrels were found during this study, with one<br />

confirmed record in White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest and several observations in <strong>the</strong><br />

floodplain forests. Limited records indicate that <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn flying squirrel is an uncommon<br />

resident in larger forest tracts on <strong>the</strong> installation.<br />

Recommendations. Mature forest stands on <strong>the</strong> installation should be maintained. Additional<br />

surveys should be carried out if more detailed information about this species’ distribution and<br />

abundance is needed.<br />

Timber rattlesnake: Crotalus horridus Linneaus<br />

Past Records. The timber rattlesnake, <strong>the</strong> largest venomous snake in <strong>Kansas</strong>, is restricted in<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> to counties in <strong>the</strong> eastern quarter. Specimens have been collected in Leavenworth and all<br />

surrounding <strong>Kansas</strong> counties (Collins 1993). Brumwell (1951) reported <strong>the</strong> species from Corral<br />

Creek, Government Hill, and o<strong>the</strong>r locations on FLMR. The Pest Control <strong>of</strong>fice has one timber<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 61


attlesnake specimen collected near <strong>the</strong> Missouri River along Sherman Avenue between Meade<br />

and Reynolds Avenues (date unknown). Simon and Dorlac (1990) listed <strong>the</strong> species as occurring<br />

on <strong>the</strong> installation. This rattlesnake was not observed by Freeman et al. (1997).<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. Timber rattlesnakes typically occur in open woodlands with rock<br />

outcrops. Suitable habitat is found in upland forest and woodlands at FLMR, but suitable rock<br />

substrates are limited. Searches were conducted for timber rattlesnakes on forested uplands,<br />

especially where rock outcrops were present (Appendix E). No animals were found on FLMR by<br />

KBS personnel, but a large road-killed male was collected 16 September 2003 on US 73 at <strong>the</strong><br />

west entrance to <strong>the</strong> post. Ano<strong>the</strong>r road-killed specimen was observed in June 2003 on KS 92<br />

near Sunset Memorial Gardens which is 4 km (2.5 mi) southwest <strong>of</strong> FLMR.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. Records indicate that <strong>the</strong> timber rattlesnake is present in low<br />

densities. Habitat fragmentation and human activity probably preclude healthy timber rattlesnake<br />

populations. This snake grows slowly, has a low reproductive rate, and suffers from human<br />

persecution. It tends to disappear as development pressure increases.<br />

Recommendations. Stands <strong>of</strong> White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest on FLMR should be<br />

maintained. Habitat fragmentation should be avoided if timber rattlesnake populations are to be<br />

maintained. This species is sensitive to human disturbance.<br />

Whip-poor-will: Caprimulgus vociferus (Wilson)<br />

Past Records. The whip-poor-will is a locally common transient and summer resident in eastern<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> (Thompson and Ely 1989). Brumwell (1951) reported it was common on <strong>the</strong> installation<br />

during <strong>the</strong> summer. Freeman et al. (1997) observed <strong>the</strong> species in upland forests on <strong>the</strong><br />

installation.<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. Whip-poor-wills are ground-nesting birds <strong>of</strong> upland forests and<br />

woodlands. Suitable habitat is present on wooded slopes on FLMR. This species was observed<br />

in May 2002 along Sheridan Drive. Systematic surveys for this species were not conducted.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. Suitable habitat exists, and <strong>the</strong> species was confirmed on<br />

FLMR during this study. Whip-poor-wills appear to be common breeders on upland slopes in<br />

<strong>the</strong> larger tracts <strong>of</strong> forest.<br />

Recommendations. Stands <strong>of</strong> White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest should be maintained. This<br />

species is vulnerable to high levels <strong>of</strong> predation along forest edges and in proximity to human<br />

development because <strong>of</strong> its ground-nesting habit. Activities promoting forest fragmentation<br />

should be avoided.<br />

Yellow-throated warbler: Dendroica dominica (Linneaus)<br />

Past Records. The yellow-throated warbler is a rare migrant and local breeder in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

(Thompson and Ely 1992), where it is at <strong>the</strong> extreme northwest edge <strong>of</strong> its breeding range.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 62


FLMR is <strong>the</strong> only site in nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong> where <strong>the</strong> warbler occurs regularly as a summer<br />

resident (KSNHI unpublished data). A population exists in <strong>the</strong> old-growth bottomland forest on<br />

FLMR (Schukman and Mouras 1992, Schukman 1996, Freeman et al. 1997).<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. Breeding habitat in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong> consists <strong>of</strong> mature riparian<br />

forest containing large sycamore trees. Strip-plot surveys conducted in 2002 and 2003 yielded a<br />

number <strong>of</strong> records (Table 3.7). Territorial males also were observed in May 2003 adjacent to <strong>the</strong><br />

Maple-Basswood Forest and in June 2003 in mid-successional Cottonwood-Sycamore<br />

Floodplain Forest north <strong>of</strong> Rialto Trail (tail dike trail). This latter tract <strong>of</strong> forest contains few<br />

large sycamores, and numbers <strong>of</strong> yellow-throated warblers <strong>the</strong>re appear to be low. The area <strong>of</strong><br />

FLMR occupied by <strong>the</strong> yellow-throated warbler is shown in Figure 3.4.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. The yellow-throated warbler was confirmed as a summer<br />

resident on FLMR. The species is widespread in bottomland forest on <strong>the</strong> installation, especially<br />

where large sycamores are present. The largest population is in old-growth forest east <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Sherman Army Airfield. Smaller populations on <strong>the</strong> river floodplain are found north <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

airfield adjacent to Maple-Basswood Forest and in <strong>the</strong> mid-successional Cottonwood-Sycamore<br />

Floodplain Forest.<br />

Recommendations. Mature bottomland forest on <strong>the</strong> Missouri River floodplain should be<br />

maintained, especially those that support large sycamore trees.<br />

Species Accounts–Former Federal Candidate Species<br />

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service eliminated its lists <strong>of</strong> Category 2 and Category 3 species in<br />

1996. Discussed below are some former Category 2 species that originally were to be included in<br />

this study. Because <strong>the</strong>y no longer have special federal or state status, targeted surveys for <strong>the</strong>se<br />

species were not conducted.<br />

Clanton's cave amphipod: Stygobromus clantoni (Creaser)<br />

Past Records. Clanton's cave amphipod is a subterranean crustacean known from 10–20 sites in<br />

east-central <strong>Kansas</strong> and west-central Missouri. The population closest to FLMR is in a spring in<br />

Franklin County, <strong>Kansas</strong> (Busby and Dan<strong>of</strong>f-Burg 1992).<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. This species is found in underground waters in <strong>the</strong> Flint Hills<br />

and Osage Cuestas physiographic provinces in areas with limestone and shale substrates. Survey<br />

methods consist <strong>of</strong> visually searching cave streams and by placing baited traps into open wells.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. Leavenworth County is approximately 48 km (30 mi) north<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> known range <strong>of</strong> Clanton's cave amphipod. The installation appears to lack suitable habitat<br />

for this species, but <strong>the</strong> habitat requirements <strong>of</strong> Clanton’s cave amphipod are poorly known.<br />

Recommendations. None.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 63


Loggerhead shrike: Lanius ludovicianus Linnaeus<br />

Past Records. This small, predatory bird is an uncommon migrant and summer resident in<br />

eastern <strong>Kansas</strong> (Thompson and Ely 1992). There are numerous records for Leavenworth County<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>r sites nor<strong>the</strong>astern <strong>Kansas</strong>. Loggerheads shrikes were observed on FLMR in <strong>the</strong> 1990s<br />

(J. Schukman personal comm., Freeman et al. 1997), <strong>the</strong> latter reporting <strong>the</strong>m at three locations<br />

in <strong>the</strong> Missouri River floodplain.<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. Shrikes prefer grasslands and o<strong>the</strong>r open habitats with scattered<br />

trees and large shrubs that are used for foraging perches and nesting sites (Thompson and Ely<br />

1992). Short grass and herbaceous cover is preferred over tall, dense vegetation. Shrike habitat<br />

is limited on FLMR. Sites where shrikes were observed in 1995–1996 were revisited in this<br />

study, but none was found. O<strong>the</strong>r observers have not seen loggerhead shrike in <strong>the</strong> past few<br />

years on FLMR (J. Schukman personal comm.).<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. The absence <strong>of</strong> recent shrike sightings may be due to<br />

regional population declines unrelated to conditions on <strong>the</strong> post. Alternatively, recent changes in<br />

land management at Sherman Army Airfield may have reduced habitat suitability for this species<br />

by converting mowed grassland and cropland to taller vegetation that is not suitable for shrikes.<br />

Recommendations. Shrike habitat could be improved by creating more short vegetation by<br />

mowing fields near <strong>the</strong> airfield. However, <strong>the</strong> advantages <strong>of</strong> this need to be weighed against <strong>the</strong><br />

preferences <strong>of</strong> many o<strong>the</strong>r wildlife species for tall vegetation.<br />

Regal fritillary butterfly: Speyeria idalia (Drury)<br />

Past Records. This large, colorful butterfly is found in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong> and western Missouri (Ely<br />

et al. 1986). Specimens are known from Leavenworth County.<br />

Available Habitat and Surveys. The regal fritillary is found in prairies, where <strong>the</strong> larvae feed on<br />

violets. It can persist on small prairie remnants and is a good disperser. Very little suitable<br />

habitat exists on FLMR, and no surveys were conducted.<br />

Potential for Occurrence on FLMR. It is unlikely that this butterfly reproduces on <strong>the</strong> installation<br />

because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extremely limited amount <strong>of</strong> suitable habitat. Dispersing individuals occasionally<br />

may find <strong>the</strong>ir way onto <strong>the</strong> installation.<br />

Recommendations. If existing prairie remnants are managed and expanded, it is possible that<br />

sufficient habitat on FLMR could be restored to support populations <strong>of</strong> this butterfly.<br />

Species Accounts–O<strong>the</strong>r Rare Species<br />

Three state-rare species tracked by KSNHI, but which lack protection under federal or state<br />

endangered species laws, were documented during this study or in <strong>the</strong> previous <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

Biological Survey study (Freeman et al. 1997).<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 64


A Broad-winged hawk, Buteo platypterus (Vieillot), was seen in 1995 in <strong>the</strong> oak-hickory forest<br />

in <strong>the</strong> vicinity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> National Cemetery (Freeman et al. 1997). This species was observed in<br />

2002–2003 in <strong>the</strong> same general vicinity (Figure 3.6). Nesting has not been confirmed but it is<br />

likely that a pair is nesting somewhere between <strong>the</strong> National Cemetery and Hancock Hill.<br />

The great egret, Ardea alba (Linnaeus), has nested at FLMR from about 1992 to at least 1996 in<br />

<strong>the</strong> large colony <strong>of</strong> great blue herons in <strong>the</strong> mature floodplain forest (Figure 3.6). However, none<br />

was observed in this study. This is a conspicuous bird, so it probably was not present <strong>the</strong>se two<br />

years, a fact perhaps related to drought conditions that may have reduced foraging habitat.<br />

Ovenbirds, Seiurus aurocapillus (Linnaeus) were recorded at two sites in upland forest in 1995–<br />

1996 (Figure 3.6). This large, ground-nesting warbler occurs most <strong>of</strong>ten in large tracts <strong>of</strong> dry,<br />

upland woods with abundant leaf litter. Ovenbirds were not observed in 2002–2003.<br />

Faunistic Surveys<br />

Herpetological Survey. A report on a survey <strong>of</strong> snakes on FLMR is presented in Appendix E.<br />

In addition to that survey, o<strong>the</strong>r records were ga<strong>the</strong>red <strong>of</strong> reptiles and amphibians encountered<br />

while conducting targeted surveys for protected species. Reptile and amphibian site locations are<br />

summarized in Figure 3.7. Most records are described in Appendix E.<br />

Floodplain Point Counts for Birds. Results <strong>of</strong> fixed-radius and unlimited-distance point counts<br />

for birds in three forest types (Figure 3.3) along a successional gradient are summarized in Table<br />

3.8. Species richness was highest in <strong>the</strong> old-growth forest (43 species, unlimited distance; 36<br />

species, fixed-radius), lowest in <strong>the</strong> mid-successional forest (36 species, unlimited distance; 29<br />

species, fixed-radius), and intermediate in <strong>the</strong> early successional forest. Species composition<br />

exhibited high overlap among forest types, but each forest type had some unique species or at<br />

least some species whose relative abundance varied markedly with forest type. Species recorded<br />

only in old-growth forest included <strong>the</strong> red-shouldered hawk, yellow-throated warbler, and parula<br />

warbler. Species more abundant in this forest type included <strong>the</strong> pileated woodpecker, Acadian<br />

flycatcher, Carolina wren, and wood thrush. As expected, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se birds prefer mature,<br />

closed-canopy forest. Species unique to early successional forest were open country or edgedwelling<br />

birds such as <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn bobwhite, eastern kingbird, eastern bluebird, brown thrasher,<br />

yellow warbler, and orchard oriole. As expected from its intermediate successional condition, <strong>the</strong><br />

mid-successional forest had no species unique to it, and <strong>the</strong> relative abundance <strong>of</strong> most species<br />

was intermediate between <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r two forest types. The only species that was markedly more<br />

common in mid-successional forest was warbling vireo, a species that prefers large cottonwoods.<br />

All three floodplain forest types support a relatively high diversity and density <strong>of</strong> breeding birds<br />

and contribute substantially to <strong>the</strong> native, avifaunal diversity <strong>of</strong> FLMR. However, it should be<br />

pointed out that <strong>the</strong> conservation status <strong>of</strong> different bird species does vary (Partners in Flight<br />

2003). Higher priority species in Bird Conservation Region 22 (Eastern Tallgrass Prairie) that<br />

are found in <strong>the</strong> FLMR floodplain forest include, from higher to lower scores, cerulean warbler,<br />

red-headed woodpecker, wood thrush, prothonotary warbler, Acadian flycatcher, orchard oriole,<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 65


and brown thrasher. The habitat preferences <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species as a whole represent a broad habitat<br />

spectrum from savanna/shrub to closed canopy forest, but <strong>the</strong> majority prefers mature forest, a<br />

fact that highlights <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> protecting old-growth forest at FLMR.<br />

TABLE 3.8. Results <strong>of</strong> point counts for birds conducted in June 2003 in three floodplain forest<br />

types on FLMR. Data are mean number <strong>of</strong> individuals detected during 10-minute counts (n = 13<br />

counts per forest type). Data exclude birds flying above <strong>the</strong> canopy during <strong>the</strong> counts. Scientific<br />

names are given in Appendix B.<br />

Species Old-growth Mid- Early-<br />

Successional Successional Old-growth<br />

Mid- Early -<br />

Successional Successional<br />

Unlimited distance Fixed distance (50 m radius)<br />

mean indiv. mean indiv. mean indiv. mean indiv. mean indiv. mean indiv.<br />

great blue heron 0.462 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />

red-shouldered hawk 0.077 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />

turkey vulture 0.077 0.000 0.000 0.077 0.000 0.000<br />

ring-necked pheasant 0.000 0.000 0.154 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />

wild turkey 0.231 0.000 0.077 0.154 0.000 0.077<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn bobwhite 0.000 0.000 0.385 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />

mourning dove 0.385 0.769 0.385 0.077 0.000 0.000<br />

yellow-billed cuckoo 0.538 0.769 0.538 0.000 0.308 0.308<br />

red-headed woodpecker 0.538 0.385 0.231 0.077 0.000 0.154<br />

red-bellied woodpecker 1.385 1.615 0.769 0.385 0.231 0.000<br />

downy woodpecker 0.538 0.538 0.692 0.077 0.385 0.308<br />

hairy woodpecker 0.154 0.385 0.077 0.154 0.000 0.077<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn flicker 0.154 0.462 0.462 0.000 0.077 0.154<br />

pileated woodpecker 0.462 0.154 0.000 0.154 0.077 0.000<br />

eastern wood-pewee 1.000 0.538 0.462 0.231 0.000 0.308<br />

Acadian flycatcher 0.615 0.385 0.000 0.231 0.231 0.000<br />

great crested flycatcher 1.385 0.462 0.385 0.769 0.308 0.385<br />

eastern kingbird 0.000 0.000 0.154 0.000 0.000 0.154<br />

yellow-throated vireo 0.077 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />

warbling vireo 0.308 1.308 2.154 0.000 0.538 1.154<br />

red-eyed vireo 1.077 1.231 0.615 0.615 0.538 0.154<br />

blue jay 0.769 0.462 0.615 0.231 0.000 0.385<br />

American crow 0.000 0.385 0.769 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />

black-capped chickadee 0.769 0.462 0.462 0.615 0.231 0.308<br />

tufted titmouse 0.615 0.231 0.308 0.231 0.231 0.231<br />

white-breasted nuthatch 0.846 0.769 0.000 0.308 0.462 0.000<br />

Carolina wren 0.462 0.538 0.077 0.154 0.231 0.000<br />

house wren 1.538 1.385 1.615 0.846 0.923 0.923<br />

blue-gray gnatcatcher 0.154 0.000 0.000 0.154 0.000 0.000<br />

eastern bluebird 0.000 0.000 0.154 0.000 0.000 0.154<br />

wood thrush 1.615 0.615 0.077 0.385 0.154 0.000<br />

American robin 0.000 0.000 0.154 0.000 0.000 0.077<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 66


Species Old-growth Mid- Early-<br />

Successional Successional Old-growth<br />

Mid- Early -<br />

Successional Successional<br />

Unlimited distance Fixed distance (50 m radius)<br />

mean indiv. mean indiv. mean indiv. mean indiv. mean indiv. mean indiv.<br />

gray catbird 1.923 0.615 0.769 1.231 0.308 0.615<br />

brown thrasher 0.000 0.000 0.154 0.000 0.000 0.077<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn parula 0.923 0.000 0.000 0.385 0.000 0.000<br />

yellow-throated warbler 0.923 0.000 0.000 0.385 0.000 0.000<br />

American redstart 2.308 1.846 1.615 1.462 1.077 0.846<br />

prothonotary warbler 0.077 0.231 0.000 0.077 0.000 0.000<br />

common yellowthroat 0.000 0.615 1.769 0.000 0.308 1.231<br />

yellow-breasted chat 0.000 0.000 0.077 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />

scarlet tanager 0.077 0.000 0.000 0.077 0.000 0.000<br />

eastern towhee 0.077 0.385 0.538 0.077 0.154 0.154<br />

lark sparrow 0.000 0.000 0.154 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn cardinal 1.077 1.615 1.385 0.615 0.846 0.538<br />

rose-breasted grosbeak 2.846 2.077 0.846 1.154 1.231 0.385<br />

indigo bunting 0.231 1.154 2.000 0.154 0.385 1.385<br />

red-winged blackbird 0.000 0.154 0.615 0.000 0.000 0.154<br />

eastern meadowlark 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000<br />

common grackle 0.000 0.077 0.000 0.000 0.077 0.000<br />

brown-headed cowbird 0.308 0.308 1.154 0.077 0.077 0.462<br />

orchard oriole 0.000 0.000 0.692 0.000 0.000 0.462<br />

Baltimore oriole 0.308 0.923 1.077 0.231 0.615 0.692<br />

American goldfinch 0.000 0.000 0.615 0.000 0.000 0.308<br />

Species Count 43 36 42 36 29 33<br />

Vertebrate Species Overview. A list <strong>of</strong> vertebrates for FLMR is presented in Appendix B, and<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> species in each taxonomic class are summarized in Table 3.9. Of 428 vertebrate<br />

species considered potentially to occur on FLMR, 323 (75%) have been confirmed, and 292<br />

(68%) have been confirmed since 1995. The high proportion <strong>of</strong> recently documented species is a<br />

consequence <strong>of</strong> this and o<strong>the</strong>r studies conducted in recent years at FLMR (see citations in<br />

Appendix B). Greater attention has been devoted to birds and mammals. Consequently, <strong>the</strong><br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> recently confirmed species in <strong>the</strong>se two groups (80% and 77%, respectively) is<br />

higher than that <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r classes. The low proportion <strong>of</strong> recently confirmed fishes (30%) is<br />

attributable in part to <strong>the</strong> limited attention given to this class <strong>of</strong> organisms on <strong>the</strong> installation.<br />

3.4. SUMMARY<br />

Surveys for rare and protected animals at FLMR during 2002 and 2003 revealed few changes<br />

from <strong>the</strong> findings reported by Freeman et al. (1997) As reported in that study, one federally<br />

protected species, <strong>the</strong> bald eagle, is a regular migrant and winter resident on FLMR. Four species<br />

<strong>of</strong> federally protected birds may migrate through <strong>the</strong> area, but nesting and/or foraging habitat for<br />

<strong>the</strong>se species is limited or absent. They include <strong>the</strong> Eskimo curlew, least tern, piping plover, and<br />

whooping crane. Due to <strong>the</strong> recent delisting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> peregrine falcon, <strong>the</strong>re is one less federally<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 67


TABLE 3.9. Number <strong>of</strong> vertebrate species known to occur or potentially occurring on FLMR<br />

based on data in Appendix B. Recently confirmed = species reported since 1995; Total<br />

confirmed = includes records prior to 1995; and All categories = includes species <strong>of</strong> possible,<br />

probable, and confirmed occurrence on FLMR.<br />

Class Recently confirmed Total confirmed All categories<br />

Mammals 40 44 52<br />

Birds 205 218 258<br />

Reptiles 20 30 39<br />

Amphibians 7 11 12<br />

Fishes 20 20 67<br />

Total 292 323 428<br />

protected bird species on FLMR than was reported in Freeman et al. (1997). The federally<br />

endangered pallid sturgeon, was documented in <strong>the</strong> Missouri <strong>Kansas</strong> River at FLMR in 2003.<br />

Two o<strong>the</strong>r federally endangered species, Indiana bat and American burying beetle, were not<br />

found during this study.<br />

No state-listed threatened and endangered species were documented during this study. The<br />

white-faced ibis, a state-threatened bird, may make infrequent, brief stops at FLMR during<br />

migration. Five <strong>Kansas</strong> SINCs were documented in 2003. Two SINC mammals, eastern<br />

chipmunk and sou<strong>the</strong>rn flying squirrel, are resident on FLMR. Three SINC neotropical migrant<br />

birds breed on <strong>the</strong> installation: cerulean warbler, yellow-throated warbler, and whip-poor-will. A<br />

fourth SINC bird, <strong>the</strong> red-shouldered hawk, probably breeds on or near FLMR. One additional<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> SINC bird, <strong>the</strong> black tern, infrequently may use habitat on <strong>the</strong> installation.<br />

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has not designated any habitat on FLMR as critical for any <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> species it is charged with protecting. However, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Wildlife and Parks<br />

has designated <strong>the</strong> mainstem <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri River as critical habitat for <strong>the</strong> bald eagle and seven<br />

fish species: chestnut lamprey, Ichthyomyzon castaneus (Girard); pallid sturgeon,<br />

Scaphirhynchus albus (Forbes & Richardson); fla<strong>the</strong>ad chub, Platygobio gracilis (Richardson);<br />

sicklefin chub, Macrhybopsis meeki (Jordan & Evermann); sturgeon chub, Macrhybopsis gelida<br />

(Girard); silverband shiner, Notropis shumardi (Girard); and western silvery minnow,<br />

Hybognathus argyritis (Girard).<br />

Several state-threatened and state-endangered species not found during this study still may occur<br />

on FLMR because <strong>the</strong>re is suitable habitat, including eastern spotted skunk, redbelly snake, and<br />

smooth earth snake. All suitable woodland habitats in Leavenworth County are designated as<br />

critical habitat for <strong>the</strong> redbelly snake and <strong>the</strong> smooth earth snake.<br />

Four state-rare animals with no protective status that were documented on FLMR during this<br />

study. They were <strong>the</strong> broad-winged hawk, Cooper’s hawk, great egret, and ovenbird.<br />

Of 428 species <strong>of</strong> vertebrates considered potentially to occur on <strong>the</strong> installation, 292 species<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 68


(68%) have been confirmed since 1995. Birds and mammals are among <strong>the</strong> vertebrates best<br />

documented. Reptiles and amphibians are less well known, and fishes are <strong>the</strong> least studied<br />

vertebrate group.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 69


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 70


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 71


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 72


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 73


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 74


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 75


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 76


4.1. INTRODUCTION<br />

CHAPTER 4. PLANTS<br />

Caleb A. Morse<br />

R. L. McGregor Herbarium<br />

<strong>Natural</strong> History Museum & Biodiversity Research Center<br />

2045 Constant Avenue<br />

Lawrence, KS 66047-3729<br />

cmorse@ku.edu<br />

Botanical studies on FLMR during <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field seasons consisted <strong>of</strong> five primary<br />

objectives: 1) compile a list <strong>of</strong> protected and rare species <strong>of</strong> plants, 2) plan and conduct surveys<br />

for those species, 3) document all findings <strong>of</strong> threatened and endangered species, 4) compile a<br />

comprehensive report detailing all occurrences <strong>of</strong> protected and rare species and describing<br />

exceptional biological natural areas on <strong>the</strong> installation, and 5) assist in <strong>the</strong> formulation <strong>of</strong><br />

management recommendations based on survey results. In addition, surveys were carried out in<br />

order to ga<strong>the</strong>r baseline data about vascular plants and bryophytes on <strong>the</strong> installation.<br />

No federal-listed vascular plant species were discovered on <strong>the</strong> installation during <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996<br />

field seasons. However, at least one population <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> 11 state-rare vascular plants was<br />

documented. These were Aster lateriflorus (L.) Britton var. lateriflorus (Asteraceae; white<br />

woodland aster), Blephilia hirsuta (Pursh) Benth. (Lamiaceae; hairy wood-mint), Brachyelytrum<br />

erectum (Schreb.) P. Beauv. (Poaceae; upright shorthusk), Bromus nottowayanus Fernald<br />

(Poaceae; Nottoway brome), Hydrophyllum appendiculatum Michx. (Hydrophyllaceae;<br />

notchbract waterleaf), Lithospermum latifolium Michx. (Boraginaceae; American gromwell),<br />

Osmorhiza claytonii (Michx.) C.B. Clarke (Apiaceae; hairy sweet-cicely), Packera glabella<br />

(Poir.) C. Jeffrey (Asteraceae; floodplain ragwort, reported as Senecio glabellus Poir.),<br />

Ranunculus recurvatus Poir. var. recurvatus (Ranunculaceae; eastern hooked buttercup, reported<br />

as Ranunculus recurvatus), Stachys pilosa Nutt. var. arenicola (Britton) G.A. Mulligan & D.B.<br />

Munro (Lamiaceae; marsh hedge-nettle, reported as Stachys palustris L. subsp. pilosa (Nutt.)<br />

Epling.), and Uvularia grandiflora Sm. (Liliaceae; large-flower bellwort). Floristic work on<br />

FLMR surveys confirmed 99 families (88% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total number known from Leavenworth<br />

County), 313 genera (77%), 532 species (68%), and 535 taxa (67%) <strong>of</strong> vascular plants and 17<br />

families, 31 genera, and 42 species <strong>of</strong> bryophytes. Seven species <strong>of</strong> vascular plants and one<br />

species <strong>of</strong> bryophyte were documented in <strong>Kansas</strong> for <strong>the</strong> first time. Preliminary evaluation was<br />

made for several species <strong>of</strong> exotic vascular plants documented on FLMR, with an assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> potential threats posed by each species to natural communities on <strong>the</strong> installation.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field seasons, emphasis was placed on identification <strong>of</strong> outstanding<br />

terrestrial natural areas supporting protected and rare species. In contrast, during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field<br />

season, fieldwork was directed towards refining knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vascular plant flora <strong>of</strong> FLMR,<br />

and documenting <strong>the</strong> persistence and extent <strong>of</strong> populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state-rare vascular plant species<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 77


previously reported from <strong>the</strong> installation. In addition, suitable habitat was resurveyed for three<br />

federal-listed vascular plant species and 24 state-rare vascular plant species discussed by<br />

Freeman et al. (1997) but undocumented on <strong>the</strong> installation during <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field seasons.<br />

4.2. METHODS<br />

Plant surveys were carried out during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season on FLMR between 6 May and 11<br />

November. Techniques follow those described by Freeman et al. (1997). These comprised<br />

efforts to refine and elaborate on <strong>the</strong> vascular flora presented by those authors as Appendices A<br />

and B, resurvey for three federal-listed vascular plant species, document <strong>the</strong> persistence and<br />

extent <strong>of</strong> populations <strong>of</strong> 11 state-rare vascular plant species previously reported from FLMR, and<br />

survey for <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> 24 state-rare vascular plant species discussed by Freeman et al. (1997)<br />

but undocumented on <strong>the</strong> installation.<br />

4.3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION<br />

Plant surveys <strong>of</strong> more than 17 sites were performed by C. C. Freeman and C. A. Morse on 16<br />

days, for a total <strong>of</strong> 120 person hours (Table 4.1). Many more sites were checked briefly on foot<br />

(survey time < 30 minutes) but are not reported here. Emphasis was placed on documenting taxa<br />

for <strong>the</strong> installation that were excluded from <strong>the</strong> floristic list produced by Freeman et al. (1997),<br />

resurveying for three federally protected plant species identified as potentially occurring by<br />

Freeman et al. (1997), and documenting <strong>the</strong> distribution and extent <strong>of</strong> populations <strong>of</strong> 11 state-rare<br />

vascular species identified as occurring on <strong>the</strong> installation during <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field seasons.<br />

Plant surveys were carried out in a diversity <strong>of</strong> sites in an effort to expand <strong>the</strong> floristic list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

installation. In all, 267 specimens <strong>of</strong> vascular plants and bryophytes were collected. Data for <strong>the</strong><br />

vascular flora <strong>of</strong> Leavenworth County were acquired using <strong>the</strong> R. L. McGregor Collection<br />

Management Information System and <strong>the</strong>se, along with data from FLMR, were reanalyzed for<br />

comparison with results presented by Freeman et al. (1997).<br />

TABLE 4.1. Summary <strong>of</strong> dates, areas surveyed for vascular plant species, effort, and results<br />

during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season on FLMR. Survey duration (time) is in person-hours for work<br />

performed by C. C. Freeman and C. A. Morse only; work performed by H. Loring is recorded<br />

elsewhere in this report.<br />

Date Location Time Notes<br />

2003-05-06 39.3715°N, 94.9319°W; ENE <strong>of</strong> Hancock Hill<br />

at Fort de Cavagnial Picnic Area<br />

39.3611°N, 94.9302°W; around Girl Scout<br />

Camp Conestoga<br />

2003-05-13 39.3656°N, 94.9364°W; near water reservoir,<br />

ca 0.5 mi NE Bell Point and ca 0.25 mi<br />

Hancock Hill<br />

39.3733°– 39.3786°N, 94.9061°W; N side <strong>of</strong><br />

Sherman Army Airfield, just S <strong>of</strong> Weston<br />

Bend <strong>of</strong> Missouri River<br />

2 C. C. Freeman: survey White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest on hills<br />

and bluffs above Missouri River and disturbed areas along roads and<br />

trails; document populations <strong>of</strong> Ranunculus recurvatus var.<br />

recurvatus. Collections 19748–19753.<br />

1 C. C. Freeman: survey White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest and<br />

disturbed areas. Collections 19754–19756.<br />

3 C. A. Morse, C. C. Freeman & W. D. Kettle: survey disturbed White<br />

oak-Shagbark hickory Forest on moderate, NE-facing slopes;<br />

document populations <strong>of</strong> Carex hitchcockiana, Carex rosea, and<br />

Uvularia grandiflora. Collections 9367–9379.<br />

3 C.A. Morse, C. C. Freeman & W. D. Kettle: survey Cottonwood-<br />

Sycamore Floodplain Forest along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River. Collections<br />

9380–9389.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 78


Date Location Time Notes<br />

39.3611°N, 94.9278°W; bluffs W <strong>of</strong> N end <strong>of</strong><br />

Sherman Army Airfield and ca 0.75 mi NE <strong>of</strong><br />

Hancock Hill<br />

2003-06-04 39.3720°N, 94.8952°W and points to ca 1 NE<br />

on peninsula; N side <strong>of</strong> Sherman Army<br />

Airfield, just S <strong>of</strong> Weston Bend <strong>of</strong> Missouri<br />

River<br />

39.3611°N, 94.9278°W; bluffs W <strong>of</strong> N end <strong>of</strong><br />

Sherman Army Airfield and ca 0.75 mi NE <strong>of</strong><br />

Hancock Hill<br />

2003-06-11 39.3657°–39.3676°N, 94.9349°– 94.9297°W;<br />

area to N <strong>of</strong> water reservoir, E <strong>of</strong> Hancock Hill<br />

39.3718°N, 94.9320°W; Fort de Cavagnial<br />

Picnic Area<br />

2003-06-23 39.3711°N, 94.9337°W; area E <strong>of</strong> Hancock<br />

Hill and S <strong>of</strong> Fort de Cavagnial Picnic Area<br />

6 C. A. Morse, C. C. Freeman & W. D. Kettle: survey Maple-<br />

Basswood Forest on steep, NE-facing bluffs above Missouri River<br />

and floodplain forest at base <strong>of</strong> bluffs; document populations <strong>of</strong><br />

Carex hitchcockiana, Hydrophyllum appendiculatum, Packera<br />

glabella, and Rubus alumnus. Collections 9390–9402.<br />

6 C. A. Morse: survey Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest; document<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> Carex crus-corvi, Carex radiata, and Carex<br />

tribuloides var. sangamonensis. Collections 9445–9664.<br />

2 C. A. Morse: survey Maple-Basswood forest on steep, NE-facing<br />

bluffs above Missouri River and floodplain forest at base <strong>of</strong> bluffs;<br />

document populations <strong>of</strong> Carex hitchcockiana, Carex normalis,<br />

Carex rosea, and Osmorhiza claytonii. Collections 9465–9472.<br />

7 C. A. Morse: survey mesic White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest on<br />

NE-facing slopes and floodplain forest along tributary to Quarry<br />

Creek; document populations <strong>of</strong> Brachyelytrum erectum, Bromus<br />

nottawayanus, Carex hirtifolia, Carex hitchcockiana, Carex rosea,<br />

and Osmorhiza claytonii. Collections 9478–9511.<br />

1 C. A. Morse: survey weedy edge <strong>of</strong> White oak-Shagbark hickory<br />

Forest and mowed parkland. Collections 9512–9520.<br />

4 C. A. Morse: survey mesic White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest on<br />

SE-facing slope along tributary to Quarry Creek. Collections 9684–<br />

9689.<br />

39.3590°N, 94.9424°W; area near Hunt Lodge 1 C. A. Morse: survey weedy seep and dry creek at base <strong>of</strong> wooded<br />

slope. Collection 9690.<br />

39.3497°–39.3504°N, 94.9332°–94.9373°W; 2 C. A. Morse: survey disturbed White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest<br />

area to N and W <strong>of</strong> National Cemetery<br />

on SE-facing slope; document populations <strong>of</strong> Osmorhiza claytonii<br />

and Rubus alumnus. Collections 9691–9797.<br />

2003-06-27 39.3720°–39.3905°N, 94.8952°– 94.8891°W; 7 C. A. Morse: survey Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest and weedy<br />

N side <strong>of</strong> Sherman Army Airfield, just S <strong>of</strong><br />

openings; document populations <strong>of</strong> Carex tribuloides var.<br />

Weston Bend <strong>of</strong> Missouri River<br />

sangamonensis and Stachys pilosa var. arenicola. Collections 9708–<br />

9727.<br />

2003-07-02 39.3526°–39.3545°N, 94.9391°–94.9304°W; 8 C. A. Morse: survey disturbed White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest<br />

area to E <strong>of</strong> Wagner Point and NW <strong>of</strong> National<br />

on steep slopes above tributary to Quarry Creek and floodplain forest<br />

Cemetery<br />

along creek; document populations <strong>of</strong> Carex hirtifolia, Carex<br />

radiata, and Ranunculus recurvatus var. recurvatus. Collections<br />

9728–9748.<br />

2003-07-18 39.3541°–39.3649°N, 94.9112°–94.8940°W; 3 C. A. Morse: survey muddy bank <strong>of</strong> river, weedy levy, disturbed<br />

E side <strong>of</strong> Sherman Army Airfield, just S <strong>of</strong><br />

floodplain forest between levee and river, and Eleocharis marsh<br />

Weston Bend <strong>of</strong> Missouri River<br />

along levee. Collections 9750–9758.<br />

39.3627°–39.3620°N, 94.9328°–94.9371°W; 4 C. A. Morse: survey disturbed White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest<br />

ravine 0.25 mi E <strong>of</strong> Bell Point, between<br />

on moderate E-facing slope with deep, steep sided draws along<br />

reservoir to N and radio tower to S<br />

tributary to Quarry Creek; document populations <strong>of</strong> Brachyelytrum<br />

erectum. Collections 9759–9762.<br />

2003-07-24 39.3507°–39.3533°N, 94.9362°–94.9352°W; 5 C. A. Morse: survey disturbed White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest<br />

area to N and W <strong>of</strong> National Cemetery<br />

and small tallgrass prairie remnant openings on SE-facing slope.<br />

Collections 9764–9766.<br />

39.3774°–39.3804°N, 94.9294°–94.9305°W; 3 C. A. Morse: survey Maple-Basswood forest on steep, NE-facing<br />

bluffs W <strong>of</strong> N end <strong>of</strong> Sherman Army Airfield<br />

bluffs above Missouri River and floodplain forest at base <strong>of</strong> bluffs<br />

and ca 0.75 mi NE <strong>of</strong> Hancock Hill<br />

and on E- and W side <strong>of</strong> Union Pacific RR tracks; document<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> Carex crus-corvi, Carex hirtifolia, and Carex<br />

tribuloides var. sangamonensis. Collections 9767–9771.<br />

2003-08-05 39.3707°–39.3710°N, 94.9217°–94.9240°W; 2 C. A. Morse: survey mowed area surrounding cemetery and<br />

Military Prison Cemetery and environs to N,<br />

disturbed Maple-Basswood forest on steep, primarily N-facing<br />

ca 0.5 mi E Fort de Cavagnial Picnic Area<br />

slopes; document population <strong>of</strong> Carex hitchcockiana. Collections<br />

9774–9777.<br />

39.3461°–39.3512°N, 94.9424°–94.9414°W; 5 C. A. Morse: survey openings in forest along top <strong>of</strong> ridge, lightly<br />

Government Hill and area 0.25 mi S Wagner<br />

wooded oak savanna and Glaciated Tallgrass Prairie remnants.<br />

Point<br />

Collections 9778–9782.<br />

2003-08-08 39.3585°–39.3618°N, 94.9076°–94.9033°W 1 C. A. Morse: survey weedy levee and two-track along Missouri<br />

and 39.3686°N, 94.9013°W; E side <strong>of</strong><br />

River; document population <strong>of</strong> Stachys pilosa var. arenicola.<br />

Sherman Army Airfield, just S <strong>of</strong> Weston<br />

Bend <strong>of</strong> Missouri River<br />

Collections 9783–9786.<br />

39.3774°N, 94.9063°W; N side <strong>of</strong> Sherman 1 C. A. Morse: survey edge <strong>of</strong> Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain<br />

Army Airfield, just S <strong>of</strong> Weston Bend <strong>of</strong><br />

Forest along Missouri River; document populations <strong>of</strong> Carex crus-<br />

Missouri River<br />

corvi and Carex tribuloides var. sangamonensis. Collection 9787.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 79


Date Location Time Notes<br />

39.3657°–39.3667°N, 94.9349°–94.9279°W;<br />

area to E <strong>of</strong> water reservoir , E <strong>of</strong> Hancock<br />

Hill<br />

2003-09-18 39.3660°–39.3775°N, 94.8942°–94.8827°W;<br />

E side <strong>of</strong> Sherman Army Airfield, just S <strong>of</strong><br />

Weston Bend <strong>of</strong> Missouri River<br />

39.3778°N, 94.9278°W; bluffs W <strong>of</strong> N end <strong>of</strong><br />

Sherman Army Airfield and ca 0.75 mi NE <strong>of</strong><br />

Hancock Hill<br />

2003-09-30 39.3799°–39.3911°N, 94.9003°–94.9030°W;<br />

N side <strong>of</strong> Sherman Army Airfield, just S <strong>of</strong><br />

Weston Bend <strong>of</strong> Missouri River<br />

2003-10-31 39.3526°–39.3545°N, 94.9391°–94.9304°W;<br />

area to E <strong>of</strong> Wagner Point and NW <strong>of</strong> National<br />

Cemetery<br />

39.3652°–39.3676°N, 94.9303°–94.9263°W;<br />

area to E <strong>of</strong> water reservoir and E <strong>of</strong> Hancock<br />

Hill<br />

39.3628°N, 94.9297°W; landfill dump to SE<br />

<strong>of</strong> Scout Camp Miles<br />

39.3778°N, 94.9278°W; bluffs W <strong>of</strong> N end <strong>of</strong><br />

Sherman Army Airfield and ca 0.75 mi NE <strong>of</strong><br />

Hancock Hill<br />

2003-11-10 39.3679°–39.3748°N, 94.9331°–94.9279°W;<br />

bluffs W <strong>of</strong> N end <strong>of</strong> Sherman Army Airfield<br />

and ca 0.75 mi NE <strong>of</strong> Hancock Hill<br />

39.3717°–39.3744°N, 94.9313°–94.9306°W;<br />

area to N and E <strong>of</strong> Fort de Cavagnial Picnic<br />

Area<br />

39.3471°–39.3512°N, 94.9439°–94.9414°W;<br />

Government Hill and area 0.25 mi S <strong>of</strong><br />

Wagner Point<br />

2003-11-20 39.3507°N, 94.9362°W; area to N and W <strong>of</strong><br />

National Cemetery<br />

Floristic Surveys<br />

39.3471°–39.3512°N, 94.9439°–94.9414°W;<br />

Government Hill and area 0.25 mi S <strong>of</strong><br />

Wagner Point<br />

39.3776°–39.3780°N, 94.8904°–94.8807°W;<br />

N side <strong>of</strong> Sherman Army Airfield, just S <strong>of</strong><br />

Weston Bend <strong>of</strong> Missouri River<br />

6 C. A. Morse: survey mesic White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest on<br />

NE-facing slope and floodplain forest along tributary to Quarry<br />

Creek; document populations <strong>of</strong> Bromus nottawayanus, Carex<br />

hirtifolia, Carex normalis, and Carex rosea. Collections 9788–9792.<br />

4 C. A. Morse: survey disturbed Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain<br />

Forest along river. Collections 9793–9805.<br />

4 C. A. Morse: survey Maple-Basswood Forest on steep NE- and Wfacing<br />

bluffs above Missouri River, and marshy floodplain forest at<br />

base <strong>of</strong> bluffs. Collections 9806–9813.<br />

5 C. A. Morse: survey Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest with<br />

herbaceous understory and mud flat along Missouri River; document<br />

populations <strong>of</strong> Carex crus-corvi, Carex tribuloides var.<br />

sangamonensis, Hypericum pyramidatum, and Lipocarpha<br />

micrantha. Collections 9814–9839.<br />

4 C. A. Morse: survey disturbed White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest<br />

on steep slopes above tributary to Quarry Creek and floodplain forest<br />

along creek; document population <strong>of</strong> Aster lateriflorus var.<br />

lateriflorus. Collections 9873–9886.<br />

2 C. A. Morse: survey mesic, White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest on<br />

NE-facing slope and Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest along<br />

tributary to Quarry Creek; document populations <strong>of</strong> Aster lateriflorus<br />

var. lateriflorus, Bromus nottawayanus, and Carex hirtifolia.<br />

Collections 9887–9889.<br />

1 C. A. Morse: survey weedy reclaimed landfill on E side <strong>of</strong> two-track.<br />

Collection 9890.<br />

2 C. A. Morse: survey Maple-Basswood Forest on steep NE- and Wfacing<br />

bluffs above Missouri River, and marshy floodplain forest at<br />

base <strong>of</strong> bluffs; document population <strong>of</strong> Aster lateriflorus var.<br />

lateriflorus. Collections 9891–9892.<br />

4 C. A. Morse & H. Loring: survey Maple-Basswood Forest and White<br />

oak-Shagbark hickory Forest transition on steep NE-facing bluffs<br />

above Missouri River, and marshy floodplain forest at base <strong>of</strong> bluffs<br />

on E- and W side <strong>of</strong> Union Pacific RR tracks to edge <strong>of</strong> river;<br />

document populations <strong>of</strong> Carex crus-corvi, Carex hitchcockiana,<br />

Carex tribuloides var. sangamonensis, and Hydrophyllum<br />

appendiculatum. Collections 9893–9898.<br />

2 C. A. Morse & H. Loring: survey disturbed White oak-Shagbark<br />

hickory Forest and transition to Maple-Basswood forest on moderate,<br />

NE-facing slopes above Missouri River floodplain; document<br />

population <strong>of</strong> Aster lateriflorus var. lateriflorus. Collections 9900–<br />

9903.<br />

1 C. A. Morse & H. Loring: survey openings in White oak-Shagbark<br />

hickory Forest along top <strong>of</strong> ridge, lightly wooded oak savanna and<br />

tallgrass prairie remnants. Collections 9904–9908.<br />

1 C. A. Morse, H. Loring, & V. B. Salisbury: survey disturbed<br />

Glaciated Tallgrass Prairie remnants on moderate S-facing slope.<br />

Collection 9909.<br />

1 C. A. Morse, H. Loring & V. B. Salisbury: survey openings in White<br />

oak-Shagbark hickory Forest along top <strong>of</strong> ridge, lightly wooded oak<br />

savanna and tallgrass prairie remnants. No collections.<br />

6 C. A. Morse, H. Loring & V. B. Salisbury: survey Pecan-Hackberry<br />

and Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forests on gently rolling<br />

topography and muddy bar along river; document population <strong>of</strong><br />

