The Importance of Pine Species in the Ethnomedicine of Transylvania (Romania)
by
, , and
Nóra Papp
1,
Dragica Purger
1,
Szilvia Czigle
2,
Dóra Czégényi
3,
Szilvia Stranczinger
4,
Mónika Tóth
1,
Tünde Dénes
1,
Marianna Kocsis
4
,
Anna Takácsi-Nagy
5 and
Rita Filep
1,* 1
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, 7624 Pecs, Hungary
2
Department of Pharmacognosy and Botany, Faculty of Pharmacy, Comenius University Bratislava, Odbojárov 10, 832-32 Bratislava, Slovakia
3
Department of Hungarian Ethnography and Anthropology, Babeş-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca, 400202 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
4
Department of Plant Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Pécs, 7624 Pecs, Hungary
5
Institute of Pharmaceutical Technology and Biopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Pécs, 7624 Pecs, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(18), 2331; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11182331
Submission received: 29 July 2022
/
Revised: 25 August 2022
/
Accepted: 30 August 2022
/
Published: 6 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biodiscoveries from Plants)
Abstract
:The geographical and ecological features of Transylvania enable the wide ethnobotanical use of pine species. The aim of this study was to survey the current ethnomedicinal and other traditional use of pine species of Hungarian-speaking ethnic groups in Transylvania and to compare them with earlier reports performed in Transylvania and from other countries related to the Carpathian Basin. Information on pine species was obtained using semi-structured interviews with 515 Transylvanian informants from 18 villages in the period 2007–2019. The young shoots of Abies alba Mill., Picea abies (L.) H. Karst., Pinus nigra J. F. Arnold, and Pinus sylvestris L. were applied to treat respiratory diseases, while the resin was used for dental problems. Syrup and decoction were made from the cones of all species, except Abies alba. Picea abies was the most frequently documented with seven preparations from different parts (even needles), and this species was mentioned in the treatment of 21 diseases. The least recorded was Abies alba, which was applied for coughs and decayed teeth. We recorded the use of the cones and needles of Picea abies for dyspnoea, thyroid glands, and kidney disorders, previously unknown in ethnomedicinal literature. Our data on the pine species confirm their current use and significance in Transylvania.
1. Introduction
The pine family (Pinaceae) is among the largest plant families of conifers, comprising 11 genera including altogether 225 species [1]. They are native to the northern temperate regions of the Earth [2]. According to historical records, pine species, such as Abies alba Mill., Picea abies (L.) H. Karst., Pinus nigra J. F. Arnold, and Pinus sylvestris L. are widely used in the world for different purposes.
Throughout human history, pine species have been used in traditional medicine for various ailments [3]. Ethnobotanical surveys carried out in different countries of Europe reported several medical uses of pine species, e.g., in the treatment of respiratory problems (e.g., colds, coughs) [4,5], skin diseases (e.g., abscesses, furuncles, and wounds) [6,7,8], and are also used as a vitamin source [9].
The knowledge and experience about the medicinal use of species from the Abies, Picea, and Pinus genera were gained over centuries and reported in written form in the official materia medica. In the work of Matthioli [10], the resin and oleum of Abies spp. and Picea abies have been regarded as curative emplastrum for wounds, verrucas, and as diuretics in the adjuvant treatment of minor urinary complaints. The cones, bark, seeds, and resin of Pinus spp. have been applied as Vinum medicinalum for fevers, colds, coughs, tuberculosis, urinary inflammation, toothaches, furuncles, as well as externally as emplastrum for wounds, blaze, burns, and lachrymation [10]. The resin of Picea abies has been described as emplastrum and unguentum to treat skin diseases and inhalation in coughs associated with the common cold [11].
The data about the medicinal use of pine species have appeared in the Extra Pharmacopoeia, which gave details of Oleum therebinthinae and Pinus sylvestris in galenical formulations, such as enema, emulsion, liniment, and Linimentum terebinthinae aceticum (as an antirheumatic agent). The drugs are recommended for fever, lumbago, rheumatism, and as a mild stimulant inhalation in chronic laryngitis [12].
In the national pharmacopoeias of the Habsburg Empire and Austro-Hungarian Monarchy issued between the second half of the 18th century and the beginning of the 20th century, several official drugs were derived from Pinus sylvestris [13,14,15,16,17]. In the Pharmacopoeia Hungarica (editions I–VIII, 1871–2006) [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25], the drugs of the Picea, Pinus, and Larix genera of the Pinaceae family were mentioned: resin (e.g., Emplastrum adhaesivum borussicum), essential oil (e.g., Oleum pini sylvestris pro inhalatione), and balsam of turpentine and turpentine oil (e.g., Terebinthinae communis liquatae et colatae). In the last (10th) edition of Romanian Pharmacopoeia, the volatile oil of Pinus mugo (Pini montanae aetheroleum) was discussed for its antiseptic effect [26]. At the beginning of the 21st century, the therapeutic significance of pine species gradually vanished, and currently, only Pinus sylvestris aetheroleum is officially listed in The European Pharmacopoeia [27].
A growing number of studies suggest that pine species have an important role in medicine. They have been investigated for antioxidant [28,29,30,31], anti-inflammatory [32,33,34], antibacterial [29,35], antiviral [36], anticancer, and cytotoxic activities [37,38,39]. Yang et al. [40] suggest that the crude extracts and some chemical constituents of the Abies species were found to possess antibacterial, antifungal, anti-inflammatory, and antitussive activities. The species of the genus Pinus are reported for their antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and cytoprotective properties [41,42]. They can also be used in the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases [41,43]. The antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the Picea species extracts were confirmed in several studies [44,45,46].
Among the most widely dispersed species in Europe, Abies alba has been mainly used for ships, painter and writing boards, and carpentry. In Ancient Rome, the branches of Picea abies laid on the threshold of houses were considered a symbol of grief. Additionally, in Antiquity, cork and lignum of Pinus nigra and Pinus sylvestris were utilized as timber and for container manufacturing and baskets for cereal and grape transport, while the fresh cork was used as paper [47].
Traditional plant use has played a significant role in Transylvania (North-West Romania) [48]. Due to their isolation and insufficiency of official medical care, the inhabitants of several Transylvanian villages have valuable archaic knowledge of plants [49,50]. Comprehensive ethnobotanical research was carried out in the second part of the 20th century, mainly focusing on isolated settlements [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58]. The recent ethnobotanical surveys focus primarily on the maintenance of the traditional harvesting methods, applied drugs, ethnomedicinal use of plants, and treating disorders in human and veterinary medicine [59,60,61,62,63,64,65]. Currently, the decline in the implementation of the traditional use of medicinal plants is caused by the alteration and degradation of the environment and more expanded availability of official medicines and modern pharmaceuticals in several regions of Romania. Moreover, the transmission of traditional knowledge from elderly people is also declining due to increased migration of the young generation to larger cities or abroad [64]. Nevertheless, several ethnic groups still preserve their ethnomedicinal heritage through home practices and oral transmission of their knowledge. In this study, we sought to obtain a better understanding of ethnobotanical knowledge related to the use of pine species in Transylvania. We organized our research around three objectives: (1) to reveal the current local name of pine species and their plant parts; (2) to document current ethnobotanical use of pine species; (3) to compare our records with previous data from Transylvania and other Central and South European countries related to the Carpathian Basin to make known the importance of pine species. Based on the landscape and vegetation features of the study area, our focus was on Abies alba, Picea abies, Pinus nigra, and Pinus sylvestris.
2. Results
In our study, 515 informants were interviewed, and approx. 70% of them shared their ethnobotanical knowledge about pine species (Abies alba, Picea abies, Pinus nigra, and Pinus sylvestris). Among the interviewed persons, the ratio of women to men was 2:1. The average age was 65 years.
2.1. Local Terminology of the Species and Used Plant Parts
To identify the pine species, informants used the vernacular description of the color, the tip and the length of the needles, the color of the bark, the position of young shoots and branches, and the shapes and features of the cones. In this respect, the inhabitants of Martiniş and Petreni described the needles of Abies alba as being white and blunt (without stinging tip). In Martiniş the young shoots of Abies alba are referred to as a candle. The informants from Lueta depicted the spiky stinging needles of Picea abies as reddish in summer. In Chinușu, Martiniş, and Petreni, Pinus nigra was said to have the longest needles, while in Martiniş, Pinus sylvestris was characterized as having shorter pale green leaves. In Lueta, the branches of Picea abies were described as diversified, while the trunk of Pinus sylvestris was described as winding and the bark as weak and red.
The number of local names in the study area varied from four to seven per species. Unique and overlapping names occurred among the local names of the pine species (Table 1). For example, vörösfenyő was used both for Picea abies (in four villages) and Pinus sylvestris (in six villages). However, it is the official Hungarian name of Larix decidua Mill., which is not discussed in this study. The greatest overlapping was observed between Pinus nigra and Pinus sylvestris, alternatively referred to as luc, lucfenyő, and lukszfenyő, even though in Hungarian plant terminology, lucfenyő is the official name of Picea abies.
