Next Article in Journal
Impact of Downed Logs of Masson Pine (Pinus massoniana Lamb.) on Soil Microbial Community in a Climate Transitional Forest of Central China
Next Article in Special Issue
Research History of Forest Gap as Small-Scale Disturbances in Forest Ecosystems
Previous Article in Journal
Updating Ecology and Distribution of Wild Truffles in Morocco
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Afforestation of Land Abandoned by Farmers Poses Threat to Forest Sustainability Due to Heterobasidion spp.

1
Forest Protection Department, Forest Research Institute, Ul. Braci Leśnej 3, 05-090 Sękocin Stary, Poland
2
Ukrainian Research Institute of Forestry and Forest Melioration Named after G. M. Vysotsky, 61024 Kharkiv, Ukraine
3
Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2500 S. Pine Knoll Dr., Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA
4
Department of Entomology, Phytopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Pl. Łódzki 5, 10-727 Olsztyn, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2023, 14(5), 954; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14050954
Submission received: 4 April 2023 / Revised: 1 May 2023 / Accepted: 4 May 2023 / Published: 5 May 2023

Abstract

:
Heterobasidion annosum (Fr.) Bref. sensu lato (s.l.) is a dangerous forest pathogen causing root and butt rot disease in most conifers of the northern hemisphere. This pathogen is most widespread in the forests of Europe and North America. The economic impact on forestry related to tree mortality, reduction in timber yield, and wood rot is calculated in millions of dollars and euros. The genus Heterobasidion (Basidiomycota; Russulales) has been relatively recently separated into three genetically distinct groups (H. annosum, H. insulare and H. araucariae) comprising a total of 12 species and one newly described hybrid taxon. These species are the best studied in terms of the ecology, the physiology of control methods, and the tree’s resistance to the pathogen. The article gives an overview of the symptoms and the etiology of the disease and provides information on ways to recognize the disease and limit the economic damage.

1. Introduction

In Poland, as in many other European countries, the long-term use of land leads to its complete degradation—often to the point that agricultural production becomes unprofitable. These areas are abandoned by farmers, and they spontaneously become overgrown with pine and birch trees. When they are no longer suitable for growing agricultural crops, they are afforested.
The development of post-agricultural land through afforestation carries the risk that the first generation of trees will not live to be felled due to the threat of being affected by pathogenic fungi, the spores of which are widespread and cause primary infection when they attach to the stumps formed during the cultivation of the first thinning [1,2]. The most common species used for afforestation are Skots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) However, these species are susceptible to many fungal diseases under such conditions. H. annosum is listed among the causal factors damaging roots, especially in pine and spruce stands growing on former agricultural land. This is due to the different physicochemical and biological properties of soils that have been used for agriculture for many years compared to soils in forestry [3].
Many researchers [4,5] often point out that there is a fundamental difference in nutrient management between agricultural and forestry soils, including nutrient retention and storage. Soils formerly used for agriculture have no organic layer in which humus is formed, lack many elements such as magnesium, and are dominated by bacteria (no antagonistic or mycorrhizal fungi).
After World War II, about one million post-agricultural areas were afforested in Poland [6,7]. As a result, the first generation of coniferous stands becomes diseased, and numerous gaps appear at the age of about 40 years, forcing foresters to carry out clear-cutting and start forest regeneration all over again [2]. The damage occurs annually on an area of about 0.1 million ha. In pines, the damage affects the outer parts of the trunks (cambium), in spruces, it affects the middle part of the so-called heartwood. Currently, there are 9 million ha of forest, and forest cover is 30%, but there is an ambitious national afforestation plan to increase forest cover to 33% by 2050.
The most likely sites for afforestation are former agricultural areas where the root pathogen H. annosum has been able to thrive unhindered. Therefore, foresters need to detect diseases early in order to have enough time to develop an appropriate protection strategy.
Early warning (fungal detection) therefore helps foresters make appropriate decisions to counteract the progression of the disease. The situation is similar in other countries with a high proportion of state forests where coniferous stands have been planted on land formerly used for agriculture, e.g., Romania [8,9] or Bulgaria [10].
It is true that H. annosum also causes severe damage to spruce stands in private forests, as in France [11,12] or the northern hemisphere [13].
Among other things, this article explores the possibility of early detection of the pathogen, e.g., whether new tools such as an electronic “nose” that detects volatiles could be used. These chemicals can be produced by both the fungus and the plant, especially if they interact with the infection and infestation of the tissue. It is probably also possible to detect the smell of healthy or rotten wood. In addition, in the paper, the symptomatology and etiology of the pathogens causing root and stump rot were recalled as well as ways to control the disease in order to limit the economic damage.
In Figure 1, we present selected photos of fruiting bodies of H. annosum and pine trees affected by the pathogen.