Carex tribuloides var. sangamonensis, Hydrophyllum<br />

appendiculatum, and Lipocarpha micrantha. Collections 9910-9913.<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> data provided by <strong>the</strong> R.L. McGregor Collection Management Information System<br />

showed that fieldwork carried out by staff and students affiliated with <strong>the</strong> R. L. McGregor<br />

Herbarium between 1998 and 2003 has yielded 14 genera, 53 species, and 58 taxa <strong>of</strong> vascular<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 80


plants (including all infraspecific taxa) previously undocumented in Leavenworth County.<br />

Survey work during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season yielded specimens representing 4 families, 12 genera,<br />

51 species, and 54 taxa previously undocumented on FLMR. A revised list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vascular flora<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> county and <strong>the</strong> installation is presented as Appendix C. A total <strong>of</strong> 113 families, 421<br />

genera, 832 species, and 853 taxa are reported from Leavenworth County. Of this number, 103<br />

families (91% <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> total flora <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> county), 325 genera (77%), 585 species (70%), and 591<br />

taxa (69%) have been documented on FLMR.<br />

The 10 families reported by Freeman et al. (1997) as comprising <strong>the</strong> most taxa are retained after<br />

<strong>the</strong> 2003 field season, although several families have changed rank (Table 4.2). Poaceae,<br />

reported here as comprising <strong>the</strong> largest number <strong>of</strong> taxa, was reported by Freeman et al. (1997) as<br />

second to Asteraceae; Rosaceae, reported here as comprising <strong>the</strong> seventh largest number <strong>of</strong> taxa,<br />

is reported here as fifth, followed by Brassicaceae (sixth) and Lamiaceae (seventh). These ten<br />

families cumulatively account for 475 (57%) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> taxa known in <strong>the</strong> county and 335 (57%) <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> taxa known on FLMR.<br />

TABLE 4.2. Number <strong>of</strong> taxa and cumulative percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 10 most species-rich vascular<br />

plant families known from Leavenworth County and FLMR. Cumulative % = cumulative<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> taxa relative to totals reported for county (853) and FLMR (591).<br />

Family Leavenworth Co Cumulative % FLMR Cumulative %<br />

Poaceae 111 13 76 13<br />

Asteraceae 111 26 73 25<br />

Cyperaceae 64 34 50 34<br />

Fabaceae 45 39 30 39<br />

Rosaceae 30 42 27 43<br />

Brassicaceae 30 46 21 47<br />

Lamiaceae 26 49 21 50<br />

Polygonaceae 22 51 13 53<br />

Apiaceae 18 54 12 55<br />

Scrophulariaceae 18 57 12 57<br />

Provenance. Based on <strong>the</strong> provenance data presented in Appendix C, floristic work since 1997<br />

has resulted in little change in <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> native/non-native taxa documented for<br />

Leavenworth County and FLMR (Freeman et al. 1997) (Table 4.3). The percentage <strong>of</strong> native taxa<br />

reported here for <strong>the</strong> installation has remained stable, despite <strong>the</strong> increase in number <strong>of</strong><br />

documented taxa. Populations <strong>of</strong> exotic species cited by Freeman et al. (1997) as having become<br />

established on <strong>the</strong> installation have also ei<strong>the</strong>r remained stable, or apparently increased in<br />

abundance. Several species, including Berberis thunbergii DC. (Berberidaceae; Japanese<br />

barberry), Elaeagnus umbellata Thunb. (Elaeagnaceae; autumn-olive), and Ligustrum<br />

obtusifolium Sieb. & Zucc. (Oleaceae; border privet, previously reported as Ligustrum vulgare),<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 81


cited as adventive in Freeman et al. (1997), were frequently observed in 2003 and now are<br />

considered well established on FLMR. Fieldwork carried out by staff affiliated with <strong>the</strong> R. L.<br />

McGregor Herbarium from 1998–2003 has demonstrated each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species to be more<br />

common than previously thought in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong>. Some exotic species, such as Alliaria<br />

petiolata (Bieb.) Cavara & Grande (Brassicaceae; common garlic-mustard), Ligustrum<br />

obtusifolium, Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Maxim. (Caprifoliaceae; Amur honeysuckle), and Rosa<br />

multiflora Thunb. (Rosaceae; multiflora rose) were reported as infrequent in appropriate habitats<br />

by Freeman et al. (1997), but are reported here as common. Two exotic pest species, Phalaris<br />

arundinacea L. (Poaceae; reed canary grass) and Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. (Poaceae;<br />

Johnson grass), were reported as common in appropriate habitats by Freeman et al. (1997), but<br />

were observed during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season to be locally dominant in open areas in <strong>the</strong> floodplain<br />

and reported here as abundant.<br />

Fieldwork in 2003 documented several exotic species that were ei<strong>the</strong>r overlooked during <strong>the</strong><br />

1995–1996 field seasons and are reported here as additions to <strong>the</strong> flora <strong>of</strong> FLMR, or are reported<br />

from <strong>Kansas</strong> for <strong>the</strong> first time here. Among <strong>the</strong> exotics known from <strong>Kansas</strong>, but previously<br />

unknown from FLMR, are <strong>the</strong> ornamentals Lythrum salicaria L. (Lythraceae; purple loosestrife)<br />

and Lonicera japonica Thunb. (Caprifoliaceae; Japanese honeysuckle). Native to Europe, purple<br />

loosestrife is an ecologically important wetland weed in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>ast U.S. It has been<br />

documented from 10 scattered wetlands in <strong>the</strong> eastern half <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>. Observations during 2003<br />

confirmed individuals <strong>of</strong> this species growing along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River. Native to eastern Asia,<br />

Japanese honeysuckle is an ecologically and economically important weed <strong>of</strong> forests throughout<br />

<strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern United States. Observations in 2003 confirmed several sizeable populations <strong>of</strong><br />

this species in openings in White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest on FLMR.<br />

Exotic taxa documented in <strong>Kansas</strong> in 2003 for <strong>the</strong> first time are Cyperus fuscus L. (Cyperaceae;<br />

brown flat-sedge), Euonymus alatus (Celastraceae; winged burningbush), and Rhodotypos<br />

scandens (Rosaceae; jetbead). Native to Eurasia, brown flat-sedge is an annual graminoid<br />

previously known in <strong>the</strong> Great Plains from specimens taken in Missouri, Nebraska and South<br />

Dakota (Tucker et al. 2002). Two subpopulations <strong>of</strong> this species were discovered on drying mud<br />

flats along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River. It is unlikely that this species will become a pest in <strong>Kansas</strong>.<br />

Native to eastern Asia, winged burningbush frequently is planted as an ornamental shrub<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> eastern United States. It has been reported as naturalized elsewhere in <strong>the</strong> eastern<br />

U.S. (Rhoads and Block 2000), but specimens have not previously been taken from wild plants in<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong>. Several specimens were taken during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season from plants scattered<br />

throughout <strong>the</strong> White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest on FLMR. It is unlikely that this species will<br />

become a pest in <strong>Kansas</strong>, but, along with o<strong>the</strong>r naturalized exotic shrubs, winged burningbush<br />

may contribute locally to <strong>the</strong> decline <strong>of</strong> native plants in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong> forest communities.<br />

Native to Japan, jetbead has been planted widely and is reported as an occasional escape in <strong>the</strong><br />

nor<strong>the</strong>astern United States (Rhoads and Block 2000). Two small populations, each <strong>of</strong> fewer than<br />

10 plants, were observed in White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest along horse trails. These appear<br />

to represent <strong>the</strong> first documented occurrence <strong>of</strong> this species in <strong>the</strong> Great Plains. This species has<br />

not proved itself to be a pest where it has become established elsewhere in <strong>the</strong> U.S., and it is<br />

unlikely it will become a pest in <strong>Kansas</strong>.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 82


TABLE 4.3. Number and cumulative percentage <strong>of</strong> introduced and native taxa in Leavenworth<br />

County and on FLMR. Cumulative % = cumulative percent <strong>of</strong> taxa relative to totals reported for<br />

county (853) and FLMR (591).<br />

Provenance Leavenworth Co. Cumulative % FLMR Cumulative %<br />

Native 679 80 457 77<br />

Introduced, naturalized 154 98 122 98<br />

Introduced, adventive 20 100 12 100<br />

Longevity. Longevity data for vascular plants documented for Leavenworth County and FLMR<br />

and presented in Appendix C reveal little change from <strong>the</strong> results published by Freeman et al.<br />

(1997) (Table 4.4). The majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vascular plants remain perennial herbaceous (52% <strong>of</strong> all<br />

taxa), with annual (25%), perennial woody (17%), and o<strong>the</strong>r groups comprising <strong>the</strong> remainder.<br />

TABLE 4.4. Number and cumulative percentage <strong>of</strong> annual, biennial, and perennial taxa in<br />

Leavenworth County and on FLMR. Cumulative % = cumulative percent <strong>of</strong> taxa relative to<br />

totals reported for county (853 taxa) and FLMR (591).<br />

Longevity Leavenworth Co<br />

Cumulative<br />

%<br />

FLMR<br />

Cumulative<br />

%<br />

Perennial herbaceous 473 55 307 52<br />

Annual 218 81 150 77<br />

Perennial woody 115 94 98 94<br />

Biennial 23 97 17 97<br />

Annual or biennial 9 98 8 98<br />

Biennial or perennial herbaceous 8 99 7 99<br />

Annual, biennial, or perennial<br />

herbaceous<br />

4 >99 2 >99<br />

Annual or perennial herbaceous 3 100 2 100<br />

Habitat. Habitat data for vascular plants documented for Leavenworth County and FLMR and<br />

presented in Appendix C reveal minor changes from <strong>the</strong> results published by Freeman et al.<br />

(1997) (Table 4.5). As reported previously, a large proportion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> taxa regularly occupy<br />

upland forest and disturbed habitats. Smaller percentages <strong>of</strong> taxa occupy floodplain forest,<br />

prairie, and wetland habitats, and a very small percentage <strong>of</strong> taxa documented on FLMR occupy<br />

aquatic habitats. Changes in <strong>the</strong> rank <strong>of</strong> taxa found in floodplain forest and prairie habitats (<strong>the</strong>se<br />

occupy ranks 3 and 4 here, but were reported by Freeman et al. (1997) ranked 4 and 3,<br />

respectively) may be attributed to <strong>the</strong> relatively greater percent effort expended in 2003 surveying<br />

floodplain habitats than prairies. Habitat data were not summarized for Leavenworth County by<br />

Freeman et al. (1997), but are also summarized here in Table 4.5. It may be noted that <strong>the</strong><br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> taxa reported from forest habitats is considerably smaller for Leavenworth County<br />

than it is for FLMR, while <strong>the</strong> percentage <strong>of</strong> taxa reported from prairie habitats is greater. These<br />

results may be explained by <strong>the</strong> general inaccessibility <strong>of</strong> forested sites in <strong>the</strong> county o<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 83


those on FLMR, resulting in relatively less survey effort, and <strong>the</strong> paucity <strong>of</strong> prairies on FLMR.<br />

TABLE 4.5. Number <strong>of</strong> instances and cumulative percentage in which taxa were reported from<br />

different habitat types in Leavenworth County and on FLMR. % = percent <strong>of</strong> taxa relative to<br />

totals reported for county (853) and FLMR (591). Total number <strong>of</strong> instances in which all habitat<br />

types were reported were 1,305 for Leavenworth County and 942 for FLMR.<br />

General habitat Leavenworth Co % FLMR %<br />

Forest, upland 338 40 270 46<br />

Disturbed sites 353 41 250 42<br />

Forest, floodplain 168 20 153 26<br />

Prairie 275 32 140 24<br />

Wetlands 156 18 124 21<br />

Rivers and ponds (aquatic) 15 2 5 1<br />

Abundance. Abundance data for vascular plants documented for FLMR were not summarized<br />

by Freeman et al. (1997) but are presented here in Table 4.6 without comparison. Data presented<br />

in Appendix C reveal that <strong>the</strong> majority (55%) <strong>of</strong> taxa documented on FLMR is only infrequently<br />

encountered in appropriate habitats, 32% <strong>of</strong> taxa are reported as common on <strong>the</strong> installation, 12%<br />

are reported as rare, and only 1% are reported as dominant.<br />

TABLE 4.6. Number <strong>of</strong> instances and cumulative percentage in which taxa were reported from<br />

different habitat types in Leavenworth County and on FLMR. Cumulative % = cumulative<br />

percent <strong>of</strong> taxa relative to totals reported for county (853) and FLMR (591).<br />

Abundance FLMR Cumulative %<br />

Infrequent 328 55<br />

Common 184 87<br />

Rare 70 99<br />

Dominant 9 100<br />

Bryophytes. Few collections <strong>of</strong> bryophytes were prepared during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season. The<br />

documented bryophyte flora for FLMR has changed very little from <strong>the</strong> information presented by<br />

Freeman et al. (1997), and detailed data on <strong>the</strong> bry<strong>of</strong>lora <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> installation is still largely lacking.<br />

However, voucher specimens were obtained in 2003 for several bryophtye taxa and deposited in<br />

KANU, and <strong>the</strong> flora may be updated with <strong>the</strong> following records: Riccia frostii Aust. (Hepaticae:<br />

Ricciaceae; vouchers: Morse 9837, Morse et al. 9913), Entodon seductrix (Hedw.) C. Muell.<br />

(Musci: Entodontaceae; voucher: Morse et al. 9384), and Plagiomnium cuspidatum (Hedw.) T.<br />

Kop. (Musci: Mniaceae; vouchers: Morse et al. 9378, Morse et al. 9382). In addition, one taxon<br />

representing a family previously undocumented on FLMR was discovered. Atrichum angustatum<br />

(Brid.) Bruch & Schimp. (Musci: Polytrichaceae; voucher: Morse 9511) was confirmed to be<br />

locally abundant in shaded ravines in upland oak-hickory forest, on soils <strong>of</strong> sandstone and<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 84


limestone derivation. After <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season, a total <strong>of</strong> 18 families, 32 genera, 43 species <strong>of</strong><br />

bryophytes are reported from FLMR.<br />

Federal-listed Species<br />

Several hours were spent in 2003 surveying potential habitat for <strong>the</strong> three federally protected<br />

species discussed by Freeman et al. (1997). No evidence was found that any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species<br />

occur on <strong>the</strong> installation. Given <strong>the</strong> paucity <strong>of</strong> suitable prairie habitat for Asclepias meadii Torr.<br />

ex A. Gray (Asclepiadaceae; Mead's milkweed) and Platan<strong>the</strong>ra praeclara Shev. & M. Bowles<br />

(Orchidaceae; western prairie fringed orchid), it is unlikely that ei<strong>the</strong>r species occurs on FLMR.<br />

Trifolium stoloniferum Muhl. ex Eaton (Fabaceae; running buffalo clover) has not been observed<br />

in <strong>Kansas</strong> since 1885 (Brooks and Freeman 1989) and it remains highly unlikely that this species<br />

will be discovered on FLMR.<br />

State-rare Species<br />

At least one occurrence <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> 11 state-rare vascular plant taxa was documented on FLMR<br />

during <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field seasons and reported by Freeman et al. (1997). During <strong>the</strong> 2003 field<br />

season, nine <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se taxa were confirmed as persisting on <strong>the</strong> installation. In addition, three<br />

state-rare taxa reported by Freeman et al. (1997) as occurring on FLMR but not included among<br />

<strong>the</strong> state-rare species discussed by those authors were confirmed as persisting on <strong>the</strong> installation,<br />

and seven state-rare taxa were documented as occurring <strong>the</strong>re for <strong>the</strong> first time. Of <strong>the</strong> seven<br />

state-rare taxa discovered on FLMR in 2003, six are reported here for <strong>the</strong> first time for<br />

Leavenworth County. Altoge<strong>the</strong>r, 13 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se state-rare species occur in upland forest habitats,<br />

two occur both in upland and floodplain forest habitats, three occur in floodplain forest habitat,<br />

one occurs in open floodplain habitats, and one occurs in wetland habitats along <strong>the</strong> Missouri<br />

River. Species accounts for each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se 21 taxa are presented below, arranged in alphabetical<br />

order. Element occurrence records for all taxa, including element occurrence code, state rank,<br />

locations <strong>of</strong> populations and subpopulations for taxa observed in 2003, and date <strong>of</strong> last<br />

observation for each taxon are summarized in Table 4.7.<br />

Aster lateriflorus (L.) Britton var. lateriflorus (Asteraceae; white woodland aster) was first<br />

discovered in <strong>Kansas</strong> on FLMR during plant surveys in <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field seasons by J. Elliott<br />

and C. C. Freeman and reported as new to <strong>the</strong> state by Freeman et al. (1998). Observations<br />

during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season confirmed that white woodland aster comprises at least three<br />

sizeable subpopulations in mesic ravines in White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest (Table 4.7,<br />

occurrences 1 and 2) and Maple-Basswood Forest (Table 4.7, occurrence 3) (Figure 4.1), where it<br />

is <strong>of</strong>ten found with a similar, more common congener, Aster ontarionis. To date, this herbaceous<br />

perennial is known in <strong>Kansas</strong> only from populations on FLMR.<br />

A small population <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> perennial herb Blephilia hirsuta (Pursh) Benth. (Lamiaceae; hairy<br />

wood-mint) was discovered at <strong>the</strong> edge <strong>of</strong> a trail in White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest west <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> National Cemetery during <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field seasons. This species has been collected on<br />

four separate occasions in three counties in nor<strong>the</strong>astern <strong>Kansas</strong>. Only one o<strong>the</strong>r collection,<br />

made in 1992, is recent enough to be considered to represent an extant population. Efforts to<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 85


elocate <strong>the</strong> population on FLMR in 2003 were unsuccessful. However, given <strong>the</strong> longevity <strong>of</strong><br />

individuals <strong>of</strong> this species, additional surveys may reveal that plants persist on <strong>the</strong> installation.<br />

Two small subgroups <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> perennial grass Brachyelytrum erectum (Schreb.) P. Beauv.<br />

(Poaceae; upright shorthusk) were discovered in White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest in <strong>the</strong> northcentral<br />

part <strong>of</strong> FLMR during <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field seasons. Observations during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field<br />

season confirmed that upright shorthusk is locally common on north-facing slopes and in mesic<br />

ravines in both high-quality (Table 4.7, occurrence 1) and somewhat more disturbed (Table 4.7,<br />

occurrence 2) White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest on <strong>the</strong> installation (Figure 4.2). This species is<br />

known in <strong>Kansas</strong> from nine historic and recent collections made in three counties in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>ast<br />

part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state. Of <strong>the</strong>se, eight collections in two counties were made subsequent to 1990, and<br />

<strong>the</strong> populations <strong>the</strong>y represent are considered likely to be extant.<br />

Bromus nottowayanus Fernald (Poaceae; Nottoway brome), a perennial grass, was first<br />

discovered in <strong>Kansas</strong> on FLMR during plant surveys in <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field seasons by J. Elliott<br />

and C. C. Freeman and reported as new to <strong>the</strong> state by Freeman et al. (1998). To date, Nottoway<br />

brome is known in <strong>Kansas</strong> from a single large population on FLMR in mesic White oak-<br />

Shagbark hickory Forest nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>of</strong> Camp Miles (Figure 4.3). Observations in 2003 confirmed<br />

that this population comprises thousands <strong>of</strong> individuals.<br />

Carex crus-corvi Shuttlew. ex Kunth (Cyperaceae; raven-foot sedge), a perennial graminoid, is<br />

common to locally abundant along edges <strong>of</strong> and in openings in Cottonwood-Sycamore<br />

Floodplain Forest on FLMR (Figure 4.4), where it may become co-dominant with Carex<br />

tribuloides var. sangamonensis. This species is known in <strong>Kansas</strong> from 26 recent and historic<br />

collections from 11 counties in <strong>the</strong> eastern part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state. Of <strong>the</strong>se, five collections in five<br />

counties were made after 1975, and <strong>the</strong> populations <strong>the</strong>y represent are considered likely to be<br />

extant. This is <strong>the</strong> first record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> raven-foot sedge in Leavenworth County.<br />

Several subpopulations <strong>of</strong> Carex hirtifolia Mack. (Cyperaceae; hairy-leaf sedge), a perennial<br />

graminoid, were discovered in 2003 in White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest (Table 4.7,<br />

occurrences 1–3) and Maple-Basswood (Table 4.7, occurrence 3) forests (Figure 4.5).<br />

Occurrences 1, 2, and 4 cited in Table 4.7 were very small, comprising 1–5 individuals only.<br />

However, occurrence 3 is large, comprising many hundreds <strong>of</strong> individuals. All subpopulations<br />

occupied slightly disturbed sites, in mesic microsites on east-facing slopes along deer or horse<br />

trails (Table 4.7, occurrences 1, 3 [in part], and 4) or in wet-mesic microsites on bars along<br />

creeks (Table 4.7, occurrences 2 and 3 [in part]). This is <strong>the</strong> first record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong><br />

hairy-leaf sedge in Leavenworth County and only <strong>the</strong> second record <strong>of</strong> its occurrence in <strong>Kansas</strong>.<br />

Prior to its discovery on FLMR, this species was known in <strong>Kansas</strong> from a single locality in<br />

Wyandotte County.<br />

Large populations <strong>of</strong> Carex hitchcockiana Dewey (Cyperaceae; Hitchcock's sedge), a perennial<br />

graminoid, were discovered in 2003 in high-quality White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest (Table<br />

4.7, occurrences 1 and 2), and disturbed (Table 4.7, occurrence 3) and high-quality (Table 4.7,<br />

occurrence 4) Maple-Basswood forests (Figure 4.6). Hitchcock’s sedge is observed most<br />

frequently on FLMR in mesic ravines and on north- and east-facing slopes and less frequently on<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 86


ock outcrops; it is <strong>of</strong>ten found with similar and more common congeners Carex grisea and<br />

Carex oligocarpa. This species is known in <strong>Kansas</strong> from five recent and historic collections in<br />

three counties. Of <strong>the</strong>se, at least one population has been documented in each county subsequent<br />

to 1986, and <strong>the</strong> populations <strong>the</strong>y represent are considered likely to be extant. Prior to its<br />

discovery on FLMR, <strong>the</strong> species had not been documented in Leavenworth County since 1964.<br />

Two small subpopulations <strong>of</strong> Carex normalis Mack. (Cyperaceae; large straw sedge), a<br />

perennial graminoid, were discovered in 2003, one along a deer trial in high-quality White oak-<br />

Shagbark hickory Forest (Table 4.7, occurrence 1) and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r on an east-facing slope in<br />

Maple-Basswood Forest (Table 4.7, occurrence 2). Nei<strong>the</strong>r population comprised more than five<br />

individuals, but additional surveys likely would reveal that this frequently overlooked species is<br />

scattered throughout <strong>the</strong> upland forests on FLMR (Figure 4.7). This species is known in <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

from seven recent and historic collections in four counties in <strong>the</strong> eastern part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state. All but<br />

one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se collections were made subsequent to 1985, and <strong>the</strong> populations <strong>the</strong>y represent are<br />

considered likely to be extant. This is <strong>the</strong> first documented occurrence <strong>of</strong> large straw sedge in<br />

Leavenworth County.<br />

Carex radiata (Wahlenb.) Small (Cyperaceae; radiate sedge) was first collected on FLMR by C.<br />

C. Freeman during <strong>the</strong> 1989 field season. This species was not included among <strong>the</strong> state-rare<br />

species discussed by Freeman et al. (1997), but subsequent research has shown radiate sedge to<br />

be rare in <strong>Kansas</strong>. On FLMR, this perennial graminoid is occasional in Pecan-Hackberry<br />

Floodplain Forest (Table 4.7, occurrence 1) and in mesic ravines and along creek beds in White<br />

oak-Shagbark hickory Forest (Table 4.7, occurrence 2; Figure 4.8), where it is <strong>of</strong>ten found with<br />

similar congeners Carex rosea and Carex sparganioides. This species is known in <strong>Kansas</strong> from<br />

35 recent and historic collections made in 10 counties in <strong>the</strong> easternmost part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state. Of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se, 22 collections in nine counties were made subsequent to 1973 and <strong>the</strong> populations <strong>the</strong>y<br />

represent are considered likely to be extant.<br />

Carex rosea Schkuhr ex Willd. (Cyperaceae; rosy sedge) was first collected on FLMR during<br />

<strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field seasons. This species was not included among <strong>the</strong> state-rare species<br />

discussed by Freeman et al. (1997), but subsequent research has shown rosy sedge to be rare in<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong>. On FLMR, this perennial graminoid is occasional in mesic ravines and on north-facing<br />

slopes in White oak-Shagbark hickory (Table 4.7, occurrences 1 and 2) and Maple-Basswood<br />

(Table 4.7, occurrence 3) Forests (Figure 4.6), where it is <strong>of</strong>ten found with similar congeners<br />

Carex radiata and Carex sparganioides. This species is known in <strong>Kansas</strong> from 26 recent and<br />

historic collections made in eight counties in <strong>the</strong> easternmost part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state. Of <strong>the</strong>se, eight<br />

collections in six counties were made subsequent to 1986 and <strong>the</strong> populations <strong>the</strong>y represent are<br />

considered likely to be extant.<br />

Carex tribuloides Wahlenb. var. sangamonensis Clokey (Cyperaceae; festival sedge) is<br />

common to abundant in Cottonwood-Sycamore and Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forests on<br />

FLMR (Figure 4.9), where it is <strong>of</strong>ten co-dominant with Carex crus-corvi and Carex grayi in<br />

seasonally wet depressions. This species is known in <strong>Kansas</strong> from eight recent and historic<br />

collections four counties in <strong>the</strong> eastern part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state. Of <strong>the</strong>se, three collections in two<br />

counties were made subsequent to 1990 and <strong>the</strong> populations <strong>the</strong>y represent are considered likely<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 87


to be extant. This is <strong>the</strong> first record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> occurrence <strong>of</strong> Carex tribuloides var. sangamonensis in<br />

Leavenworth County and <strong>the</strong> first time <strong>the</strong> taxon has been documented in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern part <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> state.<br />

A large population <strong>of</strong> Hydrophyllum appendiculatum Michx. (Hydrophyllaceae; notchbract<br />

waterleaf) was reported by Freeman et al. (1997) from Maple-Basswood forest at <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

steep bluff that parallels <strong>the</strong> Missouri River floodplain in <strong>the</strong> north-central part <strong>of</strong> FLMR, and <strong>the</strong><br />

species was reported to be scattered to locally common in floodplain forests along <strong>the</strong> Missouri<br />

River. Observations during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season confirmed that this species is common in wetmesic<br />

sites in Maple-Basswood Forest on <strong>the</strong> installation (Table 4.7, occurrence 1; Figure 4.10),<br />

where it is <strong>of</strong>ten found with its more common congener, Hydrophyllum virginianum. A smaller<br />

population was observed in high-quality Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest (Table 4.7,<br />

occurrence 2). This species is known in <strong>Kansas</strong> from 21 recent and historic collections made in<br />

six counties in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state. Of <strong>the</strong>se, 11 collections in five counties were<br />

made subsequent to 1975 and <strong>the</strong> populations <strong>the</strong>y represent are considered likely to be extant.<br />

A single individual <strong>of</strong> Hypericum ascyron L. (Clusiaceae; giant St. John’s-wort) was discovered<br />

late in <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season near <strong>the</strong> edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri River in disturbed Cottonwood-<br />

Sycamore Floodplain Forest (Figure 4.11). Subsequent attempts to locate additional individuals<br />

<strong>of</strong> this species in similar habitat proved unsuccessful and <strong>the</strong> size and quality <strong>of</strong> this population is<br />

unknown. Prior to its discovery on FLMR, this species was known in <strong>Kansas</strong> only from a single<br />

historical collection made in 1947 in Doniphan County.<br />

Lipocarpha micrantha (Vahl) G.C. Tucker (Cyperaceae; small-flower dwarf-bulrush) was first<br />

collected on FLMR during <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field seasons. This species was not included among<br />

<strong>the</strong> state-rare species discussed by Freeman et al. (1997), but subsequent research has shown<br />

small-flower dwarf-bulrush to be rare in <strong>Kansas</strong>. On FLMR, this annual graminoid is locally<br />

abundant with o<strong>the</strong>r members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sedge family in <strong>the</strong> Riverine Sand Flats-Bars Sparse<br />

Vegetation community along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River (Figure 4.12). This species is known from 12<br />

recent and historic collections from nine counties throughout <strong>the</strong> eastern half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state. Of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se, seven collections in five counties were made subsequent to 1979 and <strong>the</strong> populations <strong>the</strong>y<br />

represent are considered likely to be extant.<br />

Two small subpopulations comprising widely scattered individuals <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> perennial herb<br />

Lithospermum latifolium Michx. (Boraginaceae; American gromwell) were discovered in mesic<br />

draws in White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest during <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field seasons. In <strong>Kansas</strong>, this<br />

species is known from eight recent and historic reports or collections from 5 counties in<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>astern part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state. Of <strong>the</strong>se, three collections in three counties were made subsequent<br />

to 1979 and <strong>the</strong> populations <strong>the</strong>y represent are considered likely to be extant. Efforts to relocate<br />

<strong>the</strong> population on FLMR during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season were unsuccessful. However, given <strong>the</strong><br />

longevity <strong>of</strong> individuals <strong>of</strong> this species, additional surveys may reveal that plants have persisted<br />

on <strong>the</strong> installation.<br />

Populations <strong>of</strong> Osmorhiza claytonii (Michx.) C.B. Clarke (Apiaceae; hairy sweet-cicely) were<br />

reported by Freeman et al. (1997) as occurring throughout most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> White oak-Shagbark<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 88


hickory Forest on FLMR. Observations during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season confirmed that hairy sweetcicely<br />

is scattered throughout both White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest (Table 4.7, occurrences 1<br />

and 2) and Maple-Basswood Forest (Table 4.7, occurrence 3) on <strong>the</strong> installation (Figure 4.6),<br />

where it is <strong>of</strong>ten found with its more common congener, Osmorhiza longistylis. This species is<br />

known in <strong>Kansas</strong> from eight recent and historic collections made in six counties in <strong>the</strong><br />

nor<strong>the</strong>astern part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state. Of <strong>the</strong>se, five collections in four counties were made subsequent to<br />

1974 and <strong>the</strong> populations <strong>the</strong>y represent are considered likely to be extant.<br />

A large population <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> individuals <strong>of</strong> Packera glabella (Poir.) C. Jeffrey<br />

(Asteraceae; floodplain ragwort) was reported by Freeman et al. (1997; as Senecio glabellus<br />

Poir.) in open, wet-mesic to aquatic habitat in <strong>the</strong> floodplain <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri River, especially in<br />

<strong>the</strong> depression between <strong>the</strong> railroad right-<strong>of</strong>-way and bluffs in <strong>the</strong> northwest part <strong>of</strong> FLMR.<br />

Populations <strong>of</strong> this annual herb may undergo dramatic fluctuation in size from year to year.<br />

However, observations during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season confirmed that this population <strong>of</strong> floodplain<br />

ragwort is stable, slightly larger than it was in 1995–1996 (Figure 4.13). This species is known<br />

in <strong>Kansas</strong> from 17 recent and historic collections made in nine counties in <strong>the</strong> eastern part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

state. Of <strong>the</strong>se, nine collections in six counties were made subsequent to 1975 and <strong>the</strong><br />

populations <strong>the</strong>y represent are considered likely to be extant.<br />

A small population <strong>of</strong> Ranunculus recurvatus Poir. var. recurvatus (Ranunculaceae; eastern<br />

hooked buttercup) was reported by Freeman et al. (1997; as Ranunculus recurvatus Poir.) from a<br />

deep ravine in White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest west-northwest <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> National Cemetery.<br />

Observations during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season confirmed that eastern hooked buttercup comprises at<br />

least several small subpopulations in mesic ravines (Table 4.7, occurrences 1 and 3) and along<br />

vehicle trails (Table 4.7, occurrence 2) in White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest and on lower<br />

slopes in Maple-Basswood Forest (Table 4.7, occurrence 4; Figure 4.14). This species is known<br />

in <strong>Kansas</strong> from seven recent and historic collections made in three counties in <strong>the</strong> eastern part <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> state. Of <strong>the</strong>se, four collections in two counties were made subsequent to 1987 and <strong>the</strong><br />

populations <strong>the</strong>y represent are considered likely to be extant.<br />

Two small subpopulations <strong>of</strong> Rubus alumnus L.H. Bailey (Rosaceae; nursling highbush<br />

blackberry), a thicket-forming shrub, were discovered during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season, one along a<br />

power line clearing (Table 4.7, occurrence 1) and <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r along an old two-track on an eastfacing<br />

slope in Maple-Basswood Forest (Table 4.7, occurrence 2). It is likely that additional<br />

surveys would reveal that this frequently overlooked species is scattered in openings throughout<br />

<strong>the</strong> upland forests on FLMR (Figure 4.15). This species is known in <strong>Kansas</strong> from 17 historic and<br />

recent collections made in 12 counties in <strong>the</strong> eastern half <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state. This is <strong>the</strong> first<br />

documented occurrence <strong>of</strong> nursling highbush blackberry in Leavenworth County.<br />

Stachys pilosa Nutt. var. arenicola (Britton) G.A. Mulligan & D.B. Munro (Lamiaceae;<br />

marsh hedge-nettle) was reported by Freeman et al. (1997; as Stachys palustris L. subsp. pilosa<br />

(Nutt.) Epling) as occurring in scattered locations on <strong>the</strong> Missouri River floodplain. This<br />

rhizomatous, perennial herb grows in open, mesic to wet-mesic or marshy habitats or at <strong>the</strong> edge<br />

<strong>of</strong> floodplain forests or willow thickets. Observations during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season confirmed that<br />

marsh hedge-nettle is locally common in disturbed sites in <strong>the</strong> floodplain, along vehicle trails,<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 89


and on <strong>the</strong> levy (Figure 4.16), where it <strong>of</strong>ten occurs with Teucrium canadense, ano<strong>the</strong>r,<br />

superficially similar, member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mint family. This species is known in <strong>Kansas</strong> from 10<br />

recent and historic collections made in four counties in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state. Of<br />

<strong>the</strong>se, five collections in three counties were made subsequent to 1980 and <strong>the</strong> populations <strong>the</strong>y<br />

represent are considered likely to be extant.<br />

Populations <strong>of</strong> Uvularia grandiflora Sm. (Liliaceae; large-flower bellwort) were reported by<br />

Freeman et al. (1997) as occurring throughout most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest on<br />

FLMR. Observations during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season confirmed that this species is abundant<br />

throughout both White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest (Table 4.7, occurrences 1 and 2) and Maple-<br />

Basswood forests on <strong>the</strong> installation (occurrence not mapped; Figure 4.6). This species is known<br />

in <strong>Kansas</strong> from 22 recent and historic collections made in six counties in <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>astern part <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> state. Of <strong>the</strong>se, five collections in three counties were made subsequent to 1976 and <strong>the</strong><br />

populations <strong>the</strong>y represent are considered likely to be extant.<br />

TABLE 4.7. Summary <strong>of</strong> element occurrence records for 21 state-rare vascular plant species on<br />

FLMR. Nomenclature for scientific names and common names follows Freeman (2003).<br />

Synonyms (SYN) are provided in brackets for names <strong>of</strong> taxa reported from <strong>the</strong> FLMR in<br />

Freeman et al. (1997) when <strong>the</strong>y differ from those accepted here. Element occurrence codes are<br />

unique, 15 character alphanumeric codes applied to each state-rare species by KSNHI. State<br />

ranks are applied by examination <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> extant populations for <strong>the</strong> state: S1 = 1–5<br />

populations known in <strong>the</strong> state; S2 = 6–20 populations known in <strong>the</strong> state. Latitude-longitude<br />

data are provided for populations and subpopulations for all taxa observed during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field<br />

season. Each point recorded represents an observation. However, when populations appeared to<br />

be essentially continuous between two points, <strong>the</strong> occurrence is provided as a range.<br />

Scientific<br />

Name<br />

Aster lateriflorus<br />

(L.) Britton var.<br />

lateriflorus<br />

Blephilia hirsuta<br />

(Pursh) Benth.<br />

Brachyelytrum<br />

erectum<br />

(Schreb.) P.<br />

Beauv.<br />

Bromus<br />

nottowayanus<br />

Fernald<br />

Family<br />

Common<br />

Name<br />

Asteraceae white<br />

woodland<br />

aster<br />

Lamiaceae hairy woodmint<br />

Poaceae upright<br />

shorthusk<br />

Poaceae Nottoway<br />

brome<br />

Element<br />

Occurrence Code<br />

State<br />

Rank<br />

Occurrence(s)<br />

Documented in<br />

2003<br />

Last<br />

Observation<br />

PDASTE8226*001* S1 [1] 39.3510°–<br />

39.3567°N,<br />

94.9386°–<br />

94.9301°W<br />

[2] 39.3669°N,<br />

94.9282°W<br />

[3] 39.3761°N,<br />

94.9295°W<br />

2003-11-10<br />

PDLAM06020*002* S1 not observed in 2003 1995-06-28<br />

PMPOA12010*002* S1 [1] 39.3621°N,<br />

94.9349°W<br />

[2] near 39.3682°N,<br />

94.9324°W<br />

PMPOA150Z0*001* S1 [1] 39.3674°–<br />

39.3676°N,<br />

94.9310°–<br />

94.9263°W<br />

2003-07-18<br />

2003-10-31<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 90


Scientific<br />

Name<br />

Carex crus-corvi<br />

Shuttlew. ex<br />

Kunth<br />

Carex hirtifolia<br />

Mack.<br />

Carex<br />

hitchcockiana<br />

Dewey<br />

Carex normalis<br />

Mack.<br />

Carex radiata<br />

(Wahlenb.) Small<br />

Carex rosea<br />

Schkuhr ex<br />

Willd.<br />

Carex tribuloides<br />

Wahlenb. var.<br />

sangamonensis<br />

Clokey<br />

Family<br />

Common<br />

Name<br />

Cyperaceae raven-foot<br />

sedge<br />

Cyperaceae hairy-leaf<br />

sedge<br />

Cyperaceae Hitchcock's<br />

sedge<br />

Cyperaceae large straw<br />

sedge<br />

Element<br />

Occurrence Code<br />

State<br />

Rank<br />

Occurrence(s)<br />

Documented in<br />

2003<br />

PMCYP033B0*015* S2 [1] near 39.3789°N,<br />

94.8901°W<br />

[2] 39.3774°–<br />

39.3816°N,<br />

94.9063°–<br />

94.9010°W<br />

[3] 39.3840°–<br />

39.3798°N,<br />

94.9364°–<br />

94.9294°W<br />

PMCYP03610*003* S1 [1] 39.3545°N,<br />

94.9304°W<br />

[2] 39.3551°N,<br />

94.9344°W<br />

[3] 39.3676°<br />

39.3674°N,<br />

94.9297°–<br />

94.9280°W<br />

[4] 39.3774°N,<br />

94.9295°W<br />

PMCYP03630*004* S1 [1] 39.3633°N,<br />

94.9327°W<br />

[2] 39.3656°–<br />

39.3676°N,<br />

94.9364°–<br />

94.9297°W<br />

[3] 39.3708°N,<br />

94.9225°W<br />

[4] 39.3819°–<br />

39.3774°N,<br />

94.9361°–<br />

94.9294°W<br />

PMCYP039C0*001* S1 [1] 39.3668°N,<br />

94.9285°W<br />

[2] 39.37738°N,<br />

94.92936°W<br />

Cyperaceae radiate sedge PMCYP03BB0*008* S2 [1] near 39.3771°N,<br />

94.8898°W<br />

[2] near 39.3539°N,<br />

94.9362°W<br />

Cyperaceae rosy sedge PMCYP03BM0*007* S2 [1] 39.3545°N,<br />

94.9348°W<br />

[2] 39.3656°–<br />

39.3656°N,<br />

94.9364°–<br />

94.9364°W<br />

[3] 39.3779°N,<br />

94.9295°W<br />

Cyperaceae festival sedge PMCYP03DW1*003* S1 [1] 39.3774°–<br />

39.3775°N,<br />

94.8964°–<br />

94.8829°W<br />

[2] 39.3774°–<br />

39.3816°N,<br />

94.9063°–<br />

94.9010°W<br />

[3] 39.3778°N,<br />

94.92838°W<br />

[4] 39.3841°–<br />

39.3792°N,<br />

94.9364°–<br />

94.9276°W<br />

Last<br />

Observation<br />

2003-11-10<br />

2003-10-31<br />

2003-08-05<br />

2003-08-08<br />

2003-06-04<br />

2003-06-11<br />

2003-11-10<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 91


Scientific<br />

Name<br />

Hydrophyllum<br />

appendiculatum<br />

Michx.<br />

Hypericum<br />

ascyron L.<br />

Lipocarpha<br />

micrantha (Vahl)<br />

G.C. Tucker<br />

Lithospermum<br />

latifolium Michx.<br />

Osmorhiza<br />

claytonii<br />

(Michx.) C.B.<br />

Clarke<br />

Packera glabella<br />

(Poir.) C. Jeffrey<br />

[SYN = Senecio<br />

glabellus Poir.]<br />

Ranunculus<br />

recurvatus Poir.<br />

var. recurvatus<br />

Rubus alumnus<br />

L.H. Bailey<br />

Stachys pilosa<br />

Nutt. var.<br />

arenicola<br />

(Britton) G.A.<br />

Mulligan & D.B.<br />

Munro<br />

[SYN = Stachys<br />

palustris L.<br />

subsp. pilosa<br />

(Nutt.) Epling]<br />

Uvularia<br />

grandiflora Sm.<br />

Family<br />

4.4. SUMMARY<br />

Common<br />

Name<br />

Hydrophyllaceae notchbract<br />

waterleaf<br />

Clusiaceae giant St.<br />

John’s-wort<br />

Cyperaceae small-flower<br />

dwarf-bulrush<br />

Boraginaceae American<br />

gromwell<br />

Apiaceae hairy sweetcicely<br />

Asteraceae floodplain<br />

ragwort<br />

Ranunculaceae eastern<br />

hooked<br />

buttercup<br />

Rosaceae nursling<br />

highbush<br />

blackberry<br />

Lamiaceae marsh hedgenettle<br />

Liliaceae large-flower<br />

bellwort<br />

Element<br />

Occurrence Code<br />

State<br />

Rank<br />

Occurrence(s)<br />

Documented in<br />

2003<br />

Last<br />

Observation<br />

PDHYD08010*006* S2 [1] 39.3815°–<br />

39.3784°N,<br />

94.9356°–<br />

94.9279°W<br />

[2] 39.3852°–<br />

39.3861°N,<br />

94.8968°–<br />

94.8958°W<br />

2003-11-20<br />

PDCLU031E0*002* S1 [1] 39.3909°N,<br />

94.9029°W<br />

2003-09-30<br />

PMCYP0H040*002* S2 [1] near 39.3637°N,<br />

94.8986°W<br />

(1997 coll)<br />

[2] 39.3780°N,<br />

94.8807°W<br />

[3] 39.3911°N,<br />

94.9030°W<br />

2003-11-20<br />

PDBOR0L080*008* S2 not observed in 2003 1996-07 31<br />

PDAPI1K040*008* S1 [1] near 39.3526°N,<br />

94.9352°W<br />

[2] near 39.3680°N,<br />

94.9316°W<br />

[3] 39.3774°N,<br />

94.9294°W<br />

PDAST8H1G0*001* S2 [1] near 39.3807°–<br />

39.3775°N,<br />

94.9320°–<br />

94.9276°W<br />

PDRAN0L2A0*003* S1 [1] 39.3545°N,<br />

94.9348°W<br />

[2] 39.3620°N,<br />

94.9371°W<br />

[3] near 39.3709°N,<br />

94.9351°W<br />

[4] near 39.3773°N,<br />

94.9278°W<br />

PDROS1K0D0*001* S2 [1] near 39.3506°N,<br />

94.9346°W<br />

[2] near 39.3759°N,<br />

94.9265°W<br />

PDLAM1X0R0*005* S2 [1] 39.3585°N,<br />

94.9076°W<br />

[2] 39.3739°–<br />

39.3731°N,<br />

94.9047°–<br />

94.8964°W<br />

PMLIL24020*001* S2 [1] 39.3526°N,<br />

94.9391°W<br />

[2] 39.3656°N,<br />

94.9364°W<br />

2003-06-23<br />

2003-07-24<br />

2003-07-02<br />

2003-06-23<br />

2003-08-08<br />

2003-07-02<br />

In surveys <strong>of</strong> more than 17 sites on FLMR during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season, 267 specimens <strong>of</strong><br />

vascular plants and bryophytes were collected. Among <strong>the</strong>se were voucher specimens<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 92


epresenting 5 families, 13 genera, 52 species, and 55 taxa <strong>of</strong> vascular plants and bryophytes<br />

previously undocumented on FLMR, making a total <strong>of</strong> 103 families, 325 genera, 585 species, and<br />

591 taxa <strong>of</strong> vascular plants and 18 families, 32 genera, 43 species <strong>of</strong> bryophytes confirmed on<br />

FLMR. Overall, <strong>the</strong> provenance for, longevity <strong>of</strong>, and habitat regularly occupied by taxa<br />

reported from FLMR have changed little between <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 and 2003 field seasons.<br />

However, <strong>the</strong> frequency <strong>of</strong> certain exotic taxa on <strong>the</strong> installation indicates that several species,<br />

including Berberis thunbergii, Elaeagnus umbellata, and Ligustrum obtusifolium, cited by<br />