Nevertheless, the correct identification of each selected species was performed based on the morphological descriptions given by the informants and upon collected voucher specimens. The local names of the young fresh shoots of each species were újulás, usually collected in early spring. The resin of each species was named szurok. Fenyőalma (in two villages), fenyőtubus (in one village), buba and fenyőbuba (in one village), csusza (in one village), and csalóka (in five villages) were documented as mostly denominating the young, fresh, and red female inflorescence also harvested in spring. The needles are known as fenyőcserhe or tövis (one and one village, respectively).
2.2. Ethnomedicinal Uses
Abies alba, Picea abies, Pinus nigra, and Pinus sylvestris were applied in the ethnomedicinal practice in the study area (Table 2). The frequency of the recorded data about selected species differed. Picea abies was the most frequently documented; it was mentioned in the treatment of 21 diseases. The young shoots of all pine species were used to treat respiratory diseases, while the resin of all species was applied for dental problems. The cones of all species were used, except Abies alba. The least recorded was Abies alba, used only for coughs and decayed teeth (Table 2).
The preparations of drug parts varied between two and seven per species, and most preparations (seven) were used from different parts of Picea abies. The use of needles was recorded only in the case of Picea abies, while the cones and resin of each pine species were documented as food in various forms (Table 2).
The bark, cones, needles, resin, and shoots of Picea abies were used in different preparations for medicinal purposes. The decoction of the bark was applied in the treatment of varicose veins in Lueta. Syrup and decoction were made from the cones and used internally or externally. The decoction of one bushel (−35 L) of cones was prepared with 40 L of water and applied for rheumatic pain (e.g., backache). The young cones of Picea abies were collected in the flowering period and boiled with sugar as a sweet named dulcsáca, similar to honey, and added to desserts by teaspoon. The decoction of the needles, prepared by soaking one teaspoon of the leaves in 1 L of water, was applied for urinary bladder disorders (e.g., cystitis) in Lueta. The resin can be collected from the trunk in dried form or by letting it run in a bottle. It is applied for skin injuries and furuncles as an ointment (in Lueta) and for backache as a poultice (in Ghipeș). The melted resin was mixed with oil and incorporated into ointments to treat furuncles (in Porumbeşti) and wounds, furuncles, and tooth decay (in Călugăreni). In complex preparations, the resin was generally mentioned as a stiffening agent; it is furthermore an excipient that facilitates the drying process and gives a unique fragrance to homemade ointments. In the treatment of hand skin diseases, the resin of Picea abies combined with six or eight other components was used in 7-ír (= seven-part lotion) and 9-ír (= nine-part lotion) and also with the leaf of útilapi (Plantago lanceolata L.) as sticking material for a poultice. In the ointment formulations, 100 g of resin was usually mixed with 2 dL of oil or 100 g of wax, and tallow pork fat was used to treat furuncles. As a poultice for treating furuncles, beeswax and oil were incorporated into the formulation (in Lueta). The young shoots of the species collected in spring were soaked for a day in water in a 1:1 ratio and then boiled with sugar; the brew is then filtered, dry-steamed, and stored in a warm place until cooled. Two or three teaspoons or one cup daily of this syrup was used for asthma in children and adults (in Lueta, Lunca de Sus, and Martiniş).
Picea abies was recorded for treating respiratory disorders as a green or red syrup prepared from the young shoots or the cones mixed with honey or sugar (for taste enhancement and preservation). The syrup made from this species contained the young shoot (200 g), sugar (650 g), and water (350 g) boiled and applied for respiratory problems (in Turulung). Both the decoction and the syrup of the young shoots were documented in Lueta for circulatory issues and as sedative remedies. The old branches of Picea abies were used for several multiherbal remedies in Lueta, e.g., (1) boiled with the bark of bojzafa (Sambucus nigra L.) for the treatment of hemorrhoids; (2) boiled with the bark of fűzfa (Salix alba L.) and cserefa (Quercus spp.) and mixed with one handful of salt and one teaspoon of potash alum to treat varicose veins of the legs; and (3) boiled with the leaves of Fragaria vesca L., Rubus idaeus L., R. caesius L., and Juglans regia L. and the pseudofruit of szaragógya (Rosa canina L.) to treat paralyses and also used as a bath. For thyroid disorders, five handfuls of branches are boiled in 5 L of water and applied as a poultice in the evenings and as a gargle during the day. Honey of this species alone was used for stomatitis in Lueta.
The cones, resin, and shoots of Pinus nigra were used in different preparations for medicinal purposes in the study area (Table 2). The resin was used in the treatment of skin disorders and decayed teeth. The resin was collected in Petreni by tapping the trunk in a V-shape, heart-shape, or wedge-shape and letting the resin flow out into a pot through a metal spout and then using it for the treatment of wounds (Figure 1A).
The young shoots of Pinus sylvestris were used to treat respiratory diseases (e.g., asthma, coughs, and tracheitis). They were collected in spring, cut at about 10 cm from the end of the branches, and used for preparation: one kg of shoots is soaked in 1–1.5 L of water, boiled slowly until the shoots have softened, mixed with citric acid to extract the taste, soaked for 1–2 days, filtered through gauze, and then mixed with sugar with the ratio of sugar and liquid being 1:1 (in Chinușu, Orășeni, and Petreni). This syrup, whose color is red, often is added (1–2 drops) in herbal tea (in Chinușu). In other prescriptions, shoots can be soaked in honey for 3 days or layered with sugar in a bottle for 2–3 months (in Martiniş) (Figure 1B). In this village, people inhale the resin-like fragrance of the fresh shoots against cold.
The resin from a matchstick was melted above a candle and blended with tallow in the treatment of wounds caused by the dryness of the hands (in Orășeni), with honey for furuncles (in Mereşti), or applied directly onto decayed teeth (in Mereşti and Sânpaul). A long time ago, children chewed the resin picked from the trunk as a dessert and tooth cleaner (in Lueta and Martiniş). The alcoholic extract (brandy) of the resin of Pinus sylvestris is known as esszenc (in Martiniş). The honey made by bees in pine forests is also consumed in tea (in Lueta).
Comparing our records to previous data from Transylvania and other countries related to the Carpathian Basin, it is obvious that we cannot confirm several previously described medicinal uses of Abies alba and Pinus sylvestris, nor did we register any new applications. In contrast, for Picea abies and Pinus nigra, we recorded lots of new data that were not previously known (Figure 2).
2.3. Other Uses
In addition to the ethnomedicinal use, the studied pine species were mentioned as being used for various other purposes (Table 3).
The decoction of the bark of Picea abies boiled with the bark of Quercus spp. was applied to tan raw leather. The bark of Abies alba was used for shoe soles, while the bark of Pinus sylvestris and Pinus nigra was employed to make cottage cheese containers (Figure 3A).
The cones of Pinus sylvestris and Pinus nigra were described as a tinder material. The resin of pine species is used for various purposes: the resin of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris was used, e.g., for rosining violin bows, that of Pinus nigra as adhesive and dye additive, while the resin of Picea abies was utilized for homemade soap, human epilation, and hair removal during pig slaughter. Before slaughtering pigs, the inhabitants collected the previously stove-dried and ground resin of Picea abies; they scattered it on the animal, adding hot water to form a balm to accelerate the removal of the bristles. The following recipe for the preparation of homemade soap from the resin of Picea abies was documented in Lueta: 3 kg of fat or bacon, 1 kg of superalkali and resin, and 6–7 peeled potatoes are boiled for 1–2 h and then covered and allowed to stand until the following day.
All of the studied species are known in the study area as Christmas trees. Branches of Picea abies serve as decoration in front of the bride’s house on the wedding day (in Crăciunel). Needles of Abies alba were used on the surface of cheese for its conservation (Figure 3B).
The wood of the pine species was used for various tools and as timber, e.g., Picea abies for doors, boards, windows, and houses (in Lueta) and Pinus nigra for roofing (in Petreni). The wood of Pinus sylvestris was not recommended as timber because the resulting buildings would collapse in 2 years.
3. Discussion
The local names of selected pine species in Transylvania: fehérfenyő for Abies alba, veresfenyő for Picea abies, and lucfenyő for Pinus sylvestris were found to be similar to the earlier recorded names [51,53,58,110]. However, the majority of earlier works mention pines under the collective name of fenyő [51,53,85,86,98].
The ethnomedicinal use of Abies alba is well-documented in Transylvania and other European countries. Our recordings on this species show that it was used in the study area only to treat coughs and decayed teeth. However, we could not confirm, e.g., the use of resin of this species in the treatment of dermatological disorders [8,54,73,111,112,113].
Our results suggest that Picea abies was the most frequently used in the ethnomedicinal practice in the selected Transylvanian villages. We recorded some previously unknown uses of this species: cones for silicosis, burns, kidney diseases, and backache; needles for cardiac problems, thyroid glands, and cystitis; resin for burns; shoots for piles, paralysis, and as a sedative drug; and shoots or bark for varicose veins. Our results confirm the use of this species for respiratory diseases, dermatological disorders, and rheumatism, which was widely known from other studies in Transylvania [51,52,53,54,56,58,60,61,63,66,85,90] and other European countries [6,7,9,67,73,75,84,86,111,113,114,115,116]. The informants in our study area described several multiherbal remedies using different parts of Picea abies. Some of them, e.g., a seven-part ointment containing pine species resin, were previously documented in Transylvania by Miklóssy [85], but the plant source of resin was unidentified. The resin of Picea abies by itself for furuncles was documented in our study, while previous studies reported the use of resin combined with tallow, honey, wax, fat, and leaven [53,85].