2. Methods

In order to prepare a comprehensive overview of the concept of root and stump rot caused by H. annosum, we reviewed several published studies on the subject. The Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were queried in February 2023 to collect the relevant literature. The Google Scholar database allowed searches of articles in Ukrainian and Russian, which were not available in the Web of Science database. To exclude irrelevant literature, the search was limited to topics in forestry and plant pathology.
Different keywords were used, starting with the more general ones, e.g., “Heterobasidion”, resulting in a search with 1236 entries from 1970 to 2023. Later, different keywords were used: “Heterobasidion annosum”, “root rot”, and “conifer”, resulting in a database with 75 entries suitable for this topic and forming the basis for further searches.
The present review is based on a selection of articles from these results as well as on some papers further cited in the selected articles.
As an example of the growing interest in research on Heterobasidion, we show in Figure 2 the number of scientific publications indexed in the Scopus database.

3. Variety of Complexes Heterobasidion annosum

The H. annosum complex is a species comprising in North America two species [14] H. irregulare Garbel and Otrosina and H. occidentale Otrosina and Garbel, and in Eurasia three species [15]: H. abietinum Niemelä and Korhonen, H. annosum (Fr.) Bref. and H. parviporum Niemelä and Korhonen.
In North America, H. irregulare generally attacks pines and junipers (Juniperus spp.), while the host range of H. occidentale includes Abies, Picea, Tsuga, Pseudotsuga, Sequoia, and Sequoiadendron [15,16,17].
The H. annosum complex in Europe includes three intersterility groups that show different host preferences [18,19,20]. In general, the S group (H. parviporum Niemelä and Korhonen) is restricted to spruce (Picea abies L.) [21] and the F group (H. abietinum Niemelä and Korhonen) is restricted to silver fir (Abies alba Mill.). The P group (H. annosum sensu stricto (see above)) has a lower host specialization and mainly attacks pine but also spruce [22]. To a lesser extent, it also causes root rot on some deciduous trees: Quercus sp., Betula pendula, Fagus sylvatica, and Carpinus betulus [23,24].
Studies [25] on the replacement of conifers by deciduous trees (Betula spp.) have shown that H. annosum is able to persist for decades in the root systems of diseased trees and easily infect birch trees transplanted to infested areas. Root rot infections in Norway spruce (P. abies L.) planted on Heterobasidion-infested sites occur about 10 years after planting, and the proportion of infected spruce increases steadily with tree age [26].
Zaluma et al. [27] investigated the origin and mode of spread of root disease in P. contorta stands in the forest and agricultural areas. Trees with Heterobasidion symptoms were identified as H. parviporum and H. annosum, and P. contorta proved to be highly susceptible to both pathogens of tree death. H. annosum from Scots pine (P. sylvestris L.) stumps from the previous rotation period was successfully transferred to P. contorta, which means that the pathogen survived in pine stumps for at least 26 years. The pathogens formed spreading territorial clones and their basidiospores colonized P. contorta (primary infections), with H. parviporum spreading more slowly than H. annosum. In contrast, clones from stumps with established secondary infections spread more rapidly than from stumps with primary infections, making it important to protect stumps from infection.
Groups S and P have a wide distribution, while group F has been found in southern Europe, mainly in the Apennines of Italy [28]. North American pathogen H. irregulare infests pine plantations in Italy and hybridizes readily with the pathogenic native species [16,29,30]. Invasion can spread at an estimated rate of 1.3 km/year through invasion corridors formed by individual trees but not necessarily through larger patches of forest [31].
Spruce in Europe is infested by both the S- and P-types of H. anossum, although the S-type dominates in spruce forests in southern Finland and central Scandinavia [18,32,33]. In northern Europe, the basidiomycete H. annosum consists of two intersterility groups, S and P. A third intersterility group, F, has been reported from southern Europe [19]. H. annosum isolates were collected from spruce, pine and mixed stands in Belarus, Lithuania, and Estonia on forest and former agricultural soils. Intersterility groups of the isolates were identified. Pine was infested only by the P group and spruce mainly by the S group. The frequency of the P group on spruce was higher on old forest soils and in mixed spruce and pine stands [18]. The F-type of H. annosum mainly attacks firs and occurs in natural plantations in the Carpathians and Pricarpathians, but throughout western Poland, H. annosum occurs epiphytically in pine plantations, which is also the case in the flat regions of western Ukraine [34].
All three intersterility groups, P, S, and F, were identified [35] in populations of H. annosum in Bulgaria. The P group was isolated from P. sylvestris and P. nigra and occasionally from stumps of A. alba. The F group caused severe damage to A. alba, but it was not even found as saprotrophs on mixed pines. The S group was only found on P. abies. In western Turkey, Heterobasidion abietinum (group F) is relatively virulent on Abies trees [36].