Freeman et al. (1997) as adventive, are better considered naturalized in <strong>the</strong> area. Moreover, some<br />

exotic taxa, such as Alliaria petiolata, Ligustrum obtusifolium, Lonicera maackii, and Rosa<br />

multiflora, previously reported as rare, are now common, while o<strong>the</strong>rs, such as Phalaris<br />

arundinacea and Sorghum halepense, previously reported as common, are now abundant in<br />

certain habitats on FLMR. Three exotic taxa, Cyperus fuscus, Euonymus alatus, and Rhodotypos<br />

scandens, were documented for <strong>the</strong> first time in <strong>Kansas</strong> during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season. It is<br />

unlikely that any one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species will exhibit a significant, negative ecological impact on<br />

natural communities in <strong>the</strong> state.<br />

No populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> federal-listed species Asclepias meadii, Platan<strong>the</strong>ra praeclara, or<br />

Trifolium stoloniferum were observed during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season. However, nine <strong>of</strong> 11 staterare<br />

vascular plant taxa documented on FLMR during <strong>the</strong> 1995–1996 field seasons and reported<br />

by Freeman et al. (1997) were confirmed as persisting on <strong>the</strong> installation. These were Aster<br />

lateriflorus, Brachyelytrum erectum, Bromus nottowayanus, Hydrophyllum appendiculatum,<br />

Osmorhiza claytonii, Packera glabella, Ranunculus recurvatus var. recurvatus, Stachys pilosa<br />

var. arenicola, and Uvularia grandiflora. Populations <strong>of</strong> Blephilia hirsuta and Lithospermum<br />

latifolium were not relocated during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season, but <strong>the</strong>se may persist on FLMR. In<br />

addition, Carex radiata, Carex rosea, and Lipocarpha micrantha, three state-rare taxa reported<br />

by Freeman et al. (1997) as occurring on FLMR but not included among <strong>the</strong> state-rare species<br />

discussed by those authors were confirmed as persisting on <strong>the</strong> installation and seven state-rare<br />

taxa were documented as occurring <strong>the</strong>re for <strong>the</strong> first time. These were Carex crus-corvi, Carex<br />

hirtifolia, Carex hitchcockiana, Carex normalis, Carex tribuloides var. sangamonensis,<br />

Hypericum ascyron, and Rubus alumnus.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 93


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 94


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 95


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 96


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 97


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 98


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 99


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 100


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 101


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 102


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 103


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 104


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 105


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 106


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 107


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 108


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 109


5.1. INTRODUCTION<br />

CHAPTER 5. MANAGEMENT<br />

RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

W. Dean Kettle, William H. Busby, and Vaughn B. Salisbury<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> Biological Survey<br />

2101 Constant Avenue<br />

Lawrence, KS 66047-3759<br />

kettle@ku.edu, wbusby@ku.edu, and salisbur@ku.edu<br />

Preservation <strong>of</strong> native biological diversity is mandated for Army installations and must be<br />

undertaken in ways consistent with military mission. The purpose <strong>of</strong> this study was to identify<br />

high-quality natural areas on FLMR and to identify management recommendations, educational<br />

opportunities, and scientific activities that would, if implemented, promote <strong>the</strong> preservation and<br />

enhancement <strong>of</strong> native biodiversity at <strong>the</strong> site. These recommendations also are intended to<br />

provide <strong>the</strong> public, FLMR personnel, and o<strong>the</strong>rs with opportunity for greater understanding and<br />

appreciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural environment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> site. Management recommendations in this report<br />

are based on this and previous studies, and on discussions with knowledgeable individuals.<br />

A number <strong>of</strong> globally and regionally significant native species and communities are found at<br />

FLMR (see relevant sections <strong>of</strong> this report); yet <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se elements are not afforded<br />

protection at <strong>the</strong> site. A fur<strong>the</strong>r concern is that <strong>the</strong>re is not a comprehensive plan that identifies<br />

conservation issues and management recommendations for <strong>the</strong>se elements. However, <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong><br />

such a plan is understandable given <strong>the</strong> previous paucity <strong>of</strong> information on <strong>the</strong> native<br />

environment at FLMR and <strong>the</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> resources to develop such a plan. This report, with <strong>the</strong><br />

identification <strong>of</strong> location and character <strong>of</strong> native biological diversity at FLMR and with<br />

identification <strong>of</strong> issues relevant to <strong>the</strong>ir management, provides a fundamental building block<br />

from which to develop a comprehensive plan.<br />

5.2. LANDSCAPE ISSUES AND FACTORS INFLUENCING THE BIODIVERSITY OF<br />

THE FT. LEAVENWORTH MILITARY RESERVATION<br />

Effective management and preservation <strong>of</strong> natural resources at FLMR requires a landscape<br />

context, whereby decisions are made in consideration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> regional context <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> site (e.g., not<br />

treating FLMR as an isolated area independent <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> larger landscape). Wiens et al. (2002) have<br />

identified three challenges to sound land-use management in general, and <strong>the</strong>se may be<br />

appropriately applied to FLMR. First, lands can be managed as isolated units only as regards to<br />

ownership, administration, or politics, but not in regards to ecology. Second, land management<br />

is <strong>of</strong>ten carried out over a limited range <strong>of</strong> spatial and temporal scales, yet natural systems are not<br />

nearly so restricted; sound land management requires an ecological perspective cognizant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

broad range <strong>of</strong> scales. Lastly, resource management issues require <strong>the</strong> integration <strong>of</strong> ecology<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 110


with o<strong>the</strong>r considerations, including economics, land ownership, politics, and sociology.<br />

Freeman et al. (1997) suggested use <strong>of</strong> a landscape approach to conservation planning at FLMR,<br />

proposing that this method permits broader understanding <strong>of</strong> environmental, biological, and<br />

cultural factors influencing multiple sites in <strong>the</strong> region. They suggest that this approach has <strong>the</strong><br />

advantage <strong>of</strong> identifying regional conservation issues and priorities, and developing conservation<br />

strategies that could benefit multiple sites.<br />

The landscape area considered here lies within <strong>the</strong> Glaciated Region <strong>of</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong>. FLMR<br />

is one <strong>of</strong> four large sites along <strong>the</strong> extreme eastern edge <strong>of</strong> this area (Freeman et al. 1997). The<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r sites, all <strong>of</strong> which encompass floodplain and bluff habitats along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River from<br />

<strong>the</strong> Nebraska border to <strong>Kansas</strong> City, are White Cloud Bluff Forest (Doniphan County), Mosquito<br />

Bluff Forest (Doniphan County), and Wyandotte County Park Site (Wyandotte County).<br />

Historically, <strong>the</strong> Missouri River Valley was a dynamic natural system exhibiting a range <strong>of</strong><br />

conditions. As described by Freeman et al. (1997), “…The river was characterized by a wide,<br />

braided channel, rapid current, high turbidity, and wide seasonal fluctuation in flow volume.<br />

Flooding and channel changes were frequent, creating numerous sandbars and islands and<br />

rearranging <strong>the</strong> natural communities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floodplain. A mixture <strong>of</strong> marshes, low prairies,<br />

forests, oxbow lakes, and o<strong>the</strong>r natural features in <strong>the</strong> floodplain were shaped by <strong>the</strong> forces <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

river, and <strong>the</strong>ir boundaries and successional stages constantly were shifting. O<strong>the</strong>r sources <strong>of</strong><br />

natural disturbance were fire and grazing, both <strong>of</strong> which maintained upland tallgrass prairie on<br />

<strong>the</strong> bluffs and likely affected floodplain vegetation as well.”<br />

Euro-American settlement and activity within <strong>the</strong> Missouri River Valley have disrupted natural<br />

disturbance regimes in this landscape and fragmented and destroyed most natural communities<br />

Freeman et al. (1997) explain that “natural hydrology <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri River has been altered<br />

greatly through <strong>the</strong> construction <strong>of</strong> large reservoirs and levees, which channelized <strong>the</strong> river and<br />

controlled much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> seasonal flooding. Because <strong>of</strong> this, most native bottomland vegetation<br />

long ago was converted to cropland. Similarly, most upland natural communities were altered by<br />

humans during <strong>the</strong> past 150 years. These changes have fragmented many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> terrestrial<br />

communities once used by wildlife. However, stream valleys and o<strong>the</strong>r areas exhibiting<br />

moderate to high relief still support corridors essential to many species. Riparian forests are<br />

especially significant. In addition to providing routes for <strong>the</strong> movement <strong>of</strong> wildlife, <strong>the</strong>y help<br />

maintain water quality and contribute to <strong>the</strong> aes<strong>the</strong>tics <strong>of</strong> FLMR by providing structural diversity<br />

to <strong>the</strong> landscape.”<br />

FLMR is an important contributor to regional biodiversity because it supports significant<br />

remnants <strong>of</strong> several kinds <strong>of</strong> forests. This is in stark contrast to most areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri River<br />

valley where native communities have been greatly altered. The remnant communities at FLMR<br />

remain largely because <strong>the</strong>y were not suitable for o<strong>the</strong>r uses during <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

military facilities and activities. These native communities at FLMR are vulnerable to<br />

destruction from a variety <strong>of</strong> direct, disruptive activities (e.g., construction and agriculture).<br />

However, native communities also are vulnerable to degradation from a number <strong>of</strong> “indirect”<br />

forces. Freeman et al. (1997) commented on <strong>the</strong> vulnerability <strong>of</strong> natural communities at FLMR<br />

by stating that “Habitat degradation is a more insidious consequence <strong>of</strong> human alteration <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 111


landscape. Small, fragmented, and isolated natural community remnants are more susceptible to<br />

anthropogenic influences because <strong>of</strong> a host <strong>of</strong> size-dependent factors. <strong>Natural</strong> processes that<br />

historically influenced <strong>the</strong> larger landscape areas <strong>of</strong> which <strong>the</strong>se remnants originally were a part<br />

are more easily disrupted (e.g., fire on prairies no longer sweep over large areas). A small natural<br />

area also has a greater ratio <strong>of</strong> edge to area as compared to a large natural area. Often, <strong>the</strong>se<br />

edges abut disturbed land from which exotic species can invade and out-compete native species.<br />

Edges also are favored by predators (e.g., cats, raccoons, skunks) and parasites (e.g., cowbirds) <strong>of</strong><br />

nesting songbirds and o<strong>the</strong>r small vertebrates.”<br />

5.3. RECOMMENDATIONS<br />

Based on <strong>the</strong> findings <strong>of</strong> this and previous studies <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> biota and natural environment <strong>of</strong> FLMR,<br />

<strong>the</strong> following recommendations are <strong>of</strong>fered to help maintain and enhance <strong>the</strong> biodiversity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

installation (some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se recommendations are updates <strong>of</strong> those proposed in Freeman et al.<br />

1997). Recommendations fall into one <strong>of</strong> three general categories: land management,<br />

education/promotion, and future studies. Recommendations for land management are based on<br />

<strong>the</strong> best pr<strong>of</strong>essional judgment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scientific staff preparing this report and range from<br />

recommendations for immediate action to steps that can be implemented in <strong>the</strong> future. We<br />

strongly recommend efforts to enhance recreational and educational opportunities on FLMR by<br />

improving <strong>the</strong> public’s knowledge, understanding, and appreciation for <strong>the</strong> natural environment<br />

at <strong>the</strong> site. Lastly, <strong>the</strong>re are gaps in our knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural environment at FLMR, and we<br />

have identified several activities that, if completed, would provide information valuable to<br />

natural resource management, including public education and recreational opportunities.<br />

Our knowledge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> biota <strong>of</strong> FLMR is far from complete. Several data gaps were identified<br />

during <strong>the</strong> course <strong>of</strong> this study. The following recommendations are intended to allow some <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>se information gaps to be filled, <strong>the</strong>reby yielding a more complete picture <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ecosystems<br />

and species on FLMR and assisting us in our efforts to inform better <strong>the</strong> public and installation<br />

personnel about <strong>the</strong> significance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se natural resources.<br />

Recommendation 1. A comprehensive conservation and resource management plan should be<br />

developed for FLMR. It should identify <strong>the</strong> priorities and principal stake-holders for <strong>the</strong><br />

maintenance and use <strong>of</strong> biodiversity on FLMR, evaluate all existing management practices,<br />

and identify new initiatives targeted to preservation and enhancement <strong>of</strong> natural resources.<br />

An essential aspect <strong>of</strong> this plan should be a comprehensive review <strong>of</strong> existing land management<br />

policies and practices on <strong>the</strong> installation. The plan should examine all major management issues<br />

that affect native and naturalized species and natural communities, including silvicultural<br />

practices, burning, road construction, infrastructure development, herbicide and pesticide use,<br />

mowing, recreational use (e.g., hiking, horse riding, hunting, bird watching, and mushroom<br />

hunting), and agricultural practices. FLMR is updating an Integrated <strong>Natural</strong> Resource<br />

Management Plan for <strong>the</strong> site (estimated completion in 2004) and that document should address<br />

<strong>the</strong>se issues.<br />

Recommendation 2. The timber harvest policy on FLMR should be formalized in light <strong>of</strong><br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 112


existing natural areas information. Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> ecological importance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> old-growth<br />

forest on FLMR, a no-harvest policy should be established for <strong>the</strong> highest quality areas <strong>of</strong><br />

upland and floodplain forest.<br />

Old-growth forest remnants on <strong>the</strong> uplands and bottomlands on FLMR are exceptional in part<br />

because timber harvesting has been limited. This policy has helped maintain occurrences <strong>of</strong><br />

plants, animals, and natural communities on FLMR that are declining elsewhere. Clearly, <strong>the</strong><br />

long-term viability <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species depends on maintaining high-quality forest remnants<br />

on FLMR. For <strong>the</strong>se reasons, a no-harvest policy in core forest areas should be adopted. Core<br />

area boundaries for upland and bottomland forests were presented Freeman et al. (1997).<br />

Currently <strong>the</strong>re is a salvage only policy in place at FLMR that is used for timber resources in<br />

heavily disturbed or modified areas.<br />

Recommendation 3. <strong>Areas</strong> outside <strong>the</strong> levee on <strong>the</strong> Missouri River floodplain should be<br />

managed in such a way as to emulate historical disturbance regimes and <strong>the</strong> full array <strong>of</strong><br />

natural communities once represented in <strong>the</strong> floodplain.<br />

Perhaps <strong>the</strong> biggest threats to floodplain natural communities along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River are<br />

hydrologic changes and continued clearing <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forest remnants. It is unrealistic to expect in<br />

<strong>the</strong> foreseeable future that <strong>the</strong> seasonality, intensity, and duration <strong>of</strong> flow in <strong>the</strong> Missouri River<br />

will be modified to approximate conditions that existed before dams and levees were built.<br />

Never<strong>the</strong>less, some management practices can be implemented to manage better <strong>the</strong>se floodplain<br />

forests and to increase overall biological diversity in and along <strong>the</strong> river. This includes managing<br />

areas for a variety <strong>of</strong> successional stages <strong>of</strong> herbaceous and woody plant communities. Currently<br />

<strong>the</strong>re is a program underway to notch wing-dikes along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River to provide greater<br />

diversity <strong>of</strong> aquatic and wetland habitats for certain species.<br />

Recommendation 4. The U.S. Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers should be encouraged to regulate <strong>the</strong><br />

flow <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri River in such a way as to maximize benefits to native animals, plants, and<br />

natural communities on FLMR.<br />

The U.S. Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> Resources staff <strong>of</strong> Ft. Leavenworth function<br />

largely independently, but we encourage <strong>the</strong> two organizations to cooperate and coordinate in<br />

efforts to manage <strong>the</strong> Missouri River for <strong>the</strong> benefit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> region’s biodiversity. Interactions<br />

could be facilitated by holding annual meetings to discuss respective management goals and<br />

strategies and by exploring resource management opportunities that could be mutually beneficial.<br />

Management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri River is key to protection <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> threatened and<br />

endangered species. The majority <strong>of</strong> federal-listed species in this region depend on aquatic or<br />

terrestrial habitats in or immediately along <strong>the</strong> river, including <strong>the</strong> pallid sturgeon, least tern,<br />

piping plover, and bald eagle. As mentioned in Recommendation 3, <strong>the</strong>re is currently a program<br />

underway to notch wing-dikes along <strong>the</strong> Missouri River to provide greater diversity <strong>of</strong> habitat for<br />

certain species.<br />

Recommendation 5. <strong>Areas</strong> on <strong>the</strong> Missouri River floodplain, formerly in agricultural row<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 113


crop farming, should be maintained/restored as open, native, herbaceous vegetation.<br />

Efforts have been made to establish plantings <strong>of</strong> eastern gamma grass (Tripsacum dactyloides<br />

(L.) L.) in some formerly row-cropped areas within <strong>the</strong> floodplain levee. They now are<br />

maintained with an open aspect. One presumed advantage <strong>of</strong> this change in land use was to<br />

reduce parasitism by Brown-headed cowbirds on songbird nests (cowbirds forage in cropland and<br />

proximity <strong>of</strong> such areas is related to cowbird parasitism rates in forest birds).<br />

It should be noted that much <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri River floodplain on FLMR probably is federal<br />

jurisdictional wetland as defined in <strong>the</strong> Clean Water Act. Depending on <strong>the</strong>ir nature, some landuse<br />

changes associated with restoration work in <strong>the</strong> floodplain might require consultation with<br />

and approval from <strong>the</strong> U.S. Army Corps <strong>of</strong> Engineers. However, <strong>the</strong>se actions generally are<br />

viewed favorably by <strong>the</strong> agency during <strong>the</strong> review process.<br />

Recommendation 6. Tallgrass prairie remnants on <strong>the</strong> uplands <strong>of</strong> FLMR should be actively<br />

managed to preserve native biodiversity. If no management is implemented, woody vegetation<br />

will continue to encroach and eventually will eliminate <strong>the</strong> native herbaceous species.<br />

Five small (


<strong>the</strong>se areas would enhance <strong>the</strong> prairie habitat. The entire “prairie corridor” along <strong>the</strong> horse trail<br />

north <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> National Cemetery could be expanded gradually by removing trees and shrubs and<br />

allowing recovery <strong>of</strong> prairie vegetation that exists in <strong>the</strong> understory at <strong>the</strong> edge <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forest.<br />

Recommendation 7. Buffer areas should be established where possible to insulate highquality<br />

natural areas from future anthropogenic disturbances. Such areas also may be<br />

restored to support natural communities and species that historically were more widespread<br />

but which have been eliminated due to human activities.<br />

All areas and activities at FLMR are potentially important in preserving native biodiversity. For<br />

example, even degraded natural areas can be extremely important in conserving local biodiversity<br />

by serving as buffer areas and connectors for high-quality sites. Lower quality sites also may<br />

have restoration potential. Thus, even though most degraded prairies, forests, and wetlands are<br />

not discussed herein, <strong>the</strong>y are vital components <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> biodiversity <strong>of</strong> FLMR, and integral<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> plans to preserve and enhance <strong>the</strong> natural environment. There are several concerns<br />

that might be addressed using buffer areas (e.g., slowing invasion by exotic plants and reduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> songbird nest predators and parasites).<br />

Recommendation 8. Fragmentation <strong>of</strong> native habitats on FLMR must be minimized.<br />

Activities such as road construction, development <strong>of</strong> utility corridors, and o<strong>the</strong>r land use<br />

changes that divide native habitats into smaller pieces, would degrade native biodiversity at<br />

FLMR.<br />

Habitat fragmentation occurs when landscapes and habitats are broken into smaller pieces. The<br />

fragmentation and isolation <strong>of</strong> natural habitats are hallmark effects <strong>of</strong> expanding humandominated<br />

landscapes. Examples <strong>of</strong> common activities causing habitat fragmentation, and loss<br />

<strong>of</strong> native biodiversity, include road construction, utility corridors, and land use changes (e.g.,<br />

logging, cultivation, and grazing). Patterns <strong>of</strong> human-induced fragmentation are strongly<br />

influenced by culture, economics, politics, social conventions, and aes<strong>the</strong>tic preferences<br />

(Nassauer 1995). In <strong>the</strong> resulting patchwork, natural areas <strong>of</strong>ten are surrounded by humaninfluenced<br />

environments that may harbor invasive species, generalist predators, and ecological<br />

processes that can degrade natural areas. O<strong>the</strong>r effects <strong>of</strong> habitat fragmentation that have been<br />

well documented include increased edge effects, disrupted species dispersal, reduced<br />

biodiversity, and changes in natural disturbance regimes.<br />

Major efforts should be made at FLMR to limit fur<strong>the</strong>r fragmentation <strong>of</strong> contiguous blocks <strong>of</strong><br />

native habitat, mainly <strong>the</strong> upland and bottomland forests. The unique nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floodplain<br />

forest on a regional scale makes management to prevent fragmentation a priority. Road<br />

construction, timber harvest, and o<strong>the</strong>r activities that create artificial disturbance corridors into<br />

natural areas should be eliminated. These corridors can act as pathways for biological invasion<br />

by unwanted species. At <strong>the</strong> same time efforts to limit edge effects and buffer <strong>the</strong>se areas with<br />

low intensity land uses should be encouraged.<br />

Recommendation 9. Monitor and control exotic plants that pose a threat to native biodiversity<br />

at FLMR.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 115


Biological communities at FLMR represent a rich reservoir <strong>of</strong> native biodiversity, and <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

plans to enhance and preserve this biodiversity through strategic management initiatives.<br />

Invasive (exotic) plants pose a threat to <strong>the</strong> native biodiversity at FLMR and may interfere with<br />

future restoration efforts. Exotic species are those that do not naturally occur within an area.<br />

Although many exotic species have minimal impact on native communities, some that colonize<br />

an area can become so abundant that <strong>the</strong>y out-compete native plants and disrupt native habitats.<br />

For <strong>the</strong>se reasons, sound management requires monitoring <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> potentially aggressive<br />

exotic species and, in some cases, active treatment to reduce <strong>the</strong>ir abundance. We have<br />

identified 27 species <strong>of</strong> exotic plants that are <strong>of</strong> concern at FLMR (Appendix F).<br />

Monitoring <strong>the</strong> distribution and abundance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species is a critical step in protecting<br />

biodiversity at FLMR. For some species, an active program <strong>of</strong> control is recommended (see<br />

species-specific summaries in Appendix F). Control programs must be implemented carefully to<br />

minimize <strong>the</strong> impact on non-target species; a poorly implemented program can be extremely<br />

harmful to native biodiversity. Workshops on invasive species and educational materials<br />

(pamphlets and handouts) could help inform resource managers and <strong>the</strong> public about <strong>the</strong> threats<br />

posed by exotic species.<br />

Recommendation 10. The old-growth floodplain forest on FLMR should be designated<br />

formally as an outstanding natural area.<br />

The old-growth floodplain forest on FLMR is believed to be <strong>the</strong> largest example <strong>of</strong> this natural<br />

community type remaining in <strong>the</strong> lower Missouri River basin. It supports a variety <strong>of</strong> state-rare<br />

species (Chapters 3 and 4 in this report) and contains <strong>the</strong> state champion pecan tree. This tract <strong>of</strong><br />

floodplain forest should be nominated for recognition by appropriate state and/or federal agencies<br />

that operate natural areas programs, such as <strong>the</strong> National Park Service’s National <strong>Natural</strong><br />

Landmark Program. O<strong>the</strong>r types <strong>of</strong> recognition also may be appropriate. Before specific areas<br />

are nominated for recognition, a list <strong>of</strong> activities planned in <strong>the</strong> forest should be made, including<br />

military training and recreational uses (hunting, horse riding, mushroom hunting, hiking, and bird<br />

watching). Some activities may have to be restricted in <strong>the</strong> floodplain forest depending on <strong>the</strong><br />

type <strong>of</strong> recognition sought. We believe formal recognition would increase awareness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

importance <strong>of</strong> this area and instill pride among <strong>the</strong> base staff and in <strong>the</strong> community as a whole.<br />

Recommendation 11. A trail plan should be developed for <strong>the</strong> installation that will promote<br />

greater public understanding and appreciation for <strong>the</strong> natural environments <strong>of</strong> FLMR and<br />

minimize damage to fragile ecosystems.<br />

The trail system that exists currently on FLMR should be modified in light <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> this<br />

study. Specifically, we suggest that one primary interpretive trail be established in <strong>the</strong> upland<br />

forest and one in <strong>the</strong> floodplain forest. Development and maintenance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se trails might<br />

involve civic organizations from FLMR or <strong>the</strong> city <strong>of</strong> Leavenworth. Interpretive trails should be<br />

built on existing trails and designed to provide reliable access, minimize <strong>of</strong>f-trail damage, and<br />

stabilize or repair damage that has resulted from earlier trail use. A well-marked trail head at<br />

which hikers can pick up trail guides and o<strong>the</strong>r interpretive information is strongly suggested.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 116


O<strong>the</strong>r trails and paths on <strong>the</strong> installation, especially those in high-quality natural communities,<br />

near populations <strong>of</strong> rare species, or through sites that are fragile (such as on steep slopes along<br />

<strong>the</strong> bluffs in <strong>the</strong> north part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> installation) should be closed to reduce fur<strong>the</strong>r environmental<br />

damage caused by hikers, horse riders, hunters, or o<strong>the</strong>r recreational users. Use <strong>of</strong> trails by<br />

people in motorized vehicles (e.g., trucks, ATVs, or motorcycles) is particularly damaging to<br />

certain sensitive areas.<br />

Recommendation 12. More interpretive information about <strong>the</strong> natural history <strong>of</strong> FLMR<br />

should be made available to <strong>the</strong> public and installation personnel.<br />

The abundant information about <strong>the</strong> flora, fauna, and ecology <strong>of</strong> FLMR and <strong>the</strong> landscape area in<br />

which it is located should be used to produce brochures, pamphlets, and booklets about <strong>the</strong>se<br />

subjects. Easy-to-understand, readily available information is an essential element to improve<br />

<strong>the</strong> public’s understanding <strong>of</strong> natural history. Examples <strong>of</strong> such publications are available at Ft.<br />

Riley Military Reservation and at many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> public lands managed by state and federal agencies<br />

across <strong>Kansas</strong>. Various pr<strong>of</strong>essional societies and o<strong>the</strong>rs likely would be willing to help with<br />

<strong>the</strong>se projects (e.g., <strong>Kansas</strong> Ornithological Society, <strong>Kansas</strong> Herpetological Society, and <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

Wildflower Society).<br />

Recommendation 13. A comprehensive publication dealing with natural resources at FLMR,<br />

including historical perspectives, should be produced.<br />

This type <strong>of</strong> publication would be invaluable in describing <strong>the</strong> current and historic status <strong>of</strong><br />

natural resources at FLMR, and could serve as a fundamental building block in raising awareness<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> character and nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural environment. A key person in producing this document<br />

would be <strong>the</strong> FLMR Forester, Matt Nowak, who’s tenure at FLMR exceeds 25 years. An issue in<br />

planning this project will be balancing technical information with ease <strong>of</strong> reading by a broad<br />

audience.<br />

Recommendation 14. Baseline studies <strong>of</strong> aquatic environments on FLMR should be<br />

conducted.<br />

Aquatic habitats are an integral part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural environment <strong>of</strong> FLMR but have received only<br />

limited attention. Urbanization, industrial development, and agricultural activity in <strong>the</strong><br />

watersheds on and near <strong>the</strong> installation clearly have affected streams and rivers. Unfortunately,<br />

few studies have examined <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong>se streams and <strong>the</strong>ir biota have changed.<br />

Baseline studies <strong>of</strong> all aquatic environments on FLMR should be conducted and should include<br />

invertebrates as well as vertebrates. Once <strong>the</strong>se studies have been completed, periodic<br />

monitoring <strong>of</strong> aquatic species and <strong>the</strong>ir habitats should be implemented.<br />

Recommendation 15. FLMR should continue to support <strong>the</strong> MAPS initiative.<br />

Long-term data on breeding birds resulting from <strong>the</strong> MAPS project by <strong>the</strong> Institute for Bird<br />

Populations (2003) were compiled through 2001; however, that research was discontinued at<br />

FLMR in 2002. These are extremely valuable data and <strong>the</strong> staff <strong>of</strong> FLMR is encouraged to<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 117


support this research program in <strong>the</strong> future given <strong>the</strong> opportunity.<br />

Recommendation 16. Periodic surveys should be conducted on FLMR to update existing<br />

information about rare plants and animals and outstanding natural areas.<br />

Occurrence records maintained by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Heritage</strong> <strong>Inventory</strong> should be updated<br />

periodically to determine <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> rare and declining species and natural communities and to<br />

assess <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> changes in <strong>the</strong> management <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> installation.<br />

Recommendation 17. Habitat maps should be produced to facilitate natural resources<br />

management planning for FLMR.<br />

Maps <strong>of</strong> vegetation and habitat are fundamental components <strong>of</strong> natural resource planning and<br />

should be produced for FLMR. High-quality natural areas have been identified in <strong>the</strong> present<br />

report; however, a complete habitat map that also includes o<strong>the</strong>r features (e.g., degraded native<br />

communities, small high-quality natural areas, disturbed areas, and cultural vegetation types) is<br />

needed to plan for preservation and enhancement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural environment. Baseline<br />

vegetation data could be collected in conjunction with mapping that could serve as baseline to<br />

monitor changes in conditions. All such information should be mapped in GIS format and data<br />

layers should be updated as required.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 118


FIGURE 5.1. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> small remnant prairies at FLMR. Woody vegetation within and<br />

surrounding <strong>the</strong> site should be removed and a prescribed burning plan implemented to preserve<br />

biodiversity<br />

.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 119


CHAPTER 6. SUMMARY<br />

A two-year field study was initiated in 2002 on <strong>the</strong> Ft. Leavenworth Military Reservation as a<br />

follow-up to research conducted <strong>the</strong>re by <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> Biological Survey in 1995 and 1996<br />

(Freeman et al. 1997). The project had four primary objectives. First, new surveys were<br />

conducted to update information about biotic assemblages, outstanding natural areas, and<br />

protected species. <strong>Natural</strong> communities identified during <strong>the</strong> first survey were re-evaluated to<br />

document any significant changes in extent, structure, or species composition. Systematic<br />

surveys were conducted for protected species known to occur on <strong>the</strong> installation and several o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

species that potentially might use habitat <strong>the</strong>re. Second, because some rare species and natural<br />

communities are vulnerable to <strong>the</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> exotic species, threats from exotic plants were<br />

identified. Third, locations <strong>of</strong> rare species, problematic exotic species, and outstanding natural<br />

community occurrences were mapped in GIS for use by members <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural resources staff at<br />

FLMR. Fourth, based on <strong>the</strong> cumulative findings, management recommendations were<br />

developed to assist resource managers with maintenance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> installation’s biodiversity assets.<br />

Seven kinds <strong>of</strong> terrestrial natural communities were confirmed: four forest types (Maple-<br />

Basswood Forest, White oak-Shagbark hickory Forest, Cottonwood-Sycamore Floodplain Forest,<br />

and Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest), one herbaceous type (Glaciated Tallgrass Prairie), and<br />

two sparse vegetation types (Midwest Moist Limestone-Dolostone Cliff and Riverine Sand Flats-<br />

Bars Sparse Vegetation). Riverine communities were not examined or evaluated in this study.<br />

One occurrence each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> four forest types, first identified by Freeman et al. (1997), was<br />

updated in KSNHI’s database <strong>of</strong> outstanding natural community occurrences. Detailed<br />

information for o<strong>the</strong>r natural community occurrences was not ga<strong>the</strong>red because <strong>the</strong>se<br />

communities are too small, too degraded, or too poorly known in <strong>the</strong> state to permit satisfactory<br />

evaluation. The name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Pecan-Hackberry Floodplain Forest, reported by Freeman et al.<br />

(1997) as <strong>the</strong> Pecan-Sugarberry Floodplain Forest, was changed to reflect <strong>the</strong> co-dominance <strong>of</strong><br />

common hackberry, not sugarberry, in that community. A small, degraded remnant <strong>of</strong> Bulrush-<br />

Catttail Marsh reported in Freeman et al. (1997) was found to have been destroyed due to<br />

construction along <strong>the</strong> railroad on FLMR.<br />

As reported earlier (Freeman et al. 1997), natural communities on FLMR are regionally or<br />

globally significant. The floodplain forest is believed to be <strong>the</strong> largest old-growth stand<br />

remaining in <strong>the</strong> lower Missouri River valley. Upland forests and smaller, associated natural<br />

communities are regionally important. Collectively, <strong>the</strong>se natural communities provide habitat<br />

for globally-rare or state-rare species, and <strong>the</strong>y support a rich biota representative <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> forestgrassland<br />

ecotone <strong>of</strong> central North America.<br />

Visual analysis <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> floodplain forests suggest significant changes have occurred since <strong>the</strong><br />

1995–1996 field seasons, probably <strong>the</strong> ongoing results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1993 flood. Analysis <strong>of</strong> plot data<br />

from 1995–1996 and 2003 did not reveal statistically significant differences, perhaps due to <strong>the</strong><br />

inherent stability <strong>of</strong> dominant trees in <strong>the</strong> community and methodological differences that<br />

affected <strong>the</strong> two data sets.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 120


While FLMR supports a diverse flora and fauna, <strong>the</strong> long-term maintenance <strong>of</strong> many <strong>of</strong> its<br />

ecosystems depends on a host <strong>of</strong> factors and influences outside <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resource<br />

managers at FLMR. Native species that inhabit FLMR year-round or seasonally face growing<br />

threats from degradation, fragmentation, isolation, and destruction <strong>of</strong> natural areas both on site<br />

and <strong>of</strong>f-site. Many species depend on air, land, and water corridors to rest, feed, and breed, and<br />

as avenues for <strong>the</strong>ir movement. Human activities have disrupted and altered many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se<br />

corridors, jeopardizing <strong>the</strong> survival <strong>of</strong> some species. Riparian forests on FLMR are especially<br />

significant in this regard, providing routes for <strong>the</strong> movement <strong>of</strong> wildlife, helping to maintain<br />

water quality, and contributing to <strong>the</strong> aes<strong>the</strong>tics <strong>of</strong> FLMR. Efforts to maintain <strong>the</strong> ecological<br />

health <strong>of</strong> FLMR must begin by recognizing <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> natural habitats on FLMR and <strong>the</strong><br />

role <strong>the</strong>y play in <strong>the</strong> local and regional movement <strong>of</strong> species. Degraded prairies, forests, and<br />

wetlands can serve as buffer areas and connectors between high-quality sites, and many areas<br />

have restoration potential.<br />

Animal surveys revealed few changes from <strong>the</strong> findings reported by Freeman et al. (1997). As<br />

before, one federally protected species, <strong>the</strong> bald eagle, Haliaeetus leucocephalus (Linnaeus), is a<br />

regular migrant and winter resident on FLMR. Four species <strong>of</strong> federally protected birds may<br />

migrate through <strong>the</strong> area, but nesting and/or foraging habitat for <strong>the</strong>se species is limited or<br />

absent. They include <strong>the</strong> Eskimo curlew, Numenius borealis (Forster); least tern, Sterna<br />

antillarum (Lesson); piping plover, Charadrius melodus Ord; and whooping crane, Grus<br />

americana (Linnaeus). Due to <strong>the</strong> recent delisting <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> peregrine falcon, Falco peregrinus<br />

Tunstall, <strong>the</strong>re is one less federally protected bird species on FLMR than was reported earlier.<br />

The federally endangered pallid sturgeon, Scaphirhynchus albus (Forbes & Richardson), was<br />

documented in <strong>the</strong> Missouri River at FLMR in 2003. Surveys for two o<strong>the</strong>r federally endangered<br />

species, Indiana bat, Myotis sodalis Miller and G.M. Allen, and American burying beetle,<br />

Nicrophorus americanus Olivier, were conducted but nei<strong>the</strong>r species was found.<br />

No state-listed threatened and endangered species were documented. The white-faced ibis,<br />

Plegadis chihi (Vieillot), a state-threatened bird, may make infrequent, brief stops at FLMR<br />

during migration. Five <strong>Kansas</strong> SINCs were documented in 2003. Two SINC mammals, eastern<br />

chipmunk, Tamias striatus (Linnaeus) and sou<strong>the</strong>rn flying squirrel, Glaucomys volans<br />

(Linnaeus), are resident on FLMR. Three SINC neotropical migrant birds breed on <strong>the</strong><br />

installation: cerulean warbler, Dendroica cerulea (Wilson); yellow-throated warbler, Dendroica<br />

dominica (Linnaeus); and whip-poor-will, Caprimulgus vociferus Wilson. A fourth SINC bird,<br />

<strong>the</strong> red-shouldered hawk, Buteo lineatus Gmelin, probably breeds on or near FLMR. One<br />

additional <strong>Kansas</strong> SINC bird, <strong>the</strong> black tern Chlidonias niger (Linnaeus), infrequently may use<br />

habitat on <strong>the</strong> installation.<br />

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has not designated any habitat on FLMR as critical for any<br />

protected species. However, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> Department <strong>of</strong> Wildlife and Parks has designated <strong>the</strong><br />

mainstem <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri River as critical habitat for <strong>the</strong> bald eagle and seven fish species:<br />

chestnut lamprey, Ichthyomyzon castaneus (Girard); pallid sturgeon, Scaphirhynchus albus<br />

(Forbes & Richardson); fla<strong>the</strong>ad chub, Platygobio gracilis (Richardson); sicklefin chub,<br />

Macrhybopsis meeki (Jordan & Evermann); sturgeon chub, Macrhybopsis gelida (Girard);<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 121


silverband shiner, Notropis shumardi (Girard); and western silvery minnow, Hybognathus<br />

argyritis (Girard).<br />

Several state threatened and endangered species not found during this study still may occur on<br />

FLMR because <strong>the</strong>re is suitable habitat. They include: eastern spotted skunk, Spilogale putorius<br />

(Raf.); redbelly snake, Storeria occipitomaculata (Storer); and smooth earth snake, Virginia<br />

valeriae (Baird & Girard). All suitable woodland habitats in Leavenworth County are designated<br />

as critical habitat for <strong>the</strong> redbelly snake and <strong>the</strong> smooth earth snake.<br />

State-rare animals with no protection status documented on FLMR were <strong>the</strong> broad-winged hawk,<br />

Buteo platypterus (Vieillot), Cooper’s hawk, Accipiter cooperi (Bonaparte), great egret,<br />

Casmerodius albus (Linnaeus), and ovenbird, Seiurus aurocapillus (Linnaeus).<br />

Of 428 species <strong>of</strong> vertebrates considered potentially to occur on <strong>the</strong> installation, 292 species<br />

(68%) have been confirmed since 1995. The bird and mammal faunas <strong>of</strong> FLMR are <strong>the</strong> best<br />

documented. The level <strong>of</strong> understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> reptile and amphibian fauna on <strong>the</strong> installation is<br />

intermediate, with fishes being <strong>the</strong> most poorly studied vertebrate group.<br />

No populations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> federal-listed plant species Asclepias meadii, Platan<strong>the</strong>ra praeclara, or<br />

Trifolium stoloniferum were observed. However, nine <strong>of</strong> 11 state-rare vascular plant taxa<br />

documented by Freeman et al. (1997) were confirmed as persisting. These were Aster<br />

lateriflorus, Brachyelytrum erectum, Bromus nottowayanus, Hydrophyllum appendiculatum,<br />

Osmorhiza claytonii, Packera glabella, Ranunculus recurvatus var. recurvatus, Stachys pilosa<br />

var. arenicola, and Uvularia grandiflora. Populations <strong>of</strong> Blephilia hirsuta and Lithospermum<br />

latifolium were not relocated during <strong>the</strong> 2003 field season, but <strong>the</strong>se may persist. In addition,<br />

Carex radiata, Carex rosea, and Lipocarpha micrantha, three state-rare taxa reported by<br />

Freeman et al. (1997) as occurring on FLMR but not included among <strong>the</strong> state-rare species<br />

discussed by those authors were confirmed as persisting on <strong>the</strong> installation, and seven state-rare<br />

taxa were documented as occurring <strong>the</strong>re for <strong>the</strong> first time. These were Carex crus-corvi, Carex<br />

hirtifolia, Carex hitchcockiana, Carex normalis, Carex tribuloides var. sangamonensis,<br />

Hypericum ascyron, and Rubus alumnus.<br />

Plant surveys <strong>of</strong> more than 17 sites yielded 267 specimens <strong>of</strong> vascular plants and bryophytes.<br />

Among <strong>the</strong>se were voucher specimens representing 5 families, 13 genera, 52 species, and 55 taxa<br />

<strong>of</strong> vascular plants and bryophytes previously undocumented on FLMR, making a total <strong>of</strong> 103<br />

families, 325 genera, 585 species, and 591 taxa <strong>of</strong> vascular plants and 18 families, 32 genera, 43<br />

species <strong>of</strong> bryophytes confirmed on FLMR. Overall, <strong>the</strong> provenance for, longevity <strong>of</strong>, and<br />

habitat regularly occupied by taxa reported from FLMR have changed little between 1995–1996<br />

and 2003.<br />

The frequency <strong>of</strong> certain exotic taxa on <strong>the</strong> installation indicates that several species, including<br />

Berberis thunbergii, Elaeagnus umbellata, and Ligustrum obtusifolium, cited by Freeman et al.<br />

(1997) as adventive, are better considered naturalized in <strong>the</strong> area. Moreover, some exotic taxa,<br />

such as Alliaria petiolata, Ligustrum obtusifolium, Lonicera maackii, and Rosa multiflora,<br />

previously reported as rare, are now common, while o<strong>the</strong>rs, such as Phalaris arundinacea and<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 122


Sorghum halepense, previously reported as common, are now abundant in certain habitats on<br />

FLMR. Three exotic taxa, Cyperus fuscus, Euonymus alatus, and Rhodotypos scandens, were<br />

documented for <strong>the</strong> first time in <strong>Kansas</strong>. It is unlikely that any one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species will exhibit a<br />

significant, negative ecological impact on natural communities in <strong>the</strong> state.<br />

Based on <strong>the</strong> findings <strong>of</strong> this and previous studies, 17 recommendations are made to help<br />

maintain and enhance <strong>the</strong> biodiversity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> installation. Some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se are updates <strong>of</strong> those<br />

proposed by Freeman et al. (1997). The recommendations fall into one <strong>of</strong> three general<br />

categories: land management, education/promotion, and future studies. Land management<br />

recommendations include those that could be implemented quickly and relatively inexpensively<br />

to those that will require considerable allocation <strong>of</strong> resources and extensive coordination. Efforts<br />

to enhance recreational and educational opportunities on FLMR can take several forms.<br />

Improving <strong>the</strong> public’s knowledge, understanding, and appreciation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural environment at<br />

<strong>the</strong> site is strongly encouraged. Several recommendations will help fill gaps in our knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> natural environment at FLMR and would provide information valuable to natural resource<br />

managers.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 123


LITERATURE CITED<br />

Aber, J. S., J. Wallace, and M. C. Nowak. 2002. Response <strong>of</strong> forest to climatic events and<br />

human management at Fort Leavenworth, <strong>Kansas</strong>: <strong>Kansas</strong> Geological Survey, Current<br />

Research in Earth Sciences, Bull. 248, part 1.<br />

(http://www.kgs.ukans.edu/Current/2002/aber/aberl.html).<br />

Anonymous. 1966. When <strong>the</strong> Carolina parakeet was a part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> scene. <strong>Kansas</strong> Hist.<br />

Quarterly 32: i–ii.<br />

Axelrod, D. I. 1985. Rise <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> grassland biome, central North America. Bot. Rev. 51: 163–<br />

201.<br />

Barry, L. 1972. The beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> West. <strong>Kansas</strong> State Historical Society. Topeka, KS. 1296<br />

pp.<br />

Bee, J. W., G. E. Glass, R. S. H<strong>of</strong>fman, and R. R. Patterson. 1981. Mammals in <strong>Kansas</strong>. Univ.<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>, Mus. Nat. Hist. Publ. Educa. Ser. Lawrence, KS. 300 pp.<br />

Bragg, T. B. and L. C. Hulbert. 1976. Woody plant invasion <strong>of</strong> unburned <strong>Kansas</strong> bluestem<br />

prairie. J. Range Management 29: 19–24.<br />

Bragg, T. B. and A. K. Tatschl. 1977. Changes in flood-plain vegetation and land use along <strong>the</strong><br />

Missouri River from 1862-1972. Environmental Management 1: 343–348.<br />

Brooks, R. E. and C. C. Freeman. 1989. Status report on Trifolium stoloniferum Muhl. ex A.<br />

Eaton (running buffalo clover) in <strong>Kansas</strong>, Nebraska, and South Dakota. Unpubl. report to<br />

<strong>the</strong> U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Denver, CO. 20 pp.<br />

Busby, W. H. and J. Dan<strong>of</strong>f-Burg. 1992. Status report on Stygobromus clantoni (Creaser),<br />

Clanton’s cave amphipod, in <strong>Kansas</strong>. <strong>Kansas</strong> Biol. Surv. Rep. No. 52. Lawrence, KS. 22<br />

pp.<br />

Busby, W. H., D. W. Mulhern, P. G. Kramos, and D. Rintoul. 1997. Nesting piping plover and<br />

least tern on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> River. Prairie <strong>Natural</strong>ist 29: 257–262.<br />

Busby, W. H. and J. L. Zimmerman. 2001. <strong>Kansas</strong> breeding bird atlas. University Press <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Kansas</strong>. Lawrence, KS. 466 pp.<br />

Butterfield, C., J. Stubbendieck, and J. Stumpf. 1996. Species abstracts <strong>of</strong> highly disruptive<br />

exotic plants. Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Prairie Wildlife Research Center. Jamestown, ND.<br />

(http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/othrdata/exoticab/exoticab.htm).<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 124


Brumwell, M. J. 1951. An ecological survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fort Leavenworth Military Reservation.<br />

Amer. Midl. <strong>Natural</strong>ist 45: 187–231.<br />

Collins, J. T. 1993. Amphibians and reptiles in <strong>Kansas</strong>. University Press <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>. Lawrence,<br />