We confirmed the use of the shoots of Pinus nigra in the treatment of respiratory diseases [91,111]. Furthermore, the use of the cones as a syrup for cold therapy and their resin as a poultice for dermatological disorders and dental problems is newly recorded in the study area.
Our records regarding Pinus sylvestris confirm the use of its different parts (cones, resin, and shoots) in the treatment of respiratory and dermatological diseases earlier reported in Transylvania [52,53,54,55,57,58,61,62,63,66] and other European countries [9,72,75,91,93,112,115].
Our study confirms the use of pine species in the ethnoveterinary practice. For example, the resin of Pinus syvestris is used in the study area to treat equine wounds [54,55], but we did not document the use of the plant as fodder reported earlier [107].
The studied pine species were also used for other purposes. Our informants shared with us their knowledge on several uses of Picea abies in the study area, which were mentioned in earlier surveys in Transylvania, but not known from other European countries related to the Carpathian Basin, e.g., the use of the bark for tanning processes of raw leather [81] and resin for homemade soap [102].
The resin of Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris was used for coating the violin bow, which is in accordance with the study by Pâques [108], who suggests that the resin of Pinus sylvesteris is still in use for colophony (rosin) in Romania.
The bark of Pinus nigra and Pinus sylvestris as a container for cottage cheese was known in Hungary, the Balkans, and Italy [47,98]. The use of the resin of Pinus sylvestris for soap was reported earlier by Rácz and Füzi [89]. The needles of Abies alba were used to preserve cheese, which was not mentioned in earlier studies. The use of the cones of Pinus nigra and Pinus sylvestris as tinder was not reported earlier. The wood of the pine species was used for various tools and as timber, e.g., in the case of Picea abies for doors, boards, windows, and houses and that of Pinus nigra for roofing. The same utilization was earlier reported from Transylvania [58,63,102,107] and other European countries [7].
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Study Area
The study was performed in the Harghita and Satu Mare counties in Transylvania (in the extended sense that includes Transylvania, Banat, Crișana, and Maramureș), a former part of Hungary, currently belonging to Romania [117]. The study area is surrounded by the Eastern and Southern Carpathian Mountains, and a large part is covered with coniferous forests [118]. Abies alba is mainly distributed in the Carpathians (e.g., Hargitha Mountains) as the dominant generalist species in coniferous forests [119], occurring at altitudes of (450) 600–1300 (1500) m [120]. Picea abies tends to form stands with other firs and beeches in montane and subalpine zones, at altitudes of (650) 800–1500 (1600) m, involving several cultivars as ornamentals. Pine species, such as Pinus sylvestris and Pinus nigra, grow naturally in higher regions of the Carpathians, where they have also been extensively planted [120].
In the frame of the study, we selected 18 villages, where informants use the Hungarian language and dialects to facilitate communication (Table 4). The map of the study area was prepared by using the ArcGIS program (Figure 4).
The traditional knowledge of rural people working in agriculture and on farms is based on personal experience, on data passed on by their ancestors, and, in some cases, on other sources (e.g., books and media). The latter type of data was eliminated by using targeted questions about the origin of their knowledge; thus, only records of traditional knowledge are listed in this work.
Only 4 villages have a permanent pharmacy and facilities for human and veterinary medical service; 3 villages have only two of these three, while 11 villages in the study area have none of the three facilities.
4.2. Data Collection
The field study was conducted during the summer in the period 2007–2019. Before performing the interviews, consent was obtained from the participants, and ethical guidelines adopted by the International Society of Ethnobiology [121] were followed. The data gathered by semi-structured interviews were systematically arranged by collecting location and time, plant harvesting and storage method, administration, remedies, and treated disorders. Data documentation was carried out by voice recordings, handwritten notes, photographs of plants, drugs and remedies derived from them, and plant habitats.
The vernacular (local) name of pines, plant features, diseases, and original notes regarding the administration of the drugs are written in italics and bold based on folk terminology, while the names and terms corresponding to the official Hungarian and Romanian terminology were noted only in italics. The names of the disorders treated are in accordance with the orthography of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11).
During the ethnobotanical field surveys, all plants listed were documented according to the abovementioned aspects; however, this work summarizes only the records of the pine species Abies alba, Picea abies, Pinus nigra, and Pinus sylvestris identified by the botanist N. Papp. The names of identified plants follow the database of World Flora Online [122]. Voucher specimens of pine species (voucher specimens: PT04, PT07, PT11, PT12, PT16, PT17, PT19, and PT20) were deposited at the herbaria of the Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Pécs (7624 Pecs, Hungary).
4.3. Comparison to Literature
Our collected data on the pine species were compared to data gathered from earlier works performed in Transylvania (starting in the 16th century until 2021). Our literature research focused on the whole territory of Transylvania (including the villages where our study was performed) and sources from other countries related to the Carpathian Basin (Croatia, Hungary, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, and Ukraine), collected from books, and mainly English-language references. The scientific articles associated with the studied pine species were selected from available databases, e.g., ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Google Scholar, using the following keywords: traditional, ethnobotanical, ethnomedicinal, and ethnopharmacological and filtered for the selected pine species. The results were illustrated as Venn diagrams.
5. Conclusions
The ethnobotanical and ethnomedicinal data recorded on the pine species confirm their current use in Transylvania. Despite several ethnobotanical studies being performed in this region, we registered several new and unique records, which highlight the current significance of ethnobotany in the study area. In comparison with previous studies, we could not confirm several data suggesting that the transmission of ethnomedicinal and ethnobotanical knowledge is on the decline.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, N.P. and R.F.; performing of field work N.P., D.C., M.T., T.D. and R.F.; data curation, N.P., D.P. and R.F.; writing—original draft preparation, N.P., D.P. and R.F.; writing—review and editing, N.P., D.P., S.C., A.T.-N., S.S. and R.F.; visualization, N.P. and R.F.; supervision, A.T.-N., D.P. and M.K.; funding acquisition, N.P. and S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by OTKA (Hungarian Scientific Research Fund, K 127944) (N.P.) and the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic grants (VEGA 1/0226/22) (S.C.).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Acknowledgments
We thankfully acknowledge all our informants from Transylvania (Romania) who entrusted us with their knowledge and shared it generously and patiently. We are grateful to Péter Detvai who prepared the study area map.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Tutin, T.G.; Burges, N.A.; Chater, A.O.; Edmondson, J.R.; Heywood, V.H.; Moore, D.M.; Valentine, D.H.; Walters, S.M.; Webb, D.A. Flora Europaea, Volume 1; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Bayton, R.; Maughan, S. Pinaceae (Pine). In Plant Families; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2017; pp. 52–53. [Google Scholar]
- Richardson, D.M. Ecology and Biogeography of Pinus; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Menković, N.; Šavikin, K.; Tasić, S.; Zdunić, G.; Stešević, D.; Milosavljević, S.; Vincek, D. Ethnobotanical Study on Traditional Uses of Wild Medicinal Plants in Prokletije Mountains (Montenegro). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2011, 133, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pfeiffer, Ž.T.; Krstin, L.; Špoljarić Maronić, D.; Hmura, M.; Eržić, I.; Bek, N.; Stević, F. An Ethnobotanical Survey of Useful Wild Plants in the North-Eastern Part of Croatia (Pannonian Region). Plant Biosyst. 2020, 154, 463–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lumpert, M.; Kreft, S. Folk Use of Medicinal Plants in Karst and Gorjanci, Slovenia. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2017, 13, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Teixidor-Toneu, I.; Kjesrud, K.; Bjerke, E.; Parekh, K.; Kool, A. From the “Norwegian Flora”(Eighteenth Century) to “Plants and Tradition”(Twentieth Century): 200 Years of Norwegian Knowledge about Wild Plants. Econ. Bot. 2020, 74, 398–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellia, G.; Pieroni, A. Isolated, but Transnational: The Glocal Nature of Waldensian Ethnobotany, Western Alps, NW Italy. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2015, 11, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tucakov, J. Lečenje Biljem (Healing with Herbs); Rad: Belgrade, Serbia, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Matthioli, P.A. Herbář neboli Bylinář. Commentarrii in Sex Libros Pedacii Dioscoridis (Herbarium. Commentaries on the Six Books of Pedacius); Georg. Melantrichius ab Aventino ad Inst. Vinc. Valgrisii: Prague, Czech Republic, 1562. [Google Scholar]
- Dörfler, H.P.; Roselt, G. Heilpfanzen Gestern und Heute; Urania: Leipzig/Jena/Berlin, Germany, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Martindale, W.; Westcott, W. The Extra Pharmacopøeia of Martindale and Westcott, 15th ed.; HK Lewis: London, UK, 1910; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
- Pharmacopoea Austriaca: Editio Prima; Kupffer & Wimmer: Vienna, Austria, 1812.