4. Damage to Conifer Plantations by H. annosum

H. annosum causes considerable wood losses in Scots pine, with the disease being particularly destructive in young stands [37,38]. This pathogen may also be responsible for high seedling mortality in pines [1]. However, the susceptibility to H. annosum s.s. decreases with age, and at older ages, damage by this pathogen rarely leads to tree death [39]. Losses caused by the disease were lower in mixed stands than in pure stands [33].
As a result of secondary infection via root grafting, tree death caused by Heterobasidion occurs in groups called root disease centers, which expand over time. Studies [40] carried out in southern Germany have shown that the frequency of infected trees increases with age (0% in age class 1 (1–10 years), 7.5% in class 2 (11–20 years), 33.3% in class 3 (21–30 years)). The most destructive outbreaks of H. annosum s.s. are observed [37] in young (up to 40 years old) pine plantations established at high initial densities on former agricultural soils. The proportion of trees affected by the root fungus in a plantation can be as high as 20%–60% and the yield of commercial timber can drop to 40% [41].
Research [42] on the forests of Ukraine (1994–2009) reported that the area of pine plantations where various pathological processes were becoming more and more obvious covered about 100,000 ha, and one-third of them were affected by root rot in 2009.
In eastern Lithuania, the resistance of Scots pine to H. annosum (Fr.) Bref. s.s. and its transfer to forest regeneration were studied. These plots represented H. annosum disease foci in P. sylvestris L. stands that had been completely felled and replanted with Betula pendula Roth 25 years before this study. The research of Lygis et al. [25] showed that H. annosum can persist for decades in the root systems of diseased trees and easily infect birch replanted in infected areas.
With regard to the importance of this fungus as a pest, it should be mentioned that its extracts have been shown to have a potential anti-cancer effect. In this study, the apoptotic effect of H. annosum on colon cancer was confirmed in an in vivo model. The results obtained by Sadowska et al. [43] are novel and provide a basis for further studies on the anti-cancer effect of the extract of H. annosum, especially in relation to its interaction with anti-cancer chemotherapeutic agents.