KS. 397 pp.<br />

Collins, J. T. 2003. Fall field trip report. Journal <strong>Kansas</strong> Herpetology 8:15.<br />

Collins, J. T., S. L. Collins, J. Horak, D. Mulhern, W. Busby, C. C. Freeman, and G. Wallace.<br />

1995. An illustrated guide to endangered and threatened species in <strong>Kansas</strong>. University<br />

Press <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>. Lawrence, KS. 140 pp.<br />

Coues, E. 1898. Notes on Mr. Thomas Meehan’s paper on <strong>the</strong> plants <strong>of</strong> Lewis and Clark’s<br />

expedition across <strong>the</strong> continent. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia 1898: 291–315.<br />

Cuttright, P. R. 1969. Lewis and Clark: pioneering naturalists. University <strong>of</strong> Nebraska Press.<br />

Lincoln, NE. 506 pp.<br />

Davis, C. R. 2003. Mammals <strong>of</strong> Fort Leavenworth, <strong>Kansas</strong>: a 60-year follow-up. Unpubl.<br />

Master’s <strong>the</strong>sis, Midwestern State University, Wichita Falls, TX. 65 pp.<br />

Edgerton, R. 1995. The relationship between Department <strong>of</strong> Defense installations and <strong>the</strong><br />

priority landscapes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Great Plains <strong>of</strong> North America: a Great Plains Partnership<br />

Perspective. Report prepared by <strong>the</strong> Western Governors’ Association. Denver, CO. 40 pp.<br />

+ appendices.<br />

Ely, C. A., M. D. Schwilling, and M. E. Rolfs. 1986. An annotated list <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> butterflies <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Kansas</strong>. Fort Hays State University, Museum <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> High Plains. Hays, KS.<br />

Emlen, J. T. 1984. An observer-specific, full season, strip-map method for censusing songbird<br />

communities. Auk 101: 730-740.<br />

Freeman, C. C. 2003. Checklist <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vascular plants <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>. Published by <strong>the</strong> author,<br />

University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> History Museum, R. L. McGregor Herbarium. Lawrence,<br />

KS. 128 pp.<br />

Freeman, C. C., W. H. Busby, C. L. Lauver, K. Kindscher, J. Elliott, and D. A. Eifler. 1997. A<br />

natural areas inventory <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ft. Leavenworth Military Reservation, Leavenworth<br />

County, <strong>Kansas</strong>. Rept. State Biol. Surv. <strong>Kansas</strong> 77. 257 pp. + appendix.<br />

Freeman, C. C., R. L. McGregor, and C. A. Morse. 1998. Vascular plants new to <strong>Kansas</strong>. Sida<br />

18: 593–604.<br />

Funk, J. L. and J. W. Robinson. 1974. Changes in <strong>the</strong> channel <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower Missouri River and<br />

effects on fish and wildlife. Aquatic Series No. 11, Missouri Dept. <strong>of</strong> Conservation.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 125


Jefferson City, MO. 52 pp.<br />

Guarisco, H. 1997. Discovery <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> federally endangered American burying beetle<br />

(Nicrophorus americanus) in <strong>the</strong> Chautauqua Hills <strong>of</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern <strong>Kansas</strong>. Trans. <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

Acad. Sci. 100: 116–122.<br />

Guarisco, H. 1998. Survey for <strong>the</strong> federally endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus<br />

americanus) in <strong>the</strong> Chautauqua Hills <strong>of</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern <strong>Kansas</strong> during 1997 and 1998.<br />

Unpubl. report to <strong>the</strong> U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.<br />

Guarisco, H. 1999. Survey for <strong>the</strong> federally endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus<br />

americanus) in <strong>the</strong> Chautauqua Hills <strong>of</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern <strong>Kansas</strong> during 1999. Unpubl. report<br />

to <strong>the</strong> U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.<br />

Haig, S., T. Eubanks, R. Lock, J. Sidle, L. Pfannmuller, E. Pike, and M. Ryan. 1994. Draft<br />

revised recovery plan for piping plovers, Charadrius melodus, breeding on <strong>the</strong> Great<br />

Lakes and nor<strong>the</strong>rn Great Plains. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 121 pp.<br />

Hamel, P. B. 2000. Cerulean warbler (Dendroica cerulea). In: A. Poole and F. Gill (eds.). The<br />

birds <strong>of</strong> North America, No. 511. The Birds <strong>of</strong> North America, Inc. Philadelphia, PA.<br />

Hands, H. R., R. D. Drobney, and M. R. Ryan. 1989. Status <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cerulean warbler in <strong>the</strong><br />

northcentral United States. Missouri Coop. Fish and Wildlife Unit, Univ. <strong>of</strong> Missouri.<br />

Columbia, MO. 11 pp.<br />

H<strong>of</strong>fman, H. and K. Kearns. 1997. Wisconsin manual <strong>of</strong> control recommendations for<br />

ecologically invasive plants. Wisconsin Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Natural</strong> Resources.<br />

(http://www.dnr.state.wi.us/org/land/er/invasive/manual_toc.htm).<br />

Holloway, A. K. and G. D. Schnell. 1997. Relationship between numbers <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> endangered<br />

American burying beetle Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera: Silphidae) and<br />

available food resources. Biol. Conservation 81: 145–152.<br />

Illinois Nature Preserves Commission. 1990. Vegetation management manual. Volume 1<br />

(Number 2). (http://www.inhs.uiuc.edu/chf/outreach/VMG/VMGintro.html).<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> Biological Survey, <strong>Kansas</strong> State University, <strong>Kansas</strong> Ornithological Society, and <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

Dept. <strong>of</strong> Wildlife and Parks. 1992. <strong>Kansas</strong> breeding-bird atlas (KBBAT) 1992–1996:<br />

handbook for cooperators. Open-file report, <strong>Kansas</strong> Biological Survey. Lawrence, KS. 30<br />

pp.<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> State Board <strong>of</strong> Agriculture. 1874. Report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> State Board <strong>of</strong> Agriculture to <strong>the</strong><br />

legislature for <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>, for <strong>the</strong> year 1873. <strong>Kansas</strong> Publishing House. Topeka,<br />

KS. 307 pp.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 126


<strong>Kansas</strong> State Board <strong>of</strong> Agriculture. 1877. Fifth annual report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> State Board <strong>of</strong> Agriculture<br />

to <strong>the</strong> legislature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>, for <strong>the</strong> year ending November 30, 1876. <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

Publishing House. Topeka, KS. 312 pp.<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> State Board <strong>of</strong> Agriculture. 1948. Thirty-fifth biennial report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> State Board<br />

<strong>of</strong> Agriculture to <strong>the</strong> legislature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> state for <strong>the</strong> years 1945-1946. State Printer.<br />

Topeka, KS. 463 pp.<br />

Kettle, W. D., P. M. Rich, K. Kindscher, G. L. Pittman, and P. Fu. 2000. Land-use history in<br />

ecosystem restoration: a 40-year study in <strong>the</strong> prairie-forest ecotone. Restoration Ecology<br />

8: 307-317.<br />

Kozol, A. J. 1990. Suggested survey protocol for Nicrophorus americanus, <strong>the</strong> American<br />

burying beetle. In: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1991. American burying beetle<br />

recovery plan. Technical/Agency draft. Newton Corner, MA. 73 pp.<br />

Kramer, C. L. and B. L. Wagenknecht. 1957. The habitat <strong>of</strong> Aplectrum hyemale in <strong>Kansas</strong>.<br />

Trans. <strong>Kansas</strong> Acad. Sci. 60: 376–378.<br />

Küchler, A. W. 1974. A new vegetation map <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>. Ecology 55: 586–604.<br />

Lauver, C. L. 1989. Preliminary classification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural communities <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>. <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

<strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Heritage</strong> Program, <strong>Kansas</strong> Biological Survey. Lawrence, KS. 21 pp.<br />

Lauver, C. L., K. Kindscher, D. Faber-Langendoen, and R. Schneider. 1999. A classification <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> natural vegetation <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>. The Southwestern <strong>Natural</strong>ist 44: 421–443.<br />

Levenson, H. L. and J. W. Bee. 1980. Bald eagle use <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> River riparian habitat in<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>astern <strong>Kansas</strong>. <strong>Kansas</strong> Ornith. Soc. Bull. 31: 28–37.<br />

Lomolino, M. V., J. C. Creighton, G. D. Schnell, and D. L. Certain. 1995. Ecology and<br />

conservation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus).<br />

Conservation Biol. 9: 605–614.<br />

Miller, E. J. and L. McDonald. 1997. Rediscovery <strong>of</strong> Nicrophorus americanus Olivier<br />

(Coleoptera: Silphidae) in <strong>Kansas</strong>. Coleopterist’s Bull. 51: 22.<br />

NatureServe. 2003. NatureServe Explorer: An online encyclopedia <strong>of</strong> life [web application].<br />

Version 1.8. NatureServe. Arlington, VA. (http://www.natureserve.org/explorer).<br />

Naussauer, J. I. 1995. The culture <strong>of</strong> nature. Cultural sustainability: aligning aes<strong>the</strong>tics and<br />

ecology. Pp 65–83. In: J. I. Naussauer (editor), Placing nature: culture and landscape<br />

ecology. Island Press. Washington, D.C.<br />

Nelson, P. W. 1985. The terrestrial natural communities <strong>of</strong> Missouri. Missouri <strong>Natural</strong> <strong>Areas</strong><br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 127


Committee. Jefferson City, MO. 197 pp.<br />

Packard, S. and C. F. Mutel. 1997. The tallgrass restoration handbook. Island Press.<br />

Washington, D.C. 463 pp.<br />

Partners in Flight. 2003. Online database <strong>of</strong> conservation scores <strong>of</strong> birds.<br />

(http://www.rmbo.org/pif/index.html).<br />

Pavri, F., J. S. Aber, J. A. Wallace, and M. C. Nowak. 2003. Monitoring forest cover trends in<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>astern <strong>Kansas</strong> through historical and multi-temporal satellite-image analysis.<br />

Trans. <strong>Kansas</strong> Acad. Sci. 106: 2–10.<br />

Pergrams, O. and D. Nyberg. 2003. Spermophilus franklinii. In: IUCN 2003. 2003 IUCN Red<br />

List <strong>of</strong> Threatened Species. (http://www.redlist.org).<br />

Peterson, J. M. 1987. Science in <strong>Kansas</strong>: <strong>the</strong> early years, 1804–1875: <strong>Kansas</strong> History 10: 201–<br />

240.<br />

Pflieger, W. L. 1989. Aquatic community classification system for Missouri. Aquatic Series<br />

No. 19, Missouri Dept. <strong>of</strong> Conservation. Jefferson City, MO. 70 pp.<br />

Ralph, C. J., G. R. Geupel, P. Pyle, T. E. Martin, and D. F. DeSante. 1993. Handbook <strong>of</strong> field<br />

methods for monitoring landbirds. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-144. Pacific Southwest<br />

Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Dept. <strong>of</strong> Agriculture. Albany, CA. 41 pp.<br />

Ratcliffe, B. C. 1996. The carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae) <strong>of</strong> Nebraska. Bull. Univ.<br />

Nebraska State Mus. 13: 1–100.<br />

Rhoads, A. F. and T. A. Block. 2000. The plants <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania: An illustrated manual.<br />

University <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania Press. Philadelphia, PA. 1061 pp.<br />

Ross, J. A. 1991. Geological map <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>. <strong>Kansas</strong> Geol. Surv. Map M–23. Lawrence, KS.<br />

Rundquist, E. M. 1977. The spring peeper, Hyla crucifer Wied (Anura, Hylidae) in <strong>Kansas</strong>.<br />

Trans. <strong>Kansas</strong> Acad. Sci. 80: 155–158.<br />

Schoewe, W. H. 1948. The geography <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>. Part 1. Political geography. Trans. <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

Acad. Sci. 51: 253–288.<br />

Schukman, J. M. 1996. Temporal and spatial relationships <strong>of</strong> three canopy-dwelling warblers in<br />

a Missouri River bottomland forest. <strong>Kansas</strong> Ornith. Soc. Bull. 47: 37–40.<br />

Schukman, J. M. and T. Mouras. 1992. Probable breeding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> yellow-throated warbler<br />

(Dendroica dominica) in nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong>. <strong>Kansas</strong> Ornith. Soc. Bull. 43: 27–30.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 128


Schwartz, C. W. and E. R. Schwartz. 1981. The wild mammals <strong>of</strong> Missouri. Univ. Press <strong>of</strong><br />

Missouri and Missouri Dept. <strong>of</strong> Conservation. Columbia, MO. 356 pp.<br />

Shelford, V. E. 1963. The ecology <strong>of</strong> North America. University <strong>of</strong> Illinois Press. Urbana, IL.<br />

610 pp.<br />

Sidle, J.G., and W. F. Harrison. 1990. Recovery plan for <strong>the</strong> interior least tern (Sterna<br />

antillarum). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 90 pp.<br />

Simon, M. P. 1988. Report on <strong>the</strong> status <strong>of</strong> selected amphibian species <strong>of</strong> special interest in<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong>. Unpubl. report to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> Dept. <strong>of</strong> Wildlife and Parks. Dept. <strong>of</strong><br />

Biology, Benedictine College, Atchison, KS. 11 pp.<br />

Simon, M. P. and J. H. Dorlac. 1990. The results <strong>of</strong> a faunistic survey <strong>of</strong> reptiles and<br />

amphibians <strong>of</strong> Fort Leavenworth, <strong>Kansas</strong>. Unpubl. report. Dept. <strong>of</strong> Biology, Benedictine<br />

College. Atchison, KS. 10 pp.<br />

Smith, T. E. 1997. Missouri vegetation management plan. Revised edition. <strong>Natural</strong> History<br />

Division, Missouri Department <strong>of</strong> Conservation. Jefferson City, MO. 158 pp.<br />

Stevens, W. C. and F. E. Dill. 1942. Aplectrum spicatum in a <strong>Kansas</strong> woodland. Trans. <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

Acad. Sci. 45: 131–158.<br />

Swearingen, J., K. Reshetil<strong>of</strong>f, B. Slattery, and S. Zwicker. 2002. Plant invaders <strong>of</strong> mid-Atlantic<br />

natural areas. National Park Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 82 pp.<br />

(http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/pubs/midatlantic/index.htm).<br />

Thompson, M. C. and C. Ely. 1989. Birds in <strong>Kansas</strong>. Vol. I. University Press <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>.<br />

Lawrence, KS. 404 pp.<br />

Thompson, M. C. and C. Ely. 1992. Birds in <strong>Kansas</strong>. Vol II. University Press <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>.<br />

Lawrence, KS. 424 pp.<br />

3D/Environmental Services. 1993. A summer survey for federally endangered Indiana bat<br />

(Myotis sodalis) in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong>. Unpubl. report submitted to Western Resources.<br />

Topeka, KS.<br />

Tu, M., C. Hurd, and J. M. Randall. 2001. Weed control methods handbook: tools and<br />

techniques for use in natural areas. The Nature Conservancy.<br />

(http://tncweeds.ucdavis.edu/index.html).<br />

Tucker, G. C., B. G. Marcks, and J. R. Carter. 2002. 15. Cyperus L. Pp. 141–191. In: Flora <strong>of</strong><br />

North America Editorial Committee (eds.). Flora <strong>of</strong> North America north <strong>of</strong> Mexico. Vol.<br />

23. Magnoliophyta: Commelinideae (in part): Cyperaceae. Oxford University Press, NY.<br />

608 pp.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 129


University <strong>of</strong> Connecticut. 2001. Plant database <strong>of</strong> trees, shrubs and vines.<br />

(http://www.hort.uconn.edu/plants/).<br />

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1991. American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus)<br />

recovery plan. Newton Corner, MA. 80 pp.<br />

Ware, E. R. and L. F. Smith. 1939. Woodlands <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>. Agricultural Experiment Station,<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> State College <strong>of</strong> Agriculture and Applied Science.<br />

Water Science and Technology Board. 2002. The Missouri River ecosystem, exploring <strong>the</strong><br />

prospects for recovery. National Academy Press. Washington, D.C.<br />

Watkins, M . A., E. Willis, and D. W. Mulhern. 1994. A history <strong>of</strong> successful bald eagle nesting<br />

in <strong>Kansas</strong>. <strong>Kansas</strong> Ornith. Soc. Bull. 44: 29–35.<br />

Watkins, M. A., D. W. Mulhern, and E. Willis. 1996. Bald eagle nesting in <strong>Kansas</strong>-1995.<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> Ornith. Soc. Bull. 47:29–33.<br />

Weaver, J. E. 1960. Flood plain vegetation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> central Missouri valley and contacts <strong>of</strong><br />

woodland with prairie. Ecol. Monographs. 30: 37–64.<br />

Weins, J. A., B. Van Horne, and B. R. Noon. 2002. Integrating landscape structure and scale<br />

into natural resource management. Pp 23–67, In: J. Liu and W. N. Taylor (editors),<br />

Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management. Cambridge University<br />

Press. 480 pp.<br />

Zavesky, L. D. and W. C. Boatright. 1977. Soil survey <strong>of</strong> Leavenworth and Wyandotte counties,<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong>. U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 80 pp.<br />

Zimmerman, J. L. and J. L. Tatschl. 1975. Floodplain birds <strong>of</strong> Weston Bend, Missouri River.<br />

Wilson Bull. 87:196-206.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 130


APPENDIX A. Directions to vegetation plots.<br />

Lowland Forest Plots<br />

Plots A1-4 From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Rialto Trail (Tail Dike Trail) and Pecan Alley, go SE on<br />

Pecan Alley to a large pecan tree broken <strong>of</strong>f at head height on <strong>the</strong> N side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

trail. The center post is located 45 m due E <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> broken pecan tree. 20 m from<br />

<strong>the</strong> center post in each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cardinal directions a 30-cm long piece <strong>of</strong> rebar, sunk<br />

level with <strong>the</strong> ground, marks <strong>the</strong> corner <strong>of</strong> each plot. The plots radiate in a<br />

clockwise direction from those corners.<br />

Plots B1-4 From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Rialto Trail (Tail Dike Trail) and Pecan Alley, go 100 m<br />

due W to a center post at <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> a large cottonwood tree. 20 m from <strong>the</strong><br />

center post in each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cardinal directions a 30-cm long piece <strong>of</strong> rebar, sunk<br />

level with <strong>the</strong> ground, marks <strong>the</strong> corner <strong>of</strong> each plot. The plots radiate in a<br />

counter clockwise direction from those corners.<br />

Plot C From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Chief Joseph Loop and River Trail, go NE along River<br />

Trail for approximately 1500 paces (1 km). A large, dead tree lies parallel to <strong>the</strong><br />

trail on <strong>the</strong> NW side. A major trail crosses <strong>the</strong> trail 15 m SW <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dead tree.<br />

From <strong>the</strong> root base <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dead tree go 100 m SE to <strong>the</strong> corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot. The<br />

plot has one large cottonwood, a variety <strong>of</strong> mixed hardwoods, and an herbaceous<br />

understory <strong>of</strong> horsetails.<br />

Plot D From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Sawmill Trail and <strong>the</strong> S end <strong>of</strong> Pecan Alley go NE along<br />

Sawmill Trail 26 m to a large, double-trunk pecan. From <strong>the</strong> tree go 99 m N to a<br />

mulberry tree with a circumference <strong>of</strong> 89 cm, which marks <strong>the</strong> corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot.<br />

Plot E From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Sawmill Trail and <strong>the</strong> S end <strong>of</strong> Pecan Alley go NE along<br />

<strong>the</strong> old Sawmill Trail. The trail deteriorates. Follow <strong>the</strong> broad drainage to <strong>the</strong><br />

vicinity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> heron rookery. In <strong>the</strong> drainage due N <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> heron rookery a large<br />

double-trunk pecan is in <strong>the</strong> corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot.<br />

Plot F From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Rialto Trail (Tail Dike Trail) and Pecan Alley, continue<br />

NE on Rialto Trail for approximately 200 m to birding flags on <strong>the</strong> right side <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> trail. Go due E 250 m to a pecan-hackberry site.<br />

Plot G From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Sawmill Trail and Pecan Alley go N on Pecan Alley for<br />

approximately 240 m. Then go due E for 235 m to large sycamores.<br />

Plot H From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Chief Joseph Loop and River Trail go NE on River Trail.<br />

Approximately 2.4 km from <strong>the</strong> intersection. Go due E for 65 m to <strong>the</strong> corner <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> plot.<br />

Plot I From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Sawmill Trail and Pecan Alley, go 340 m N along Pecan<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 131


Alley to a trail to <strong>the</strong> NE. Follow <strong>the</strong> trail approximately 140 m to a large doubletrunk<br />

pecan, which is in <strong>the</strong> SW corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot.<br />

Plot J From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Chief Joseph Loop and River Trail, go NE on River Trail<br />

approximately 750 m. Enter <strong>the</strong> woods at 125˚ for 40 m. A large cottonwood is<br />

in <strong>the</strong> NW corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot.<br />

Plot K From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Rialto Trail (Tail Dike Trail) and River Trail go SE on<br />

River Trail. Approximately 300 m past <strong>the</strong> river overlook, an area <strong>of</strong> large<br />

cottonwood trees and dense horsetail will in on <strong>the</strong> W side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trail. The plot is<br />

located just <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trail. A large cottonwood tree is in <strong>the</strong> NW corner.<br />

Plots L1-4 From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Rialto Trail (Tail Dike Trail) and Weston Bend Trail go<br />

WNW 114 m along Weston Bend Trail. Go 18 m N <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trail to <strong>the</strong> largest<br />

cottonwood tree in <strong>the</strong> area (circumference 338 cm). The N side <strong>of</strong> that<br />

cottonwood marks <strong>the</strong> SE corner <strong>of</strong> Plot L4. 40 m N <strong>of</strong> that tree is <strong>the</strong> center post<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> 4 plots. 20 m in each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cardinal directions, a 30-cm long piece <strong>of</strong><br />

rebar, sunk level with <strong>the</strong> ground, marks <strong>the</strong> corner <strong>of</strong> each plot. The plots radiate<br />

in a clockwise direction from those corners.<br />

Plot M The center point is a large dead cottonwood tree (325 cm circumference) with a<br />

large burl approximately 7.6 m above ground level. A huge grape vine drapes <strong>the</strong><br />

bole. It stands in an area with little to no understory and a sparse herbaceous<br />

layer. It is located approximately 650 m from <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Rialto Trail (Tail<br />

Dike Trail) and Pecan Alley and approximately 265 m from <strong>the</strong> nearest point on<br />

Rialto Trail. The plot is located 20 m N <strong>of</strong> that tree.<br />

Plot N From <strong>the</strong> corner post <strong>of</strong> plot K go NW for approximately 350 m past a terrace <strong>of</strong><br />

sycamores to a narrow pecan-dominated terrace.<br />

Plot O From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Chief Joseph Loop and Cottonwood Trail go NE along<br />

Cottonwood Trail for 200 m. Turn to <strong>the</strong> NW at 315˚ for 140 m. The plot<br />

corner is at <strong>the</strong> edge <strong>of</strong> a thin stand <strong>of</strong> young cottonwoods. The GPS reading is<br />

for <strong>the</strong> SE corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot.<br />

Plot P From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Chief Joseph Loop and Cottonwood Trail go NE along<br />

Cottonwood Trail for 400 m. Turn SE and enter <strong>the</strong> woods at 120˚ for 100 m.<br />

The GPS reading is for <strong>the</strong> SE corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot.<br />

Plot Q From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Chief Joseph Loop and Cottonwood Trail go NE along<br />

Cottonwood Trail for 735 m. Go due W for 20 m to <strong>the</strong> SE corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot.<br />

Plot R From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Chief Joseph Loop and Rialto Trail (Tail Dike Trail) go<br />

NE along trail until it is interrupted at <strong>the</strong> scour hole. Go to <strong>the</strong> right around <strong>the</strong><br />

scour hole to a stand <strong>of</strong> young, even-aged pecans on <strong>the</strong> SE side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> scour hole.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 132


The GPS reading is <strong>the</strong> SE corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot.<br />

Plot S From Plot R continue around <strong>the</strong> scour hole to <strong>the</strong> E side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hole, across a<br />

ravine, and up onto a small terrace. The plot is located in a thin stand <strong>of</strong> young<br />

cottonwood trees and reed canary grass. The GPS reading is for <strong>the</strong> SE corner <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> plot.<br />

Plot T From <strong>the</strong> intersection <strong>of</strong> Chief Joseph Loop and Sawmill Trail go NE along<br />

Sawmill Trail for approximately 0.8 km. The plot is approximately 200 m past<br />

<strong>the</strong> intersection with <strong>the</strong> Canary Cut<strong>of</strong>f. The large slough is on <strong>the</strong> SE side <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

trail. The GPS reading is for <strong>the</strong> SE corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot.<br />

Plot U From Chief Joseph Loop go N on Marsh Trail to <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> that trail. Go 160 m at<br />

350˚ to a stand <strong>of</strong> very large cottonwood trees.<br />

Plot V From Plot U go due N for 115 m to a mixed stand <strong>of</strong> cottonwood, hackberry, and<br />

boxelder trees with an herbaceous layer <strong>of</strong> almost pure horsetails.<br />

Plot W From Plot V go 345 m at 260˚ to a stand <strong>of</strong> even-aged, mature boxelders in a sea<br />

<strong>of</strong> horsetails.<br />

Upland Forest Plots<br />

Plot AA Enter <strong>the</strong> woods from <strong>the</strong> trailhead S <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shooting range on Sheridan Drive.<br />

Walk 475 paces to <strong>the</strong> ENE. Three large bur oak trees loom to <strong>the</strong> S <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> trail.<br />

The N-most <strong>of</strong> those trees is <strong>the</strong> NW corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot. A recent fall <strong>of</strong> a large<br />

branch from one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> oaks is in <strong>the</strong> center <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot.<br />

Plot BB From <strong>the</strong> picnic area parking lot (Fort de Cavagnial) on Sheridan Drive, walk S on<br />

old road/trail into <strong>the</strong> woods. Go 300 paces to <strong>the</strong> trail intersection marked with<br />

flagging. Go W 400 paces. While ascending <strong>the</strong> hill (bearing NE), leave <strong>the</strong> trail<br />

going 40 paces to <strong>the</strong> W to <strong>the</strong> plot.<br />

Plot CC Enter <strong>the</strong> woods from trailhead on Sheridan Drive, S <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> shooting range. Walk<br />

300 paces ENE. Just after descending <strong>the</strong> hill, turn SE onto a smaller trail. This<br />

trail intersects with a larger horse-riding trail in approximately 100 paces. Follow<br />

<strong>the</strong> horse trail to <strong>the</strong> SW for 250 paces, where a smaller trail diverges to <strong>the</strong> SE<br />

across creek. Go 300 paces on <strong>the</strong> smaller trail, through <strong>the</strong> creek, and up <strong>the</strong><br />

o<strong>the</strong>r side to a T-intersection with ano<strong>the</strong>r small trail. A green metal fencepost is<br />

at that intersection on a N-facing slope. Go 20 m N to <strong>the</strong> corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot.<br />

Plot DD From intersection <strong>of</strong> Sheridan Drive and McPherson Drive go E on McPherson<br />

Drive. Halfway down <strong>the</strong> hill, a trail leads NW. Go 500 paces NW on that trail.<br />

Turn W <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong> trail for approximately 40 m to <strong>the</strong> corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot, which sits on<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 133


a terrace E <strong>of</strong> a small ravine. A large chinquapin oak is in <strong>the</strong> NE corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

plot.<br />

Plot EE From <strong>the</strong> picnic area parking lot on Sheridan Drive, enter <strong>the</strong> woods E <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

parking lot. Go S on <strong>the</strong> trail until reaching <strong>the</strong> creek at <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> hill. Walk<br />

along <strong>the</strong> creek to <strong>the</strong> NW until <strong>the</strong> creek begins a second loop toward <strong>the</strong> N.<br />

Climb steep ridge to <strong>the</strong> S. Plot is near top <strong>of</strong> ridge.<br />

Plot FF Park near <strong>the</strong> NE corner <strong>of</strong> Chief Joseph Loop and <strong>the</strong> railroad tracks. Cross <strong>the</strong><br />

tracks and follow <strong>the</strong> base <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cliff to <strong>the</strong> NW for approximately 1.2 km.<br />

Ascend <strong>the</strong> ridge. The plot is near <strong>the</strong> ridge top to <strong>the</strong> SE <strong>of</strong> a ravine. A large<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn red oak is in <strong>the</strong> NW corner <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> plot.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 134


APPENDIX B. Checklist <strong>of</strong> vertebrates known to occur or possibly occurring on <strong>the</strong> Ft.<br />

Leavenworth Military Reservation.<br />

Presence codes are: C = confirmed on FLMR during this study or previous studies (* = confirmed<br />

breeding); Pr = probably occurs on FLMR; Po = possibly occurs on FLMR. Sources <strong>of</strong> data are: 1<br />

= surveys conducted specifically for this study (1997 and 2003); 2 = Brumwell (1951); 3 =<br />

unpublished data from <strong>the</strong> MAPS project, data from <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong> Breeding Bird Atlas Project<br />

(<strong>Kansas</strong> Biological Survey et al. 1992), or Checklist <strong>of</strong> Birds, Fort Leavenworth, <strong>Kansas</strong>; 4 =<br />

Davis (2003, unpublished data). Status codes are: R = year-round resident; B = summer resident<br />

and presumed breeder; M = migrant or winter resident, X = presumed extirpated.<br />

ORDER<br />

Species<br />

MAMMALS<br />

Common Name Presence Source Status<br />

Didelphis virginiana Virginia opossum C 2,4 R<br />

Blarina brevicada nor<strong>the</strong>rn short-tailed shrew C 2,4 R<br />

Cryptotis parva least shrew C 2,4 R<br />

Scalopus aquaticus eastern mole C 2,4 R<br />

Myotis lucifugus little brown myotis C 1,2 B<br />

Myotis septentrionalis nor<strong>the</strong>rn myotis C 1 B<br />

Pipistrellus subflavus eastern pipistrelle C 1 B<br />

Eptesicus fuscus big brown bat C 1,2,4 R<br />

Lasiurus borealis red bat C 1,2,4 B<br />

Lasiurus cinereus hoary bat C 1,2 B<br />

Nycticeius humeralis evening bat C 1,2,4 B<br />

Tadarida brasiliensis Brazilian free-tailed bat Po - M<br />

Dasypus novemcinctus nine-banded armadillo Po - ?<br />

Sylvilagus floridanus eastern cottontail C 1,2,4 R<br />

Lepus californicus black-tailed jackrabbit C 2 X<br />

Tamius striatus eastern chipmunk C 1,2,4 R<br />

Marmota monax woodchuck C 2,4 R<br />

Spermophilus tridecemlineatus thirteen-lined ground squirrel C 2,4 R<br />

Spermophilus franklinii Franklin's ground squirrel C 2 X<br />

Sciurus carolinensis gray squirrel C 1,2,4 R<br />

Sciurus niger fox squirrel C 1,2,4 R<br />

Glaucomys volans sou<strong>the</strong>rn flying squirrel C 1,2,4 R<br />

Geomys bursarius plains pocket gopher C 2,4 R<br />

Castor canadensis beaver C 1,2,4 R<br />

Reithrodontomys montanus plains harvest mouse Po - ?<br />

Reithrodontomys megalotis western harvest mouse C 2,4 R<br />

Peromyscus maniculatus deer mouse C 2,4 R<br />

Peromyscus leucopus white-footed mouse C 1,2,4 R<br />

Sigmodon hispidus hispid cotton rat C 4 R<br />

Neotoma floridana eastern woodrat C 1,2,4 R<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 135


ORDER<br />

Species<br />

Common Name Presence Source Status<br />

Microtus ochrogaster prairie vole C 1,2,4 R<br />

Microtus pinetorum woodland vole C 2,4 R<br />

Ondatra zibethicus muskrat C 2 ?<br />

Synaptomys cooperi sou<strong>the</strong>rn bog lemming C 4 R<br />

Rattus norvegicus Norway rat C 2 R<br />

Mus musculus house mouse C 2,4 R<br />

Zapus hudsonius meadow jumping mouse C 1,4 R<br />

Canis latrans coyote C 2,4 R<br />

Vulpes vulpes red fox C 2,4 R<br />

Urocyno cinereoargenteus gray fox C 4 R<br />

Ursus americanus black bear - - X<br />

Procyon lotor raccoon C 1,2,4 R<br />

Lutra canadensis river otter Pr - ?<br />

Mustela nivalis least weasel Po - ?<br />

Mustela frenata long-tailed weasel C 2 ?<br />

Mustela vison mink C 2,4 R<br />

Taxidea taxus badger Po - ?<br />

Spilogale putorius eastern spotted skunk C 2 X<br />

Mephitis mephitis striped skunk C 2,4 R<br />

Cervus elaphus elk - 2 X<br />

Odocoileus virginianus white-tailed deer C 1,4 R<br />

Homo sapiens man C 1,2 R<br />

BIRDS<br />

Anser albifrons greater white-fronted goose C 3 M<br />

Chen caerulescens snow goose C 2,3 M<br />

Chen rossii Ross' goose Pr - M<br />

Branta canadensis Canada goose C* 1,2,3 M/R<br />

Aix sponsa wood duck C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Anas crecca green-winged teal C 1,2,3 M<br />

Anas rubripes American black duck Po - M<br />

Anas platyrhynchos mallard C 1,2,3 M<br />

Anas acuta nor<strong>the</strong>rn pintail C 2,3 M<br />

Anas discors blue-winged teal C* 1,2,3 M<br />

Anas clypeata nor<strong>the</strong>rn shoveler C 2,3 M<br />

Anas strepera gadwall C 2,3 M<br />

Anas americana American wigeon Pr - M<br />

Aythya valisineria canvasback C 2 M<br />

Aythya americana redhead C 3 M<br />

Aythya collaris ring-necked duck Pr - M<br />

Aythya marila greater scaup Po - M<br />

Aythya affinis lesser scaup C 2,3 M<br />

Bucephala clangula common goldeneye C 2,3 M<br />

Bucephala albeola bufflehead Pr - M<br />

Lophodytes cucullatus hooded merganser C 3 M<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 136


ORDER<br />

Species<br />

Common Name Presence Source Status<br />

Mergus merganser common merganser C 3 M<br />

Oxyura jamaicensis ruddy duck Pr - M<br />

Phasianus colchicus ring-necked pheasant C 1,3 R<br />

Bonasa umbellus ruffed grouse Po - R<br />

Meleagris gallopavo wild turkey C* 1,3 R<br />

Colinus virginianus nor<strong>the</strong>rn bobwhite C 1,2,3 R<br />

Gavia immer common loon Po - M<br />

Podilymbus podiceps pied-billed grebe C 1,2,3 M<br />

Podiceps auritus horned grebe Po - M<br />

Podiceps nigricollis eared grebe Po - M<br />

Pelecanus erythrorhynchos American white pelican C 1,2,3 M<br />

Phalacrocorax auritus double-crested cormorant C 1,2,3 M<br />

Botaurus lentiginosus American bittern C 2,3 M<br />

Ixobrychus exilis least bittern C 1,3 M<br />

Ardea herodias great blue heron C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Casmerodius albus great egret C* 1,2,3 M<br />

Egretta thula snowy egret C 1 M<br />

Egretta caerulea little blue heron C 1,2,3 M<br />

Bubulcus ibis cattle egret C 1,3 M<br />

Butorides striatus green heron C 1,2,3 B<br />

Nycticorax nycticorax black-crowned night-heron C 2 M<br />

Nyctanassa violacea yellow-crowned night-heron Po - M<br />

Plegadis chihi white-faced ibis Po - M<br />

Cathartes aura turkey vulture C 1,2,3 M/B<br />

Pandion haliaetus osprey C 2 M<br />

Haliaeetus leucocephalus bald eagle C 3 M<br />

Circus cyaneus nor<strong>the</strong>rn harrier C 1,3 M/B<br />

Accipiter striatus sharp-shinned hawk C 2,3 M<br />

Accipiter cooperii Cooper's hawk C* 1,2,3 M/B<br />

Buteo lineatus red-shouldered hawk C 1,2,3 M/B<br />

Buteo platypterus broad-winged hawk C 1,2,3 M/B<br />

Buteo swainsoni Swainson's hawk C 3 M<br />

Buteo jamaicensis red-tailed hawk C* 1,3 R<br />

Buteo lagopus rough-legged hawk C 2,3 M<br />

Falco sparverius American kestrel C* 1,2,3 M/B<br />

Falco columbarius merlin C 2 M<br />

Falco peregrinus peregrine falcon C 3 M<br />

Rallus elegans King rail Po - M<br />

Rallus limicola Virginia rail C 3 M<br />

Porzana carolina sora C 3 M<br />

Porphyrula martinica common moorhen Po - M<br />

Fulica americana American coot C 1,2,3 M<br />

Pluvialis squatarola black-bellied plover Po - M<br />

Pluvialis doninica American golden-plover Po - M<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 137


ORDER<br />

Species<br />

Common Name Presence Source Status<br />

Charadrius alexandrinus snowy plover Po - M<br />

Charadrius semipalmatus semipalmated plover C 2 M<br />

Charadrius vociferus killdeer C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Recurvirostra americana American avocet Po - M<br />

Tringa melanoleuca greater yellowlegs C 2,3 M<br />

Tringa flavipes lesser yellowlegs C 2,3 M<br />

Tringa solitaria solitary sandpiper C 2,3 M<br />

Catoptrophorus semipalmatus willet Po - M<br />

Actitis macularia spotted sandpiper C 2,3 M/B<br />

Bartramia longicauda upland sandpiper Po - M<br />

Limosa haemastica Hudsonian godwit Po - M<br />

Limosa fedoa marbled godwit Po - M<br />

Calidris alba sanderling Po - M<br />

Calidris pusilla semipalmated sandpiper C 2 M<br />

Calidris mauri western sandpiper C 3 M<br />

Calidris minutilla least sandpiper C 2,3 M<br />

Calidris fuscicollis white-rumped sandpiper C 3 M<br />

Calidris baridii Baird's sandpiper C 2,3 M<br />

Calidris melanotos pectoral sandpiper C 2,3 M<br />

Limnodromus scolopus long-billed dowitcher C 3 M<br />

Calidris himantopus stilt sandpiper Po - M<br />

Tryngites subruficollis buff-breasted sandpiper Po - M<br />

Gallinago gallinago common snipe C 3 M<br />

Scolopax minor American woodcock C 1,2,3 B<br />

Phalaropus tricolor Wilson's phalarope Po - M<br />

Larus pipixcan Franklin's gull C 2,3 M<br />

Larus philadelphia Bonaparte's gull C 2 M<br />

Larus delawarensis ring-billed gull C 2,3 M<br />

Larus argentatus herring gull C 2 M<br />

Sterna caspia Caspian tern Po - M<br />

Sterna forsteri Forster's tern C 2 M<br />

Sterna antillarum least tern C 2 M<br />

Chlidonias niger black tern C 2,3 M<br />

Columba livia rock dove C 1,3 R<br />

Streptopelia decaocto Eurasian collared-dove Pr - R<br />

Zenaida macroura mourning dove C 1,2,3 M<br />

Coccyzus erythroptalmus black-billed cuckoo C 3 B<br />

Coccyzus americanus yellow-billed cuckoo C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Tyto alba common barn-owl C 2 R<br />

Otus asio eastern screech-owl C 1,2,3 R<br />

A<strong>the</strong>ne cuncularia burrowing owl C 3 M<br />

Bubo virginianus great horned owl C* 1,2,3 R<br />

Strix varia barred owl C 1,2,3 R<br />

Asio otus long-eared owl C 2 M<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 138


ORDER<br />

Species<br />

Common Name Presence Source Status<br />

Asio flammeus short-eared owl C 2,3 M<br />

Cordeiles minor common nighthawk C 1,2,3 B<br />

Caprimulgus carolinensis chuck-will's-widow C 3 B<br />

Caprimulgus vociferus whip-poor-will C 1,2,3 B<br />

Chaetura pelagica chimney swift C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Archilochus colubris ruby-throated hummingbird C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Ceryle alcyon belted kingfisher C* 1,2,3 M/B<br />

Melanerpes erythrocephalus red-headed woodpecker C* 1,2,3 R<br />

Melanerpes carolinus red-bellied woodpecker C* 1,2,3 R<br />

Sphyrapicus varius yellow-bellied sapsucker C* 1,2,3 M<br />

Picoides pubescens downy woodpecker C* 1,2,3 R<br />

Picoides villosus hairy woodpecker C* 1,3 R<br />

Colaptes auratus nor<strong>the</strong>rn flicker C* 1,2,3 R<br />

Dryocopus pileatus pileated woodpecker C* 1,2,3 R<br />

Contopus borealis olive-sided flycatcher C 2,3 M<br />

Contopus virens eastern wood-pewee C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Empidonax alnorum alder flycatcher C 3 M<br />

Empidonax traillii willow flycatcher C 1,2,3 B/M<br />

Empidonax virescens Acadian flycatcher C 1,3 B<br />

Empidonax minimus least flycatcher C 1,2,3 M<br />

Sayornis phoebe eastern phoebe C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Myiarchus crinitus great crested flycatcher C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Tyrannus verticalis western kingbird C 2,3 B<br />

Tyrannus tyrannus eastern kingbird C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Tyrannus forficatus scissor-tailed flycatcher Pr - B<br />

Lanius ludovicianus loggerhead shrike C 1,2,3 B/M<br />

Vireo griseus white-eyed vireo C* 3 M<br />

Vireo bellii Bell's vireo C 1,2,3 B<br />

Vireo solitarius solitary vireo C 3 M<br />

Vireo flavifrons yellow-throated vireo C* 1,3 B<br />

Vireo gilvus warbling vireo C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Vireo philadelphicus Philadelphia vireo Po - M<br />

Vireo olivaceus red-eyed vireo C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Cyanocitta cristata blue jay C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Corvus brachyrhynchos American crow C 1,2,3 R<br />

Eremophila alpestris horned lark C 2,3 R<br />

Progne subis purple martin C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Tachycineta bicolor tree swallow C 1,2,3 B<br />

Stelgidopteryx serripennis nor<strong>the</strong>rn rough-winged swallow C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Hirundo pyrrhonoto cliff swallow C 2,3 B<br />

Hirundo rustica barn swallow C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Riparia riparia bank swallow C 2,3 B/M<br />

Parus atricapillus black-capped chickadee C* 1,2,3 R<br />

Parus bicolor tufted titmouse C* 1,2,3 R<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 139


ORDER<br />

Species<br />

Common Name Presence Source Status<br />

Sitta canadensis red-breasted nuthatch C 3 M<br />

Sitta carolinensis white-breasted nuthatch C 1,2,3 R<br />

Certhia americana brown creeper C 1,2,3 M<br />

Thryomanes ludovicianus Carolina wren C* 1,2,3 R<br />

Troglodytes aedon house wren C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Thyomanes bewickii Bewick’s wren C 3 B<br />

Troglodytes troglodytes winter wren Po - M<br />

Cistothorus platensis sedge wren C 1,3 B<br />

Cistothrus palustris marsh wren C 3 M<br />

Regulus satrapa golden-crowned kinglet C 2,3 M<br />

Regulus calendula ruby-crowned kinglet C 2,3 M<br />

Polioptila caerulea blue-gray gnatcatcher C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Sialia sialis eastern bluebird C* 1,2,3 R<br />

Catharus fuscescens veery C 3 M<br />

Catharus guttatus hermit thrush C 3 M<br />

Catharus ustulatus Swainson's thrush C 2,3 M<br />

Catharus minimus gray-checked thrush C 3 M<br />

Hylocichla mustelina wood thrush C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Turdus migratorius American robin C* 1,2,3 R<br />

Dumetella carolinensis gray catbird C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Mimus polyglottus mockingbird C 1,2,3 R<br />

Toxostoma rufum brown thrasher C 1,2,3 B<br />

Sturnus vulgaris European starling C* 1,2,3 R<br />

Bombycilla cedorum cedar waxwing C 1,3 B/M<br />

Vermivora pinus blue-winged warbler Pr - M<br />

Vermivora chrysoptera golden-winged warbler C 3 M<br />

Vermivora peregrina Tennessee warbler C 1,2,3 M<br />

Vermivora celata orange-crowned warbler C 1,3 M<br />

Vermivora ruficapilla Nashville warbler C 1,3 M<br />

Parula americana nor<strong>the</strong>rn parula C 1,3 B<br />

Dendroica petechia yellow warbler C 1,2,3 B<br />

Dendroica pensylvania chestnut-sided warbler C 3 M<br />

Dendroica magnolia magnolia warbler C 3 M<br />

Dendroica tigrina Cape May warbler C 3 M<br />

Dendroica coronata yellow-rumped warbler C 1,2,3 M<br />

Dendroica virens black-throated green warbler C 3 M<br />

Dendroica fusca Blackburnian warbler C 3 M<br />

Dendroica dominica yellow-throated warbler C* 1,3 B<br />

Dendroica palmarum palm warbler Pr - M<br />

Dendroica pinus pine warbler C 3 M<br />

Dendroica castanea bay-breasted warbler C 3 M<br />

Dendroica striata blackpoll warbler C 1,3 M<br />

Dendroica cerulea cerulean warbler C 1,3 B<br />

Mniotilta varia black-and-white warbler C 1,2,3 B<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 140


ORDER<br />

Species<br />

Common Name Presence Source Status<br />

Setophaga ruticilla American redstart C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Protonotaria citrea prothonotary warbler C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Helmi<strong>the</strong>ros vermivora worm-eating warbler C 3 M<br />