- Pharmacopoea Austriaca: Editio Altera, Emendata; Kupffer & Wimmer: Vienna, Austria, 1814.
- Pharmacopoea Austriaca: Editio Tertia, Emendata; Gerold: Vienna, Austria, 1820.
- Pharmacopoea Austriaca: Editio Quarta, Emendata; Caes. Reg. Aulae et Status Typographia: Vienna, Austria, 1834.
- Pharmacopoea Austriaca: Editio Quinta; Caes. Reg. Aulae et Imperii Typographia: Vienna, Austria, 1855.
- Pharmacopoea Hungarica I, Editio Prima; Athenaeum: Budapest, Hungary, 1871.
- Pharmacopoea Hungarica II, Editio Secunda; Athenaeum: Budapest, Hungary, 1888.
- Pharmacopoea Hungarica III, Editio Tertia; Magyar Királyi Állami Nyomda: Budapest, Hungary, 1909.
- Pharmacopoea Hungarica IV, Editio Quarta, Tomus Tertia; Magyar Királyi Állami Nyomda: Budapest, Hungary, 1933.
- Pharmacopoea Hungarica V, Editio Quinta; Egészségügyi Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1954.
- Pharmacopoea Hungarica VI, Editio Sixta; Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1958.
- Pharmacopoea Hungarica VII, Editio Septima; Medicina Könyvkiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1987.
- Pharmacopoea Hungarica VIII, Editio Octa; Medicina Könyvkiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 2006.
- Dobrescu, D. Farmacopeea Română (Romanian Pharmacopoeia), Ediția a X-a; Editura Medicală: Bucureşti, Hungary, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- European Pharmacopoeia. Ph. Eur. (10), 10th ed.; EDQM: Strassbourg, France, 2020.
- Legault, J.; Girard-Lalancette, K.; Dufour, D.; Pichette, A. Antioxidant Potential of Bark Extracts from Boreal Forest Conifers. Antioxidants 2013, 2, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namshir, J.; Shatar, A.; Khandaa, O.; Tserennadmid, R.; Shiretorova, V.G.; Nguyen, M.C. Antimicrobial, Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Activity on Human Breast Cancer Cells of Essential Oil from Pinus sylvestris. Var Mongolica Needle. Mong. J. Chem. 2020, 21, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adjaoud, A.; Laouer, H.; Braca, A.; Cioni, P.; Moussi, K.; Berboucha-Rahmani, M.; Abbaci, H.; Falconieri, D. Chemical Composition, Antioxidant and Insecticidal Activities of a New Essential Oil Chemotype of Pinus nigra ssp. mauritanica (Pinaceae), Northern Algeria. Plant Biosyst. 2020, 156, 358–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Zou, P.; Zhao, H.; Qiu, J.; Mac Regenstein, J.; Yang, X. Isolation, Purification, Structure and Antioxidant Activity of Polysaccharide from Pinecones of Pinus koraiensis. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 251, 117078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharma, A.; Goyal, R.; Sharma, L. Potential Biological Efficacy of Pinus Plant Species against Oxidative, Inflammatory and Microbial Disorders. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 16, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Zhao, Q.-Q.; Wang, S.-F.; Li, Y.; Song, Q.-Y.; Gao, K. Terpenoids with Anti-Inflammatory Activity from Abies chensiensis. Fitoterapia 2016, 111, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, P.-C.; Li, Y.-C.; Kusuma, A.M.; Tzen, J.T.; Hwang, T.-L.; Ye, G.-H.; Yang, M.-L.; Wang, S.-Y. Antii-Inflammatory Principles from the Needles of Pinus taiwanensis Hayata and in Silico Studies of Their Potential Anti-Aging Effects. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shpatov, A.V.; Frolova, T.S.; Popov, S.A.; Sinitsyna, O.I.; Salnikova, O.I.; Zheng, G.; Yan, L.; Sinelnikova, N.V.; Pshennikova, L.M.; Kochetov, A.V. Lipophilic Metabolites from Five-Needle Pines, Pinus armandii and Pinus kwangtungensis, Exhibiting Antibacterial Activity. Chem. Biodivers. 2020, 17, e2000201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ha, T.K.Q.; Lee, B.W.; Nguyen, N.H.; Cho, H.M.; Venkatesan, T.; Doan, T.P.; Kim, E.; Oh, W.K. Antiviral Activities of Compounds Isolated from Pinus densiflora (Pine Tree) against the Influenza A Virus. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.-W.; Zeng, H.-W.; Liu, X.-H.; Li, S.-M.; Xu, W.; Shen, Y.-H.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, W.-D. Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Tumour Effects of Abies georgei Extracts. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2008, 60, 937–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Machana, S.; Weerapreeyakul, N.; Barusrux, S.; Nonpunya, A.; Sripanidkulchai, B.; Thitimetharoch, T. Cytotoxic and Apoptotic Effects of Six Herbal Plants against the Human Hepatocarcinoma (HepG2) Cell Line. Chin. Med. 2011, 6, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pocasap, P.; Nonpunya, A.; Weerapreeyakul, N. Pinus kesiya Royle Ex Gordon Induces Apoptotic Cell Death in Hepatocellular Carcinoma HepG2 Cell via Intrinsic Pathway by PARP and Topoisomerase I Suppression. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 139, 111628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, X.-W.; Li, S.-M.; Shen, Y.-H.; Zhang, W.-D. Phytochemical and Biological Studies of Abies Species. Chem. Biodivers. 2008, 5, 56–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhardwaj, K.; Silva, A.S.; Atanassova, M.; Sharma, R.; Nepovimova, E.; Musilek, K.; Sharma, R.; Alghuthaymi, M.A.; Dhanjal, D.S.; Nicoletti, M. Conifers Phytochemicals: A Valuable Forest with Therapeutic Potential. Molecules 2021, 26, 3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Omari, N.; Guaouguaou, F.E.; El Menyiy, N.; Benali, T.; Aanniz, T.; Chamkhi, I.; Balahbib, A.; Taha, D.; Shariati, M.A.; Zengin, G. Phytochemical and Biological Activities of Pinus halepensis Mill., and Their Ethnomedicinal Use. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 268, 113661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Postu, P.A.; Sadiki, F.Z.; El Idrissi, M.; Cioanca, O.; Trifan, A.; Hancianu, M.; Hritcu, L. Pinus halepensis Essential Oil Attenuates the Toxic Alzheimer’s Amyloid Beta (1-42)-Induced Memory Impairment and Oxidative Stress in the Rat Hippocampus. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2019, 112, 108673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Francezon, N.; Meda, N.-S.-B.R.; Stevanovic, T. Optimization of Bioactive Polyphenols Extraction from Picea mariana Bark. Molecules 2017, 22, 2118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haman, N.; Morozova, K.; Tonon, G.; Scampicchio, M.; Ferrentino, G. Antimicrobial Effect of Picea abies Extracts on E. coli Growth. Molecules 2019, 24, 4053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hofmann, T.; Albert, L.; Németh, L.; Vršanská, M.; Schlosserová, N.; Voběrková, S.; Visi-Rajczi, E. Antioxidant and Antibacterial Properties of Norway Spruce (Picea abies H. Karst.) and Eastern Hemlock (Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carrière) Cone Extracts. Forests 2021, 12, 1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plinius Secundus, C. A Természet Históriája—A Növényekről (Naturalis Historia—Plants); Pannon Nyomda: Veszprém, Hungary, 1987; Volume XII–XXI. [Google Scholar]
- Melius, J. Herbarium; Heltai Gáspárné Műhelye: Kolozsvár, Romania, 1578. [Google Scholar]
- Papp, N.; Farkas, Á.; Pieroni, A. An Ethnobotanical Study on Home Gardens in a Transylvanian Hungarian Csángó Village (Romania). Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2013, 60, 1423–1432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bartha, S.G.; Quave, C.L.; Balogh, L.; Papp, N. Ethnoveterinary Practices of Covasna County, Transylvania, Romania. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2015, 11, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kóczián, G.; Pintér, I.; Szabó, L.G. Adatok a Gyimesi Csángók Népi Gyógyászatához (Ethnobotanical Data of the Csángós in Ghimeș). Gyógyszerészet 1975, 19, 226–230. [Google Scholar]
- Kóczián, G.; Szabó, I.; Szabó, L. Etnobotanikai Adatok Kalotaszegről (Ethnobotanical Data in Ţara Călatei). Botanikai közlemenyek 1977, 64, 23–29. [Google Scholar]
