Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Hypospadias: lessons learned. An overview of incidence, epidemiology, surgery, research, complications, and outcomes

Abstract

Hypospadias is a common condition and familiar, though sometimes challenging territory for the pediatric urologist. This review is a summary of hypospadias incidence, epidemiology, surgery, research, and complications intended for the non-specialist. It outlines the history, the principles of surgery for hypospadias, and the long-term outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Springer A, van den Heijkant M, Baumann S. Worldwide prevalence of hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol. 2016;12:152.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.12.002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergman JE, Laone M, Vrijeid M, Pierini A, Nijman RJ, Addor MC, et al. Epidemiology of hypospadias in Europe: a registry-based study. World J Urol. 2015;33:2159–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1507-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Zanden LF, van Rooij IA, Feitz WF, Franke B, Knoers NV, Roeleveld N, et al. Aetiology of hypospadias: a systematic review of genes and environment. Hum Reprod Update. 2012;18:260–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ea V, Bergounoux A, Philbert P, Servat-Fauconnet N, Faure A, Breaud J, et al. How far should we explore hypospadias? Next-generation sequencing applied to a large cohort of hypospadiac patients. Eur Urol. 2021;79:507–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hsieh MH, Breyer BN, Eisenberg ML, Baskin LS. Associations among hypospadias, cryptorchidism, anogenital distance, and endocrine disruption. Curr Urol Rep. 2008;9:137–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-008-0025-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsushita S, Suzuki K, Murashima A, Kajioka D, Acebedo AR, Miyagawa S, et al. Regulation of masculinization: androgen signalling for external genitalia development. Nat Rev Urol. 2018;15:358–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0008-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carmack A, Notini L, Earp BD. Should surgery for hypospadias be performed before an age of consent? J Sex Res. 2016;53:1047–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1066745.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Win G, Hoebeke P, Wood D, Cuckow P. Long-term outcomes of pediatric hypospadias and surgical intervention. Pediatr Health Med Ther. 2012;3:69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  9. van der Horst HJ, de Wall LL. Hypospadias, all there is to know. Eur J Pediatr. 2017;176:435–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-017-2864-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Manzoni G, Bracka A, Palminteri E, Marrocco G. Hypospadias surgery: when, what and by whom? BJU Int. 2004;94:1188–95. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2004.05128.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hadidi AT. History of hypospadias: Lost in translation. J Pediatr Surg. 2017;52:211–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.11.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lambert SM, Snyder HM 3rd, Canning DA. The history of hypospadias and hypospadias repairs. Urology. 2011;77:1277–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.10.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Halstead NV, MP, Wilcox DT. In: Essentials of pediatric urology. Thomas DFM, Wilcox DT, editors. Ch. 16, CRC Press; Florida, USA. 2022. p. 209–26.

  14. Springer A, Krois W, Horcher E. Trends in hypospadias surgery: results of a worldwide survey. Eur Urol. 2011;60:1184–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.08.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Snodgrass WT. Snodgrass technique for hypospadias repair. BJU Int. 2005;95:683–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05384.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Snodgrass WT. Tubularized incised plate hypospadias repair: indications, technique, and complications. Urology. 1999;54:6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00144-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Johal NS, Nitkunan T, O’Malley K, Cuckow PM. The two-stage repair for severe primary hypospadias. Eur Urol. 2006;50:366–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.01.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Halstead NV, Mouriquand PDE, Wilcox DT. In: Essentials of pediatric urology. Wilcox DT, Thomas DFM, editors. Ch. 16, Routledge, CRC Press, Florida, USA. 2021.

  19. Perovic S, Vukadinovic V. Penoscrotal transposition with hypospadias: 1-stage repair. J Urol. 1992;148:1510–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36952-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pinke LA, Rathbun SR, Husmann DA, Kramer SA. Penoscrotal transposition: review of 53 patients. J Urol. 2001;166:1865–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65708-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schoenwolf GC, Bleyl SB, Brauer PR, Francis-West PH. In: Larsen’s human embryology. Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; Philadelphia, USA 2009.