Seiurus aurocapillus ovenbird C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Seiurus noveboracensis nor<strong>the</strong>rn waterthrush C 1,3 M<br />

Seiurus motacilla Louisiana waterthrush C* 1,3 B<br />

Oporornis formosus Kentucky warbler C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Oporornis agilus Connecticut warbler C 3 M<br />

Oporornis philadelphia mourning warbler C 1,3 M<br />

Geothlypis trichas common yellowthroat C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Wilsonia citrina hooded warbler C 3 M<br />

Wilsonia pusilla Wilson's warbler C 3 M<br />

Wilsonia canadensis Canada warbler C 3 M<br />

Icteria virens yellow-breasted chat C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Piranga rubra summer tanager C 1,2,3 B<br />

Piranga olivacea scarlet tanager C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Pipilo erythrophthalmus eastern towhee C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Pipila maculates spotted towhee C 1 M<br />

Spizella arborea American tree sparrow C 1,2,3 M<br />

Spizella passerina chipping sparrow C 1,2,3 B<br />

Spizella pallida clay-colored sparrow C 3 M<br />

Spizella pusilla field sparrow C 1,2,3 B<br />

Pooecetes gramineus vesper sparrow C 2,3 M<br />

Chondestes grammacus lark sparrow C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Passerculus sandwichensis savannah sparrow C 1,2,3 M<br />

Ammodramus savannarum grasshopper sparrow C 1,2,3 B<br />

Ammodramus henslowii Henslow's sparrow Po - B/M<br />

Ammodramus leconteii Le Conte's sparrow C 2 M<br />

Ammodramus nelsoni Nelson’s sparrow Po - M<br />

Passerella iliaca fox sparrow C 2,3 M<br />

Melospiza melodia song sparrow C 1,2,3 B/M<br />

Melospiza lincolnii Lincoln's sparrow C 2,3 M<br />

Melospiza georgiana swamp sparrow C 2,3 M<br />

Zonotrichia albicollis white-throated sparrow C 1,2,3 M<br />

Zonotrichia leucophrys white-crowned sparrow C 1,2,3 M<br />

Zonotrichia querula Harris' sparrow C 1,2,3 M<br />

Junco hyemalis dark-eyed junco C 1,2,3 M<br />

Calcarius lapponicus Lapland longspur C 3 M<br />

Cardinalis cardinalis nor<strong>the</strong>rn cardinal C* 1,2,3 R<br />

Pheucticus ludovicianus rose-breasted grosbeak C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Guiraca caerulea blue grosbeak C 1,3 B<br />

Passerina cyanea indigo bunting C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Passerina ciris painted bunting C 3 M<br />

Spiza americana dickcissel C* 1,2,3 B<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 141


ORDER<br />

Species<br />

Common Name Presence Source Status<br />

Dolichonyx oryzivorus bobolink C 3 M<br />

Agelaius phoeniceus red-winged blackbird C* 1,2,3 R<br />

Sturnella magna eastern meadowlark C 1,2,3 R<br />

Sturnella neglecta western meadowlark C 2,3 M<br />

Xanthocephalus xanthocephalus yellow-headed blackbird C 2,3 M<br />

Euphagus carolinus rusty blackbird C 2,3 M<br />

Euphagus cyanocephalus Brewer's blackbird Po - M<br />

Quiscalus mexicanus great-tailed grackle Pr - M<br />

Quiscalus quiscala common grackle C* 1,3 B<br />

Molothrus ater brown-headed cowbird C 1,2,3 B<br />

Icterus spurius orchard oriole C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Icterus galbula Baltimore oriole C* 1,2,3 B<br />

Carpodacus purpureus purple finch C 3 M<br />

Carpodacus mexicanus house finch C 1,2,3 R<br />

Loxia curvirostra red crossbill Po - M<br />

Carduelis flammea common redpoll Pr - M<br />

Carduelis pinus pine siskin C 3 M<br />

Carduelis tristis American goldfinch C* 1,2,3 R<br />

Passer domesticus house sparrow C* 1,2,3 R<br />

REPTILES<br />

Chelydra serpentina common snapping turtle C 1,2 R<br />

Chrysemys picta painted turtle C 1,2 R<br />

Graptemys geographica common map turtle Po - R<br />

Graptemys pseudogeographica Ouachita map turtle C 2 R<br />

Terrapene carolina eastern box turtle Po - R<br />

Terrapene ornata ornate box turtle C 1,2 R<br />

Trachemys scripta slider C 2 R<br />

Apalone mutica smooth s<strong>of</strong>tshell C 2 R<br />

Apalone spinifera spiny s<strong>of</strong>tshell C 2 R<br />

Ophisaurus attenuatus slender glass lizard C 2 R<br />

Eumeces fasciatus five-lined skink C 1,2 R<br />

Eumeces obsoletus Great Plains skink C 2 R<br />

Scincella lateralis ground skink Po - R<br />

Cnemidophorus sexlineatus six-lined racerunner C 2 R<br />

Carphophis amoenus western worm snake C 1,2 R<br />

Coluber constrictor racer C 1,2 R<br />

Diadophis punctatus ringneck snake C 1,2 R<br />

Elaphe emoryi Great Plains rat snake C 1,2 R<br />

Elaphe obsoleta eastern rat snake C 1,2 R<br />

Heterodon platirhinos eastern hognose snake Po - R<br />

Heterodon nasicus western hognose snake C 1 R<br />

Lampropeltis calligaster prairie kingsnake C 1,2 R<br />

Lampropeltis getula common kingsnake C - R<br />

Lampropeltis triangulum milk snake C 1,2 R<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 142


ORDER<br />

Species<br />

Common Name Presence Source Status<br />

Opheodrys aestivus rough green snake C 1 R<br />

Pituophis melanoleucus gopher snake Pr - R<br />

Nerodia erythrogaster plainbelly water snake C 2 R<br />

Nerodia rhombifer diamondback water snake Po - R<br />

Nerodia sipedon nor<strong>the</strong>rn water snake C 1,2 R<br />

Storeria dekayi brown snake C 1,2 R<br />

Regina grahami Graham's crayfish snake Po - R<br />

Storeria occipitomaculata redbelly snake Po - R<br />

Tantilla gracilis fla<strong>the</strong>ad snake C 2 R<br />

Thamnophis proximus western ribbon snake C 1,2 R<br />

Thamnophis sirtalis red-sided garter snake C 1,2 R<br />

Tropidoclonion lineatum lined snake C 2 R<br />

Virginia valeriae smooth earth snake Po - R<br />

Agkistrodon controtrix copperhead C 1,2 R<br />

Crotalus horridus timber rattlesnake C 1,2 R<br />

AMPHIBIANS<br />

Ambystoma texanum smallmouth salamander C 2 R<br />

Ambystoma tigrinum eastern tiger salamander C 2 R<br />

Necturus maculosus mudpuppy C 2 R<br />

Spea bombifrons plains spadefoot Pr - R<br />

Bufo americanus American toad C 1,2 R<br />

Bufo woodhousei Woodhouse's toad C 1,2 R<br />

Acris crepitans Blanchard's cricket frog C 1,2 R<br />

Hyla versicolor gray treefrog C 1,2 R<br />

Pseudacris triseriata western chrous frog C 1,2 R<br />

Rana blairi plains leopard frog C 1,2 R<br />

Rana catesbeiana bullfrog C 1,2 R<br />

Gastrophryne olivacea Great Plains narrowmouth toad C 2 R<br />

FISHES<br />

Ichthyomyzon castaneus chestnut lamprey Pr - M<br />

Scaphirhynchus albus pallid sturgeon C 1 R<br />

Scaphirhynchus platorynchus shovelnose sturgeon C 1 R<br />

Polyodon spathula paddlefish Pr - R<br />

Lepisosteus osseus longnose gar Pr - R<br />

Lepisosteus platostomus shortnose gar C 1 R<br />

Hiodon alosoides goldeneye C 1 R<br />

Alosa chrysochloris skipjack herring Pr - M<br />

Dorosoma cepedianum gizzard shad Pr - R<br />

Campostoma anomalus central stoneroller Po - R<br />

Carassius auratus goldfish Po - R<br />

Ctenopharyngodon idella grass carp Po - R<br />

Cyprinus carpio common carp C 1 R<br />

Hybognathus argyritis western silvery minnow Po - R<br />

Hybognathus hankinsoni brassy minnow C 1 R<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 143


ORDER<br />

Species<br />

Common Name Presence Source Status<br />

Hybognathus placitus plains minnow Po - R<br />

Hypophthalmichthys nobilis bighead carp C 1 R<br />

Notropis a<strong>the</strong>rinoides emerald shiner C 1 M<br />

Notropis stramineus sand shiner C 1 R<br />

Notropis shumardi silverband shiner Po - R<br />

Phenacobius mirabilis suckermouth minnow Pr - R<br />

Pimephales notatus bluntnose minnow Pr - R<br />

Pimephales promelas fa<strong>the</strong>ad minnow Pr - R<br />

Macrhybopsis gracilis fla<strong>the</strong>ad chub Pr - R<br />

Macrhybopsis gelida sturgeon chub Po - R<br />

Macrhybopsis meeki sicklefin chub Po - R<br />

Macrhybopsis storeriana silver chub C 1 R<br />

Semotilus atromaculatus creek chub Pr - R<br />

Cyprinella lutrensis red shiner C 1 R<br />

Luxilus cornutus common shiner Pr - R<br />

Lythrurus umbratilis redfin shiner Pr - R<br />

Carpiodes carpio river carpsucker C 1 R<br />

Carpoides cyprinus quillback Pr - R<br />

Carpoides velifer highfin carpsucker Pr - R<br />

Catostomus commersoni white sucker Pr - R<br />

Cycleptus elongatus blue sucker Pr - R<br />

Ictiobus bubalus smallmouth buffalo C 1 R<br />

Ictiobus cyprinellus bigmouth buffalo Po - M<br />

Ictiobus niger black buffalo Po - M<br />

Moxostoma macrolepidotum shor<strong>the</strong>ad redhorse Po - R<br />

Ictalurus furcatus blue catfish Pr - R<br />

Ictalurus punctatus channel catfish C 1 R<br />

Noturus flavus stonecat Pr - R<br />

Noturus exilis slender madtom Pr - R<br />

Pylodictis olivaris fla<strong>the</strong>ad catfish C 1 R<br />

Ameiurus melas black bullhead Pr - R<br />

Ameiurus natalis yellow bullhead Pr - R<br />

Osmerus mordax rainbow smelt C 1 R<br />

Lota lota burbot Pr - R<br />

Fundulus zebrinus plains killifish Pr - R<br />

Gambusia affinis western mosquit<strong>of</strong>ish Pr - R<br />

Morone chrysops white bass C 1 R<br />

Lepomis cyanellus green sunfish C 1 R<br />

Lepomis gulosus warmouth Pr - R<br />

Lepomis humilis orangespotted sunfish Pr - R<br />

Lepomis macrochirus bluegill C 1 R<br />

Lepomis megalotis longear sunfish Pr - R<br />

Micropterus dolomieu smallmouth bass Pr - R<br />

Micropterus salmoides largemouth bass Pr - R<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 144


ORDER<br />

Species<br />

Common Name Presence Source Status<br />

Pomoxis annularis white crappie Pr - R<br />

Pomoxis nigromaculatus black crappie Po - R<br />

E<strong>the</strong>ostoma spectabile orangethroat darter Pr - R<br />

Perca flavescens yellow perch Pr - R<br />

Percina caprodes logperch Pr - R<br />

Stizostedion canadense sauger C 1 R<br />

Stizostedion vitreum walleye Pr - R<br />

Aplodinotus grunniens freshwater drum C 1 R<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 145


APPENDIX C. Annotated checklist <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> vascular plants <strong>of</strong> Leavenworth County and <strong>the</strong> Ft.<br />

Leavenworth Military Reservation (FLMR).<br />

Species collected on FLMR are in bold face, accompanied by voucher information. Numbers<br />

following family names are <strong>the</strong> total number <strong>of</strong> genera, species, and infraspecific taxa in each<br />

family in <strong>the</strong> county [C] and on Ft. Leavenworth [F], respectively. Nomenclature for scientific<br />

names and common names follows Freeman 2003. Synonyms are provided in brackets for names<br />

<strong>of</strong> taxa reported from <strong>the</strong> FLMR in Freeman et al. (1997) when <strong>the</strong>y differ substantially from<br />

those accepted here. The following codes denote <strong>the</strong> provenance (N = native; I = introduced,<br />

naturalized; A = introduced, adventive), longevity (Pw = perennial, woody; Ph = perennial,<br />

herbaceous; B = biennial; A = annual), general habitat (P = prairie; Ff = forest, floodplain; Fu =<br />

forest, upland; W = wetlands; A = rivers and ponds [aquatic]; D = disturbed sites), and<br />

abundance on FLMR <strong>of</strong> each species (4 = dominant in appropriate habitat; 3 = common in<br />

appropriate habitat; 2 = infrequent in appropriate habitat; 1 = rare in appropriate habitat; 0 = not<br />

known to occur on FLMR). The last names <strong>of</strong> infrequent collectors have been spelled out in full.<br />

All vouchers cited below are deposited in <strong>the</strong> R. L. McGregor Herbarium (KANU) at <strong>the</strong><br />

University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>. Collectors whose activities account for <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> vouchers at KANU<br />

are abbreviated by <strong>the</strong> first letter <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> collector(s) last name (E = J. Elliott; F = C. C. Freeman;<br />

M = C. A. Morse; W = B. L. Wagenknecht; thus EF = J. Elliott & C. C. Freeman; EM = J. Elliott<br />

& C. A. Morse; FE = C. C. Freeman & J. Elliott).<br />

PTERIDOPHYTES, <strong>the</strong> ferns and fern allies<br />

1. Aspleniaceae, <strong>the</strong> spleenwort family [C=1/2/2, F=1/1/1]<br />

Asplenium platyneuron (L.) Britton et al. ebony spleenwort N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

Asplenium rhizophyllum L. walking fern N/Ph/Fu/2; Brooks 14154, Brooks & Harris<br />

15155, F 2860, FE 6981, Keith & Wagenknecht 2348, Morse & Loring 9893<br />

2. Dryopteridaceae, <strong>the</strong> wood fern family [C=5/6/6, F=2/2/2]<br />

Cystopteris protrusa (Weath.) Blasdell sou<strong>the</strong>rn bladder fern N/Ph/Fu/3; Brooks 14150, E<br />

477, EM 641, M 9499, Morse & Loring 9895, W 2349<br />

Cystopteris tennesseensis Shaver Tennessee bladder fern N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

Diplazium pycnocarpon (Spreng.) M. Broun narrow-leaf glade fern N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

Dryopteris marginalis (L.) A. Gray marginal wood fern N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

Onoclea sensibilis L. sensitive fern N/Ph/FuW/2; EM 644, F 7129<br />

Woodsia obtusa (Sprengel) Torr. subsp. obtusa blunt-lobe cliff fern N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

3. Equisetaceae, <strong>the</strong> horsetail family [C=1/4/4, F=1/2/2]<br />

Equisetum arvense L. field horsetail N/Ph/DPW/2; FE 6962<br />

Equisetum hyemale L. subsp. affine (Engelm.) Calder & Roy L. Taylor common scouringrush<br />

N/Ph/DFfW/4; F 7146, M 9721, Morse & Loring 9897<br />

Equisetum laevigatum A. Braun smooth scouring-rush N/Ph/DPW/0<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 146


Equisetum ×ferrissii Clute (Equisetum hyemale × Equisetum laevigata) intermediate scouringrush<br />

N/Ph/DPW/0<br />

4. Ophioglossaceae, <strong>the</strong> adder’s-tongue family [C=2/3/3, F=2/3/3]<br />

Botrychium dissectum Spreng. dissected grape fern N/Ph/Fu/2; FE 6990, M 9873<br />

Botrychium virginianum (L.) Sw. rattlesnake fern N/Ph/Fu/2; E 478, EM 652, F 7101, M<br />

9688<br />

Ophioglossum engelmannii Prantl limestone adder's-tongue N/Ph/D/1; McGregor 886<br />

5. Osmundaceae, <strong>the</strong> royal fern family [C=1/1/1, F=0/0/0]<br />

Osmunda regalis L. var. spectabilis (Willd.) A. Gray royal fern N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

6. Pteridaceae, <strong>the</strong> maiden-hair fern family [C=3/4/4, F=2/2/2]<br />

Adiantum pedatum L. nor<strong>the</strong>rn maiden-hair fern N/Ph/Fu/2; E 482, F 7090, M 9492<br />

Argyrochosma dealbata (Pursh) Windham false cloak fern N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

Pellaea atropurpurea (L.) Link purple cliff-brake N/Ph/Fu/1; Morse & Loring 9894,<br />

Wagenknecht et al. 2350<br />

Pellaea glabella Mett. ex Kuhn subsp. glabella smooth cliff-brake N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

7. Selaginellaceae, <strong>the</strong> spike-moss family [C=1/1/1, F=0/0/0]<br />

Selaginella rupestris (L.) Spring rock spike-moss N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

GYMNOSPERMS, <strong>the</strong> conifers<br />

8. Cupressaceae, <strong>the</strong> cypress family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Juniperus virginiana L. var. virginiana eastern red-cedar N/Pw/FuP/3; E 483<br />

ANGIOSPERMS, <strong>the</strong> flowering plants<br />

9. Acanthaceae, <strong>the</strong> acanthus family [C=2/3/3, F=1/2/2]<br />

Justicia americana (L.) Vahl American water-willow N/Ph/W/0<br />

Ruellia humilis Nutt. fringe-leaf ruellia N/Ph/P/1; E 1114<br />

Ruellia strepens L. limestone ruellia N/Ph/Fu/2; EM 640, M 9506<br />

10. Aceraceae, <strong>the</strong> maple family [C=1/4/5, F=1/3/4]<br />

Acer negundo L. var. negundo boxelder N/Pw/Ff/0<br />

Acer negundo L. var. violaceum (Kirchn.) Jaeger boxelder N/Pw/FfFuW/3; FE 6977<br />

Acer negundo L. var. texanum Pax boxelder N/Pw/FfFuW/3; M 9724<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 147


[Acer nigrum Michx. f. = A. saccharum]<br />

Acer saccharinum L. silver maple N/Pw/Ff/3; F 7103<br />

Acer saccharum Marshall sugar maple N/Pw/Fu/3; E 1126, FE 6852, Morse et al. 9393, W<br />

3409<br />

11. Alismataceae, <strong>the</strong> water-plantain family [C=3/4/4; F=3/3/3]<br />

Alisma triviale Pursh nor<strong>the</strong>rn water-plantain N/Ph/FuW/3; F 7461<br />

Echinodorus berteroi (Spreng.) Fassett upright burhead N/A/W/3; F 7460<br />

Sagittaria latifolia Willd. broad-leaf arrowhead N/Ph/W/0<br />

Sagittaria montevidensis Cham. & Schltdl. subsp. calycina (Engelm.) Bogin giant<br />

arrowhead N/Ph/W/2; F 7462<br />

12. Amaranthaceae, <strong>the</strong> pigweed family [C=1/6/6, F=1/3/3]<br />

Amaranthus albus L. tumbleweed pigweed I/A/D/2; F 7880<br />

Amaranthus hybridus L. slender pigweed N/A/D/0<br />

Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson Palmer's pigweed I/A/D/1; F 8299<br />

Amaranthus retr<strong>of</strong>lexus L. rough pigweed N/A/D/0<br />

[Amaranthus rudis J. D. Sauer = A. tuberculatus]<br />

Amaranthus spinosus L. spiny pigweed I/A/D/0<br />

Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) J. D. Sauer tall water-hemp N/A/DW/3; Brooks &<br />

Harris 15147, E 1101, F 7774, F 8290, F 8301, M 9828<br />

13. Anacardiaceae, <strong>the</strong> cashew family [C=2/4/4, F=2/2/2]<br />

Rhus aromatica Aiton var. serotina (Greene) Rehder fragrant sumac N/Pw/P/0<br />

Rhus copallina L. dwarf sumac N/Pw/P/0<br />

Rhus glabra L. smooth sumac N/Pw/P/3; EF 798<br />

Toxicodendron radicans (L.) Kuntze subsp. negundo (Greene) Gillis poison-ivy<br />

N/Pw/FfFu/3; EM 650<br />

14. Annonaceae, <strong>the</strong> custard-apple family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Asimina triloba (L.) Dunal common pawpaw N/Pw/FuFf/3; F 19753, FE 6969, M 9460, W<br />

2402, W 3411<br />

15. Apiaceae, <strong>the</strong> parsley family [C=14/18/18, F=10/12/12]<br />

Chaerophyllum procumbens (L.) Crantz spreading chervil N/A/Ff/3; FE 6979, W 2400<br />

Chaerophyllum tainturieri Hook. var. tainturieri sou<strong>the</strong>rn chervil N/A/Fu/3; E 430, F 7143<br />

Cicuta maculata L. var. maculata spotted water-hemlock N/BPh/W/3; F 7858<br />

Conium maculatum L. poison-hemlock I/B/DFf/3; EF 812, M 9717<br />

Cryptotaenia canadensis (L.) DC. honewort N/Ph/Fu/2; EM 648<br />

Daucus carota L. subsp. carota wild carrot I/B/D/2; EF 671<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 148


Daucus pusillus Michx. southwestern wild carrot N/A/P/0<br />

Eryngium yuccifolium Michx. var. yuccifolium button snake-root eryngo N/Ph/P/0<br />

Lomatium foeniculaceum (Nutt.) J. M. Coult. & Rose var. daucifolium (Torr. & Gray) Cronquist<br />

fennel-leaf desert-parsley N/Ph/Ff/0<br />

Osmorhiza claytonii (Michx.) C.B. Clarke hairy sweet-cicely N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7141, M 9467,<br />

M 9491, M 9699<br />

Osmorhiza longistylis (Torr.) DC. long-style sweet-cicley N/Ph/Fu/3; E 486, F 7099,<br />

Hulbert 3372, M 9490<br />

Pastinaca sativa L. garden parsnip I/B/D/3; EM 672<br />

Polytaenia nuttallii DC. Nuttall’s prairie-parsley N/Ph/P/0<br />

Sanicula canadensis L. var. canadensis Canadian sanicle N/B/Fu/0<br />

Sanicula odorata (Raf.) Pryer & Phillippe fragrant sanicle N/Ph/Fu/3; E 431, EF 775, EM<br />

643<br />

Spermolepis inermis (Nutt. ex DC.) Mathias & Constance spreading scaleseed N/A/P/0<br />

Torilis arvensis (Huds.) Link field hedge-parsley I/A/D/3; EF 772<br />

Zizia aurea (L.) W.D.J. Koch common golden-alexanders N/Ph/Fu/2; E 484, EM 653, F<br />

7130, M 9494<br />

16. Apocynaceae, <strong>the</strong> dogbane family [C=2/2/2, F=1/1/1]<br />

Apocynum cannabinum L. hemp dogbane N/Ph/DFuP/3; Brooks 14423; EM 619, F 7459<br />

Vinca minor L. common periwinkle A/Ph/Fu/0<br />

17. Araceae, <strong>the</strong> arum family [C=1/2/2, F=1/2/2]<br />

Arisaema dracontium (L.) Schott dragonroot Jack-in-<strong>the</strong>-pulpit N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7144, M<br />

9697<br />

Arisaema triphyllum (L.) Schott subsp. triphyllum Indian Jack-in-<strong>the</strong>-pulpit N/Ph/Fu/3; E<br />

489, FE 6978, W 2364<br />

18. Aristolochiaceae, <strong>the</strong> Dutchman’s-pipe family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Asarum canadense L. Canadian wild-ginger N/Ph/Fu/3; F 2854, FE 6966, Hulbert 3371,<br />

Morse et al. 9374, W 2389<br />

19. Asclepiadaceae, <strong>the</strong> milkweed family [C=2/13/13, F=2/6/6]<br />

Asclepias amplexicaulis Sm. blunt-leaf milkweed N/Ph/P/0<br />

Asclepias hirtella (Pennell) Woodson prairie milkweed N/Ph/P/0<br />

Asclepias incarnata L. subsp. incarnata swamp milkweed N/Ph/W/2 ; F 7436<br />

Asclepias meadii Torr. ex A. Gray Mead's milkweed N/Ph/P/0<br />

Asclepias purpurascens L. purple milkweed N/Ph/FuP/2 ; EM 627; Busby s.n. (22 Jun<br />

1995)<br />

Asclepias stenophylla A. Gray narrow-leaf milkweed N/Ph/P/0<br />

Asclepias sullivantii Engelm. ex A. Gray smooth milkweed N/Ph/P/0<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 149


Asclepias syriaca L. common milkweed N/Ph/DP/3; EF 784<br />

Asclepias tuberosa L. subsp. interior Woodson butterfly milkweed N/Ph/P/0<br />

Asclepias verticillata L. whorled milkweed N/Ph/DP/2; F 8126<br />

Asclepias viridiflora Raf. green milkweed N/Ph/P/2; EF 795<br />

Asclepias viridis Walter spider milkweed N/Ph/P/0<br />

Cynanchum laeve (Michx.) Pers. smooth swallow-wort N/Ph/DFu/2; F 7464<br />

20. Asteraceae, <strong>the</strong> sunflower family [C=47/102/111, F=35/71/73]<br />

[Achillea millefolium L. subsp. occidentalis (DC.) Hyl = Achillea millefolium subsp. lanulosa]<br />

Achillea millefolium subsp. lanulosa (Nutt.) Piper western yarrow N/Ph/DP/1; E 450<br />

Ageratina altissima (L.) R.M. King & H. Rob. tall snakeroot N/Ph/Fu/3; F 7793, W 3381<br />

Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. common ragweed N/A/DFfP/3; E 1089, F 7776, W 3397<br />

Ambrosia psilostachya DC. western ragweed N/Ph/P/0<br />

Ambrosia trifida L. giant ragweed N/A/DFf/2; E 1092, W 3387<br />

Amphiachyris dracunculoides (DC.) Nutt. prairie broomweed N/A/P/0<br />

Antennaria neglecta Greene field pussy’s-toes N/Ph/P/0<br />

Antennaria parlinii Fernald subsp. fallax (Greene) R.J. Bayer & Stebbins plantain-leaf<br />

pussy’s-toes N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7092<br />

An<strong>the</strong>mis cotula L.(DC.) may-weed chamomile A/A/D/0<br />

Arctium minus (Hill) Bernh. common burdock I/B/DP/0<br />

Arnoglossum atriplicifolium (L.) H. Rob. pale Indian-plantain N/Ph/Fu/1; E 1091<br />

Arnoglossum plantagineum Raf. tuberous Indian-plantain N/Ph/P/2; EF 793<br />

Artemisia annua L. sweet wormwood I/A/DFfW/1; F 7869, F 8279, M 9832<br />

Artemisia ludoviciana Nutt. var. ludoviciana Louisiana sagewort N/Ph/P/0<br />

Artemisia ludoviciana Nutt. var. mexicana (Willd. ex Spreng.) Fernald Louisiana sagewort<br />

N/Ph/DP/0<br />

Aster cordifolius L. var. sagittifolius (Wedem. ex Willd.) A.G. Jones heart-leaf aster<br />

N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

Aster drummondii Lindl. subsp. drummondii Drummond's aster N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7803, M<br />

9878, W 3397<br />

Aster drummondii Lindley in Hook. subsp. texanus (Burgess) A.G. Jones Drummond's aster<br />

N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

Aster ericoides L. subsp. ericoides var. ericoides heath aster N/Ph/P/2; F 7815<br />

Aster laevis L. var. laevis smooth blue aster N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7814, Morse & Loring 9904<br />

Aster lanceolatus Willd. subsp. lanceolatus var. lanceolatus lance-leaf aster<br />

N/Ph/FfFuW/2; F 8276, W 3384<br />

Aster lanceolatus Willd. subsp. lanceolatus var. interior (Wiegand) Semple & Chmiel.<br />

lance-leaf aster N/Ph/FfFu/2; F 7862<br />

[Aster lanceolatus Willd. subsp. simplex (Willd.) A.G. Jones = Aster lanceolatus subsp.<br />

lanceolatus var. interior]<br />

Aster lateriflorus (L.) Britton var. lateriflorus white woodland aster N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7808, M<br />

9874, M 9887, M 9891, Morse & Loring 9902<br />

Aster novae-angliae L. New England aster N/Ph/FuW/2; F 7832<br />

Aster ontarionis Wiegand Ontario aster N/Ph/FfFu/2; F 7788, F 7871, M 9888, W 3397<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 150


Aster oolentangiensis Riddell var. oolentangiensis azure aster N/Ph/P/2; Morse et al. 9909<br />

Aster pilosus Willd. var. demotus S.F. Blake hairy aster N/Ph/DFfFuP/0<br />

Aster pilosus Willd. var. pilosus hairy aster N/Ph/DFfFuP/2; F 7781<br />

Aster praealtus Poir. var. praealtus willow-leaf aster N/Ph/DFfFu/3; F 7848<br />

Bidens aristosus (Michx.) Britton var. retrorsa (Sherff) Wunderlin coreopsis beggar-ticks<br />

N/AB/W/0<br />

Bidens bipinnatus L. Spanish needles N/A/D/1; F 8302<br />

Bidens cernuus L. nodding beggar-ticks N/A/DW/2; F 7784, F 8285, M 9829<br />

Bidens comosus (A. Gray) Wiegand leafy-bract beggar-ticks N/A/DFfW/2; F 7798, M<br />

9830<br />

Bidens connatus Muhl. ex Willd. purple-stem beggar-ticks N/A/FfW/0<br />

Bidens frondosus L. devil's beggar-ticks N/A/DFf/2; F 7851, M 9809<br />

Bidens vulgatus Greene tall beggar-ticks N/A/DFf/2; F 7785, F 7794<br />

Brickellia eupatorioides (L.) Shinn. var. corymbulosa (Torr. & Gray) Shinners corymbulose<br />

false-boneset N/Ph/P/0<br />

[Cacalia atriplicifolia L. = Arnoglossum atriplicifolium]<br />

[Cacalia plantaginea (Raf.) Shinners = Arnoglossum plantagineum]<br />

Carduus nutans L. subsp. leiophyllus (Petrovič) Stoj. & Stefani musk plumeless-thistle<br />

I/B/DP/3; EM 618<br />

[Chrysan<strong>the</strong>mum leucan<strong>the</strong>mum L. = Leucan<strong>the</strong>mum vulgare]<br />

Cichorium intybus L. common chicory I/Ph/D/2; F 7455<br />

Cirsium altissimum (L.) Hill tall thistle N/B/DFfFu/2; F 8293<br />

Cirsium undulatum (Nutt.) Spreng. wavy-leaf thistle N/Ph/DP/0<br />

Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. bull thistle I/B/D/1; F 8292<br />

Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronquist var. canadensis Canadian horseweed N/A/D/2; E 1088,<br />

W 3360<br />

Coreopsis grandiflora Hogg ex Sweet big-flower coreopsis N/Ph/DP/0<br />

Coreopsis palmata Nutt. finger coreopsis N/Ph/DP/0<br />

Cyclachaena xanthifolia (Nutt.) Fresen. bur-weed marshelder N/A/DW/0<br />

Dyssodia papposa (Vent.) Hitchc. prairie foetid-marigold N/A/D/0<br />

Echinacea pallida (Nutt.) Nutt. pale purple coneflower N/Ph/P/2; EM 636<br />

Eclipta prostrata (L.) L. yerba de tajo N/A/W/2; F 7498<br />

Erechtites hieraciifolia (L.) Raf. ex DC. American burnweed N/A/FfW/2; F 7790<br />

Erigeron annuus (L.) Pers. annual fleabane N/A/D/2; E 508, M 9737<br />

Erigeron philadelphicus L. Philadelphia fleabane N/BPh/D/2; F 7115<br />

Erigeron strigosus Muhl. ex Willd. daisy fleabane N/BPh/DP/2; EM 624<br />

Eupatorium altissimum L. tall joe-pye-weed N/Ph/DP/2; F 7830, W 3390<br />

Eupatorium purpureum L. var. holzingeri (Rydb.) E. Lamont Holzinger's joe-pye-weed<br />

N/Ph/Fu/3; F 7437, M 9777<br />

[Eupatorium rugosum Houtt. = Ageratina altissima]<br />

Eupatorium serotinum Michx. fall joe-pye-weed N/Ph/FfW/3; F 7783, M 9831<br />

Euthamia gymnospermoides Greene sticky euthamia N/Ph/D/0<br />

Helianthus annuus L. common sunflower N/A/DP/3; F 7490<br />

Helianthus grosseserratus Martens saw-tooth sunflower N/Ph/P/1; F 8329, W 3385<br />

Helianthus hirsutus Raf. hairy sunflower N/Ph/DFu/3; F 7451<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 151


Helianthus maximilianii Schrad. Maximilian's sunflower N/Ph/P/0<br />

Helianthus mollis Lam. ashy sunflower N/Ph/P/0<br />

Helianthus pauciflorus Nutt. var. pauciflorus stiff sunflower N/Ph/P/2; F 7831, F 8123<br />

Helianthus tuberosus L. Jerusalem-artichoke sunflower N/Ph/FfFu/3; F 7856<br />

Heliopsis helianthoides (L.) Sweet var. scabra (Dunal) Fernald sunflower heliopsis<br />

N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7446<br />

Hetero<strong>the</strong>ca subaxillaris (Lam.) Britton & Rusby subsp. latifolia (Buckley) Semple broad-leaf<br />

golden-aster N/A/DP/0<br />

Hieracium longipilum Torr. ex Hook. long-beard hawkweed N/Ph/FuP/0<br />

Iva annua L. annual sumpweed N/A/DW/0<br />

Lactuca canadensis L. Canadian lettuce N/B/DFu/0<br />

Lactuca floridana (L.) Gaertn. Florida lettuce N/B/Fu/2; F 7802, F 7861, W 3370<br />

Lactuca saligna L. willow-leaf lettuce I/A/D/3; F 7488, W 3386<br />

Lactuca serriola L. prickly lettuce I/A/D/3; F 7489<br />

Leucan<strong>the</strong>mum vulgare Lam. common ox-eye daisy I/Ph/DP/2; E 468<br />

Liatris aspera Michx. button gayfea<strong>the</strong>r N/Ph/P/2; E 1117, F 7816<br />

Liatris pycnostachya Michx. thick-spike gayfea<strong>the</strong>r N/Ph/P/0<br />

Liatris squarrosa (L.) Michx. var. hirsuta (Rydb.) Gaiser plains gayfea<strong>the</strong>r N/Ph/P/2; E<br />

1109, F 7817<br />

Matricaria matricarioides (Less.) Porter pineapple-weed I/A/D/3; E 503, F 7134<br />

Packera glabella (Poir.) C. Jeffrey floodplain ragwort N/A/FfFuW/2; F 7147<br />

Packera obovata (Muhl. ex Willd.) W.A. Weber & Á. Löve round-leaf ragwort N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

Packera plattensis (Nutt.) W.A. Weber & Á. Löve prairie ragwort N/Ph/P/0<br />

Packera pseudaurea (Rydb.) W.A. Weber & Á. Löve var. semicordata (Mack. & Bush) W.A.<br />

Weber & Á. Löve false golden ragwort N/Ph/P/0<br />

Pseudognaphalium obtusifolium (L.) Hilliard & B.L. Burtt fragrant false-cudweed N/A/DP/0<br />

Pyrrhopappus carolinianus (Walt.) DC. Carolina false dandelion N/AB/D/1; F 8273<br />

Ratibida columnifera (Nutt.) Wooton & Standl. upright prairie-coneflower N/Ph/P/0<br />

Ratibida pinnata (Vent.) Barnhart Gray-head prairie-coneflower N/Ph/P/2; EF 832<br />

Rudbeckia hirta L. var. pulcherrima Farw. black-eyed-Susan N/BPh/DP/3; EF 821<br />

Rudbeckia laciniata L. var. laciniata cut-leaf coneflower N/Ph/FfFu/2; E 1075, W 3365<br />

Rudbeckia triloba L. var. triloba brown-eyed-Susan N/Ph/FfFu/3; F 7453, W 3393<br />

[Senecio glabellus Poir. = Packera glabella]<br />

Silphium integrifolium Michx. var. deamii L.M. Perry Deam’s rosinweed N/Ph/P/0<br />

Silphium integrifolium Michx. var. integrifolium whole-leaf rosinweed N/Ph/P/2; F 7439<br />

Silphium integrifolium Michx. var. laeve Torr. & A. Gray showy rosinweed N/Ph/P/0<br />

Silphium laciniatum L. compassplant N/Ph/P/2; E 474<br />

Silphium perfoliatum L. var. perfoliatum cup rosinweed N/Ph/DFfFuW/2; F 7512<br />

Solidago canadensis L. var. hargeri Fernald Canada goldenrod N/Ph/FuP/3; F 7846<br />

Solidago canadensis L. var. scabra (Muhl. ex Willd.) Torr. & A. Gray Canadian goldenrod<br />

N/Ph/DFuP/2; F 7827<br />

Solidago gigantea Ait. late goldenrod N/Ph/FfFuP/3; E 1107, F 7820, W 3383<br />

Solidago missouriensis Nutt. Missouri goldenrod N/Ph/P/0<br />

Solidago nemoralis Ait. subsp. decemflora (DC.) Brammall oldfield goldenrod N/Ph/P/2; F<br />

7822<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 152


[Solidago nemoralis Ait. var. longipetiolata (Mack. & Bush) E.J. Palmer & Steyerm. = Solidago<br />

nemoralis subsp. decemflora]<br />

Solidago petiolaris Ait. var. petiolaris downy goldenrod N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

Solidago rigida L. subsp. rigida stiff goldenrod N/Ph/P/2; F 7821<br />

Solidago speciosa Nutt. var. rigidiuscula Torr. & A. Gray showy-wand goldenrod N/Ph/P/0<br />

Solidago ulmifolia Muhl. ex Willd. var. ulmifolia elm-leaf goldenrod N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7805,<br />

M 9807, W 3407<br />

Sonchus asper (L.) Hill prickly sow-thistle I/A/D/3; E 504<br />

Taraxacum laevigatum (Willd.) DC. red-seed dandelion I/Ph/D/0<br />

Taraxacum <strong>of</strong>ficinale F.H. Wigg. common dandelion I/Ph/D/2; F 7854, W 2395<br />

Tragopogon dubius Scop. western salsify I/BPh/D/2; E 442<br />

Verbesina alternifolia (L.) Britton ex Kearney wing-stem crownbeard N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7837,<br />

W 3413<br />

Vernonia baldwinii Torr. subsp. baldwinii inland ironweed N/Ph/DP/0<br />

Vernonia baldwinii Torr. subsp. interior (Small) W.Z. Faust inland ironweed N/Ph/DP/2;<br />

E 1069<br />

Vernonia fasciculata Michx. subsp. fasciculata prairie ironweed N/Ph/W/1; F 8129<br />

Xanthium strumarium L. common cocklebur N/A/D/3; F 7770<br />

21. Balsaminaceae, <strong>the</strong> touch-me-not family [C=1/2/2, F=1/2/2]<br />

Impatiens capensis Meerb. spotted touch-me-not N/A/FuW/3; EF 780<br />

Impatiens pallida Nutt. pale touch-me-not N/A/FuW/3; E 1076, F 7458, W 3371<br />

22. Berberidaceae, <strong>the</strong> barberry family [C=2/2/2, F=2/2/2]<br />

Berberis thunbergii DC. Japanese barberry I/Pw/Fu/2; F 7132, F 7867, M 9501, M 9700<br />

Podophyllum peltatum L. common May-apple N/Ph/Fu/3; E 427<br />

23. Betulaceae, <strong>the</strong> birch family [C=2/2/2, F=2/2/2]<br />

Corylus americana Walter American hazelnut N/Pw/Fu/3; EF 805, F 8307, M 9509<br />

Ostrya virginiana (Mill.) K. Koch American hop-hornbeam N/Pw/Fu/3; EM 632, FE<br />

6848, M 9698<br />

24. Bignoniaceae, <strong>the</strong> bignonia family [C=2/2/2, F=2/2/2]<br />

Campsis radicans (L.) Seem. common trumpet-creeper N/Pw/Ff/2; F 7470<br />

Catalpa speciosa Warder nor<strong>the</strong>rn catalpa I/Pw/Ff/2; EF 816<br />

25. Boraginaceae, <strong>the</strong> borage family [C=7/10/10, F=4/6/6]<br />

Cynoglossum <strong>of</strong>ficinale L. common hound’s-tongue I/BPh/D/1; F 7855<br />

Echium vulgare L. blueweed I/B/P/0<br />

Hackelia virginiana (L.) I.M. Johnst. Virginia bracted-stickseed N/B/DFfFu/2; F 7450<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 153


Lappula squarrosa (Retz.) Dumort blue stickseed I/A/DFu/0<br />

Lithospermum arvense L. corn gromwell I/A/D/3; FE 6853, W 2354<br />

Lithospermum canescens (Michx.) Lehm. hoary gromwell N/Ph/FuP/2; EM 649, F 7095<br />

Lithospermum incisum Lehm. plains gromwell N/Ph/P/0<br />

Lithospermum latifolium Michx. American gromwell N/Ph/Fu/1; E 507, F 8113<br />

Myosotis verna Nutt. spring forget-me-not N/A/DP/0<br />

Onosmodium bejariense A. DC. var. occidentale (Mack.) B.L. Turner western marbleseed<br />

N/Ph/P/1; M 9739<br />

26. Brassicaceae, <strong>the</strong> mustard family [C=19/30/30, F=15/21/21]<br />

Alliaria petiolata (M. Bieb.) Cavara & Grande common garlic-mustard I/B/DFfFu/3; FE<br />

6960, M 9461<br />

Arabis canadensis L. Canadian rockcress N/B/Fu/2; EF 776, F 8119, M 9479<br />

Arabis shortii (Fernald) Gleason Short's rockcress N/B/Fu/2; Brooks 14151, F 2859, FE<br />

6974, W 2396<br />

Barbarea vulgaris W.T. Aiton bitter wintercress I/B/D/2; FE 6987<br />

Brassica rapa L. subsp. rapa field mustard A/A/D/2; E 422<br />

Camelina microcarpa Andrz. ex DC. little-pod false-flax I/A/D/1; F 7142<br />

Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. common shepherd's-purse I/A/D/3; FE 6844<br />

Cardamine bulbosa (Schreb. ex Muh.) Britton et al. spring bittercress N/Ph/W/0<br />

Cardamine concatenata (Michx.) O. Schwarz cut-leaf toothwort N/Ph/Fu/3; FE 6975<br />

Cardaria draba (L.) Desv. heart-pod hoarycress I/Ph/D/0<br />

Descurainia pinnata (Walter) Britton subsp. brachycarpa (Richardson) Detling tansy<br />

mustard N/A/D/3; F 7102, FE 7000<br />

Draba brachycarpa Nutt. ex Torr. & A. Gray short-pod draba N/A/DP/0<br />

Draba cuneifolia Nutt. ex Torr. & Gray wedge-leaf draba N/A/D/2; FE 6995<br />

Draba reptans (Lam.) Fernald white whitlow-wort N/A/D/0<br />

Erysimum repandum L. bushy wallflower I/A/DP/3; E 437, FE 6986<br />

Hesperis matronalis L. dame's rocket I/BPh/D/0<br />

Lepidium campestre (L.) R. Br. field pepper-grass I/AB/D/2; F 7094<br />

Lepidium densiflorum Schrad. var. densiflorum prairie pepper-grass N/AB/D/3; F 7113<br />

Lepidium virginicum L. var. virginicum Virginia pepper-grass N/AB/D/3; F 7838, Morse<br />

et al. 9388<br />

Microthlaspi perfoliatum (L.) F.K. Mey. perfoliate-pennycress I/A/D/3; FE 6846<br />

Nasturtium <strong>of</strong>ficinale W.T. Aiton watercress I/Ph/W/0<br />

Rorippa palustris (L.) Besser subsp. fernaldiana (Butters & Abbe) Jonsell var. fernaldiana<br />

bog yellowcress N/ABPh/W/2; Brooks & Harris 15143, M 9827<br />

Rorippa sessiliflora (Nutt.) Hitchc. stalkless yellowcress N/AB/W/2; F 7468, F 8286<br />

Rorippa sinuata (Nutt.) Hitchc. spreading yellowcress N/Ph/W/2; E 439, F 7486<br />

Sibara virginica (L.) Rollins Virginia rockcress I/A/D/0<br />

Sinapis arvensis L. charlock I/A/D/0<br />

Sisymbrium altissimum L. tumble-mustard I/A/D/0<br />

Sisymbrium loeselii L. tall hedge-mustard I/A/D/3; E 423, F 7109, M 9715<br />

Sisymbrium <strong>of</strong>ficinale (L.) Scop. common hedge-mustard I/A/D/2; Morse et al. 9396<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 154


Thlaspi arvense L. field pennycress I/A/D/3; FE 6993, W 2362, W 2403<br />

[Thlaspi perfoliatum L. = Microthlaspi perfoliatum]<br />

27. Campanulaceae, <strong>the</strong> bellflower family [C=3/5/5, F=3/4/4]<br />

Campanula americana L. American bellflower N/A/FfFuW/3; F 7431<br />

Lobelia siphilitica L. great lobelia N/Ph/FfFuW/3; Brooks & Harris 15151, F 7857, W<br />

3399<br />

Lobelia spicata Lam. pale-spike lobelia N/Ph/P/2; E 1116, EF 796, Freeman 8122<br />

Triodanis leptocarpa (Nutt.) Nieuwl. slender-fruit Venus’-looking-glass N/A/DP/0<br />

Triodanis perfoliata (L.) Nieuwl. clasping-leaf Venus’-looking-glass N/A/DP/2; E 455<br />