- Péntek, J.; Szabó, A. Ember És Növényvilág: Kalotaszeg Növényzete És Népi Növényismerete (People and Plants: Vegetation and Rural Botanical Knowledge in Ţara Călatei); Kriterion: Bukarest, Romania, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Butură, V. Enciclopedie de Etnobotanică Românească (Dictionary of the Romanian Ethnobotany); Editura Științifică și Enciclopedică: Bucharest, Romania, 1979. [Google Scholar]
- Halászné, Z.K. Adatok a Moldvai Magyarok Gyógynövény-Használatához (Data to the Medicinal Plants Usage of the Hungarians in Moldova). Gyógyszerészet 1981, 25, 361–367. [Google Scholar]
- Rab, J.; Tankó, P.; Tankó, M. Népi Növényismeret Gyimesbükkön (Ethnobotany in Ghimeş-Făget). In Népismereti Dolgozatok; Kriterion: Bucharest, Romania, 1981; pp. 23–38. [Google Scholar]
- Vasas, S. Népi Gyógyászat: Kalotaszegi Gyűjtés (Ethnomedicinal Study in Ţara Călatei); Kriterion: Bucharest, Romania, 1985. [Google Scholar]
- Gub, J. Adatok a Nagy-Homoród És a Nagy-Küküllő Közötti Terület Népi Növényismeretéhez (Ethnobotanical Data of the Nagy-Homoród and Nagy-Küküllő). Néprajzi Látóhatár 1993, 1, 95–110. [Google Scholar]
- Gub, J. Népi Növényismeret a Nagy-Homoród Mentén (Ethnobotanical Data along the Nagy-Homoród); Pro-Print Könyvkiadó: Miercurea Ciuc, Romania, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Mitra, Z.; Gálicza, J. Népi Gyógymódok (Folk Medicine). Természettudományi Közlöny 2002, 133, 132–135. [Google Scholar]
- Szabó, L.G. Népi Gyógynövény-Ismeret Kalotaszegen És Gyimesvölgyében (Ethnobotanical Data in Ţara Călatei and Ghimeș). Turán 2002, 5, 39–52. [Google Scholar]
- Antalné, T.M. Gyimes-Völgyi Népi Gyógyászat (Ethnomedicine in the Ghimeș); Európa Folklór Intézet—L’Harmattan: Budapest, Hungary, 2003. [Google Scholar]
- Halász, P. Növények a Moldvai Magyarok Hagyományában És Mindennapjaiban (Plants in the Tradition and Everyday Life of the Hungarians in Moldova); General Press K.: Budapest, Hungary, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Papp, N. “A Virágok… Mindegyik Orvosság”—Hagyományok És Népi Orvoslás Lövétén (Traditions and Ethnomedicine in Lueta, Romania); Mayors’ Office of Lueta: Lueta, Romania, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Papp, N.; Birkás-Frendl, K.; Farkas, Á.; Czégényi, D. Hungarian Ethnobotanical Studies in Romania. In Ethnobotany and Biocultural Diversities in the Balkans; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 29–44. [Google Scholar]
- Kóczian, G. A Hagyományos Parasztgazdálkodás, Termesztett, a Gyűjtögető Gazdálkodás, Vad Növényfajainak Etnobotanikai Értékelése (Ethnobotanical Evaluation of Traditional Farming, Cultivation, and Collecting of Wild Plant Species); Nagyatádi Kulturális és Sport Központ: Nagyatád, Hungary, 2014; p. 545. [Google Scholar]
- Gugić, D. Tradicionalna Botanička Primjena Samoniklog Bilja: Usporedba Kontinentalnog i Mediteranskog Područja Hrvatske (Traditional Use of Wild Plants: Comparison of Continental and Mediterranean Regions of Croatia). Master’s Thesis, Sveučilište u Zagrebu Agronomski Fakultet, Zagreb, Croatia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Kóczián, G.; Szabó, L.G. Nagyatád Egy Kertészgazdaságának Leírása, Agrobotanikai Értékei És Géntartaléka (Description of a Garden in Nagyatád, Its Agrobotanical Values and Gene Resources). Agrártudományi Szle. 1978, 1–2, 181–197. [Google Scholar]
- Kóczián, G.; Szabó, L.G. Gyógynövények És Népgyógyászat. A Szlovákiai Áj És Falucska Községek Népeinek Gyógynövényhasználata, Etnobotanikai Tudása (Adatközlés) (Herbs and Folk Medicine. Herbal Use and Ethnobotanical Knowledge of Inhabitants of Áj and Falucska Villages from Slovakia (Report)). Gyógyszerészet 1990, 34, 371–377. [Google Scholar]
- Hoppál, M. Népi Gyógyítás. In Folklór 3. Népszokás, Néphit, Népi Vallásosság. (Magyar Néprajz, VII.); Dömötör, T., Hoppál, M., Eds.; Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest, Romania, 1990; pp. 693–724. [Google Scholar]
- Gunda, B. Gyanta (Szócikk) (Resin (Entry)). In Magyar Néprajzi Lexikon (Hungarian Ethnographic Lexicon) II. (F-Ka); Gyula, O., Ed.; Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1979; p. 335. [Google Scholar]
- Fándly, J. Zelinkár (Herbarium) (Facsimile) [Original: Trnava: U Václava Jelínka Privilegovaného kníhtlačiara, 1793]; Osveta M.: Slovakia, 1978. [Google Scholar]
- Hodak, A. Etnobotanička i Gospodarska Važnost Tradicijske Primjene Biljaka Na Području Središnje Like. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Botany, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Tucakov, J.; Mihajlov, M. Medicinska Flora Ovčara, Kablara i Jelice (Medicinal Flora of Ovčar, Kablar and Jelica Mts); Srpska Akad. nauka I Umetnosti: Belgrade, Serbia, 1977; p. 275. [Google Scholar]
- Matejić, J.S.; Stefanović, N.; Ivković, M.; Živanović, N.; Marin, P.D.; Džamić, A.M. Traditional Uses of Autochthonous Medicinal and Ritual Plants and Other Remedies for Health in Eastern and South-Eastern Serbia. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 261, 113186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tasić, S. Ethnobotany in SEE-WB Countries; Traditional Uses of Indigenous Plants. Lek. Sirovine 2012, 32, 71–81. [Google Scholar]
- Grlić, L. Encyclopaedia of Wild Edible Plants; August Cesarec: Zagreb, Croatia, 1986. (In Croatian) [Google Scholar]
- Pieroni, A.; Giusti, M.E.; Quave, C.L. Cross-Cultural Ethnobiology in the Western Balkans: Medical Ethnobotany and Ethnozoology among Albanians and Serbs in the Pešter Plateau, Sandžak, South-Western Serbia. Hum. Ecol. 2011, 39, 333–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kóczián, G.; Pintér, I.; Gál, M.; Szabó, I.; Szabó, L.G. Etnobotanikai Adatok Gyimesvölgyéből (Ethnobotanical Data of the Ghimeș Valley). Bot. Közlemények 1976, LXIII, 29–35. [Google Scholar]
- Rab, J. New Folk Medicinal Data from Gyimes. Gyógyszerészet 1982, 26, 325–333. [Google Scholar]
- Kosz, Z. Népi Gyógyítás Csíkrákoson (Ethnomedicine in Racu). In A Beteg Ember; Keszeg, V., Czégényi, D., Eds.; Mentor Kiadó: Marosvásárhely, Romania, 2010; pp. 109–178. [Google Scholar]
- Babai, D.; Molnár, Á.; Molnár, Z. „Ahogy Gondozza Úgy Veszi Hasznát.” Hagyományos Ökológiai Tudás És Gazdálkodás Gyimesben. (“The Way You Take Care of It Benefits You.” Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Farming in Gyimes); MTA BTK Néprajztudományi Intézet—MTA Ökológiai Kutatóközpont Ökológiai és Botanikai Intézet: Budapest/Vácrátót, Hungary, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Kótyuk, E. A Népi Gyógyítás Hagyományai Egy Kárpátaljai Magyar Faluban (Traditions of Folk Healing in a Hungarian Village in Transcarpathia); Európai Folklór Intézet: Budapest, Hungary, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Papež Kristanc, A. Uporaba Divje Rastočih Rastlin v Prehrani (Use of Wild-Growing Edible Plants in Human Nutrition). Master’s Thesis, Univerza v Ljubljani, Biotehniška Fakulteta, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Miklóssy, V.V. Csíki Népi Sebtapaszok (Traditional Plasters in Ciuc). Népismereti Dolg. 1980, 3, 60–63. [Google Scholar]
- Berde, K. A Magyar Nép Dermatológiája: A Bőr És Betegségei Népünk Nyelvében, Hijedelmeiben És Szokásaiban (Hungarian Ethnodermatology); Magyar Orvosi Könyvkiadó Társulat: Budapest, Hungary, 1940; 303p. [Google Scholar]
- Molnár, M. Fenjük a Fogainkat (We Brush Our Teeth). Vas Népe 1990, XXXV, 4. [Google Scholar]
- Vasas, S. A Mindentudó Méz. És Mit Tudnak Róla Kalotaszegen? (The Omniscient Honey. And What Do They Know about Kalotaszeg?). A Hét 1978, IX, 11. [Google Scholar]
- Rácz, G.; Füzi, J. Kovászna Megye Gyógynövényei (Medicinal Plants in Covasna County); Mezőgazdasági, Élelmiszeripari és Vízügyi Vezérigazgatóság: Sepsiszentgyörgy, Romania, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Vita, Z. Köhögés, Légcsőhurut Elleni Házi Gyógyszerek (Home Remedies for Cough, Bronchitis). Dolg. Nő 1986, XLII. [Google Scholar]