  22. Baskin L, Derpinghaus A, Cao M, Sinclair A, Li Y, Overland M, et al. Hot spots in fetal human penile and clitoral development. Differentiation. 2020;112:27–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2019.11.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Snodgrass W, Macedo A, Hoebeke P, Mouriquand PD. Hypospadias dilemmas: a round table. J Pediatr Urol. 2011;7:145–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2010.11.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hadidi AT, Roessler J, Coerdt W. Development of the human male urethra: a histochemical study on human embryos. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49:1146–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.01.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Baskin L, Shen J, Sinclair A, Cao M, Liu X, Liu G, et al. Development of the human penis and clitoris. Differentiation. 2018;103:74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diff.2018.08.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Batavia JP, Canning DA, Zaontz MR. In: Consent in pediatric urology. Godbole P, Wilcox DT, Koyle MA, editors. Springer Link; Switzerland. 2016.

  27. Vavilov S, Smith G, Starkey M, Pockney P, Deshpande AV. Parental decision regret in childhood hypospadias surgery: a systematic review. J Paediatr Child Health. 2020;56:1514–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.15075.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chalmers DJ, Siparsky GL, Wiedel CA, Wilcox DT. Distal hypospadias repair in infants without a postoperative stent. Pediatr Surg Int. 2015;31:287–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-014-3647-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chua ME, Kim JK, Rivera KC, Ming JM, Flores F, Farhat WA. The use of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in stented distal hypospadias repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Urol. 2019;15:138–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.10.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Alshafei A, Cascio S, Boland F, O’Shea N, Hickey A, Quinn F. Comparing the outcomes of tubularized incised plate urethroplasty and dorsal inlay graft urethroplasty in children with hypospadias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16:154–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.01.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Xiao D, Nie X, Wang W, Zhou J, Zhang M, Zhou Z, et al. Comparison of transverse island flap onlay and tubularized incised-plate urethroplasties for primary proximal hypospadias: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9:e106917. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Saltzman AF, Carrasco A, Colvin A, Campbell JB, Vemulakonda VM, Wilcox D. Patients with disorders of sex development and proximal hypospadias are at high risk for reoperation. World J Urol. 2018;36:2051–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2350-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Long CJ, Chu DI, Tenney RW, Morris AR, Weiss DA, Shukla AR, et al. Intermediate-term followup of proximal hypospadias repair reveals high complication rate. J Urol. 2017;197:852–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.11.054.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wood DN, Andrich DE, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR. Standing the test of time: the long-term results of urethroplasty. World J Urol. 2006;24:250–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-006-0057-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wilcox D, Snodgrass W. Long-term outcome following hypospadias repair. World J Urol. 2006;24:240–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-006-0059-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Keays MA, Dave S. Current hypospadias management: diagnosis, surgical management, and long-term patient-centred outcomes. Can Urol Assoc J. 2017;11:S48–53. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.4386.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Rynja SP, de Jong TP, Bosch JL, de Kort LM. Functional, cosmetic and psychosexual results in adult men who underwent hypospadias correction in childhood. J Pediatr Urol. 2011;7:504–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2011.02.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Spinoit AF, Poelaert F, Groen LA, Van Laecke E, Hoebeke P. Hypospadias repair at a tertiary care center: long-term followup is mandatory to determine the real complication rate. J Urol. 2013;189:2276–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.12.100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tack LJW, Springer A, Riedl S, Tonnhofer U, Hiess M, Weninger J, et al. Adolescent and young adult urogenital outcome following childhood hypospadias repair: perfection revisited. J Urol. 2021;206:734–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001869.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wood D, Baird A, Carmignani L, De Win G, Hoebeke P, Holmdahl G, et al. Lifelong congenital urology: the challenges for patients and surgeons. Eur Urol. 2019;75:1001–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.03.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DNW—conception, research, authorship, and editing of paper. DTW—conception, research, authorship, and editing of paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Wood.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wood, D., Wilcox, D. Hypospadias: lessons learned. An overview of incidence, epidemiology, surgery, research, complications, and outcomes. Int J Impot Res 35, 61–66 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00563-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-022-00563-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links