28. Cannabaceae, <strong>the</strong> hemp family [C=2/3/3, F=2/2/2]<br />

Cannabis sativa L. hemp I/A/D/3; Busby s.n. (22 Jun 1995), F 7769, W 3388<br />

Humulus japonicus Siebold & Zucc. Japanese hop I/Ph/DFf/3; Brooks & Harris 15152, F<br />

7501, M 9793<br />

Humulus lupulus L. var. pubescens E. Small common hop I/Ph/Fu/0<br />

29. Caprifoliaceae, <strong>the</strong> honeysuckle family [C=5/8/8, F=5/8/8]<br />

Lonicera japonica Thunb. Japanese honeysuckle I/Pw/FfFu/2; M 9889<br />

Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Maxim. Amur honeysuckle I/Pw/FuP/3; E 433, F 7865, F 7866,<br />

M 9517<br />

[Lonicera tatarica L., reports <strong>of</strong> this species in Freeman et al. 1997 were based on misidentified<br />

specimens <strong>of</strong> Lonicera ×bella and Lonicera maackii]<br />

Lonicera ×bella Zabel (Lonicera morrowii × Lonicera tatarica) Bell’s honeysuckle<br />

I/Pw/FuP/2; F 7087<br />

Sambucus canadensis L. American elder N/Pw/FfFu/3; EM 662, W 3396<br />

Symphoricarpos orbiculatus Moench coral-berry N/Pw/FuP/2; F 8325<br />

Triosteum perfoliatum L. clasping horse-gentian N/Ph/FuP/2; F 7850, M 9765<br />

Viburnum dentatum L. var. lucidum Aiton nor<strong>the</strong>rn arrow-wood A/Pw/Fu/1; F 8328<br />

Viburnum prunifolium L. black-haw viburnum N/Pw/Fu/3; F 7089, FE 6994, M 9687, M<br />

9780<br />

30. Caryophyllaceae, <strong>the</strong> pink family [C=11/17/17, F=7/9/9]<br />

Agrostemma githago L. common corncockle A/A/D/0<br />

Arenaria serpyllifolia L. subsp. serpyllifolia thyme-leaf sandwort I/A/D/2; FE 6985<br />

Cerastium fontanum Baumg. subsp. vulgare (Hartman) Greuter & Burdet common mouse’sear-chickweed<br />

N/Ph/DP/0<br />

Cerastium nutans Raf. nodding mouse’s-ear-chickweed N/A/DFu/2; E 454, F 7114<br />

Dianthus armeria L. Deptford pink I/A/D/0<br />

Dianthus barbatus L. subsp. barbatus sweet-William I/A/D/0<br />

Holosteum umbellatum L. subsp. umbellatum jagged-chickweed I/A/D/3; FE 6856<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 155


Myosoton aquaticum (L.) Moench water chickweed I/Ph/Ff/1; M 9718<br />

Paronychia canadensis (L.) A.W. Wood Canadian nailwort N/A/FuP/2; EF 788, M 9465<br />

Sagina apetala Ard. hairy-leaf pearlwort A/A/D/0<br />

Sagina decumbens (Elliott) Torr. & A. Gray subsp. decumbens trailing pearlwort N/A/DFu/0<br />

Saponaria <strong>of</strong>ficinalis L. common soapwort I/Ph/D/0<br />

Silene antirrhina L. sleepy catchfly N/A/D/3; E 461, F 7153<br />

Silene latifolia Poir. subsp. alba (Mill.) Greuter & Burdet white catchfly A/Ph/D/0<br />

Silene stellata (L.) W.T. Aiton starry catchfly N/Ph/D/2; F 7433<br />

Stellaria pallida (Dumort.) Crép. pale chickweed I/A/D/3; FE 6958, M 9480<br />

Stellaria media (L.) Vill. common chickweed I/A/D/3; F 19756,<br />

31. Celastraceae, <strong>the</strong> stafftree family [C=2/4/4, F=2/4/4]<br />

Celastrus scandens L. American bittersweet N/Pw/Fu/2; F 8127<br />

Euonymus atropurpureus Jacq. eastern wahoo N/Pw/Fu/3; Brooks & Harris 15153, EM<br />

660, F 7457, W 3410<br />

Euonymus fortunei (Turcz.) Hand.-Mazz. Chinese spindle-tree I/Pw/FfFu/2; F 7868,<br />

F8327, M 9496<br />

Euonymus alatus (Thunb.) Sieb. winged burning bush I/Pw/Fu/3; M 9497, M 9695, M<br />

9761, M 9877<br />

32. Ceratophyllaceae, <strong>the</strong> hornwort family [C=1/1/1, F=0/0/0]<br />

Ceratophyllum demersum L. common hornwort N/Ph/A/0<br />

33. Chenopodiaceae, <strong>the</strong> goosefoot family [C=4/8/8, F=2/5/5]<br />

Chenopodium ambrosioides L. var. ambrosioides worm-seed goosefoot I/ABPh/D/0<br />

Chenopodium berlandieri Moq. var. zschackei (Murray) Murray ex Aschs. pit-seed<br />

goosefoot N/A/D/2; E 1094, F 8289<br />

Chenopodium missouriense Aellen Missouri goosefoot N/A/D/2; F 8333<br />

Chenopodium simplex (Torr.) Raf. maple-leaf goosefoot N/A/DFf/2; F 7773, F 8330, M<br />

9836<br />

Chenopodium standleyanum Aellen Standley's goosefoot N/A/DFuFf/2; F 8121, M9835, W<br />

3372, W 3363<br />

Cycloloma atriplicifolium (Spreng.) J.M. Coult. tumble ringwing N/A/D/0<br />

Kochia scoparia (L.) Schrad. broom kochia I/A/D/0<br />

Monolepis nuttalliana (Schult.) Greene Nuttall's poverty-weed N/A/D/1; FE 6963<br />

34. Clusiaceae, <strong>the</strong> St. John’s-wort family [C=1/2/2, F=1/1/1]<br />

Hypericum ascyron L. giant St. John’s-wort N/Ph/Ff/1; M 9833<br />

Hypericum perforatum L. common St. John's-wort I/Ph/P/0<br />

35. Commelinaceae, <strong>the</strong> spiderwort family [C=2/4/4, F=2/3/3]<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 156


Commelina communis L. Asiatic dayflower I/A/DFu/3; EF 778, EM 639, F 7836<br />

Commelina erecta L. var. erecta erect dayflower I/A/DFu/2; E 1086, W 3379<br />

Tradescantia bracteata Small bracted spiderwort N/A/P/0<br />

Tradescantia ohiensis Raf. Ohio spiderwort N/Ph/FuP/2; E 505, F 8323<br />

36. Convolvulaceae, <strong>the</strong> morning-glory family [C=3/6/6, F=3/4/4]<br />

Calystegia sepium (L.) R. Br. subsp. angulata Brummitt common hedge-bindweed<br />

N/Ph/D/2; F 7440<br />

Calystegia silvatica (Kit.) Griseb. subsp. fraterniflora (Mack. & Bush) Brummitt woodland<br />

hedge-bindweed N/Ph/D/0<br />

Convolvulus arvensis L. field bindweed I/Ph/D/3; E 448<br />

Ipomoea hederacea Jacq. ivy-leaf morning-glory N/A/D/1; F 8294<br />

Ipomoea lacunosa L. white morning-glory N/A/DFf/2; F 7780<br />

Ipomoea pandurata (L.) G.F.W. Mey. big-root morning-glory N/Ph/DP/0<br />

37. Cornaceae, <strong>the</strong> dogwood family [C=1/2/2, F=1/1/1]<br />

Cornus amomum Mill. subsp. obliqua (Raf.) J.S. Wilson pale dogwood N/Pw/FuP/0<br />

Cornus drummondii C.A. Mey. rough-leaf dogwood N/Pw/FuP/2; E 1079, EM 617, M<br />

9512<br />

38. Cucurbitaceae, <strong>the</strong> cucumber family [C=2/2/2, F=1/1/1]<br />

Echinocystis lobata (Michx.) Torr. & A. Gray wild mock-cucumber N/A/Fu/0<br />

Sicyos angulatus L. wall bur-cucumber N/A/Ff/2; F 7768, M 9802, W 3380<br />

39. Cuscutaceae, <strong>the</strong> dodder family [C=1/4/4, F=1/3/3]<br />

Cuscuta cuspidata Engelm. cusp dodder N/A/FuP/1; Brooks & Harris 15145<br />

Cuscuta megalocarpa Rydb. big-fruit dodder N/A/FuP/1; W 3361<br />

Cuscuta pentagona Engelm. var. pentagona field dodder N/A/DW/1; M 9754<br />

Cuscuta polygonorum Engelm. smartweed dodder N/A/FfW/0<br />

40. Cyperaceae, <strong>the</strong> sedge family [C=7/62/64, F=5/49/50]<br />

Carex aggregata Mack. cluster sedge N/Ph/FfW/2; Morse et al. 9398<br />

Carex albicans Willd. ex Spreng. var. albicans white-tinge sedge N/Ph/Fu/2; FE 6984, W<br />

2360<br />

[Carex amphibola Steud. var. turgida Fern. = Carex grisea Wahlenb.]<br />

Carex austrina Mack. sou<strong>the</strong>rn sedge N/Ph/DW/3; F 19752<br />

Carex bicknellii Britton Bicknell’s sedge N/Ph/P/0<br />

Carex blanda Dewey woodland sedge N/Ph/FfFu/2; EM 645, M 9453, Morse et al. 9371,<br />

W 2399<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 157


Carex brevior (Dewey) Mack. ex Lunell short-beak sedge N/Ph/DFuW/2; F 7139<br />

Carex cephalophora Muhl. ex Willd. oval-leaf sedge N/Ph/Fu/3; M 9470, M 9487, Morse<br />

et al. 9401<br />

Carex conjuncta Boott s<strong>of</strong>t sedge N/Ph/FfW/3; M 9446, Morse et al. 9399<br />

Carex cristatella Britton crested sedge N/Ph/W/2; EF 837<br />

Carex crus-corvi Shuttlew. ex Kunth raven-foot sedge N/Ph/FfW/2; M 9448, M 9768, M<br />

9787<br />

Carex davisii Schwein. & Torr. Davis' sedge N/Ph/FfFu/1; EM 621, M 9451<br />

Carex emoryiDewey Emory’s sedge N/Ph/W/1; F 7961<br />

Carex frankii Kunth Frank's sedge N/Ph/FuPW/2; EF 797, M 9484<br />

Carex granularis Muhl. ex Willd. var. granularis meadow sedge N/Ph/DFuW/2; M 9690<br />

Carex gravida L.H. Bailey heavy sedge N/Ph/PW/2; EM 625<br />

Carex grayi Carey Gray's sedge N/Ph/Fu/1; Hulbert 3370, M 9445<br />

Carex grisea Wahlenb. narrow-leaf sedge N/Ph/FuP/2; F 2855, F 7155, M 9450, M 9723<br />

Carex hirtifolia Mack. hairy-leaf sedge N/Ph/Fu/2; M 9481, M 9732, M 9767<br />

Carex hitchcockiana Dewey Hitchcock's sedge N/Ph/Fu/3; M 9472, M 9482, Morse et al.<br />

9369, Morse et al. 9391<br />

Carex hyalinolepis Steud. shoreline sedge N/Ph/FfFuW/3; E 466, F 2863, F 7145, M 9454<br />

Carex inops L.H. Bailey subsp. heliophila (Mack.) Crins sun sedge N/Ph/P/0<br />

Carex jamesii Schwein. James' sedge N/Ph/FfFu/2; EM 642, Freeman & Brooks 2909, M<br />

9452, Morse et al. 9400<br />

Carex laeviconica Dewey smooth-cone sedge N/Ph/Ff/3; M 9455<br />

Carex leavenworthii Dewey Leavenworth’s sedge N/Ph/FuP/3; F 19750<br />

Carex lupulina Muhl. ex Willd. hop sedge N/Ph/FfFuW/1; F 2856, M 9731<br />

Carex meadii Dewey Mead's sedge N/Ph/P/0<br />

Carex mesochorea Mack. savannah sedge N/Ph/P/0<br />

Carex missouriensis P.E. Rothr. & Reznicek Missouri sedge N/Ph/W/0<br />

Carex molesta Mack. ex Bright pest sedge N/Ph/FuW/3; M 9485<br />

Carex muehlenbergii Schkuhr ex Willd. var. inermis Boott Muhlenberg’s sedge<br />

N/Ph/Fu/1; M 9486, M 9778<br />

Carex normalis Mack. large straw sedge N/Ph/Fu/1; M 9469, M 9788<br />

Carex oligocarpa Schkuhr ex Willd. straight-fruit sedge N/Ph/Fu/2; Morse et al. 9370<br />

Carex pellita Muhl. ex Willd. woolly sedge N/Ph/PW/0<br />

Carex radiata (Wahlenb.) Small radiate sedge N/Ph/FfFu/3; F 2862, Freeman & Brooks<br />

2908, M 9449, M 9733<br />

Carex rosea Schkuhr ex Willd. rosy sedge N/Ph/Fu/3; EM 646, F 7136, M 9471, M 9488,<br />

Morse et al. 9373<br />

Carex shortiana Dewey Short's sedge N/Ph/FuW/2; EM 666, M 9483<br />

Carex sparganioides Muhl. ex Willd. bur-reed sedge N/Ph/Fu/3; EF 783, F 7138, Morse et<br />

al. 9372, Morse et al. 9390<br />

Carex stipata Muhl. ex Willd. stalk-grain sedge N/Ph/FuW/0<br />

Carex tribuloides Wahlenb. var. sangamonensis Clokey festival sedge N/Ph/FfFuW/4; M<br />

9447, M 9713, M 9769<br />

Carex tribuloides Wahlenb. var. tribuloides festival sedge N/Ph/W/0<br />

Carex umbellata Schkuhr ex Willd. low sedge N/Ph/Fu/2; FE 6842<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 158


Carex vulpinoidea Michx. fox sedge N/Ph/FfFuW/2; E 515, M 9714<br />

Carex ×subimpressa Clokey (Carex hyalinolepis ×Carex pellita) impressed sedge<br />

N/Ph/FuW/2; EM 620<br />

Cyperus acuminatus Torr. & Hook. tape-leaf flat-sedge N/A/W/2; E 1113, F 7484, F7819<br />

Cyperus bipartitus Torr. brook flat-sedge N/A/W/0<br />

Cyperus echinatus (L.) A.W. Wood globe flat-sedge N/Ph/DW/1; F 8303<br />

Cyperus erythrorhizos Muhl. red-root flat-sedge N/A/FfW/2; Brooks & Harris 15144, F<br />

7791, M 9814<br />

Cyperus esculentus L. var. leptostachyus Boeck. yellow nut-sedge N/Ph/DW/1; E 1100<br />

Cyperus fuscus L. brown flat-sedge I/A/W/2; M 9815, Morse et al. 9911<br />

Cyperus lupulinus (Spreng.) Marcks subsp. lupulinus slender-stem flat-sedge N/Ph/DP/1;<br />

F 8295<br />

Cyperus odoratus L. slender flat-sedge N/A/W/2; M 9817<br />

Cyperus squarrosus L. awned flat-sedge N/A/FfW/3; F 7473, M 9816<br />

Cyperus strigosus L. false nut-sedge N/Ph/W/0<br />

Eleocharis compressa Sull. var. acutisquamata (Buckley) S.G. Sm. flat-stem spike-rush<br />

N/Ph/PW/1; M 9734<br />

Eleocharis compressa Sull. var. compressa flat-stem spike-rush N/Ph/PW/2; F 7093<br />

Eleocharis obtusa (Willd.) Schultes blunt spike-rush N/A/W/2; F 7485<br />

Eleocharis macrostachya Britton large-spike spike-rush N/Ph/FfFuW/3; F 7093, F 8130<br />

[Eleocharis xyridiformis Fern. & Brackett = Eleocharis macrostachya]<br />

Lipocarpha micrantha (Vahl) G.C. Tucker small-flower dwarf-bulrush N/A/W/2; F 7476,<br />

F 7495, M 9818, Morse et al. 9912<br />

Schoenoplectus acutus (Muhl. ex Bigelow) Á. Löve & D. Löve var. acutus hard-stem twinebulrush<br />

N/Ph/AW/0<br />

Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani (C.C. Gmel.) Palla s<strong>of</strong>t-stem twine-bulrush N/Ph/AW/0<br />

Scirpus atrovirens Willd. green bulrush N/Ph/W/2; F 7452, M 9735<br />

Scirpus georgianus R.M. Harper Georgia bulrush N/Ph/AW/0<br />

Scirpus pendulus Muhl. drooping bulrush N/Ph/AW/2; Elliott 493<br />

Scleria triglomerata Michx. whip nut-rush N/Ph/P/0<br />

41. Dioscoreaceae, <strong>the</strong> yam family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

[Dioscorea quaternata J.F. Gmel. = Dioscorea villosa]<br />

Dioscorea villosa L. Atlantic yam N/Ph/FuFf/2; EF 799, F 7445, M 9696<br />

42. Dipsacaceae, <strong>the</strong> teasel family [C=1/2/2, F=1/1/1]<br />

Dipsacus fullonum L. Fuller's teasel I/B/D/0<br />

Dipsacus laciniatus L. cut-leaf teasel I/B/D/2; F 7506, M 9775<br />

43. Ebenaceae, <strong>the</strong> ebony family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Diospyros virginiana L. common persimmon N/Pw/Fu/2; EF 792<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 159


44. Elaeagnaceae, <strong>the</strong> oleaster family [C=1/2/2, F=1/1/1]<br />

Elaeagnus angustifolia L. Russian-olive I/Pw/D/0<br />

Elaeagnus umbellata Thunb. autumn-olive I/Pw/Fu/2; F 7441; M 9516<br />

45. Elatinaceae, <strong>the</strong> waterwort family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Bergia texana (Hook.) Seub. ex Walp. Texas bergia N/A/W/2; F 7496<br />

46. Euphorbiaceae, <strong>the</strong> spurge family [C=4/14/14, F=4/9/9]<br />

Acalypha rhomboidea Raf. rhombic copperleaf N/A/DFfP/2; F 7502, F7797, M 9801, W<br />

s.n. (23 Sep 1956), W 3367<br />

Acalypha virginica L. Virginia copperleaf N/A/DFf/2; E 1080<br />

Chamaesyce maculata (L.) Small spotted mat-spurge N/A/DP/2; E 1096, F 7481, W 3403<br />

Chamaesyce nutans (Lag.) Small eyebane N/A/D/3; E 1099, F 7499, W 3400<br />

Chamaesyce prostrata (Aiton) Small prostrate mat-spurge I/A/DP/3; F 7879<br />

Chamaesyce serpens (Kunth) Small round-leaf mat-spurge N/A/D/3; F 7480<br />

Croton capitatus Michx. var. capitatus woolly croton N/A/DP/0<br />

Croton glandulosus L. var. septentrionalis Müll. Arg. tropic croton N/A/D/0<br />

Croton monanthogynus Michx. one-seed croton N/A/DP/2; F 7444<br />

Euphorbia corollata L. flowering spurge N/Ph/P/2; F 8124<br />

Euphorbia cyathophora Murray painted spurge N/A/DFu/0<br />

Euphorbia davidii Subils western too<strong>the</strong>d spurge N/A/D/3; EF 813<br />

Euphorbia dentata Michx. eastern too<strong>the</strong>d spurge N/A/D/0<br />

Euphorbia marginata Pursh snow-on-<strong>the</strong>-mountain N/A/DP/0<br />

47. Fabaceae, <strong>the</strong> bean family [C=26/45/45, F=20/30/30]<br />

Amorpha canescens Pursh leadplant N/Pw/FuP/2; EF 803<br />

Amorpha fruticosa L. bush wild-indigo N/Pw/FuPW/0<br />

Amphicarpaea bracteata (L.) Fernald American hog-peanut N/A/FuP/3; F 7812, W 3369<br />

Apios americana Medik. American potato-bean N/Ph/FfP/2; F 7786<br />

Astragalus crassicarpus Nutt. var. crassicarpus ground-plum milk-vetch N/Ph/P/0<br />

Baptisia alba (L.) Vent. var. macrophylla (Larisey) Isely white wild-indigo N/Ph/FuP/1; F<br />

7845<br />

Baptisia australis (L.) R. Br. var. minor (Lehm.) Fern. blue wild-indigo N/Ph/P/0<br />

Baptisia bracteata Muhl. ex Elliott var. leucophaea (Nutt.) Kartesz & Gandhi plains wildindigo<br />

N/Ph/P/0<br />

Cercis canadensis L. var. canadensis eastern redbud N/Pw/Fu/3; E 1110, FE 6992, W<br />

2351<br />

Chamaecrista fasciculata (Michx.) Greene var. fasciculata showy partridgepea N/A/P/2; F<br />

7504, W 3391<br />

[Coronilla varia L. = Securigera varia]<br />

Crotalaria sagittalis L. arrow rattlebox N/A/FuP/0<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 160


Dalea candida Michx. ex Willd. var. candida white prairie-clover N/Ph/FuP/0<br />

Dalea leporina (Ait.) Bullock hare-foot prairie-clover N/Ph/DW/2; Freeman 8275<br />

Dalea purpurea Vent. var. purpurea purple prairie-clover N/Ph/P/1; Elliott 1112<br />

Desmanthus illinoensis (Michx.) MacMill. ex Rob. & Fernald Illinois bundle-flower<br />

N/Ph/P/2; Freeman 7443<br />

Desmodium cuspidatum (Muhl. ex Willd.) DC. ex Loud. long-leaf tick-clover N/Ph/Fu/1;<br />

F 8306<br />

Desmodium glutinosum (Muhl. ex Willd.) A.W. Wood large-flower tick-clover<br />

N/Ph/Fu/3; E 1064, EF 810, M 9738, W 3394<br />

Desmodium illinoense A. Gray Illinois tick-clover N/Ph/P/0<br />

Desmodium paniculatum (L.) DC. panicled tick-clover N/Ph/FuP/2; E 1068, F 8278, W<br />

3389<br />

Desmodium perplexum B.G. Schub. Dillen’s tick-clover N/Ph/FuP/0<br />

Gleditsia triacanthos L. common honey-locust N/Pw/Fu/2; E 480<br />

Glycine max (L.) Merr. soybean A/A/D/2; EF 840<br />

Gymnocladus dioicus (L.) K. Koch Kentucky c<strong>of</strong>feetree N/Pw/FfFu/3; F 8315<br />

Kummerowia stipulacea (Maxim.) Makino Korean low bush-clover I/A/D/2; F 8334<br />

Kummerowia striata (Thunb.) Schindl. Japanese low bush-clover I/A/FuP/2; F 7824<br />

Lespedeza capitata Michx. round-head bush-cover N/Ph/D/0<br />

Lespedeza cuneata (Dum. Cours.) G. Don sericea lespedeza I/Ph/D/2; F 7859<br />

Lespedeza violacea (L.) Pers. violet bush-clover N/Ph/DFuP/2; F 7809, F 8316<br />

Lespedeza virginica (L.) Britton slender bush-clover N/Ph/P/0<br />

Lespedeza ×manniana Mack. [Lespedeza capitata × Lespedeza virginica] Mann’s bush-cover<br />

N/Ph/P/0<br />

Medicago lupulina L. black medick I/APh/DP/3; Elliott 443<br />

Medicago sativa L. subsp. sativa alfalfa A/Ph/D/2; M 9784<br />

Melilotus albus Medik. white sweet-clover I/AB/D/3; EM 626<br />

Melilotus <strong>of</strong>ficinalis (L.) Lam. yellow sweet-clover I/AB/D/2; E 440<br />

Mimosa quadrivalvis L. var. nuttallii (DC.) L.S. Beard ex Barneby cat-claw mimosa N/Ph/P/0<br />

Pediomelum esculentum (Pursh) Rydb. bread-root scurf-pea N/Ph/P/0<br />

Psoralidium tenuiflorum (Pursh) Rydb. narrow-leaf scurf-pea N/Ph/P/0<br />

Robinia pseudoacacia L. black locust I/Pw/Fu/2; E 435<br />

Securigera varia (L.) Lassen common crown-vetch I/Ph/D/3; EM 659<br />

Strophostyles helvola (L.) Elliott trailing wildbean N/A/DFf/2; F 7472<br />

Tephrosia virginiana (L.) Pers. Virginia hoarypea N/Ph/P/0<br />

Trifolium campestre Schreb. low hop clover I/A/D/2; E 469<br />

Trifolium hybridum alsike clover I/Ph/DW/3; M 9757<br />

Trifolium pratense L. red clover I/Ph/D/3; E 441<br />

Trifolium repens L. white clover I/Ph/D/3; E 426<br />

48. Fagaceae, <strong>the</strong> oak family [C=1/9/9, F=1/7/7]<br />

Quercus alba L. white oak N/Pw/Fu/3; F 7442, M 9478<br />

[Quercus borealis Michx. f. var. maxima (Marshall) Ashe = Quercus rubra]<br />

Quercus imbricaria Michx. shingle oak N/Pw/Fu/0<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 161


Quercus macrocarpa Michx. bur oak N/Pw/FfFu/3; F 8308<br />

Quercus muehlenbergii Engelm. chinquapin oak N/Pw/Fu/2; E 1070<br />

Quercus prinoides Willd. dwarf chinquapin oak N/Pw/Fu/2; F 7086, M 9694<br />

Quercus rubra L. nor<strong>the</strong>rn red oak N/Pw/Fu/4; F8318<br />

Quercus stellata Wangenh. post oak N/Pw/Fu/2; EF 787, F 7454, F 8319<br />

Quercus velutina Lam. black oak N/Pw/Fu/2; E 1072, F 7515, F 7801<br />

Quercus x faxonii Trel. Faxon’s oak N/Pw/Fu/0<br />

49. Fumariaceae, <strong>the</strong> fumitory family [C=2/3/3, F=2/3/3]<br />

Corydalis flavula (Raf.) DC. pale fumewort N/A/Ff/3; F 2853, FE 6980, M 9457, W 2359,<br />

W 2401<br />

Corydalis micrantha (Engelm. ex A. Gray) A. Gray subsp. micrantha slender fumewort<br />

N/A/DFu/3; FE 6982<br />

Dicentra cucullaria (L.) Bernh. Dutchman's-breeches N/Ph/Fu/3; FE 6855, W 2356,<br />

Wagenknecht et al. 2355<br />

50. Gentianaceae, <strong>the</strong> gentian family [C=1/1/1, F=0/0/0]<br />

Gentiana flavida A. Gray white prairie gentian N/Ph/FuPW/0<br />

51. Geraniaceae, <strong>the</strong> geranium family [C=1/2/2, F=1/1/1]<br />

Geranium carolinianum L. Carolina crane’s-bill N/A/D/3; E 458, F 7150<br />

Geranium maculatum L. spotted crane’s-bill N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

52. Grossulariaceae, <strong>the</strong> currant family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Ribes missouriense Nutt. Missouri gooseberry N/Pw/DFuP/3; FE 6970, W 2368<br />

53. Hippocastanaceae, <strong>the</strong> buckeye family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Aesculus glabra Willd. var. arguta (Buckl.) B.L. Rob. western Ohio buckeye<br />

N/Pw/FuFf/2; FE 6959<br />

54. Hydrangeaceae, <strong>the</strong> hydrangea family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Philadelphus inodorus L. scentless mock-orange A/Pw/DFfFu/1; EF 834, M 9759<br />

(determination tentative)<br />

55. Hydrocharitaceae, <strong>the</strong> frog’s-bit family [C=2/2/2, F=0/0/0]<br />

Elodea nuttallii (Planch.) H. St. John Nuttall’s waterweed N/Ph/A/0<br />

Najas guadalupensis (Spreng.) Magnus subsp. guadalupensis common naiad N/A/A/0<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 162


56. Hydrophyllaceae, <strong>the</strong> waterleaf family [C=2/3/3, F=2/3/3]<br />

Ellisia nyctelea (L.) L. water-pod N/A/DFfFu/3; F 7105<br />

Hydrophyllum appendiculatum Michx. notchbract waterleaf N/Ph/FfFu/3; F 2858, F 7149,<br />

Freeman & Brooks 2906, Hulbert 3373<br />

Hydrophyllum virginianum L. Virginia waterleaf N/Ph/FfFu/3; E 506, F 7148<br />

57. Iridaceae, <strong>the</strong> Iris family [C=3/4/4, F=2/3/3]<br />

Belamcanda chinensis (L.) DC. Chinese blackberry-lily I/Ph/D/0<br />

Iris virginica L. var. shrevei (Small) E.S. Anderson sou<strong>the</strong>rn iris N/Ph/FuW/1; M 9791<br />

Sisyrinchium angustifolium Mill. narrow-leaf blue-eyed-grass N/Ph/FuP/2; E 447, Morse<br />

et al. 9395<br />

Sisyrinchium campestre E.P. Bicknell prairie blue-eyed-grass N/Ph/P/2; E 487<br />

58. Juglandaceae, <strong>the</strong> walnut family [C=2/4/4, F=2/4/4]<br />

Carya cordiformis (Wangenh.) K. Koch bitternut hickory N/Pw/Fu/3; EF 806<br />

Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh.) K. Koch pecan N/Pw/Ff/2; Brooks & Harris 15154, M<br />

9786<br />

Carya ovata (Mill.) K. Koch shag-bark hickory N/Pw/Fu/4; F 8317<br />

Juglans nigra L. black walnut N/Pw/FfFu/3; EF 807, M 9776<br />

59. Juncaceae, <strong>the</strong> rush family [C=1/6/6, F=1/4/4]<br />

Juncus an<strong>the</strong>latus (Wiegand) R.E. Brooks forgotten rush N/PH/PW/3; EM 630<br />

Juncus dudleyi Wiegand Dudley's rush N/Ph/PW/0<br />

Juncus interior Wiegand inland rush N/Ph/FfPW/2; M 9709<br />

Juncus marginatus Rostk. grass-leaf rush N/Ph/FuPW/0<br />

Juncus tenuis Willd. path rush N/Ph/FfFuPW/2; M 9685, M 9710, M 9744<br />

Juncus torreyi Coville Torrey’s rush N/Ph/PW/2; F 8134<br />

60. Lamiaceae, <strong>the</strong> mint family [C=19/26/26, F=16/21/21]<br />

Agastache nepetoides (L.) Kuntze catnip giant-hyssop N/Ph/FfFu/2; F 7775, W 3402<br />

Ajuga reptans L. carpet bugleweed I/Ph/D/2; F 19754<br />

Blephilia hirsuta (Pursh) Benth. hairy wood-mint N/Ph/Fu/1; EF 773<br />

Glechoma hederacea L. gill-over-<strong>the</strong>-ground I/Ph/DFf/2; Freeman 7106<br />

Hedeoma hispida Pursh rough false-penny-royal N/A/DP/0<br />

Hedeoma pulegioides (L.) Pers. American false-penny-royal N/A/DFU/0<br />

Lamium amplexicaule L. var. amplexicaule hen-bit dead-nettle I/A/D/3; FE 6841<br />

Lamium purpureum L. var. purpureum purple dead-nettle I/A/D/2; FE 6983<br />

Leonurus cardiaca L. common mo<strong>the</strong>rwort I/Ph/DFf/2; EF 814, M 9716<br />

Leonurus marrubiastrum L. horehound mo<strong>the</strong>rwort I/B/DFf/3; F 7465, M 9753, M 9770<br />

Lycopus americanus Muhl. ex W.P.C. Barton American water-horehound N/Ph/W/2; E<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 163


1121, F 7491<br />

Lycopus virginicus L. Virginia water-horehound N/Ph/FfW/1; F 8287, Morse & Loring<br />

9898<br />

Mentha arvensis L. field mint N/Ph/W/2; F 8280<br />

Monarda fistulosa L. var. fistulosa wild bergamot N/Ph/DP/2; Elliott 1067<br />

Nepeta cataria L. common catnip I/Ph/D/0<br />

Perilla frutescens (L.) Britton common perilla I/A/DFfFuW/2; F 7777, M 9797, W 3374<br />

Physostegia virginiana (L.) Benth. subsp. virginiana Virginia lion’s-heart N/Ph/FfW/1; E<br />

1087; F 8272<br />

Prunella vulgaris L. common selfheal I/Ph/DFfW/2; E 1111, F 7432<br />

[Pycnan<strong>the</strong>mum pilosum Nutt. = Pycnan<strong>the</strong>mum verticillatum var. pilosum]<br />

Pycnan<strong>the</strong>mum tenuifolium Schrad. narrow-leaf mountain-mint N/Ph/PFu/0<br />

Pycnan<strong>the</strong>mum verticillatum (Michx.) Pers. var. pilosum (Nutt.) Cooperr. hairy mountainmint<br />

N/Ph/P/2; E 1108<br />

Salvia azurea Michx. ex Lam. var. grandiflora Benth. blue sage N/Ph/P/0<br />

Scutellaria lateriflora L. var. lateriflora side-flower skullcap N/Ph/FfW/2; F 7507<br />

[Scutellaria parvula Michx. var. leonardii (Epling) Fernald = Scutellaria parvula var.<br />

missouriensis]<br />

Scutellaria parvula Michx. var. missouriensis (Torr.) Goodman & C.A. Lawson Leonard's<br />

small skullcap N/Ph/P/2; EM 657<br />

[Stachys palustris L. subsp. pilosa (Nutt.) Epling = Stachys pilosa var. arenicola]<br />

Stachys pilosa Nutt. var. arenicola (Britton) G.A. Mulligan & D.B. Munro marsh hedgenettle<br />

N/Ph/W/2; F 7494, F 8128, M 9708, M 9783<br />

Stachys tenuifolia Willd. slender-leaf marsh-nettle N/Ph/DFfW/2; F 7771, M 9771<br />

Teucrium canadense L. var. canadense American germander N/Ph/DPW/2; EF 827<br />

61. Lemnaceae, <strong>the</strong> duckweed family [C=2/2/2, F=1/1/1]<br />

Lemna minor L. lesser duckweed N/Ph/A/3; M 9755<br />

Spirodela polyrrhiza (L.) Schleid. greater duckmeat N/Ph/A/0<br />

62. Liliaceae, <strong>the</strong> lily family [C=13/14/15, F=7/7/7]<br />

Allium canadense L. var. canadense Canadian wild onion N/Ph/FuP/3; E 490, EF 785<br />

Allium canadense L. var. lavandulare (Bates) Ownbey & Aase Canadian wild onion<br />

N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

Allium vineale L. field garlic I/Ph/D/0<br />

Asparagus <strong>of</strong>ficinalis L. garden asparagus I/Ph/D/2; F 7097<br />

Camassia scilloides (Raf.) Cory Atlantic camas N/Ph/PFu/0<br />

Erythronium albidum Nutt. white fawn-lily N/Ph/Fu/3; FE 6965, W 2353<br />

Hemerocallis fulva (L.) L. orange day-lily I/Ph/DFu/2; EF 831, M 9689<br />

Hypoxis hirsuta (L.) Coville hairy yellow star-grass N/Ph/P/0<br />

Lilium michiganense Farw. Michigan lily N/Ph/FuP/0<br />

Melanthium virginicum L. Virginia bunchflower N/Ph/FuP/0<br />

Muscari botryoides (L.) Mill. common grape-hyacinth I/Ph/D/0<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 164


Nothoscordum bivalve (L.) Britton yellow false-garlic N/Ph/FuP/0<br />

Ornithogalum umbellatum L. common star-<strong>of</strong>-Bethlehem N/Ph/DFu/2; Morse et al. 9376<br />

Polygonatum biflorum (Walt.) Ell. small Solomon's-seal N/Ph/Fu/2; E 488, M 9498<br />

Uvularia grandiflora Sm. large-flower bellwort N/Ph/Fu/3; Brooks 14155, EM 665, F<br />

2861, FE 6964, FE 6989, Morse et al. 9375, W 2361<br />

63. Linaceae, <strong>the</strong> flax family [C=1/1/1, F=0/0/0]<br />

Linum sulcatum Riddell var. sulcatum grooved flax N/A/P/0<br />

64. Lythraceae, <strong>the</strong> loosestrife family [C=3/5/5, F=2/4/4]<br />

Ammannia coccinea Rottb. purple toothcup N/A/W/3; F 7497<br />

Ammannia robusta Heer & Regel stout toothcup N/A/W/2; F 7463, F 8283, M 9823<br />

Cuphea viscosissima Jacq. blue waxweed N/A/W/0<br />

Lythrum alatum Pursh winged loosestrife N/Ph/W/2; EF 782<br />

Lythrum salicaria L. purple loosestife N/Ph/DW/3; M 9719, M 9758<br />

65. Malvaceae, <strong>the</strong> mallow family [C=3/3/3, F=2/2/2]<br />

Abutilon <strong>the</strong>ophrasti Medik. common velvetleaf I/A/D/2; F 7875<br />

Hibiscus trionum L. flower-<strong>of</strong>-an-hour I/A/D/0<br />

Sida spinosa L. prickly sida I/A/D/2; F 7479, W 3357<br />

66. Menispermaceae, <strong>the</strong> moonseed family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Menispermum canadense L. Canadian moonseed N/Pw/FfFu/2; M 9743, M 9806<br />

67. Molluginaceae, <strong>the</strong> carpetweed family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Mollugo verticillata L. green carpetweed I/A/D/1; F 8332<br />

68. Monotropaceae, <strong>the</strong> Indian-pipe family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Monotropa uniflora L. one-flower Indian-pipe N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7804<br />

69. Moraceae, <strong>the</strong> mulberry family [C=2/3/3, F=1/2/2]<br />

Maclura pomifera (Raf.) Schneid. Osage-orange I/Pw/DFuP/0<br />

Morus alba L. white mulberry I/Pw/FfFu/2; F 7474, M 9712<br />

Morus rubra L. red mulberry N/Pw/FfFu/2; EM 668, F 7456, M 9462<br />

70. Nyctaginaceae, <strong>the</strong> four-o’clock family [C=1/2/2, F=1/1/1]<br />

Mirabilis albida (Walter) Heimerl white four-o'clock N/Ph/P/0<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 165


Mirabilis nyctaginea (Michx.) MacM. wild four-o'clock N/Ph/DP/2; EF 825, W 3364<br />

71. Oleaceae, <strong>the</strong> olive family [C=3/5/5, F=3/5/5]<br />

Fraxinus americana L. white ash N/Pw/Fu/2; F 8331<br />

Fraxinus pennsylvanica Marshall green ash N/Pw/FfP/2; F 8336, M 9711<br />

Ligustrum obtusifolium Sieb. & Zucc. border privet I/Pw/Fu/3; EM 634, F 7133, F 7863,<br />

F 19863, M 9519, M 9792<br />

[Ligustrum sinense Lour., reports <strong>of</strong> this species in Freeman et al. 1997 were based on<br />

misidentified specimens <strong>of</strong> Ligustrum obtusifolium]<br />

Ligustrum vulgare L. common privet A/Pw/Fu/1; M 9515, Morse & Loring 9901 (reports<br />

<strong>of</strong> this species in Freeman et al. 1997 were based on misidentified specimens <strong>of</strong><br />

Ligustrum obtusifolium)<br />

Syringa ×persica L. Persian lilac A/Pw/Fu/1; M 9514<br />

72. Onagraceae, <strong>the</strong> evening-primrose family [C=4/10/10, F=4/7/7]<br />

Circaea lutetiana L. subsp. canadensis (L.) Asch. & Magnus nor<strong>the</strong>rn enchanter'snightshade<br />

N/Ph/Fu/2; EF 774, M 9686<br />

Gaura longiflora Spach large-flower butterfly-weed N/A/DP/2; E 1084, F 7810<br />

Gaura mollis E. James velvet butterfly-weed N/A/DP/1; F 8274<br />

[Gaura parviflora Dougl. ex Lehm. = Gaura mollis]<br />

Ludwigia alternifolia L. bushy seedbox N/Ph/AW/1; F 8297<br />

Ludwigia peploides (Kunth) P.H. Raven subsp. glabrescens (Kuntze) P.H. Raven floating<br />

seedbox N/Ph/W/1; E 1123<br />

Oeno<strong>the</strong>ra biennis L. common evening-primrose N/B/DFf/2; E 1102, F 7493, F7792<br />

Oeno<strong>the</strong>ra laciniata Hill cut-leaf evening-primrose N/A/DP/2; E 452<br />

Oeno<strong>the</strong>ra macrocarpa Nutt. subsp. macrocarpa Missouri evening-primrose N/Ph/P/0<br />

Oeno<strong>the</strong>ra speciosa Nutt. showy white evening-primrose N/Ph/P/0<br />

Oeno<strong>the</strong>ra villosa Thunb. subsp. villosa hairy evening-primrose N/B/DP/0<br />

73. Orchidaceae, <strong>the</strong> orchid family [C=6/10/10, F=4/4/4]<br />

Aplectrum hyemale (Muhl. ex Willd.) Torr. puttyroot N/Ph/FfFu/3; Freeman & Brooks<br />

2907, FE 6854, Kramer s.n. (20 May 1956), M 9834, M 9879, Morse et al. 9368, Morse et<br />

al. 9910<br />

Corallorrhiza odontorhiza (Willd.) Poir. fall coralroot N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7842<br />

Corallorrhiza wisteriana Conrad Wister’s coralroot N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

[Cypripedium calceolus L. var. pubescens (Willd.) Correll = Cypripedium parviflorum var.<br />

parviflorum]<br />

Cypripedium parviflorum Salisb. var. parviflorum yellow lady's-slipper N/Ph/Fu/1; F<br />

7127, M 9760<br />

Galearis spectabilis (L.) Raf. showy orchis N/Ph/Fu/1; EF 808<br />

Platan<strong>the</strong>ra praeclara Sheviak & M.L. Bowles western prairie fringed orchid N/Ph/P/0<br />

Spiran<strong>the</strong>s cernua (L.) L.C. Rich. nodding ladies'-tresses N/Ph/FuP/0<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 166


Spiran<strong>the</strong>s lacera (Raf.) Raf. slender ladies'-tresses N/Ph/FuP/0<br />

Spiran<strong>the</strong>s tuberosa Raf. little ladies'-tresses N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

Spiran<strong>the</strong>s vernalis Engelm. & A. Gray upland ladies'-tresses N/Ph/P/0<br />

74. Orobanchaceae, <strong>the</strong> broomrape family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Orobanche uniflora L. one-flower broomrape N/Ph/Fu/1; F 7135, F 19748<br />

75. Oxalidaceae, <strong>the</strong> wood-sorrel family [C=1/3/3, F=1/3/3]<br />

Oxalis dillenii Jacq. gray-green wood-sorrel N/Ph/DFuP/3; E 449<br />

Oxalis stricta L. yellow wood-sorrel N/Ph/DFuP/3; EF 777, W 3366<br />

Oxalis violacea L. violet wood-sorrel N/Ph/FuP/2; E 471<br />

76. Papaveraceae, <strong>the</strong> poppy family [C=2/2/2, F=1/1/1]<br />

Papaver dubium L. long-pod poppy A/A/D/0<br />

Sanguinaria canadensis L. bloodroot N/Ph/DFu/3; FE 6967, Morse et al. 9394, W 2366<br />

77. Pedaliaceae, <strong>the</strong> unicorn-plant family [C=1/1/1, F=0/0/0]<br />

Proboscidea louianica (Mill.) Thell. common devil’s-claw N/A/D/0<br />

78. Penthoraceae, <strong>the</strong> ditch-stonecrop family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Penthorum sedoides L. Virginia penthorum N/Ph/FfW/2; F 7796<br />

79. Phytolaccaceae, <strong>the</strong> pokeweed family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Phytolacca americana L. var. americana American pokeweed N/Ph/DFfFu/2; EF 819, W<br />

3378<br />

80. Plantaginaceae, <strong>the</strong> plantain family [C=1/6/6, F=1/3/3]<br />

Plantago aristata Michx. bottle-brush plantain N/A/FuP/0<br />

Plantago lanceolata L. English plantain I/ABPh/D/3; E 444<br />

Plantago patagonica Jacq. var. patagonica woolly plantain N/ABPh/DP/0<br />

Plantago pusilla Nutt. tiny plantain N/A/Fu/0<br />

Plantago rugelii Decne. Rugel's plantain N/Ph/DFuP/2; F 7849<br />

Plantago virginica L. pale-seed plantain N/A/DP/2; E 451, F 7152<br />

81. Platanaceae, <strong>the</strong> planetree family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Platanus occidentalis L. common sycamore N/Pw/FfFu/2; EF 786, W 3358<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 167


82. Poaceae, <strong>the</strong> grass family [C=51/106/111, F=40/74/76]<br />

Aegilops cylindrica Host jointed goat grass I/A/D/3; E 470, F 7126<br />

Agrostis perennans (Walter) Tuck. autumn bent grass N/Ph/FfFu/0<br />

Alopecurus carolinianus Walter Carolina foxtail N/A/DFfW/3; F 2852<br />

Andropogon gerardii Vitman big bluestem N/Ph/P/4; E 1073<br />

Andropogon virginicus L. broom-sedge bluestem N/Ph/DP/0<br />

Aristida oligantha Michx. old-field threeawn N/A/DP/2; F 7825, F 8326<br />

Arundinaria gigantea (Walter) Muhl. giant cane N/Ph/FfW/0<br />

Avena fatua L. wild oat A/A/D/0<br />

Bothriochloa ischaemum (L.) Keng var. songarica (Rupr. ex Fisch. & C.A. Mey.) Celarier & J.R.<br />

Harlan Turkestan bluestem I/Ph/P/0<br />

Bothriochloa laguroides (DC.) Herter subsp. torreyana (Steud.) Allred & Gould silver bluestem<br />

N/Ph/P/0<br />

Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr. var. curtipendula side-oats grama N/Ph/P/2; E<br />

1118, M 9764<br />

Brachyelytrum erectum (Schreb.) P. Beauv. upright shorthusk N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7447, F 7843,<br />