- Janaćković, P.; Gavrilović, M.; Savić, J.; Marin, P.D.; Stevanović, Z.D. Traditional Knowledge on Plant Use from Negotin Krajina (Eastern Serbia): An Ethnobotanical Study. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 2019, 18, 25–33. [Google Scholar]
- Krželj, M.; Vitasović Kosić, I. Etnobotanička Primjena Samoniklog Bilja: Hrana i Lijek Za Ljude i Životinje Na Području Općine Šestanovac (Dalmatinska Zagora, Hrvatska) (Ethnobotanical Use of Wild Plants: Food, Feed and Folk Medicine in Šestanovac Municipality Area, (Dalmatinska Zagora, Croatia). Krmiva Časopis O Hranidbi Životinja Proizv. I Tehnol. Krme 2020, 62, 3–13. [Google Scholar]
- Čajkanović, V.; Durić, V. Rečnik Srpskih Narodnih Verovanja o Biljkama. Sabrana Dela iz Srpske Religije i Mitologije 4. (Dictionary of Folk Beliefs on Plants. Compiled Works from Serbian Religion and Mitology, Belgrade); Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti Prosveta: Belgrade, Serbia, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Gunda, B. Egy Kárpátaljai Magyar Falu Etnobotanikája (Ethnobotany of a Hungarian Village in Transcarpathia). Nyíregyházi Jósa András Múzeum Évkönyve XXI-XXIII (1978–1980) 1988, 21–23, 25–41. [Google Scholar]
- Keszeg, V. A Mezőségi Detrehemtelep Népi Gyógyászata (Folk Medicine of the Detrehemtelep in the Field). In Népismereti Dolgozatok; Kriterion: Bucharest, Romania, 1981; pp. 97–117. [Google Scholar]
- Karadžić, V.S. Život i Običaji Naroda Srpskoga. Beč (Life and Customs of Serbian Folk. Vienna); A. Karažić: Vienna, Austria, 1867; p. 356. [Google Scholar]
- Stryamets, N.; Elbakidze, M.; Ceuterick, M.; Angelstam, P.; Axelsson, R. From Economic Survival to Recreation: Contemporary Uses of Wild Food and Medicine in Rural Sweden, Ukraine and NW Russia. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2015, 11, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gunda, B. Magyar Néprajzi Lexikon (Szócikk) (Hungarian Ethnographic Lexicon (Entry)). In Magyar Néprajzi Lexikon (Hungarian Ethnographic Lexicon) III. (K-Né); Gyula, O., Ed.; Akadémiai Kiadó: Budapest, Hungary, 1980; pp. 97–98. [Google Scholar]
- Kisgyörgy, M. Szórakoztató Dendrológia (Entertaining Dendrology) Jegenyefenyők (Abies). Háromszék 1995, VII, 6. [Google Scholar]
- Miklóssy, V.V. Festőnövények a Csíki Háziiparban. In Népismereti Dolgozatok; Kriterion: Bucharest, Romania, 1978; pp. 91–100. [Google Scholar]
- Lőrinczi, E. Fonalfestési Kísérleteim Növényekkel (My Yarn Dyeing Experiments with Plants). In Kriza János Néprajzi Társaság 3. Évkönyve; Erzsébet, Z., Ed.; Kriza János Néprajzi Társaság: Kolozsvár, Romania, 1995; pp. 73–80. [Google Scholar]
- Csergő, B. A Vörösfenyő Küküllőkeményfalva Népi Növényismeretében (Larch in the Folk Botanical Knowledge of Târnovița). In Népismereti Dolgozatok; Kós, K., Faragó, J., Eds.; Kriterion: Bucharest, Romania, 1978; pp. 40–50. [Google Scholar]
- Barabás, I. Ki Lehet Ura a Természetnek? Az Erdő Télen 7. (Who Can Be the Master of Nature? The Forest in Winter). Előre 1983, XXXVII, 3. [Google Scholar]
- Babai, D.; Szépligeti, M.; Tóth, A.; Ulicsni, V. Traditional Ecological Knowledge and the Cultural Significance of Plants in Hungarian Communities in Slovenia. Acta Ethnogr. Hung. 2021, 65, 481–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rácz, J. Növénynevek Enciklopédiája (Encyclopedia of Plant Names); Tinta Könyvkiadó: Bucharest, Romania, 2010; p. 333. [Google Scholar]
- Grynaeus, T.; Szabó, L.G. A Bukovinai Hadikfalvi Székelyek Növényei (Plants of the Szeklers in Hadikfalva, Bukovina). Gyógyszerészet 2002, 46, 251–259. [Google Scholar]
- Babai, D. Hegyvidéki Növényzet Botanikai És Etnoökológiai Szempontú Vizsgálata Gyimesben (Keleti Kárpátok, Románia) (Botanical and Ethnoecological Study of Highland Flora in Ghimeș, Romania). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Pâques, L.E. Forest Tree Breeding in Europe; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; Volume 25. [Google Scholar]
- Diószegi, S.F.M.; Fazekas, M. Magyar Füvészkönyv (Hungarian Herbal Book); Csáthy: Debrecen, Hungary, 1807; Volume 9. [Google Scholar]
- Molnár, Z.; Babai, D. Népi Növényzetismeret Gyimesben I.: Növénynevek, Népi Taxonómia, Az Egyéni És Közösségi Növényismeret (Ethnogeobotanical Studies in Gyimes I.: Plant Names, Folk Taxonomy, Personal and Communal Knowledge). Bot. Közlemények 2009, 96, 117–143. [Google Scholar]
- Šarić-Kundalić, B.; Dobeš, C.; Klatte-Asselmeyer, V.; Saukel, J. Ethnobotanical Study on Medicinal Use of Wild and Cultivated Plants in Middle, South and West Bosnia and Herzegovina. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 131, 33–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mustafa, B.; Hajdari, A.; Krasniqi, F.; Hoxha, E.; Ademi, H.; Quave, C.L.; Pieroni, A. Medical Ethnobotany of the Albanian Alps in Kosovo. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2012, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pieroni, A.; Rexhepi, B.; Nedelcheva, A.; Hajdari, A.; Mustafa, B.; Kolosova, V.; Cianfaglione, K.; Quave, C.L. One Century Later: The Folk Botanical Knowledge of the Last Remaining Albanians of the Upper Reka Valley, Mount Korab, Western Macedonia. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2013, 9, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mayer, M.; Zbinden, M.; Vogl, C.R.; Ivemeyer, S.; Meier, B.; Amorena, M.; Maeschli, A.; Hamburger, M.; Walkenhorst, M. Swiss Ethnoveterinary Knowledge on Medicinal Plants—A within-Country Comparison of Italian Speaking Regions with North-Western German Speaking Regions. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2017, 13, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sõukand, R.; Hrynevich, Y.; Vasilyeva, I.; Prakofjewa, J.; Vnukovich, Y.; Paciupa, J.; Hlushko, A.; Knureva, Y.; Litvinava, Y.; Vyskvarka, S. Multi-Functionality of the Few: Current and Past Uses of Wild Plants for Food and Healing in Liubań Region, Belarus. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2017, 13, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mertenat, D.; Dal Cero, M.; Vogl, C.R.; Ivemeyer, S.; Meier, B.; Maeschli, A.; Hamburger, M.; Walkenhorst, M. Ethnoveterinary Knowledge of Farmers in Bilingual Regions of Switzerland–Is There Potential to Extend Veterinary Options to Reduce Antimicrobial Use? J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 246, 112184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brandstätter, A.; Egyed, B.; Zimmermann, B.; Duftner, N.; Padar, Z.; Parson, W. Migration Rates and Genetic Structure of Two Hungarian Ethnic Groups in Transylvania, Romania. Ann. Hum. Genet. 2007, 71, 791–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mihai, B.; Savulescu, I.; Sandric, I. Change Detection Analysis (1986–2002) of Vegetation Cover in Romania. Mt. Res. Dev. 2007, 27, 250–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babai, D.; Molnár, Z. Multidimensionality and Scale in a Landscape Ethnoecological Partitioning of a Mountainous Landscape (Gyimes, Eastern Carpathians, Romania). J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2013, 9, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Săvulescu, T. Flora Republicii Populare Române. Vol. I (Flora of the Romanian People’s Republic); Editura Academiei Republicii Populare Române: Bukarest, Romania, 1952. [Google Scholar]
- ISE International Society of Ethnobiology. ISE Code of Ethics (with 2008 Additions). 2006. Available online: http://ethnobiology.net (accessed on 10 February 2022).
- WFO. The World Flora Online. Available online: http://worldfloraonline.org (accessed on 15 March 2022).
Figure 1.
(A) Resin collection by tapping the trunk (in Petreni) and (B) Preparation of syrup from the young shoots (in Lueta).
Figure 1.
(A) Resin collection by tapping the trunk (in Petreni) and (B) Preparation of syrup from the young shoots (in Lueta).
Figure 2.
Venn diagram showing the total number and overlapping of medical uses recorded in the study area and other countries related to the Carpathian Basin. (A) Abies alba, (B) Picea abies, (C) Pinus nigra, and (D) Pinus sylvestris.
Figure 2.