F 8114, M 9493, M 9762<br />

Bromus inermis Leyss. smooth brome I/Ph/DP/3; EF 790<br />

Bromus japonicus Thunb. Japanese brome I/A/D/3; E 512<br />

Bromus nottowayanus Fernald Nottoway brome N/Ph/Ff/1; F 8118, M 9500, M 9789<br />

Bromus pubescens Muhl. ex Willd. Canadian brome N/Ph/Fu/2; E 511, F 7448, F 8115, M<br />

9468<br />

Bromus secalinus L. rye brome I/A/D/1; F 7960<br />

Bromus tectorum L. downy brome I/A/D/3; E 424<br />

Cenchrus longispinus (Hack.) Fernald field sandbur N/A/D/1; F 8291<br />

Chloris verticillata Nutt. whorled windmill grass N/Ph/D/2; F 7852<br />

Cinna arundinacea L. eastern wood-reed N/Ph/FfFu/2; F 7806<br />

Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. common bermuda grass I/Ph/D/2; E 1082<br />

Dactylis glomerata L. common orchard grass I/Ph/D/2; E 472<br />

Diarrhena obovata (Gleason) Brandenburg American beakgrain N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7434, F<br />

8117, W 3369<br />

Dichan<strong>the</strong>lium acuminatum (Sw.) Gould & C.A. Clark var. implicatum (Scribn.) Gould &<br />

C.A. Clark pointed dichan<strong>the</strong>lium N/Ph/Fu/2; EF 791<br />

Dichan<strong>the</strong>lium clandestinum (L.) Gould deer-tongue dichan<strong>the</strong>lium N/Ph/Fu/2; F 8296,<br />

Morse & Loring 9905<br />

Dichan<strong>the</strong>lium latifolium (L.) Gould & C.A. Clark broad-leaf dichan<strong>the</strong>lium N/Ph/Fu/2;<br />

EM 631, M 9498<br />

Dichan<strong>the</strong>lium oligosan<strong>the</strong>s (Schultes) Gould var. scribnerianum (Nash) Gould Scribner's<br />

dichan<strong>the</strong>lium N/Ph/DP/2; EM 623<br />

Digitaria ciliaris (Retz.) Koeler sou<strong>the</strong>rn crab grass I/A/D/0<br />

Digitaria cognata (Schult.) Pilg. subsp. cognata fall witch grass N/Ph/PD/0<br />

Digitaria ischaemum (Schreb.) Muhl. smooth crab grass I/A/D/2; F 7835<br />

Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. hairy crab grass I/A/D/2; E 1081<br />

Echinochloa crusgalli (L.) P. Beauv. common barnyard grass I/A/DW/2; E 1097, M 9821<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 168


Echinochloa muricata (P. Beauv.) Fernald var. microstachya Wiegand rough barnyard<br />

grass N/A/D/2; W 3359<br />

Echinochloa muricata (P. Beauv.) Fernald var. muricata rough barnyard grass N/A/D/0<br />

Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. Indian goose grass I/A/D/3; F 7503<br />

Elymus canadensis L. var. canadensis Canadian wild-rye N/Ph/D/0<br />

Elymus glabriflorus (Vasey) Scribn. & C.R. Ball sou<strong>the</strong>astern wild-rye N/Ph/D/0<br />

Elymus hystrix L. var. bigelovianus (Fernald) Bowden bottle-brush wild-rye N/Ph/Fu/2; F<br />

7435<br />

Elymus hystrix L. var. hystrix bottle-brush wild-rye N/Ph/Fu/2; EM 628, M 9684<br />

Elymus macgregorii R.E. Brooks & J.J.N. Campbell early wild-rye N/Ph/FfFu/3; M 9458,<br />

M 9502<br />

Elymus repens (L.) Gould quack grass I/Ph/D/1; F 8133<br />

Elymus submuticus (Hook.) Smyth & Smyth short-awn wildrye N/Ph/DFu/0<br />

Elymus villosus Muhl. ex Willd. var. villosus hairy wild-rye N/Ph/Fu/2; EM 655, EF 655<br />

Elymus virginicus L. var. jejunus (Ramaley) Bush Virginia wild-rye N/Ph/DFfP/0<br />

Elymus virginicus L. var. virginicus Virginia wild-rye N/Ph/DFfP/3; EF 820<br />

[Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski = Elymus repens]<br />

Eragrostis cilianensis (All.) Vignolo ex Janch. stink grass I/A/D/3; F 7482<br />

Eragrostis frankii C.A. Mey. ex Steud. sandbar love grass N/A/DFf/0<br />

Eragrostis hypnoides (Lam.) Britton et al. teal love grass N/A/FfW/2; F 8281, M 9819<br />

Eragrostis pectinacea (Michx.) Nees var. pectinacea Carolina love grass N/A/D/3; F 7466,<br />

M 9822<br />

Eragrostis spectabilis (Pursh) Steud. purple love grass N/Ph/DP/0<br />

Eragrostis trichodes (Nutt.) A.W. Wood var. trichodes sand love grass N/Ph/P/0<br />

Eriochloa contracta A.S. Hitchc. prairie cup grass N/A/DP/0<br />

[Festuca pratensis (Huds.) Darbysh. = Lolium pratense]<br />

Festuca subverticillata (Pers.) E.B. Alexeev nodding fescue N/Ph/FfFu/3; E 446, M 9459<br />

Glyceria striata (Lam.) A.S. Hitchc. fowl manna grass N/Ph/FfW/2; M 9742<br />

Hesperostipa spartea (Trin.) Barkworth porcupine grass N/Ph/P/0<br />

Hordeum jubatum L. fox-tail barley N/Ph/DW/2; E 510<br />

Hordeum pusillum Nutt. little barley N/A/D/3; E 479, F 7140<br />

Koeleria macrantha (Ledeb.) Schult. prairie June grass N/Ph/P/0<br />

Leersia oryzoides (L.) Sw. rice cut grass N/Ph/FfW/3; F 7860<br />

Leersia virginica Willd. white grass N/Ph/FfW/2; F 7787, W 3373<br />

[Leptochloa fascicularis (Lam.) Gray = Leptochloa fusca subsp. fascicularis]<br />

Leptochloa fusca (L.) Kunth subsp. fascicularis (Lam.) N. Snow bearded sprangletop<br />

N/A/DW/2; F 7467<br />

Leptochloa panicea (Retz.) Ohwi subsp. mucronata (Michx.) R. Nowak red sprangletop<br />

N/A/D/0<br />

Lolium arundinaceum (Schreb.) Darbysh. tall rye grass I/Ph/DP/0<br />

Lolium perenne L. var. aristatum Willd. perennial rye grass A/Ph/D/2; Elliott 501<br />

Lolium perenne L. var. perenne perennial rye grass A/Ph/D/2; EM 664<br />

Lolium pratensis Huds. meadow rye grass I/Ph/D/2; E 492; F 8335<br />

Muhlenbergia bushii R.W. Pohl Bush's muhly N/Ph/DFu/0<br />

Muhlenbergia capillaris (Lam.) Trin. hair-awn muhly N/Ph/FuP/0<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 169


Muhlenbergia frondosa (Poir.) Fernald wire-stem muhly N/Ph/DFf/2; F 8284<br />

Muhlenbergia mexicana (L.) Trin. Mexican wire-stem muhly N/Ph/DFuP/2; F 7782, F<br />

7807<br />

Muhlenbergia schreberi J.F. Gmel. nimblewill N/Ph/DFfFu/3; Freeman 7839, F 7872<br />

Muhlenbergia sobolifera (Muhl. ex Willd.) Trin. rock muhly N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7811, M 9808<br />

Muhlenbergia sylvatica (Torr.) Torr. forest muhly N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7829, F 8120<br />

Panicum capillare L. var. capillare common witch grass N/A/D/2; F 7833<br />

Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx. fall panicum N/A/D/3; Brooks & Harris 15149; F 7800,<br />

M 925<br />

Panicum virgatum L. var. virgatum switchgrass N/Ph/P/3; F 7847<br />

Paspalum laeve Michx. var. laeve field paspalum N/Ph/D/2; F 8320<br />

Paspalum pubiflorum Rupr. ex Fourn. var. glabrum Vasey ex Scribn. hairy-seed paspalum<br />

N/Ph/D/3; F 7516, F 7795, F 8304<br />

Paspalum setaceum Michx. var. muehlenbergii (Nash) D.J. Banks thin paspalum N/Ph/P/0<br />

Phalaris arundinacea L. reed canary grass N/Ph/DW/4; EF 826<br />

Phleum pratense L. subsp. pratense common timothy I/Ph/DFuP/2; EF 801<br />

Poa annua L. annual blue grass I/A/D/3; FE 6843<br />

Poa compressa L. Canadian blue grass I/Ph/DFu/2; M 9693<br />

Poa pratensis L. Kentucky blue grass I/Ph/DFfFuP/3; E 425<br />

Poa sylvestris A. Gray woodland blue grass N/Ph/FfFu/3; Brooks 14152, E 491, F 7112,<br />

Hulbert 3374, Morse et al. 9376<br />

Schedonnardus paniculatus (Nutt.) Trel. tumble grass N/Ph/DP/0<br />

Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash little bluestem N/Ph/P/2; F 7818<br />

Sclerochloa dura (L.) P. Beauv. hard grass I/A/D/2; FE 6998<br />

Setaria faberi R.A.W. Herrm. Chinese bristle grass I/A/D/3; E 1083, F 7510<br />

Setaria parviflora (Poir.) Kerguélen knot-root bristle grass N/Ph/P/0<br />

Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roem. & Schult. yellow bristle grass I/A/D/3; F 7513<br />

Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv. green bristle grass I/A/D/3; F 7876<br />

Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash yellow Indian grass N/Ph/P/4; F 7823<br />

Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench subsp. bicolor grain sorghum I/A/D/2; F 7874<br />

Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Johnson grass I/Ph/D/4; EF 828<br />

Spartina pectinata Link prairie cordgrass N/Ph/PW/0<br />

Sphenopholis intermedia (Rydb.) Rydb. slender wedge grass N/APh/FfFu/2; EF 809<br />

[Sphenopholis obtusata (Michx.) Scribn. var. major (Torr.) Erdman = Sphenopholis intermedia]<br />

Sphenopholis obtusata (Michx.) Scribn. prairie wedge grass N/APh/FfW/0<br />

[Sporobolus asper (Michx.) Kunth var. asper (Michx.) Kunth = Sporobolus compositus var.<br />

compositus]<br />

Sporobolus clandestinus (Biehler) Hitchc. eastern dropseed N/Ph/DFuP/0<br />

Sporobolus compositus (Poir.) Merr. var. compositus rough dropseed N/Ph/P/2; F 7826<br />

Sporobolus compositus (Poir.) Merr. var. drummondii (Trin.) Kartesz & Gandhi Drummond's<br />

dropseed N/Ph/DP/0<br />

Sporobolus cryptandrus (Torr.) A. Gray sand dropseed N/Ph/DP/0<br />

Sporobolus heterolepis (A. Gray) A. Gray prairie dropseed N/Ph/P/0<br />

Sporobolus neglectus Nash puff-sheath dropseed N/A/D/2; F 7844<br />

[Sporobolus ozarkanus Fernald, reports <strong>of</strong> this species in Freeman et al. 1997 were based on a<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 170


misidentified specimen <strong>of</strong> Sporobolus neglectus]<br />

Sporobolus pyramidatus (Lam.) A.S. Hitchc. whorled dropseed N/Ph/DP/0<br />

Sporobolus vaginiflorus (Torr. ex A. Gray) A.W. Wood poverty dropseed N/A/D/0<br />

Tridens flavus (L.) Hitchc. var. flavus purpletop N/Ph/DP/3; F 7828, W 3406<br />

Tripsacum dactyloides (L.) L. var. dactyloides eastern gamma grass N/Ph/P/1; F 8125<br />

Triticum aestivum L. bread wheat A/A/D/2; F 7156, Morse et al. 9397<br />

Vulpia oct<strong>of</strong>lora (Walter) Rydb. six-weeks annual-fescue N/A/DP/0<br />

83. Polemoniaceae, <strong>the</strong> polemonium family [C=1/3/3, F=1/1/1]<br />

Phlox divaricata L. subsp. laphamii (A.W. Wood) Wherry sweet-William phlox<br />

N/Ph/DFu/2; FE 6971, W 2358, W 2392<br />

Phlox paniculata L. summer phlox N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

Phlox pilosa L. subsp. fulgida (Wherry) Wherry prairie phlox N/Ph/P/0<br />

84. Polygalaceae, <strong>the</strong> milkwort family [C=1/1/1, F=0/0/0]<br />

Polygala incarnata L. slender milkwort N/A/P/0<br />

85. Polygonaceae, <strong>the</strong> buckwheat family [C=2/22/22, F=2/13/13]<br />

Polygonum achoreum S.F. Blake lea<strong>the</strong>ry knotweed N/A/D/0<br />

Polygonum amphibium L. var. emersum Michx. swamp smartweed N/Ph/AW/3; EF 822,<br />

F 7487<br />

Polygonum arenastrum Boreau sand knotweed I/A/D/2; F 7840<br />

Polygonum bicorne Raf. pink smartweed N/Ph/D/0<br />

Polygonum cespitosum Blume var. longisetum (Bruijn) Steward Asian smartweed<br />

I/A/DFfFuW/2; F 7779, F 7864, M 9722, M 9736, M 9875<br />

Polygonum convolvulus L. dull-seed cornbind I/A/D/0<br />

Polygonum erectum L. erect knotweed N/A/D/0<br />

Polygonum hydropiper L. water-pepper smartweed N/A/DW/0<br />

Polygonum hydropiperoides Michx. mild water-pepper smartweed N/Ph/AW/0<br />

Polygonum lapathifolium L. pale smartweed N/A/W/2; F 7799<br />

Polygonum pensylvanicum L. Pennsylvania smartweed N/A/W/2; E 1093, F 7778, M 9826,<br />

W 3362<br />

Polygonum persicaria L. lady's-thumb smartweed I/A/DW/2; F 7870<br />

Polygonum punctatum Ell. dotted smartweed N/Ph/FfW/2; F 7789, M 9795<br />

Polygonum scandens L. hedge cornbind N/Ph/DFf/2; F 7834, M 9796, W 3382<br />

Polygonum virginianum L. jumpseed N/Ph/FfFu/2; F 7813, W 3398<br />

Rumex acetosella L. sheep sorrel I/Ph/D/0<br />

Rumex altissimus A.W. Wood pale dock N/Ph/DW/0<br />

Rumex crispus L. curly dock I/Ph/D/3; E 514<br />

Rumex cristatus DC. crested dock A/Ph/D/0<br />

Rumex obtusifolius L. bitter dock I/Ph/DW/2; EF 781<br />

Rumex patientia L. patience dock I/Ph/DW/2/ E 513<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 171


Rumex stenophyllus Ledeb. narrow-leaf dock I/Ph/DW/2; EF 839, M 9824<br />

86. Pontederiaceae, <strong>the</strong> pickerel-weed family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Heteran<strong>the</strong>ra rotundifolia (Kunth) Griseb. round-leaf mud-plantain N/Ph/DW/2; F 7500<br />

87. Portulacaceae, <strong>the</strong> purslane family [C=2/2/2, F=1/1/1]<br />

Claytonia virginica L. Virginia springbeauty N/Ph/Fu/2; FE 6851<br />

Portulaca oleracea L. common purslane N/A/D/0<br />

88. Potamogetonaceae, <strong>the</strong> pondweed family [C=1/2/2, F=0/0/0]<br />

Potamogeton foliosus Raf. subsp. foliosus leafy pondweed N/Ph/A/0<br />

Potamogeton nodosus Poir. long-leaf pondweed N/Ph/A/0<br />

89. Primulaceae, <strong>the</strong> primrose family [C=3/3/3, F=1/1/1]<br />

Anagallis arvensis L. scarlet pimpernel I/A/DP/0<br />

Androsace occidentalis Pursh western rock-jasmine N/A/P/0<br />

Lysimachia ciliata L. fringed loosestrife N/Ph/PW/2; EF 804<br />

90. Ranunculaceae, <strong>the</strong> buttercup family [C=8/14/14, F=6/11/11]<br />

Anemone canadensis L. Canadian anemone N/Ph/FfP/3; E 438, Hulbert 3369, M 9456<br />

Anemone virginiana L. var. virginiana tall anemone N/Ph/FfFu/2; EF 802, EM 637, M<br />

9740<br />

Aquilegia canadensis L. American columbine N/Ph/Fu/2; Brooks 14148, E 481, F 7128<br />

Clematis pitcheri Torr. & A. Gray var. pitcheri Pitcher's clematis N/Ph/FfFu/0<br />

Delphinium carolinianum Walter subsp. virescens (Nutt.) R.E. Brooks plains larkspur<br />

N/Ph/P/0<br />

Delphinium tricorne Michx. dwarf larkspur N/Ph/Fu/0<br />

Enemion biternatum Raf. false rue-anemone N/Ph/FfFu/3; FE 6973, W 2404<br />

[Isopyrum biternatum (Raf.) Torr. & Gray = Enemion biternatum]<br />

Myosurus minimus L. tiny mousetail N/A/D/1; F 7104<br />

Ranunculus abortivus L. early wood buttercup N/BPh/FfFu/2; Brooks 14153, FE 6847, W<br />

2369, W 2394<br />

Ranunculus hispidus Michx. var. nitidus (Elliott) T. Duncan bristly buttercup<br />

N/Ph/AW/2; W 2393<br />

Ranunculus micranthus Nutt. small-flower buttercup N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7088<br />

Ranunculus recurvatus Poir. var. recurvatus eastern hooked buttercup N/Ph/FuW/2; F<br />

7137, F 19749, M 9730<br />

Ranunculus sceleratus L. var. sceleratus cursed crowfoot N/A/DW/2; F 7107<br />

Thalictrum dasycarpum Fisch. & Avé-Lall. purple meadow-rue N/Ph/Fu/2; EM 635<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 172


91. Rhamnaceae, <strong>the</strong> buckthorn family [C=2/3/3, F=2/3/3]<br />

Ceanothus americanus L. American ceanothus N/Pw/FuP/1; M 9779<br />

Ceanothus herbaceus Raf. inland ceanothus N/Pw/P/2; E 475<br />

Rhamnus lanceolata Pursh var. glabrata Gleason lance-leaf buckthorn N/Pw/FuP/2; F<br />

7091, M 9518<br />

92. Rosaceae, <strong>the</strong> rose family [C=12/30/30, F=11/27/27]<br />

Agrimonia parviflora Aiton small-flower agrimony N/Ph/Fu/1; F 8324<br />

Agrimonia pubescens Wallr. downy agrimony N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7438, M 9766<br />

Amelanchier arborea (Michx. f.) Fernald downy service-berry N/Pw/Fu/0<br />

Crataegus crus-galli cock-spur hawthorn N/Pw/DFuP/1; M 9741<br />

Crataegus mollis (Torr. & A. Gray) Scheele downy hawthorn N/Pw/DFuP/2; FE 6988<br />

Duchesnea indica (Andr.) Focke Indian mock-strawberry N/Ph/DFf/2; M 9720<br />

Fragaria virginiana Mill. wild strawberry N/Ph/FuP/2; FE 6997<br />

Geum canadense Jacq. white avens N/Ph/Fu/2; EF 811<br />

Geum vernum (Raf.) Torr. & A. Gray heart-leaf avens N/Ph/Fu/2; F 7096<br />

Malus ioensis (A.W. Wood) L.H. Bailey var. ioensis Iowa crab apple N/Pw/Fu/0<br />

Malus sieboldii (Regel) Rehd. var. zumi (Matsumura) Asmai Toringo crab apple<br />

I/Pw/Fu/1; M 9876<br />

Potentilla arguta Pursh var. arguta tall cinquefoil N/Ph/D/0<br />

Potentilla norvegica L. Norwegian cinquefoil N/AB/W/2; E 436, EM 663, F 7154, M 9466<br />

Potentilla recta L. sulphur cinquefoil I/Ph/D/2; EM 661<br />

Potentilla simplex Michx. old-field cinquefoil N/Ph/DFuP/2; E 473<br />

Prunus hortulana L.H. Bailey Hortulan plum N/Pw/DFf/2; M 9785<br />

Prunus mexicana S. Watson big-tree plum N/Pw/FuP/2; FE 6991, M 9781, W 2370<br />

Prunus serotina Ehrh. var. serotina black cherry N/Pw/Fu/2; F 8300<br />

Prunus virginiana L. var. virginiana choke cherry N/Pw/FuP/3; F 7098<br />

Rhodotypos scandens (Thunb.) Makino jetbead I/Pw/FuD/1; M 9507, Morse & Loring<br />

9896<br />

Rosa arkansana Porter ex Porter & J.M. Coult. Arkansas rose N/Pw/FuP/2; EM 651<br />

Rosa multiflora Thunb. multiflora rose I/Pw/DFfFuP/3; E 432<br />

Rosa setigera Michx. prairie rose N/Pw/FuP/3; EF 800<br />

Rubus aborginum Rydb. one-flower dewberry N/Pw/FuP/2; M 9691, M 9728<br />

[Rubus allegheniensis Porter, reports <strong>of</strong> this species in Freeman et al. 1997 were based on a<br />

misidentified specimen referable to Rubus rosa]<br />

Rubus alumnus L.H. Bailey nursling highbush blackberry N/Pw/DFu/2; M 9701, Morse<br />

et al. 9377, Morse et al. 9392<br />

Rubus enslenii Tratt. small dewberry N/Pw/Fu/2; F 7116, F 19751, M 9503<br />

Rubus flagellaris Willd. American dewberry N/Pw/DFuFf/1; F 19864, M 9692, M 9729<br />

(determination for specimens collected by Morse are tentative; plants are referable to<br />

Rubus meracus L.H. Bailey)<br />

Rubus laudatus A. Berger praiseworthy blackberry N/Pw/Fu/2; M 9505<br />

Rubus occidentalis L. black raspberry N/Pw/DFu/3; E 502, M 9504<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 173


Rubus rosa L.H. Bailey rose blackberry A/Pw/Ff/3; Elliott 429<br />

93. Rubiaceae, <strong>the</strong> madder family [C=3/8/8, F=2/5/5]<br />

Cephalanthus occidentalis L. common buttonbush N/Pw/FfW/2; F 7475<br />

Galium aparine L. catch-weed bedstraw N/A/DFfFuP/3; E 428<br />

Galium circaezans Michx. forest bedstraw N/Ph/Fu/2; EM 658<br />

Galium concinnum Torr. & A. Gray shining bedstraw N/Ph/FuP/3; EF 789, M 9508<br />

Galium obtusum Bigelow subsp. obtusum bluntleaf bedstraw N/Ph/FfW/0<br />

Galium pedemontanum (Bellardi) All. foothill bedstraw I/A/D/2; E 500, Morse et al. 9389<br />

Galium triflorum Michx. sweet-scent bedstraw N/Ph/DFuP/0<br />

Houstonia pusilla Schöpf small bluet N/A/DFuP/0<br />

94. Rutaceae, <strong>the</strong> citrus family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Zanthoxylum americanum P. Mill. common prickly-ash N/Pw/FuP/2; EM 654, M 9513<br />

95. Salicaceae, <strong>the</strong> willow family [C=2/6/8, F=2/5/5]<br />

Populus deltoides W. Bartram ex Marshall subsp. monilifera (Aiton) Eckenw. plains<br />

cottonwood N/Pw/DFf/4; F 7477, W 3412<br />

Salix amygdaloides Andersson peach-leaf willow N/Pw/FfW/4; EF 835, F 7469<br />

Salix eriocephala Michx. subsp. eriocephala var. eriocephala diamond willow N/Pw/Ff/2;<br />

F 7111, W 2391<br />

Salix eriocephala Michx. subsp. eriocephala var. famelica (C.R. Ball) Dorn plains willow<br />

N/Pw/Ff/0<br />

Salix exigua Nutt. subsp. interior (Rowlee) Cronquist sandbar willow N/Pw/FfW/4; EM<br />

669, EM 670, F 7151, F 7478<br />

Salix humilis Marshall var. humilis prairie willow N/Pw/P/2; EF 794<br />

Salix humilis Marshall var. microphylla (Andersson) Fernald dwarf upland willow N/Pw/P/0<br />

Salix nigra Marshall black willow N/Pw/Ff/0<br />

96. Santalaceae, <strong>the</strong> sandlewood family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Comandra umbellata (L.) Nutt. subsp. umbellata umbellate bastard-toadflax N/Ph/P/2; E<br />

485<br />

97. Sapindaceae, <strong>the</strong> soapberry family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Koelreuteria paniculata Laxm. golden rain-tree A/Pw/Fu/1; F 8314<br />

98. Saxifragaceae, <strong>the</strong> saxifrage family [C=1/1/1, F=0/0/0]<br />

Heuchera richardsonii R. Br. Richardson’s alumroot N/Ph/FuP/0<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 174


99. Scrophulariaceae, <strong>the</strong> figwort family [C=12/17/18, F=8/12/12]<br />

Agalinis tenuifolia (Vahl) Raf. narrow-leaf agalinis N/A/FuP/0<br />

Buchnera americana L. American bluehearts N/Ph/P/0<br />

Dasistoma macrophylla (Nutt.) Raf. big-leaf mullein-foxglove N/A/FfFuP/1; E 1115<br />

Leucospora multifida (Michx.) Nutt. paleseed N/A/FfW/1; F 8282<br />

Lindernia dubia (L.) Pennell yellow false-pimpernel N/A/FfW/3; F 7483, M 9820<br />

Mimulus alatus Aiton sharp-wing monkey-flower N/Ph/FfW/1; F 8131, M 9752<br />

Mimulus ringens L. Alleghany monkey-flower N/Ph/W/2; Brooks & Harris 15150, F<br />

7873, M 9751<br />

Pedicularis canadensis L. subsp. canadensis Canadian lousewort N/Ph/FuP/2; F 7131<br />

Penstemon digitalis Nutt. ex Sims smooth beardtongue N/Ph/FuP/0<br />

Penstemon pallidus Small pale beardtongue N/Ph/P/0<br />

Scrophularia marilandica L. Maryland figwort N/Ph/DFu/3; F 7511<br />

Verbascum blattaria L. moth mullein I/B/D/2; EF 817<br />

Verbascum thapsus L. flannel mullein I/B/D/3; EF 823<br />

Veronica arvensis L. corn speedwell I/A/D/2; FE 6999<br />

Veronica peregrina L. subsp. peregrina purslane speedwell N/A/D/2; F 7108, FE 6996<br />

Veronica peregrina L. subsp. xalapensis (Kunth) H. St. John & F.A. Warren purslane speedwell<br />

N/A/D/0<br />

Veronica polita Fries wayside speedwell I/A/D/3; FE 6845<br />

Veronicastrum virginicum (L.) Farw. Culver's-root N/Ph/FuP/0<br />

100. Simaroubaceae, <strong>the</strong> quassia family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle tree-<strong>of</strong>-heaven I/Pw/D/2; F 7449, F 8298<br />

101. Smilacaceae, <strong>the</strong> catbrier family [C=1/3/3, F=1/3/3]<br />

Smilax ecirrata (Engelm.) S. Watson upright greenbrier N/Ph/Fu/2; M 9780<br />

[Smilax herbacea L. var. lasioneura (Hook.) A. DC. = Smilax lasioneura Hook.]<br />

Smilax lasioneura Hook. Blue Ridge greenbrier N/Ph/FfFu/2; EF 833<br />

[Smilax hispida Muhl. ex Torr. = Smilax tamnoides]<br />

Smilax tamnoides L. bristly greenbrier N/Pw/FfFu/2; F 8322<br />

102. Solanaceae, <strong>the</strong> nightshade family [C=2/6/6, F=2/5/5]<br />

Physalis heterophylla Nees clammy ground-cherry N/Ph/DFuP/2; E 1105, EF 841, F<br />

7430, F 7853, W 3404<br />

Physalis longifolia Nutt. var. longifolia common ground-cherry N/Ph/DFfFuP/3; E 1077,<br />

F 7877, M 9756<br />

Physalis pubescens L. var. integrifolia (Dunal) Waterf. downy ground-cherry N/A/D/1; F<br />

7878<br />

Solanum carolinense L. Carolina horse-nettle N/Ph/D/2; EF 771<br />

Solanum ptycanthum Dunal black nightshade N/A/DFf/2; F 8288, M 9794<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 175


Solanum rostratum Dunal buffalo-bur nightshade N/A/D/0<br />

103. Staphyleaceae, <strong>the</strong> bladdernut family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Staphylea trifolia L. American bladdernut N/Pw/Fu/3; E 476, FE 6972, W 3408<br />

104. Tamaricaceae, <strong>the</strong> tamarix family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Tamarix ramosissima Ledeb. tamarisk I/Pw/D/1; M 9890<br />

105. Tiliaceae, <strong>the</strong> linden family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Tilia americana L. var. americana American basswood N/Pw/FfFu/3; E 1106, EF 770, F<br />

7085, M 9520<br />

106. Typhaceae, <strong>the</strong> cat-tail family [C=1/3/3, F=1/3/3]<br />

Typha angustifolia L. narrow-leaf cat-tail N/Ph/W/3; EF 838<br />

Typha domingensis Pers. sou<strong>the</strong>rn cat-tail N/Ph/W/3; F 8277<br />

Typha latifolia L. broad-leaf cat-tail N/Ph/W/3; EF 815<br />

107. Ulmaceae, <strong>the</strong> elm family [C=2/5/5, F=2/4/4]<br />

Celtis laevigata Willd. sugarberry, sugar hackberry N/Pw/FfFu/0<br />

Celtis occidentalis L. common hackberry N/Pw/FfFu/3; F 7100<br />

Ulmus americana L. American elm N/Pw/FfFu/3; FE 6850<br />

Ulmus pumila L. Siberian elm I/Pw/D/3; EF 818<br />

Ulmus rubra Muhl. slippery elm N/Pw/Fu/2; FE 6849, W 2367<br />

108. Urticaceae, <strong>the</strong> nettle family [C=5/5/5, F=5/5/5]<br />

Boehmeria cylindrica (L.) Sw. small-spike false-nettle N/Ph/FfW/2; F 7772, W 3375<br />

Laportea canadensis (L.) Wedd. Canadian wood-nettle N/Ph/FfFu/3; F 7508, M 9798, W<br />

3376<br />

Parietaria pensylvanica Muhl. ex Willd. Pennsylvania pellitory N/A/FfFu/3; EM 656, F<br />

7110<br />

Pilea pumila (L.) A. Gray dwarf clearweed N/A/FfFu/2; F 7509, M 9800<br />

Urtica dioica L. subsp. gracilis (Aiton) Selander American stinging nettle N/Ph/FfFu/2;<br />

EF 824, M 9799, W 3377<br />

109. Valerianaceae, <strong>the</strong> valerian family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Valerianella radiata (L.) Dufr. limestone cornsalad N/A/DFuP/2; E 460<br />

110. Verbenaceae, <strong>the</strong> verain family [C=3/9/9, F=3/7/7]<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 176


Phryma leptostachya L. American lopseed N/Ph/Fu/3; EF 779<br />

Phyla lanceolata (Michx.) Greene nor<strong>the</strong>rn fogfruit N/Ph/FfW/2; E 1124, EF 836<br />

Verbena bracteata Lag. & Rodr. prostrate verbena N/Ph/DP/3; EM 673<br />

Verbena hastata L. blue vervain N/Ph/PW/2; F 7514<br />

Verbena simplex Lehm. narrow-leaf vervain N/Ph/DP/3; M 9495<br />

Verbena stricta Vent. hoary vervain N/Ph/DP/2; F 7505<br />

Verbena urticifolia L. nettle-leaf vervain N/Ph/DFf/2; F 7471<br />

Verbena ×moechina Moldenke (Verbena simplex × Verbena stricta) pasture vervain<br />

N/Ph/DP/0<br />

Verbena ×rydbergii Moldenke (Verbena hastata × Verbena stricta) Rydberg's vervain<br />

N/Ph/DP/0<br />

111. Violaceae, <strong>the</strong> violet family [C=1/5/5, F=1/3/3]<br />

Viola bicolor Pursh Johnny-jump-up N/A/DFuP/3; FE 6857<br />

Viola pedatifida G. Don bird-foot violet N/Ph/FuP/0<br />

[Viola pratincola Greene = Viola sororia var. sororia]<br />

Viola pubescens Aiton var. pubescens downy yellow violet N/Ph/FfFu/3; Brooks 15277,<br />

Brooks 15277-5, FE 6968, W 2357, W 2390<br />

[Viola rafinesquii Greene = Viola bicolor]<br />

Viola sororia Willd. downy blue violet N/Ph/DFuP/2; FE 6961, FE 6976, W 2352, W 2363,<br />

W 2397<br />

Viola ×bernardii Greene Bernard's violet N/Ph/FuP/0<br />

112. Vitaceae, <strong>the</strong> grape family [C=3/7/7, F=3/5/5]<br />

Ampelopsis cordata Michx. heart-leaf raccoon-grape N/Pw/FfFu/3; EF 842, F 7492, M<br />

9725<br />

Par<strong>the</strong>nocissus quinquefolia (L.) Planch. var. quinquefolia Virginia creeper N/Pw/FuFf/3;<br />

F 8321, M 9510<br />

Par<strong>the</strong>nocissus vitacea (Knerr) Hitchc. thicket creeper N/Pw/Fu/0<br />

Vitis aestivalis Michx. var. aestivalis pigeon grape N/Pw/Ff/2; M 9727<br />

Vitis cinerea (Engelm.) Engelm. ex Millardet gray-bark grape N/Pw/FfFu/2; F 8305<br />

Vitis riparia Michx. riverbank grape N/Pw/FfFu/3; F 8132, M 9726, M 9750<br />

Vitis vulpina L. winter grape N/Pw/Fu/0<br />

113. Zygophyllaceae, <strong>the</strong> caltrop family [C=1/1/1, F=1/1/1]<br />

Tribulus terrestris L. puncturevine I/A/D/1; E 1078<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 177


APPENDIX D. A report on a field survey <strong>of</strong> summer bats on FLMR.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Bat Survey <strong>of</strong> Ft. Leavenworth Military Reservation, <strong>Kansas</strong>,<br />

with Emphasis on Rare and Endangered Species<br />

Dr. Lynn W. Robbins<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> Biology<br />

Southwest Missouri State University<br />

Springfield, MO 65804<br />

(417) 836-5366<br />

fax: (417) 836-4204<br />

lwr704f@smsu.edu<br />

An intensive study was conducted at Ft. Leavenworth Military Reservation (FLMR), <strong>Kansas</strong> to<br />

determine <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> all bat species on <strong>the</strong> base, but special emphasis was placed on <strong>the</strong><br />

endangered Indiana bat, Myotis sodalis. This species has not been documented in <strong>Kansas</strong><br />

(3D/Environmental Services 1993), but reproductively active individuals have been observed<br />

approximately 160 km (100 mi) east and nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>of</strong> FLMR in Caldwell and Nodaway counties,<br />

Missouri. Because habitat similarities do exist, it is reasonable to expect that Indiana bats may<br />

occur in suitable habitat near <strong>the</strong> Missouri River.<br />

METHODS<br />

Survey methods were based on <strong>the</strong> recommended mist netting protocol provided by <strong>the</strong> Indiana<br />

Bat Recovery Team (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1999) in conjunction with Anabat II bat<br />

detectors and a species identification program using a call library that includes species known to<br />

be in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong> or adjacent Missouri (Britzke et al. 2002, Murray et al. 1999, 2001).<br />

Methods used consisted <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> mist net sets (two nets not closer than 60 m from each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r) in appropriate areas in <strong>the</strong> floodplain and upland forests. One bat detector, recording call<br />

sequences to a laptop computer, was set up at each net set and left to record throughout <strong>the</strong> night,<br />

wea<strong>the</strong>r permitting. The protocol recommends that <strong>the</strong> nets be set for two nights in <strong>the</strong> same<br />

location. Data presented here are from 8–13 July 2002 and represent <strong>the</strong> first night <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> survey<br />

for each net set, and from May 31 through June 4, and July 17 and 18, 2003 that represent <strong>the</strong><br />

second night <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> survey for localities 1-10, and two nights at locality 11. Data from each net<br />

(A, B) at a site were pooled for each year, <strong>the</strong>n combined for <strong>the</strong> final results.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 178


Net sets 1, 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, and 11 are located in <strong>the</strong> lowland floodplain <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri River, and<br />

sets 5, 6, 7, and 8 are in <strong>the</strong> upland deciduous forest (Figure D.1). Net set 9 consisted <strong>of</strong> only one<br />

net set adjacent to a large pond in <strong>the</strong> lowlands. Net set 8 was along a perennial stream, Quarry<br />

Creek, and both nets were set across <strong>the</strong> stream. All o<strong>the</strong>r nets were set across roads or openings<br />

in <strong>the</strong> forest. UTM coordinates were recorded for all collecting locations. Nets and bat detectors<br />

also were set up at Weston Bend State Park during both summers. This park is located across <strong>the</strong><br />

Missouri River in Missouri and consists <strong>of</strong> upland deciduous forest and riparian corridors.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Species numbers (Table D.1) and numbers <strong>of</strong> individuals (Table D.2) are summarized for 48 net<br />

nights over two summers. Net locations are presented in Table D.3.<br />

TABLE D.1. Species <strong>of</strong> bats captured at FLMR in 2002 and 2003. Species with asterisks were<br />

recorded with bat detectors but not captured in nets.<br />

Scientific Name Common Name 2002 2003 Total<br />

Lasiurus borealis (LABO) red bat 14 8 22<br />

Lasiurus cinereus (LACI) hoary bat 1 - 1<br />

Eptesicus fuscus (EPFU) big brown bat 73 76 149<br />

Nycticeius humeralis (NYHU) evening bat 8 3 11<br />

Myotis septentrionalis (MYSE) nor<strong>the</strong>rn bat 1 - 1<br />

Myotis lucifugus (MYLU)* little brown bat 0 0 0<br />

Pipistrellus subflavus (PISU)** eastern pipistrelle 0 0 0<br />

*Little brown bats were recorded at two locations in 2003.<br />

**Eastern pipistrelles were recorded at eight locations in 2002 and 2003.<br />

TABLE D.2. Numbers <strong>of</strong> each bat species collected at each net site. A = Adult, J = Juvenile, P<br />

= pregnant, L = lactating, M = Male, F = Female, U = Undetermined, and asterisk (*) indicates<br />

presence documented with detector. Data for 2002 and 2003 are combined.<br />

Set LABO LACI EPFU NYHU MYSE MYLU PISU<br />

1 2,A,F,P* U,?* 7,M,F,A,J* 1,J,M* - -*<br />

2 2,A,J,F,P* -* 40,A,J,M,F,P* 4,A,J,F,P* 1,A,F,L* -*<br />

3 -* - 2,A,J,F* -* - -<br />

4 7,J,M,F* - 12,A,J,M,F* 4,J*,M,F - -* -<br />

5 -* - 3,A,J,M,F* -* - -*<br />

6 -* -* 1,J,F* 1 - -*<br />

7 2,J,M,F* - 5,A,J,M,F* - - -*<br />

8 7,A,J,M,F,P* - 48,A,J,M,F,P,L* 1,M,A - -*<br />

9 1,J,F* -* 1,A* 1,A,F* - -* -*<br />

10 -* - 1,A* - - -*<br />

11 1,A,F - 29,A,J,M,F - - - -<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 179


TABLE D.3. UTM coordinates for net locations. Locations are <strong>the</strong> same for 2002 and 2003,<br />

with <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> 11, which was monitored only in 2003.<br />

Location Easting Northing<br />

NT 1A 0336680 4359854<br />

NT 1B 0336773 4359784<br />

NT 2A 0336997 4359993<br />

NT 2B 0337128 4360148<br />

NT 3A 0336486 4361118<br />

NT 3B 0336404 4360859<br />

NT 4A 0336608 4361403<br />

NT 4B 0336643 4361446<br />

NT 5A 0333709 4359046<br />

NT 5B 0333683 4359128<br />

NT 6A 0333387 4358952<br />

NT 6B 0333348 4358925<br />

NT 7A 0334523 4358911<br />

NT 7B 0334542 4358895<br />

NT 8A 0334261 4358689<br />

NT 8B 0334200 4358631<br />

NT 9 0336052 4360750<br />

NT10A 0333888 4360750<br />

NT10B 0333858 4360758<br />

NT11A,B 0335165 4356302<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

No Indiana bats were captured or recorded at FLMR or at Weston Bend State Park, but both sites<br />

support habitat potentially capable <strong>of</strong> sustaining reproducing populations <strong>of</strong> three (red, big<br />

brown, and evening) <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> five bat species that we captured. A fourth species, Myotis<br />

septentrionalis, <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn bat, was represented by a single individual, but this was a lactating<br />

female, indicating <strong>the</strong>re is habitat available for reproductive success. Two species, <strong>the</strong> eastern<br />

pipistrelle and <strong>the</strong> little brown bat were represented only by echolocation recordings but probably<br />

represent reproductively active populations. These two species are known to forage over open<br />

water, which was not sampled using our protocol. The seventh species, <strong>the</strong> hoary bat, probably is<br />

an uncommon resident based on our recordings, but <strong>the</strong> one captured individual escaped before<br />

age or reproductive data could be collected. Big brown bats were <strong>the</strong> most common species<br />

recorded and are most likely forming maternity colonies in both natural tree cavities and in manmade<br />

structures. Adult males, females, and juveniles were common. Red bats roost in canopy<br />

foliage and were captured in lowland and upland habitats. Only adult females and juveniles were<br />

captured. Evening bats were more common in lowland habitats, and adults <strong>of</strong> both sexes and<br />

juveniles were captured. The one adult male was <strong>the</strong> first to be recorded from <strong>the</strong> state <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Kansas</strong>.<br />

Limited netting (two nights) at Weston Bend State Park yielded only one capture—a red bat.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 180


However, Anabat recordings indicated <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> all o<strong>the</strong>r species documented at FLMR<br />

except <strong>the</strong> two species <strong>of</strong> Myotis (Table D.2).<br />

The only habitat management recommendations <strong>of</strong>fered at this time are to maintain mature<br />

upland and lowland forests without removing dead trees or snags. Evening bats, big brown bats,<br />

and nor<strong>the</strong>rn bats prefer <strong>the</strong>se habitats. If Indiana bats are present in adjacent areas, this area<br />

could serve as a refuge for <strong>the</strong>m if <strong>the</strong>ir present habitat should be disturbed or eliminated.<br />

LITERATURE CITED<br />

Britzke, E. R., K. L. Murray, J. E. Heywood, and L.W. Robbins. 2002. Acoustic identification.<br />

In The Indiana Bat: Biology and Management <strong>of</strong> an Endangered Species (A. Kurta and J.<br />

Kennedy, eds.) Bat Conservation International, Austin, TX.<br />

Murray, K. L., E. R. Britzke, B. M. Hadley, and L.W. Robbins. 1999. Surveying bat<br />

communities: a comparison between mist nets and <strong>the</strong> Anabat II detector system. Acta<br />

Chiropterologica 1: 105–112.<br />

Murray, K. L., E. R. Britzke, and L. W. Robbins. 2001. Variation in search-phase calls <strong>of</strong> bats.<br />

J. Mammalogy 82: 728–737.<br />

3D/Environmental Services. 1993. A summer survey for federally endangered Indiana bats<br />

(Myotis sodalis) in eastern <strong>Kansas</strong>. Report submitted to Western Resources, Topeka, KS.<br />

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1999. Agency draft Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) revised<br />

recovery plan. Fort Snelling, MN. 53 pp.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 181


NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 182


APPENDIX E. Report on a 2003 field survey <strong>of</strong> snakes on FLMR.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

A Survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Snakes <strong>of</strong> Ft. Leavenworth Military Reservation,<br />

Leavenworth County, <strong>Kansas</strong>, in 2003<br />

Hank Guarisco<br />

Research Associate<br />

Denver Museum <strong>of</strong> Nature & Science<br />

P.O. Box 3171, Lawrence, KS 66046<br />

A survey <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> snakes <strong>of</strong> Ft. Leavenworth Military Reservation (FLMR), Leavenworth County,<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong>, was conducted from May–October 2003. This work was part <strong>of</strong> a larger investigation<br />

intended to identify <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> notable species <strong>of</strong> plants, animals, and natural communities<br />

on FLMR. Of particular interest were three snake species that potentially may occur on FLMR:<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn redbelly snake (Storeria occipitomaculata), smooth earth snake (Virginia valeriae), and<br />

timber rattlesnake (Crotalus horridus). The first two species are state threatened in <strong>Kansas</strong>,<br />

while <strong>the</strong> timber rattlesnake is a <strong>Kansas</strong> Species In Need <strong>of</strong> Conservation (SINC).<br />

METHODS<br />

Both systematic and opportunistic surveys were conducted in 2003. For <strong>the</strong> former, 31 pieces <strong>of</strong><br />

corrugated metal, which served as shelters, were placed in upland areas on FLMR, mostly along<br />

roads and trails, and at <strong>the</strong> edges <strong>of</strong> forests and old fields. Shelters were installed on 11 June and<br />

checked periodically until 11 July, when an extended period <strong>of</strong> hot, dry wea<strong>the</strong>r commenced.<br />

This hot spell lasted though August, precluding any field work. The wea<strong>the</strong>r improved in early<br />

September, at which time six drift fence arrays were installed in <strong>the</strong> extreme sou<strong>the</strong>astern part <strong>of</strong><br />

FLMR in an attempt to detect <strong>the</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> western hognose snake, which was collected in<br />

this area in October 1999. These methods were described and evaluated by Fitch (1987) and<br />

Parmelee and Fitch (1995). Each array consisted <strong>of</strong> a drift fence <strong>of</strong> galvanized roll metal 36–41<br />

cm (14-16 in) wide and 3–6 m (10–20 ft) long. The ends usually were located in a sheltered spot,<br />

such as a group <strong>of</strong> trees. A wire funnel trap with a large-mouth mason jar was placed at each<br />

end. The base <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> fence was buried in <strong>the</strong> soil ca 5 cm (2 in) and <strong>the</strong> fence fastened with lag<br />

bolts to 3 or 4, 5 x 5 cm pine braces. The braces were angled away from <strong>the</strong> drift fence and<br />

staked into <strong>the</strong> ground with #20 nails. Coordinates <strong>of</strong> shelters and traps were determined using a<br />

Magellan GPS 310 unit. Reptiles that were not recognized immediately were identified using<br />

Collins (1993) and released as soon as possible <strong>the</strong>reafter. Drift fences and traps were removed<br />

on 12 October.<br />

Opportunistic surveys consisted <strong>of</strong> frequently checking a junk pile containing scattered metal tins<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 183


and old appliances, and exploring rock ledges and o<strong>the</strong>r natural materials, such as logs, which<br />

might shelter snakes. A few records were obtained when snakes were encountered by accident.<br />

RESULTS AND DISUCSSION<br />

The survey yielded 63 records <strong>of</strong> 12 species <strong>of</strong> reptiles (10 snakes, 1 lizard, and 1 turtle). Dates<br />

and locations are presented in Table E.1. The ringneck snake was encountered most frequently—<br />

22 times The next in order <strong>of</strong> abundance was <strong>the</strong> common garter snake (16 records), followed by<br />

<strong>the</strong> five-lined skink (7 records), black rat snake (5 records), racer (4 records), milksnake (2<br />

records), brown snake (2 records), prairie kingsnake (1 record), western worm snake (1 record),<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn water snake (1 record), western ribbon snake (1 record), and <strong>the</strong> ornate box turtle (1<br />

record).<br />

Although no timber rattlesnakes were captured during <strong>the</strong> survey, a road-killed timber rattlesnake<br />

was collected near <strong>the</strong> back entrance on Santa Fe Trail Road and deposited in <strong>the</strong> Entomology<br />

Office Collection (Pest Control) <strong>of</strong> FLMR on 16 September 2003. It was a large male,<br />

approximately 122 cm (48 in) in length. The collection also includes a small timber rattlesnake<br />

taken near <strong>the</strong> park above <strong>the</strong> river along <strong>the</strong> bluffs. Specimens <strong>of</strong> two o<strong>the</strong>r species not captured<br />

during this study are contained in <strong>the</strong> collection: two juvenile copperheads taken on sticky traps<br />

near <strong>the</strong> museum close to <strong>the</strong> river bluffs, and a western hognose snake taken October 1999 in<br />

<strong>the</strong> parking lot at <strong>the</strong> extreme sou<strong>the</strong>astern corner <strong>of</strong> FLMR in an area <strong>of</strong> loess. A juvenile snake<br />

initially identified as a fox snake later was confirmed to be a young black rat snake.<br />

It appears that <strong>the</strong> timber rattlesnakes occasionally occur along <strong>the</strong> bluffs above <strong>the</strong> river and in<br />

<strong>the</strong> vicinity <strong>of</strong> Government Hill. The two state-threatened species, redbelly snake and smooth<br />

earth snake, were not encountered in this study. The record <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> western hognose is significant<br />

and may indicate a small population <strong>of</strong> this species in loess areas <strong>of</strong> FLMR. This species occurs<br />

across <strong>the</strong> Missouri River in northwestern Missouri where <strong>the</strong> rough, rolling loess hills meet <strong>the</strong><br />

river floodplain (Johnson 1987).<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 184


TABLE E.1. Reptiles and amphibians observed on FLMR between May and October 2003.<br />

Latitude and longitude data are in degrees-decimal minutes (DDMM.MM).<br />

Species Date N Latitude W Longitude Individuals<br />

ringneck snake 2003-09-05 392243 945615 1<br />

2003-09-06 392243 945615 1<br />

2003-09-22 392195 945605 3 (juveniles)<br />

2003-09-22 392160 945657 1<br />

2003-09-29 392192 945624 1<br />

2003-09-29 392195 945605 4<br />

2003-10-02 391996 945500 3<br />

2003-10-04 391996 945500 1<br />

2003-10-08 392195 945605 3<br />

2003-10-09 392195 945605 3<br />

2003-10-11 392236 945622 1<br />

Total = 22<br />

black rat snake 2003-05-02 392256 945576 1 (adult)<br />

2003-06-23 392230 945641 1 (adult)<br />

2003-07-11 392243 945615 1 (juvenile)<br />

2003-10-08 392194 945616 1 (adult)<br />

2003-10-09 392194 945616 1 (adult)<br />

Total = 5<br />

racer 2003-10-07 391996 945500 1 (juvenile)<br />

2003-10-08 392230 945641 1 (juvenile)<br />

2003-10-09 391996 945500 1 (juvenile)<br />

2003-10-11 392217 945634 1 (juvenile)<br />

Total = 4<br />

milk snake 2003-10-08 392236 945603 1<br />

2003-10-11 392236 945603 1<br />

Total = 2<br />

prairie kingsnake 2003-09-29 391991 945501 1<br />

Total = 1<br />

western worm snake 2003-07-01 On wooded hill by DB Road 1 1<br />

Total = 1<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn water snake 2003-07-11 By pond DB Farm 1 (juvenile)<br />

Total = 1<br />

common garter snake 2003-06-12 392230 945641 1<br />

2003-06-23 392230 945641 1<br />

2003-06-24 392230 945641 2<br />

2003-09-09 392192 945624 1<br />

2003-09-22 392192 945624 1<br />

2003-09-22 392172 945592 1 (juvenile)<br />

2003-09-29 392259 945567 4 (adults)<br />

2003-09-29 391996 945500 3<br />

2003-10-08 391996 945500 2<br />

2003-10-11 391997 945503 1<br />

Total = 17<br />

western ribbon snake 2003-05-02 392256 945574 1<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 185


Species Date N Latitude W Longitude Individuals<br />

Total = 1<br />

brown snake 2003-06-12 392232 945637 1<br />

2003-06-18 392232 945637 1<br />

Total = 2<br />

ornate box turtle 2003-09-21 On wooded path on Government Hill 1<br />

Total = 1<br />

five-lined skink 2003-06-12 392230 945641 1<br />

2003-06-23 392158 945648 1<br />

2003-06-23 392238 945618 1<br />

2003-07-01 392232 945637 1<br />

2003-07-11 By pond at DB Farm 1<br />

2003-09-04 392258 945561 1<br />

Total = 6<br />

nor<strong>the</strong>rn cricket frog 2003-06-23 392234 945631 1<br />

Total = 1<br />

LITERATURE CITED<br />

Collins, J. T. 1993. Amphibians and reptiles in <strong>Kansas</strong>. 3 rd ed. University <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>, Lawrence,<br />

KS. 397 pp.<br />

Fitch, H. S. 1987. Collecting and life-history techniques. Pp. 143–164 In: R. A. Seigel, J. T.<br />

Collins, and S. S. Novak (eds.). Snakes; ecology and evolutionary biology. Macmillan.<br />

New York, NY.<br />

Johnson, T. R. 1987. The amphibians and reptiles <strong>of</strong> Missouri. Missouri Department <strong>of</strong><br />

Conservation. Jefferson City, MO. 368 pp.<br />

Parmelee, J.R. and H. S. Fitch. 1995. An experiment with artificial shelters for snakes: effects<br />

<strong>of</strong> material, age, and surface preparation. Herpetological <strong>Natural</strong> History 3: 187–191.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 186


APPENDIX F. Exotic and Invasive Plant Species <strong>of</strong> Concern.<br />

Invasive (exotic) plants are species that prosper and spread without human assistance after being<br />

moved from <strong>the</strong>ir native habitat to a new location. They are becoming one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> greatest threats<br />

to natural ecosystems worldwide. Problems associated with invasive plants have increased<br />

dramatically with expanding human population, world travel, and international trade. Exotic<br />

plants are <strong>of</strong> particular concern since many natural controls formally regulating <strong>the</strong>ir populations<br />

are absent in <strong>the</strong> new non-native environment. They are <strong>of</strong>ten able to out-compete native<br />

vegetation resulting in reduced biodiversity, habitat modification, and impacts on many<br />

ecological processes.<br />

The existence and distribution <strong>of</strong> exotic species <strong>of</strong> concern on FLMR have been established by<br />

several studies (Freeman et al.1997, this report). The decision to pursue active control <strong>of</strong> a given<br />

species will depend upon <strong>the</strong> degree to which native species are displaced and vegetation<br />

management decisions may need to be made on a species-specific basis. The impact any exotic<br />

species has on <strong>the</strong> natural system must be weighed against <strong>the</strong> impacts <strong>of</strong> controlling it. The<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> any type <strong>of</strong> control on non-target plants and animals must be considered. Resource<br />

restrictions will likely limit complete eradication <strong>of</strong> aggressive species and minimizing <strong>the</strong><br />

impact <strong>of</strong> exotics on native populations may be a more realistic goal in some situations.<br />

Established guidelines for pest control at Army installations must be consulted when planning<br />

control measures.<br />

Proper identification <strong>of</strong> exotic and native plants is critical to preserving native biodiversity at<br />

FLMR. Resource personnel in charge <strong>of</strong> invasive species control must be certain <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir target<br />

species, and must exercise care not to damage native plants when implementing treatment.<br />

Poorly implemented control measures on exotic species have <strong>the</strong> potential to be extremely<br />

damaging to native biodiversity. Conversely, soundly implemented measures to control exotic<br />

species can help maintain and enhance native biodiversity. A strong monitoring program that<br />

tracks <strong>the</strong> location and abundance <strong>of</strong> species <strong>of</strong> concern is a fundamental component <strong>of</strong> a sound<br />

program <strong>of</strong> exotic species control.<br />

We have identified 27 exotic plant species <strong>of</strong> concern at FLMR (Table F.1). These plants<br />

represent real or potential threats to biodiversity. We provide general information on <strong>the</strong> biology,<br />

history, and management <strong>of</strong> each species, followed by information on <strong>the</strong> species location at<br />

FLMR, and site-specific considerations and recommendations. Life form information, which<br />

may be useful when evaluating <strong>the</strong>se species <strong>of</strong> concern, appears in Table F.2.<br />

We make only general recommendations for woody exotics. These species are thought not to<br />

threaten <strong>the</strong> biodiversity in native communities at FLMR currently, and no control measures are<br />

recommended at this time. However, <strong>the</strong> distribution and abundance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se species should be<br />

monitored to detect any increase in invasive tendencies. They should not be used for landscaping<br />

in <strong>the</strong> future, and consideration should be given to removal <strong>of</strong> existing individuals that may be<br />

contributing to spread into native communities. Future efforts, if any, to control <strong>the</strong>se species in<br />

natural communities should be carefully chosen so as not to adversely affect native species.<br />

Although no one species is a particular threat at this time, it is important to note<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 187


TABLE F.1. Exotic plant species <strong>of</strong> concern at FLMR.<br />

Scientific Name Common Name Family Habit Habitat Comments<br />

Ailanthus altissima tree-<strong>of</strong>-heaven Simaroubaceae tree openings in upland forests 1,2<br />

Alliaria petiolata common garlic-mustard Brassicaceae biennial forb upland forests, floodplain 1,2<br />

Berberis thunbergii Japanese barberry Berberidaceae shrub ravines in upland forests 2<br />

Carduus nutans subsp. musk plumeless-thistle Asteraceae biennial forb floodplain, roadsides, disturbed Legally noxious weed in<br />

leiophyllus<br />

Cirsium vulgare bull thistle Asteraceae biennial forb roadsides, disturbed areas 2<br />

areas<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> and Missouri; 1,2<br />

Convolvulus arvensis field bindweed Convolvulaceae perennial forb roadsides, fields Legally noxious weed in<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> and Missouri; 1,2<br />

Dipsacus laciniatus cut-leaf teasel Dipsacaceae biennial forb floodplain, roadsides Legally noxious weed in<br />

Elaeagnus umbellata autumn-olive Elaeagnaceae shrub upland forests 1,2<br />

Missouri; 1,2<br />

Euonymus alata winged burningbush Celastraceae shrub upland forests First record <strong>of</strong> occurrence in<br />

Euonymus fortunei Chinese spindle-tree Celastraceae woody vine ravines in upland forests,<br />

Koelreuteria<br />

panicled golden-rain<br />

floodplain<br />

Sapindaceae tree openings in upland forests 3<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong>; 2<br />

paniculata<br />

tree<br />

Lespedeza cuneata sericea lespedeza Fabaceae perennial forb open uplands Legally noxious weed in<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong>; 1<br />

Ligustrum obtusifolium border privet Oleaceae shrub upland forests 1<br />

Ligustrum vulgare European privet Oleaceae shrub upland forests 1<br />

Lonicera japonica Japanese honeysuckle Caprifoliaceae shrub upland forests 1,2<br />

Lonicera maackii Amur honeysuckle Caprifoliaceae shrub upland forests 1<br />

Lonicera ×bella pretty honeysuckle Caprifoliaceae shrub upland forests 2<br />

Lythrum salicaria purple loosestrife Lythraceae perennial herb river bank, wetlands, mesic<br />

Maclura pomifera Osage-orange Moraceae tree uplands 1,2<br />

Melilotus albus white sweet-clover Fabaceae annual or biennial uplands 1,2<br />

Melilotus <strong>of</strong>ficinalis yellow sweet-clover Fabaceae annual or biennial uplands 1,2<br />

forb<br />

forb<br />

Phalaris arundinacea reed canary grass Poaceae perennial<br />

graminoid<br />

areas<br />

floodplain 2<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 188<br />

1,2<br />

Banned from nursery trade<br />

in <strong>Kansas</strong>; Legally noxious<br />

weed in Missouri; 1,2<br />

Rhodotypos scandens jetbead Rosaceae shrub upland forests First record <strong>of</strong> occurrence in<br />

Robinia pseudoacacia black locust Fabaceae tree uplands 1,2<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong>; 2<br />

Rosa multiflora multiflora rose Rosaceae shrub upland forests Legally noxious weed in<br />

Securigera varia (=<br />

Coronilla varia in<br />

many fieldguides<br />

and floras)<br />

common crown-vetch Fabaceae perennial forb roadsides 1,2<br />

Sorghum halepense Johnson grass Poaceae perennial<br />

graminoid<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> and Missouri; 1,<br />

floodplain, roadsides Legally noxious weed in<br />

<strong>Kansas</strong> and Missouri; 1,2


TABLE F.2. Life forms (habit) <strong>of</strong> exotic plant species <strong>of</strong> concern at FLMR.<br />

Trees<br />

Ailanthus altissima tree-<strong>of</strong>-heaven<br />

Koelreuteria paniculata panicled golden-rain tree<br />

Maclura pomifera Osage-orange<br />

Robinia pseudoacacia black locust<br />

Shrubs<br />

Berberis thunbergii Japanese barberry<br />

Elaeagnus umbellata autumn-olive<br />

Euonymus alata winged burning bush<br />

Euonymus fortunei Chinese spindle-tree<br />

Ligustrum obtusifolium border privet<br />

Ligustrum vulgare European privet<br />

Lonicera japonica Japanese honeysuckle<br />

Lonicera maackii Amur honeysuckle<br />

Lonicera ×bella pretty honeysuckle<br />

Rhodotypos scandens jetbead<br />

Rosa multiflora multiflora rose<br />

Forbs (non-grass herbs)<br />

Alliaria petiolata common garlic-mustard<br />

Carduus nutans ssp. leiophyllus musk plumeless-thistle<br />

Cirsium vulgare bull thistle<br />

Convolvulus arvensis field bindweed<br />

Dipsacus laciniatus cut-leaf teasel<br />

Lespedeza cuneata sericea lespedeza<br />

Lythrum salicaria purple loosestrife<br />

Melilotus albus white sweet-clover<br />

Melilotus <strong>of</strong>ficinalis yellow sweet-clover<br />

Securigera varia (= Coronilla varia) common crown vetch<br />

Graminoids (grasses)<br />

Phalaris arundinacea reed canary grass<br />

Sorghum halepense Johnson grass<br />

that, collectively, <strong>the</strong>re may be impacts exerted by a suite <strong>of</strong> species. For example, <strong>the</strong>re may be<br />

an impact on native biodiversity caused by <strong>the</strong> shrub guild (in particular, Japanese barberry,<br />

winged burning bush, Chinese spindle-tree, border privet, Japanese honeysuckle, Amur<br />

honeysuckle, and multiflora rose).<br />

Ailanthus altissima (Simaroubaceae; tree-<strong>of</strong>-heaven)<br />

Native to China, tree-<strong>of</strong>-heaven is a rapidly growing deciduous tree that can reach a height <strong>of</strong> 25<br />

m and out-compete native vegetation. It can form dense thickets and produces toxins that<br />

prevent <strong>the</strong> establishment <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r species. It mainly invades disturbed habitats but is sometimes<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 189


found in undisturbed habitats. As a control, cutting alone is usually ineffective as large numbers<br />

<strong>of</strong> stump sprouts and root suckers are produced. Targeting reproductive trees may help reduce<br />

<strong>the</strong> spread <strong>of</strong> seed. Young seedlings may be pulled or dug by hand.<br />

The species is not currently a problem at FLMR (but see general considerations for exotic trees<br />

and shrubs).<br />

Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae; common garlic-mustard)<br />

Native to nor<strong>the</strong>rn Europe, common garlic-mustard is now found in 34 states. A biennial herb <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> mustard family, it has no known natural enemies in North America. It is one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> few<br />

exotic species that can invade and dominate <strong>the</strong> understory <strong>of</strong> forests. It is found invading <strong>the</strong><br />

understory <strong>of</strong> deciduous forests, forest edges, hedgerows, shaded roadsides, and riparian and<br />

urban areas. Any type <strong>of</strong> control must be continued until <strong>the</strong> seedbank is exhausted. Fire may<br />

increase total presence if not thorough. Once successful establishment is achieved, control is<br />

unlikely without a large commitment <strong>of</strong> money and labor over an extended period.<br />

Common garlic-mustard can become highly invasive, forming dense populations that diminish<br />

native biodiversity or impede efforts at ecosystem restoration. This species is particularly<br />

problematic in forests, woodlands, and edge habitats. Common garlic-mustard is locally<br />

abundant in wooded habitat at FLMR. Once established, control <strong>of</strong> this species will be difficult<br />

due to its abundance and distribution, and <strong>the</strong> precautions that need to be taken to avoid<br />

damaging non-target native species. A working strategy is to survey high-quality woodlands and<br />

remove any light infestations. We recommend mapping <strong>the</strong> existing population before a control<br />

program is implemented in order to devise a control plan. Complete eradication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> species<br />

from FLMR, while desirable, is likely not feasible and <strong>the</strong>refore minimizing spread to highquality<br />

natural communities may be, at this stage, a more realistic goal.<br />

Berberis thunbergii (Berberidaceae; Japanese barberry)<br />

Native to Asia, Japanese barberry is a woody shrub with arching branches, yellow flowers, and<br />

red berries, which can grow to 2 m. It is <strong>of</strong>ten planted as an ornamental hedge. It is found along<br />

roadsides, fences, old fields and open woods. Mechanical removal may be <strong>the</strong> least intrusive<br />

method <strong>of</strong> control.<br />

Japanese barberry at FLMR is primarily found along stream courses in upland forest<br />

communities. The species is not currently a problem at FLMR (but see general considerations<br />

for exotic trees and shrubs).<br />

Carduus nutans (Asteraceae; musk plumeless-thistle)<br />

Native to Europe and introduced into <strong>the</strong> U.S. in <strong>the</strong> 1850s, musk plumeless-thistle is a large<br />

biennial herb that can grow to 2 m tall. It favors abandoned fields and overgrazed pastures. It is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten found along roads, in old fields, pasture, and in waste ground. It can also invade existing<br />

native prairie, grasslands, and glade communities, but will not tolerate shading in woodland<br />

settings. Varying degrees <strong>of</strong> control have been achieved with chemical, biological, mechanical<br />

and cultural control methods. Many types <strong>of</strong> control are ineffective if carried out while thistles<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 190


are in bloom. Fire has not been proven an effective control.<br />

Musk plumeless-thistle is not thought to be a major threat to native biodiversity at FLMR at this<br />

time. However, as it is <strong>of</strong>ficially designated as a noxious weed in <strong>Kansas</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re are requirements<br />

for its control. This species is generally associated with disturbed habitats (roadsides, abandoned<br />

fields, construction areas) and can become very abundant in areas grazed heavily by livestock. It<br />

also can appear during <strong>the</strong> early years <strong>of</strong> prairie restorations, but in successful restorations will<br />

generally not persist as a problem species. Extreme care must be exercised in controlling this<br />

species where it occurs within or near native communities so as not to damage non-target<br />

species.<br />

Cirsium vulgare (Asteraceae; bull thistle)<br />

Bull thistle is native to Europe, North Africa, and west Asia. It is now <strong>the</strong> most widespread and<br />

common rangeland and pasture thistle in western North America. It is a biennial, but sometimes<br />

annual or monocarpic, perennial forb and can grow to 2 m tall. It is found along roadsides and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r disturbed areas, but will not tolerate shading in woodland settings. Key to successful<br />

management is <strong>the</strong> prevention <strong>of</strong> seed production. Monitoring efforts should be concentrated at<br />

<strong>the</strong> most disturbed areas and control should be centered on small areas <strong>of</strong> infestation so <strong>the</strong>y do<br />

not expand.<br />

Bull thistle is not thought to be a major threat to native biodiversity at FLMR at this time. This<br />

species is generally associated with disturbed habitats (roadsides, abandoned fields, construction<br />

areas) and can increase in areas grazed heavily by livestock. It also can appear during <strong>the</strong> early<br />

years <strong>of</strong> prairie restorations, but in successful restorations will generally not persist as a problem<br />

species. Extreme care must be exercised in controlling this species where it occurs within or<br />

near native communities so as not to damage non-target species.<br />

Convolvulus arvensis (Convolvulaceae; field bindweed)<br />

Field bindweed is native to Eurasia. It is a perennial vine <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> morning-glory family that<br />

spreads by rhizomes and seeds. Seeds are extremely persistent and can remain viable in <strong>the</strong><br />

ground for many years. Seeds fall near <strong>the</strong> parent plant or can be transported by water and birds.<br />

It has been studied mainly as a crop pest and its impact on natural areas is less well known. It is<br />

found in a wide range <strong>of</strong> habitats but prefers strong sunlight and moderate to low moisture.<br />

Burning alone is not an effective control. Mowing is ineffective since it encourages a low<br />

growth form and plants can be missed. At sites previously used for agriculture, tilling may aid in<br />

controlling infestations. In small areas hand tools or application <strong>of</strong> herbicide with a backpack<br />

sprayer may be employed.<br />

Field bindweed is not thought to be a major threat to native biodiversity at FLMR at this time.<br />

However, as it is <strong>of</strong>ficially designated as a noxious weed in <strong>Kansas</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re are requirements for its<br />

control. This species is generally associated with disturbed habitats (lawns, roadsides,<br />

abandoned fields) and certain agricultural lands. Extreme care must be exercised in controlling<br />

this species where it occurs within or near native communities so as not to damage non-target<br />

species.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 191


Dipsacus laciniatus (Dipsacaceae; cut-leaf teasel)<br />

Native to Europe, cut-leaf teasel was probably introduced to North America in <strong>the</strong> 1700s for use<br />

in <strong>the</strong> textile industry. A biennial or monocarpic perennial, its rapid expansion was probably<br />

aided by construction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> interstate highway system and its use in flower arrangements,<br />

especially around gravestones in cemeteries. A single plant can produce 2,000 seeds. Seeds<br />

typically do not disperse far but may be water borne over a greater distance. It is an aggressive<br />

species that can degrade prairies and savannas if allowed to establish. It is found in open habitats<br />

under a wide range <strong>of</strong> moisture conditions. Mowing is ineffective as is prescribed burning alone.<br />

Foliar herbicide spot treatment with a backpack sprayer may be <strong>the</strong> most cost effective method<br />

for high-quality sites that are not yet heavily infested.<br />

Cut-leaf teasel is not thought to be a major threat to native biodiversity at FLMR at this time.<br />

This species is generally associated with disturbed habitats (roadsides, abandoned fields,<br />

construction areas), and does not do well in shaded environments. It also can appear during <strong>the</strong><br />

early years <strong>of</strong> prairie restorations, but in successful restorations will generally not persist as a<br />

problem species. Extreme care must be exercised in controlling this species where it occurs<br />

within or near native communities so as not to damage non-target species.<br />

Elaeagnus umbellata (Elaeagnaceae; autumn-olive)<br />

Native to Japan, China, and Korea, autumn-olive was introduced to <strong>the</strong> United States in 1830. It<br />

is a medium to large shrub that can reach a height <strong>of</strong> 6 m. It has been planted widely for wildlife<br />

habitat, erosion control and reclamation. Seed dispersal is by falling fruit, birds, and small<br />

mammals. Once established, autumn-olive can be difficult to control. It is <strong>of</strong>ten found in<br />

disturbed areas, roadsides, pastures, open woodlands and forest edges. A combination <strong>of</strong><br />

mechanical and chemical treatments may be effective. Cutting without herbicide treatment and<br />

burning are not effective.<br />

Autumn-olive is not currently a problem at FLMR (but see general considerations for exotic trees<br />

and shrubs).<br />

Euonymus alata (Celastraceae; winged burningbush)<br />

Native to nor<strong>the</strong>astern Asia to central China, winged burningbush was introduced about 1860 as<br />

an ornamental shrub. It is a deciduous shrub that can grow to 6 m. The foliage turns bright red<br />

in <strong>the</strong> fall. Stems have two to four prominent corky wings. Commonly used for landscaping, its<br />

seeds are readily dispersed by birds. In natural areas it shades out native herbs and competes<br />

with native shrubs. It is found in a variety <strong>of</strong> areas but prefers well-drained soils and does poorly<br />

on waterlogged soils. It does well in full sun or full shade but shows stress in soils subject to<br />

drought. Woodlands where birds nest near ornamental plantings may become infested. Control<br />

can be difficult once winged burningbush becomes established because <strong>of</strong> seed dispersal by<br />

birds. The best control is to abstain from using it as an ornamental.<br />

Winged burningbush at FLMR is found primarily found along stream courses in upland forest<br />

communities. The species is not currently a problem at FLMR (but see general considerations<br />

for exotic trees and shrubs).<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 192


Euonymus fortunei (Celastraceae; Chinese spindle-tree)<br />

Native to Asia, Chinese spindle-tree was introduced as an ornamental groundcover. It is an<br />

evergreen vine that can form a dense ground cover or climb up to 6 m high. It is an aggressive<br />

species, spreading rapidly, and can out-compete native groundcover and replace spring<br />

ephemerals. It can be spread by birds eating its seed. Found usually as a cultivated plant,<br />

Chinese spindle-tree can invade natural openings along with floodplain, mesic and dry-mesic<br />

forests that are relatively undisturbed. For small infestations hand pulling by <strong>the</strong> roots can be<br />

effective. For larger infestations, vines can be cut by hand and herbicide applied. Mowing is not<br />

effective without chemical treatment and fire may not be an alternative in forests.<br />

Chinese spindle-tree is not currently a problem at FLMR (but see general considerations for<br />

exotic trees and shrubs).<br />

Koelreuteria paniculata (Sapindaceae; panicled golden-rain tree)<br />

Native to China and Japan, <strong>the</strong> panicled golden-rain tree is a medium sized deciduous tree<br />

reaching 12 m tall. It is an introduced, ornamental, lawn tree with yellow flowers borne in large<br />

clusters 6 cm long. It has shown an invasive tendency in some areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country. It does well<br />

on a variety <strong>of</strong> soils in full sunlight and is tolerant <strong>of</strong> pollution, drought, heat and wind.<br />

Ornamental plantings should be discontinued near natural areas and existing trees replaced with<br />

native species.<br />

Panicled golden-rain tree is not currently a problem at FLMR (but see general considerations for<br />

exotic trees and shrubs).<br />

Lespedeza cuneata (Fabaceae; sericea lespedeza)<br />

Native to eastern Asia, sericea lespedeza is a perennial legume with slightly woody stems that<br />

can grow to 2 m tall. It has been introduced into many areas for erosion control and as food and<br />

cover for wildlife. It is unpalatable to livestock compared to native grassland species due to<br />

tannins found in its tissue. Seeds are dispersed in <strong>the</strong> fall, may be dispersed by birds, and can<br />

remain viable for over 20 years. It is found extensively along roadsides but also can invade a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r sites including thickets, fields, meadows, prairies, and woodlands. It is very<br />

drought hardy. Burning, grazing, and fertilization can achieve control on rangeland. Late spring<br />

burns on non-rangeland have achieved some success. For small, scattered infestations, backpack<br />

sprayer application <strong>of</strong> herbicides has been effective.<br />

Sericea lespedeza can become highly invasive, forming dense populations that diminish native<br />

biodiversity or impede efforts at ecosystem restoration; it is particularly problematic in rangeland<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Flint Hills <strong>of</strong> <strong>Kansas</strong>. The species is a threat to prairie and grassland habitats. It is<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficially designated as a noxious weed in <strong>Kansas</strong>, and <strong>the</strong>refore certain control measures are<br />

required. The current population at FLMR is small (known from a few plants along Corral<br />

Creek) and we recommend a program targeted at complete eradication. This species easily can<br />

be confused with several native plants and <strong>the</strong>refore accurate identification is critical before<br />

implementing control measures. Extreme care must be exercised in controlling this species<br />

where it occurs within or near native communities so as not to damage non-target species.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 193


Ligustrum obtusifolium (Oleaceae; border privet)<br />

Native to Japan, border privet is a perennial shrub, which can grow to 3 m tall with a spread <strong>of</strong><br />

arching branches. It grows readily from seed or sprouting and birds can distribute seeds to<br />

distant locations. It can form dense thickets and out-compete native vegetation. It is <strong>of</strong>ten found<br />

along roadsides, in old fields, and o<strong>the</strong>r disturbed areas but can invade a variety <strong>of</strong> undisturbed<br />

natural areas. Mowing and cutting or manual pulling can be used for small infestations and<br />

sensitive areas where herbicides cannot be used.<br />

Border privet is not currently a problem at FLMR (but see general considerations for exotic trees<br />

and shrubs).<br />

Ligustrum vulgare (Oleaceae; European privet)<br />

Native to <strong>the</strong> Mediterranean region European privet is a perennial shrub with spreading branches<br />

that can grow to 4 m tall. It is widely naturalized in <strong>the</strong> U.S., has few pests or predators here, and<br />

has high reproductive capacity. It grows well in open sun in low nutrient soils but tolerates lower<br />

light levels where nutrients are more abundant. It has been found in bottomland, mesic and<br />

riparian forests in Arkansas. Mowing and cutting or manual pulling can be used for small<br />

infestations and sensitive areas where herbicides cannot be used.<br />

European privet is not currently a problem at FLMR (but see general considerations for exotic<br />

trees and shrubs).<br />

Lonicera japonica (Caprifoliaceae; Japanese honeysuckle)<br />

Japanese honeysuckle was introduced from Japan in 1806 as a horticultural ground-cover<br />

species. It is a semi-evergreen vine with white or yellow tubular flowers and small black 2–3seeded<br />

fruits. It shades out native understory and herbaceous plants by overgrowing <strong>the</strong>m and<br />

can climb trees into <strong>the</strong> canopy. Japanese honeysuckle can spread by seeds and vegetative<br />

runners. Birds readily disperse <strong>the</strong> seeds. It does not do well in heavily shaded environments and<br />

preferentially invades open communities such as successional fields, prairies, savannas, glades,<br />

and open upland and floodplain forests. This species is a serious pest in tree farms in <strong>the</strong><br />

sou<strong>the</strong>astern United States, as it tends to overgrow sapling trees. Control methods have included<br />

mowing, grazing, prescribed burning and herbicides.<br />

Japanese honeysuckle is not currently a problem at FLMR (but see general considerations for<br />

exotic trees and shrubs).<br />

Lonicera maackii (Caprifoliaceae; Amur honeysuckle)<br />

The Amur honeysuckle is native to central and nor<strong>the</strong>astern China and Korea. The exotic bush<br />

honeysuckles are upright, multi-stemmed, opposite-branched, deciduous shrubs that can grow to<br />

4 m in height. The species can be very difficult to differentiate (e.g., L. maackii from L. ×bella,<br />

which both occur on FLMR). In addition, ano<strong>the</strong>r species <strong>of</strong> Lonicera (L. tatarica) has been<br />

found in <strong>Kansas</strong> and may be present at FLMR; this species would be very difficult to distinguish<br />

from L. maackii and L. ×bella. All species have been planted as ornamentals. In natural areas<br />

<strong>the</strong>y can contribute to reduced species richness in herbaceous communities and inhibit<br />

regeneration in early to mid-successional forests. Birds and possibly small mammals can<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 194


disperse <strong>the</strong>ir seeds. They are found in forests with histories <strong>of</strong> fragmentation, woodcutting, or<br />

grazing and along semi-shaded fencerows and weedy thickets. Control may be achieved by<br />

pulling or repeatedly clipping seedlings and mature shrubs for a period <strong>of</strong> three to five years.<br />

Winter clipping encourages vigorous re-sprouting. Herbicides may be necessary for control.<br />

Amur honeysuckle is not currently a problem at FLMR (but see general considerations for exotic<br />

trees and shrubs).<br />

Lonicera ×bella (Caprifoliaceae; pretty honeysuckle)<br />

Lonicera ×bella is a hybrid <strong>of</strong> two exotic bush honeysuckles, L. morrowii and L. tatarica, which<br />

are native to Japan and Russia respectively. It has intermediate characteristics with leaves<br />

slightly hairy beneath and flowers pink fading to yellow. It is found on forest edges and interiors<br />

as well as lakesides, riparian areas, and disturbed areas. Control can be by pulling or repeatedly<br />

clipping seedlings and mature shrubs for a period <strong>of</strong> three to five years. Winter clipping<br />

encourages vigorous re-sprouting. Herbicides may be necessary for control.<br />

Pretty honeysuckle is not currently a problem at FLMR (but see general considerations for exotic<br />

trees and shrubs).<br />

Lythrum salicaria (Lythraceae; purple loosestrife)<br />

Native to Europe and Asia, purple loosestrife is an erect perennial herb that grows to 2 m tall and<br />

produces a showy spike <strong>of</strong> rose-purple flowers. It was imported for use by beekeepers and as an<br />

ornamental in <strong>the</strong> 1800s. A single stalk can produce 300,000 seeds, which can be dispersed by<br />

wind, water, or animals; it also spreads vegetatively. Once established, it can block waterways<br />

and destroy marshes and wet prairies. It is found widely in wet habitats and moist soil conditions<br />

in full sun, but can survive up to 50% shade. With small infestations <strong>of</strong>


purposely planted in <strong>the</strong> late 19 th century in nor<strong>the</strong>ast <strong>Kansas</strong> for livestock fencing. It <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

invades prairies, savannas, and open forests with a history <strong>of</strong> grazing. It is found in open areas<br />

on a variety <strong>of</strong> soils. It is <strong>of</strong>ten found in pastures and hedgerows but also along riverbanks and in<br />

disturbed forests. It does not tolerate heavy shade well, and will not reproduce under those<br />

conditions. Control can be achieved by cutting and/or burning. Cutting works best during <strong>the</strong><br />

summer months. Burning will keep young plants from establishing but older trees may be<br />

resistant to fire.<br />

Osage-orange is not currently a problem at FLMR (but see general considerations for exotic trees<br />

and shrubs).<br />

Melilotus spp (Fabaceae; M. albus (white sweet-clover) and M. <strong>of</strong>ficinalis (yellow sweetclover))<br />

Melilotus spp. are native to <strong>the</strong> Mediterranean area through central Europe to Tibet and were<br />

reported as early as 1664 in North America. These biennial legumes have been used in <strong>the</strong><br />

production <strong>of</strong> honey, as wildlife cover, as a forage crop and as a soil builder. They can easily<br />

invade open habitats and will remain a problem for managers because <strong>of</strong> continued planting due<br />

to <strong>the</strong>ir economic importance. They are found on roadsides, abandoned fields, pastures and o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

open habitats such as prairies. They can grow in cold and hot climates in full sun to partial<br />

shade. Light infestations can be controlled by hand-pulling stems in late fall or early spring.<br />

Large colonies can be cut close to <strong>the</strong> ground after <strong>the</strong> leaves on <strong>the</strong> lower stem die but before<br />

seeds form. Prescribed burning with an April burn <strong>the</strong> first year and May burn <strong>the</strong> following year<br />

can be effective.<br />

White sweet-clover and yellow sweet-clover are not thought to be a major threat to native<br />

biodiversity at FLMR at this time. These species are generally associated with disturbed habitats<br />

(roadsides, abandoned fields, construction areas), and can become abundant in native prairie<br />

where <strong>the</strong>re has been disturbance. They can appear during <strong>the</strong> early years <strong>of</strong> prairie restorations,<br />

but in successful restorations will generally not persist as a problem species. These species are<br />

<strong>of</strong>ten relicts <strong>of</strong> past agricultural plantings and, because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir potential to interfere with native<br />

and restored areas, should not be planted in <strong>the</strong> future. Extreme care must be exercised in<br />

controlling <strong>the</strong>se species where <strong>the</strong>y occur within or near native communities so as not to damage<br />

non-target species.<br />

Phalaris arundinacea (Poaceae; reed canary grass)<br />

Native to <strong>the</strong> temperate regions <strong>of</strong> Europe, Asia, and North America, reed canary grass is a large,<br />

coarse, perennial grass that can grow to 2 m tall. Planted widely for forage and erosion control, it<br />

poses a threat to natural wetlands and marshes due to its aggressiveness, hardiness, and rapid<br />

growth. It can replace native wet prairie and wetland species several years after establishment. It<br />

is found in a variety <strong>of</strong> wetlands including stream banks, swales, fens, wet meadows, wet<br />

prairies, and marshes. Prescribed fire in <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> repeated late fall or spring burns over<br />

several years can be an effective control especially in areas where native species are present or in<br />

<strong>the</strong> seed bank. Fire may not be effective in dense monocultures <strong>of</strong> this species. Hand removal<br />

may be feasible in small stands. Mowing is probably not effective.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 196


Reed canary grass can become highly invasive, forming dense populations that diminish native<br />

biodiversity or impede efforts at ecosystem restoration. The species is particularly problematic in<br />

wetlands, low prairies, and mesic areas. There is a robust population at FLMR in floodplain<br />

areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Missouri River. Control <strong>of</strong> this species will be difficult due to its abundance and<br />

distribution. We recommend mapping <strong>the</strong> existing population before a control program is<br />

implemented. To minimize potential colonization <strong>of</strong> natural areas, future planting <strong>of</strong> this species<br />

should not be allowed. This species could potentially become a major impediment to current and<br />

future restoration efforts in <strong>the</strong> floodplain (low prairie and wetland systems) and in o<strong>the</strong>r “marsh<br />

habitat” (e.g., shorelines <strong>of</strong> reservoirs and ponds).<br />

Robinia pseudoacacia (Fabaceae; black locust)<br />

Black locust’s original range was in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>astern U.S. on <strong>the</strong> lower slopes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Appalachian<br />

Mountains with some outliers fur<strong>the</strong>r north on slopes and forest margins in Illinois, Indiana, and<br />

Missouri. It is a rapidly growing, deciduous tree in <strong>the</strong> legume family that can grow to 30 m tall.<br />

Most natural reproduction is by root suckering and stump sprouting. Black locust becomes a<br />

management problem when it aggressively invades dry prairies and savannas and shades native<br />

species. It is found on a range <strong>of</strong> disturbed sites such as pastures, degraded woods, old fields,<br />

roadsides and rights-<strong>of</strong>-way. Mowing and burning are somewhat ineffective due to vegetative<br />

propagation. Management has concentrated more on chemical control. Haying annually may<br />

prevent first year seedlings from spreading into prairie communities.<br />

Black locust is not currently a problem at FLMR (but see general considerations for exotic trees<br />

and shrubs).<br />

Rhodotypos scandens (Rosaceae; jetbead)<br />

Native to Japan, jetbead is a fast growing, deciduous shrub that can grow to 2 m tall. It has<br />

dense, arching branches and shining black fruit found in groups <strong>of</strong> 3 or 4 that remain throughout<br />

<strong>the</strong> winter. It is planted as an ornamental and spreads by both seeds and suckering. It<br />

occasionally escapes from cultivation and may crowd out native species. It is found on a variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> soils in full sun to shade. Small plants can be removed by hand digging. Larger infestations<br />

can be cut in <strong>the</strong> fall or winter and an herbicide applied to new growth in <strong>the</strong> spring.<br />

Jetbead is not currently a problem at FLMR (but see general considerations for exotic trees and<br />

shrubs).<br />

Rosa multiflora (Rosaceae; multiflora rose)<br />

Native to Japan, Korea, and eastern China multiflora rose was introduced in 1866 as rootstock<br />

for ornamental roses. It since has been planted for erosion control, as living fences, cover for<br />

wildlife, and in highway median strips. It is a medium height, thorny shrub with clusters <strong>of</strong> white<br />

flowers blooming in late spring. It grows aggressively and produces large numbers <strong>of</strong> fruit that<br />

are eaten and dispersed by birds. It can form dense thickets that exclude native plants. It is found<br />

on a wide range <strong>of</strong> soil, moisture, and light conditions. It can invade fields, forests, prairies,<br />

some wetlands, and o<strong>the</strong>r habitats. For light infestations, pulling individual plants by hand can<br />

be successful. Frequently repeated cutting or mowing can kill mature plants. Routine prescribed<br />

burning will hinder invasion.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 197


Multiflora rose is not thought to represent a major threat to native biodiversity on FLMR at this<br />

time. However, as it is <strong>of</strong>ficially designated as a noxious weed in <strong>Kansas</strong>, <strong>the</strong>re are requirements<br />

for its control. Extreme care must be exercised in controlling this species where it occurs within<br />

or near native communities so as not to damage non-target species.<br />

Securigera varia (Fabaceae; common crown-vetch; synonym = Coronilla varia)<br />

Native to Europe, southwest Asia, and nor<strong>the</strong>rn Africa, crown vetch is a perennial legume, which<br />

can have stems up to 2 m tall with rhizomes up to 3 m long. The agent <strong>of</strong> dispersal is unknown<br />

but animals may play a role. It has been planted for erosion control, bank stabilization, and<br />

temporary ground cover. Its rapid spread by rhizomes and seeding ability poses a threat to<br />

natural areas. It is found in open sunny areas such as roadsides, open fields and gravel bars along<br />

streams. Prescribed burning alone has not shown success. Repeated late spring mowing has<br />

shown some success and may at least stop its spread. It should be watched for along rights-<strong>of</strong>way<br />

and controlled to prevent invasion <strong>of</strong> natural areas.<br />

Common crown-vetch is not thought to be a major threat to native biodiversity at FLMR at this<br />

time. This species is generally associated with disturbed habitats, especially where it occurs as a<br />

relict <strong>of</strong> plantings for erosion control. Because <strong>of</strong> its potential to interfere with native and<br />

restored areas, its use as a cover plant for erosion control should be severely limited (alternatives<br />

for erosion control include native grasses and forbs). Extreme care must be exercised in<br />

controlling this species where it occurs within or near native communities so as not to damage<br />

non-target species.<br />

Sorghum halepense (Poaceae; Johnson grass)<br />

Native to <strong>the</strong> Mediterranean, Johnson grass was introduced to <strong>the</strong> U.S. in <strong>the</strong> 1800s as a potential<br />

forage crop. It is a coarse, perennial grass that can reach 2.5 m tall and is characterized by having<br />

stout rhizomes. It spreads by seed and rhizomes, forming dense clumps. It can crowd out native<br />

species, reducing plant diversity and complicating restoration efforts in areas it comes to<br />

dominate. It is found invading disturbed sites including fallow fields, forest edges, and<br />

riverbanks. It also can be a pest in annually tilled agricultural fields. Johnson grass grows on a<br />

variety <strong>of</strong> soils but can thrive on fertile lowlands. Individual plants in small infestations can be<br />

hand-pulled in June after rain has s<strong>of</strong>tened <strong>the</strong> ground. This may need to be repeated several<br />

times for control. Individual plants also can be sprayed with a backpack sprayer. Repeated,<br />

close mowing can kill seedlings and reduce rhizome growth.<br />

Johnson grass can become highly invasive, forming dense populations that diminish native<br />

biodiversity or impede efforts at ecosystem restoration. It is <strong>of</strong>ficially designated as a noxious<br />

weed in <strong>Kansas</strong>, and <strong>the</strong>refore certain control measures are required. The current population at<br />

FLMR is large and widespread. It occurs abundantly in low, mesic restoration areas on former<br />

agricultural land and in disturbed areas throughout FLMR. Extreme care must be exercised in<br />

controlling this species where it occurs within or near native communities so as not to damage<br />

non-target species.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 198


References<br />

Information on exotic and invasive species was obtained from <strong>the</strong> following sources: Butterfield,<br />

Stubbendieck, and Stumpf (1996); H<strong>of</strong>fman and Kearns (1997); Illinois Nature Preserves<br />

Commission (1990); Packard and Mutel (1997); Smith (1997); Swearingen, Reshetil<strong>of</strong>f, Slattery,<br />

and Zwicker (2002); and Tu, Hurd, and Randall (2001). Refer to <strong>the</strong> Literature Cited section <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> main report for complete citations.<br />

NATURAL AREAS INVENTORY OF FT. LEAVENWORTH II 199

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!