Venn diagram showing the total number and overlapping of medical uses recorded in the study area and other countries related to the Carpathian Basin. (A) Abies alba, (B) Picea abies, (C) Pinus nigra, and (D) Pinus sylvestris.
Figure 3.
(A) Cottage cheese container made of bark of pine species (in Cinod) and (B) Pine needles for cheese conservation.
Figure 3.
(A) Cottage cheese container made of bark of pine species (in Cinod) and (B) Pine needles for cheese conservation.
Figure 4.
The study area in Transylvania (Romania). Numbers refer to the studied villages: (1) Aldea, (2) Călugăreni, (3) Chinușu, (4) Cinod, (5) Crăciunel, (6) Egershec, (7) Ghipeș, (8) Lueta, (9) Lunca de Jos, (10) Lunca de Sus, (11) Martiniş, (12) Mereşti, (13) Orășeni, (14) Petreni, (15) Porumbeşti, (16) Rareș, (17) Sânpaul, and (18) Turulung.
Figure 4.
The study area in Transylvania (Romania). Numbers refer to the studied villages: (1) Aldea, (2) Călugăreni, (3) Chinușu, (4) Cinod, (5) Crăciunel, (6) Egershec, (7) Ghipeș, (8) Lueta, (9) Lunca de Jos, (10) Lunca de Sus, (11) Martiniş, (12) Mereşti, (13) Orășeni, (14) Petreni, (15) Porumbeşti, (16) Rareș, (17) Sânpaul, and (18) Turulung.
Table 1.
Local names of the pine species in the study area.
| Species | Local Name |
|---|---|
| Abies alba Mill. | fehérfenyő 3,4,6,8,10,11,14 havasi fenyő 11,14,17 jegenyefenyő 18 bradul alb 18 |
| Picea abies (L.) H. Karst | veresfenyő 5,8,12,14 vörösfenyő 4,6,8,14 fenyő1,2,7,11,13,15,16 igazi fen yő 11 keresztfenyő 12 lucsika 4,6 lucfenyő 10 |
| Pinus nigra J. F. Arnold | luc 5,11,14 fenyő 11,12,14 luckfenyő 11 lucfenyő 12,14 lukszfenyő 12 |
| Pinus sylvestris L. | lucfenyő 3,8,11,12,17 lukszfenyő 12 erdeifenyő 11,13 fenyő 4,6,9,11–13 luc 11 lucsos 11 vörösfenyő 3,10,11,13,14,17 |
Folk names are written in italics and bold, while the official names are noted only in italics. Number superscripts refer to the studied villages: Aldea 1, Călugăreni 2, Chinușu 3, Cinod 4, Crăciunel 5, Egershec 6, Ghipeș 7, Lueta 8, Lunca de Jos 9, Lunca de Sus 10, Martiniş 11, Mereşti 12, Orășeni 13, Petreni 14, Porumbeşti 15, Rareș 16, Sânpaul 17, and Turulung 18.
Table 2.
Ethnomedicinal data of the selected pine species in Transylvania compared to the literature data from the region and other Central and South European countries related to the Carpathian Basin.
Table 2.
Ethnomedicinal data of the selected pine species in Transylvania compared to the literature data from the region and other Central and South European countries related to the Carpathian Basin.
| Species | Part Used | Our Collected Data | Literature Data in Transylvania | Data from Other European Countries Related to the Carpathian Basin | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prepa- Ration | Use | Prepa- Ration | Use | Reference | Prepa- Ration | Use | Reference | ||
| Abies alba Mill. | shoot | s 11,14,18 | coughs 11,14,18 | d, i | respiratory diseases | [52,61,63,66] | s | prevention of colds, coughs, respiratory diseases | [67] |
| - | - | b | rheumatism | [54] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | d | digestive problems | [68,69] | ||
| resin | p 11 | decayed teeth 11 | - | decayed teeth | [63] | - | - | - | |
| - | - | ch | teeth cleaning | [70] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | a | trepidancy | [54] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | with leaven | furuncles | [71] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | skin problems | [54] | - | wounds | [72,73] | ||
| - | - | with fat | crackled udder of cows | [71] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | - | bruises | [74] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | p, to | arthritis | [75] | ||
| bud | - | - | d | swollen cervical nodes | [54] | - | - | - | |
| bark | - | - | d | sore throat | [54] | - | - | - | |
| cone | - | - | d | stomachache, heart problems, toothache | [54] | - | - | - | |
| needle | - | - | d, s | respiratory diseases | [54] | catarrh of the respiratory tract | [76] | ||
| - | - | c | liver pain | [54] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | - | neuralgia, rheumatism | [76] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | d | vitamin source | [77] | ||
| wood | - | - | ash | wound | [54] | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | - | - | dry and ground | cambium as flour for bread (food) | [77] | ||
| Picea abies (L.) H. Karst. | bark | d 8 | varicose veins 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| - | - | d with milk | aphthous fever | [51] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | aphthae epizootic | [66] | - | - | - | |||
| - | - | - | - | - | d, a, o | wounds arthritis | [75] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | externally | splints in case of bone fractures | [78] | ||
| cone | s 2,5,8,10,12,13 | asthma 2,5,8,10,12,13 | i, d | coughs | [51,66,79,80,81,82] | a, d | productive coughs | [75] | |
| silicosis 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
| food 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
| d 4,6,7,8, with honey 8,10,13 | burns 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| coughs 4,6,7,8,10,13 dyspnoea (fojlás) 8 pneumonia 8,13 sore throat 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
| kidney diseases 4,6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
| b 8 | backache 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | boiled with milk | aphthous fever | [79] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | d | aphtae epizooticae | [66] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | d | pyorrhoea | [83] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | ground | flour for bread (food) | [84] | ||
| needle | d 8 | cardiac problems 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| thyroid glands 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
| cystitis 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
| b 8 | rheumatism 8 | - | - | - | a, o | arthritis | [75] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | eo | external use | [84] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | s | inflammation and pain to strengthen the immune system | [5] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | s | respiratory diseases | [5] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | d | vitamin source | [77] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | with sugar | marmalade and honey (food) | [84] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | a | beverage | [84] | ||
| resin | d 4,6,8,11 | burns 4,6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| chewed as food 8,11 | - | white teeth | [53] | - | - | - | |||
| o 5,8 p 2,11,15 | wounds 2,5,8,11,15 | - | wounds | [48,54,59,85] | itself, or with fat | wounds | [6,73,86] | ||
| o 5,8,15 p 1,2,7 | furuncles 1,2,5,7,8,15 backache 1,2,5 | - | furuncles | [53,54,60,85] | - | furuncles | [6] | ||
| p 1,2,5 | toothache 1,2,5 | - | decayed teeth, toothache | [53,57,58,63,87] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | o | abscesses | [53,54,58,63] | - | abscesses | [6] | ||
| - | - | with honey | antibacterial | [88] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | b | burn, sedative | [48] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | plaster | [89] | - | - | - | ||
| shoot | b 8 | paralysis 8 piles 8 varicose veins 8 sedative 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| d 8 | rheumatism 8 | b | rheumatism | [52,61,66] | b | rheumatism | [9,75] | ||
| s 3,5,8,10,11,12,14,18 honey 8,16 | asthma 3,5,8,10,11 coughs 3,8,12,14,18 sore throat 16 stomatitis 8 | s | coughs, respiratory diseases | [51,53,56,58,63,66,90] | s, i | prevention of colds, coughs, respiratory diseases | [6,67,75,84] | ||
| p 8 | thyroid glands 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | ch | gastric acid | [56,80] | d | digestive problems | [68] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | s | vitamin source | [77] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | - | arthritis | [75] | ||
| wood | - | - | - | - | - | externally | splints in case of bone fractures | [78] | |
| - | - | - | - | - | dry and ground | cambium as flour for bread (food) | [77] | ||
| Pinus nigra J. F. Arnold | cone | s 12 | colds 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| resin | p 5,11,12,14 | furuncles 12 warts 12 wounds 5,11,12,14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| decayed teeth 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |||
| - | - | - | - | - | ritual herb | evil forces, against bad dreams, for health of family members and animals | [75] | ||
| shoot | s 11,12 a 11 | colds 12 coughs 11,12 | - | - | - | i | inflammation of the respiratory system | [91] | |
| - | - | - | - | - | s | honey, food | [77,92] | ||
| needle | - | - | - | - | - | i, s | respiratory diseases | [91] | |
| Pinus sylvestris L. | cone | s 17 | colds 17 | s, a, d, d with rusty bacon | respiratory diseases | [52,53,55,58,61,63,66] | - | - | - |
| - | - | d | digestive problems | [53] | d | digestive problems | [66,68] | ||
| - | - | b | rheumatism | [52,61] | - | - | |||
| - | - | d | digestive problems and respiratory disease in animals | [66] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | loss of appetite of pig | [52,53,61] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | d | pyorrhoea | [83] | ||
| resin | p 11–13,17 | furuncles 12 warts 12 wounds 11,13,17 | with fat | furuncles, swelling, warts, wounds, | [53,54,57,62] | - | skin problems, wounds | [9,91,92,93] | |
| decayed teeth 12,17 | - | decayed teeth | [58,63] | - | teeth cleaning | [94] | |||
| - | - | - | rheumatism, impetigo | [95] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | o | insect repellent | [54] | - | - | - | ||
| a | tuberculosis | [96] | |||||||
| shoot | d 13,17 s 3,8,9,11–14 | asthma 3,11 coughs 3,8,9,11–14 colds 12,17 tracheitis 11 | d, s | respiratory diseases | [54,66] | i, d, s, in wine | respiratory diseases | [9,72,75,97] | |
| - | - | b | rheumatism | [54,66] | eo, i | rheumatism | [9] | ||
| - | - | b | insomnia | [54,66] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | b, eo | antimicrobial, antiseptic | [9] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | eo | aromatherapy | [9] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | in wine | analgesic, epilepsy, strokes | [72] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | - | hemorrhoids, dysentery, as a diuretic | [93] | ||
| bark | - | - | - | - | - | tonic or tar | dermatological problems | [9] | |
| needle | - | - | d | varicose veins | [95] | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | plaster | [89] | - | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | i, s | respiratory diseases | [5,91] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | s | rheumatism and gout | [5] | ||
| - | - | - | - | - | d | vitamin source | [9] | ||
Number superscripts refer to the studied villages: Aldea 1, Călugăreni 2, Chinușu 3, Cinod 4, Crăciunel 5, Egershec 6, Ghipeș 7, Lueta 8, Lunca de Jos 9, Lunca de Sus 10, Martiniş 11, Mereşti 12, Orășeni 13, Petreni 14, Porumbeşti 15, Rareș 16, Sânpaul 17, and Turulung 18. Abbreviations of preparations: a = alcoholic extract, as = ash, b = bath, c = compress, ch = chewing, d = decoction, eo = essential oil, i = infusion, j = jam, o = ointment, p = poultice, s = syrup, and to = topically.
Table 3.
Other uses of the pine species in Transylvania compared to literature data from the region and other European countries related to the Carpathian Basin.
Table 3.
Other uses of the pine species in Transylvania compared to literature data from the region and other European countries related to the Carpathian Basin.
| Species | Plant Part | Our Collected Data | Literature Data in Transylvania | Data from Other European Countries Related to the Carpathian Basin | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abies alba Mill. | bark | for shoe sole as tanning 14 | - | - | - | - |
| - | for holder of cottage cheese | [98] | - | - | ||
| resin | - | - | - | wrapped in bark for scented room | [71] | |
| shoot | Christmas tree 3,4,6,8,11,17,18 | Christmas tree | [56,58,82,99] | - | - | |
| - | for house of brides | [56,82] | - | - | ||
| - | maypole | [79] | - | - | ||
| - | symbol of a new house construction | [54] | - | - | ||
| - | part of traditional wedding ceremony | [54] | - | - | ||
| wood | - | tools | [53,63] | - | - | |
| Picea abies (L.) H. Karst. | bark | tanning 8 | tanning | [100] | - | - |
| - | dyeing | [101] | - | - | ||
| fodder for sheep | [82] | - | - | |||
| cone | - | dyeing | [100] | - | - | |
| needle | - | layered with hay as bed | [102] | - | - | |
| resin | epilation 8 | - | - | - | - | |
| homemade soap 8 | with fat for soap | [102] | - | - | ||
| rosining violin bows 8 | - | - | - | - | ||
| - | chewing gum | [82,102,103] | - | - | ||
| - | resin with splinters for fire | [103] | ||||
| - | - | - | smoked resin for bees as a sedative | [86] | ||
| shoot | Christmas tree 8,12,17 | Christmas tree | [52,61,102] | - | - | |
| food 11 | - | - | - | - | ||
| incense in church 12 | - | - | - | - | ||
| ornament for house of brides 5 | - | - | ornamental plant | [104] | ||
| - | fodder for sheep | [82] | fodder | [104] | ||
| - | - | - | ritual use | [104] | ||
| wood | tools 4,6 | tools | [58,63,82,102] | - | - | |
| furniture 14 | furniture | [53,56,105] | - | - | ||
| timber | [53,56,105] | - | - | |||
| firewood | [52,61,102] | - | - | |||
| Pinus nigra J. F. Arnold | bark | holder for cottage cheese 12 | - | - | - | - |
| cone | tinder 12 | - | - | - | - | |
| resin | adhesive, dye additive 12 | |||||
| shoot | Christmas tree 12 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | as flail for weaving loom | [106] | - | - | ||
| - | - | - | timber | [91] | ||
| wood | roof 14 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | - | - | firewood | [91] | ||
| Pinus sylvestris L. | bark | holder for cottage cheese 4,6,12 | - | - | - | - |
| cone | tinder 9,12 | - | - | - | - | |
| - | Christmas decoration | [107] | - | - | ||
| resin | rosining violin bows 2 | rosining violin bows | [108] | - | - | |
| - | smoke and crock of burn resin for black dye | [109] | - | - | ||
| shoot | Christmas tree 12 | - | - | ornamental plant | [104] | |
| needle | - | soap | [89] | - | - | |
| wood | - | furniture | [58,63,82] | - | - | |
| - | tools | [58,63,82] | tools | [105] | ||
| - | - | - | firewood | [91] | ||
| - | - | - | construction material, timber | [91,104] | ||
Number superscripts refere to the studied villages: Aldea 1, Călugăreni 2, Chinușu 3, Cinod 4, Crăciunel 5, Egershec 6, Ghipeș 7, Lueta 8, Lunca de Jos 9, Lunca de Sus 10, Martiniş 11, Mereşti 12, Orășeni 13, Petreni 14, Porumbeşti 15, Rareș 16, Sânpaul 17, and Turulung 18.
Table 4.
Data on the study area in Transylvania (Romania).
| Settlements | Latitude | Longitude | Altitude (m) | County | Informants/Inhabitants | Medical Service | Veterinary Practice | Pharmacy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aldea | 46°15′09″ | 25°26′06″ | 513 | Harghita | 15/362 | - | - | - |
| Călugăreni | 46°17′32″ | 25°24′04″ | 662 | Harghita | 15/52 | - | - | - |
| Chinușu | 46°15′34″ | 25°21′39″ | 588 | Harghita | 18/143 | - | - | - |
| Cinod | 46°18′14″ | 26°03′52″ | 980 | Harghita | 45/200 | - | - | - |
| Crăciunel | 46°11′00″ | 25°25′51″ | 530 | Harghita | 23/450 | - | - | - |
| Egershec | 46°18′13″ | 26°03′55″ | 980 | Harghita | 25/200 | - | - | - |
| Ghipeș | 46°15′52″ | 25°24′17″ | 576 | Harghita | 12/138 | - | - | - |
| Lueta | 46°16′27″ | 25°29′15″ | 610 | Harghita | 85/2900 | - | + | + |
| Lunca de Jos | 46°34′41″ | 25°59′43″ | 856 | Harghita | 32/1091 | + | + | + |
| Lunca de Sus | 46°31′44″ | 25°57′33″ | 908 | Harghita | 17/809 | + | + | + |
| Mărtiniș | 46°14′00″ | 25°23′00″ | 505 | Harghita | 21/570 | + | + | + |
| Mereşti | 46°13′59″ | 25°27′21″ | 558 | Harghita | 60/1319 | + | - | + |
| Orășeni | 46°09′50″ | 25°21′56″ | 490 | Harghita | 28/240 | - | - | - |
| Petreni | 46°10′37″ | 25°22′36″ | 490 | Harghita | 12/120 | - | - | - |
| Porumbești | 47°58′45′′ | 22°58′52′′ | 122 | Satu Mare | 12/1420 | + | - | + |
| Rareș | 46°12′27″ | 25°23′15″ | 490 | Harghita | 20/136 | - | - | - |
| Sânpaul | 46°11′29″ | 25°22′56″ | 490 | Harghita | 15/494 | - | - | - |
| Turulung | 47°55′00″ | 23°05′00″ | 132 | Satu Mare | 60/3500 | + | + | + |
Abbreviations: + available, - not available
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Papp, N.; Purger, D.; Czigle, S.; Czégényi, D.; Stranczinger, S.; Tóth, M.; Dénes, T.; Kocsis, M.; Takácsi-Nagy, A.; Filep, R. The Importance of Pine Species in the Ethnomedicine of Transylvania (Romania). Plants 2022, 11, 2331. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11182331
AMA Style
Papp N, Purger D, Czigle S, Czégényi D, Stranczinger S, Tóth M, Dénes T, Kocsis M, Takácsi-Nagy A, Filep R. The Importance of Pine Species in the Ethnomedicine of Transylvania (Romania). Plants. 2022; 11(18):2331. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11182331
Chicago/Turabian StylePapp, Nóra, Dragica Purger, Szilvia Czigle, Dóra Czégényi, Szilvia Stranczinger, Mónika Tóth, Tünde Dénes, Marianna Kocsis, Anna Takácsi-Nagy, and Rita Filep. 2022. "The Importance of Pine Species in the Ethnomedicine of Transylvania (Romania)" Plants 11, no. 18: 2331. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11182331
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