5. Methods for the Determination of Heterobasidion annosum and Infected Trees in Mid-Root and Butt Rot Disease

Forest management promotes the spread of Heterobasidion spp. so that the increasing colonization of Norvay spruce should be taken into account in the management of commercial forests. Spruce colonized by Heterobasidion spp. lead to the formation of fruiting bodies, which increase the risk of reinfection by basidiospores and subsequent spread of Heterobasidion root rot to living trees. The most numerous fruiting bodies of Heterobasidion are found on infected spruce trunks standing on moist or peaty soil. Numerous fruiting bodies are also observed on abandoned agricultural land and pastures [44].
Assessing the presence of Heterobasidion root rot in pine or spruce forests is often difficult. Basidiocarps (fruiting bodies) found on tree stumps or in the root system are the most reliable signs of the presence of root rot [1,45]. However, they are rare on living trees and may also be sparse on dead trees, thus limiting the effectiveness of superficial examinations. In the absence of basidiocarps, the reliable identification of annosum root rot on a single tree may require the cultivation of the fungus from samples of infected wood [46].
The presence of root rot in pine or spruce plantations is often determined by the external characteristics of trees, but this method is not always accurate. Root rot, caused by the fungus H. annosum, damages both the below- and aboveground parts of trees. Symptoms include a change in the color of the needles, thinning or transparency of the crown, reduced shoot growth, resin secretion, and slight swelling of the stump [23,47].
Mykhaylichenko et al. [48] discovered that differences in the length and mass of needles were found in trees from the foci of the disease and the inter-focal zone. A change in biometric indicators of needles in trees with different degrees of disease development (appearance of foci, their development, and extinction) was also established. However, these signs are not specific to a particular disease but can be caused by various biotic and abiotic environmental influences. Using these secondary signs as diagnostic indicators requires knowing the underlying cause in a particular case. An incorrect diagnosis could result in inappropriate or ineffective treatment.
Given that the presence of forest tree pathogens can lead to significant problems, their early detection during seed storage or in nurseries can be crucial for choosing an appropriate management strategy. In response, additional research methods are constantly being developed to detect the disease in the early stages when symptoms are not yet externally visible. For example, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) can detect structural differences between healthy and diseased trees that are externally visible [47]. PICUS Sonic tomography is also used to detect stem rot [49].
A more specific technique currently being tested is the concept of an electronic “nose” consisting of a series of non-specific gas sensors equipped with machine algorithms for pattern recognition [50]. So far, it has been confirmed that the pathogen is not present in the soil at a distance of 0.5–1.5 m from infested tree trunks. This proves that secondary infection only occurs through contact between diseased and healthy roots and not through the development of hyphae in rotting woody debris in the soil. On the other hand, no difference could be detected between the smell of infested wood near fruiting bodies and wood above about 1.5 m. The smell of the resin as a peculiar background overlays other mycelium-specific smells, so that the latter are difficult to detect. Only when the fungus decomposes the wood does the background odor of the resin disappear. No differences were found between spruce and pine decay caused by the activity of H. annosum.
Since it is challenging to detect root rot at an early stage using the above methods, sensitive molecular methods for identifying pathogenic organisms, especially various modifications of PCR, are widely used. Genetic-molecular methods are not only used to identify pathogens but also to determine the geographical distribution of the H. annosum complex based on taxonomic and phylogenetic characteristics [51].
Since the middle of the last century, the presence of a fungal pathogen has traditionally been determined by culturing plant samples and then visually identifying the fungi. The disadvantages of this approach are the time required to grow fungal cultures, the possibility that not all fungi can be cultured, and the difficulty in distinguishing fungi morphologically. More recently, PCR-based methods have been developed for the identification of all fungi present in a sample using universal primers [52,53]. With the development of next-generation sequencing (NGS), the genomes of H. irregulare and H. annosum have already been sequenced [54,55]. A computer program, Rotstand, has been developed to simulate the development of a forest stand together with root rot disease caused by s.l. on several tree species in Europe [56].

6. Bio-Ecological Characteristics of the Causal Agent of Root and Butt Rot and the Disease Process

Massive damage to pines and other conifers by root and butt rot is more common on agriculturally abandoned land and rehabilitated soils, but disease foci can also occur on forestland [15]. Sites with high water tables are not conducive to the spread of pathogens [23], and the risk of disease development on dry and poor soils is low.
To understand the reasons for the wide geographical and ecological spectrum of root disease, it is also necessary to take into consideration features such as peculiarities of the biology of the fungus and a variety of infection routes. For example, many specific enzymes enable Heterobasidion spp. to infect different wood species, destroying stable substances such as lignin, cellulose, terpenes, resins, phenolic compounds, and others [57].
This pathogen spreads both by conidiospores and basidiospores, but primary infection is mediated by basidiospores infecting fresh stump surfaces or wounds on the roots or stems [58,59]. Heterobasidion species produce basidiospores that infect freshly cut stumps and colonize, establish, and further infect healthy trees through root interactions [23,60]. The conidiospores of H. annosum can be released into the air by wind gusts associated with high humidity or fog, so conidia may play a role in aerial dispersal. However, this mode of dispersion is considered to be much less important compared to basidiospores [61].
H. annosum s.l. is not able to grow freely in the soil; therefore, the principal mode of spread belowground is via the mycelia. Direct root contact between trees or between stumps and trees is essential for the occurrence of secondary infections [62]. Although this secondary spread is common with H. annosum s.l., it spreads mainly via the primary infection of wounds and other openings in the bark, and vegetative spread is not as epidemiologically relevant as with other root disease fungi, such as Armillaria spp. [63,64].
In many coniferous forests, the rate of spread depends largely on the stand structure and composition, stand history, and soil properties including pH [65]. The rate of spread of H. annosum varies depending on the trees’ vitality and the moisture content of the wood. The average growth rate was 25 cm/year in stump roots and 9 cm yr-1 in tree roots, neither of which differed significantly between forest (spruce stands) and arable land, ref. [66] and 29 to 40 cm/year in spruce trunks [67]. Temperatures between +5 and +35 °C are optimal for fungus development [68].
The symptoms caused by Heterobasidion root rot, such as resin discharge and crown decay, are not particularly unique and cannot be distinguished from those caused by other root pathogens. The initial growth of the pathogen in the wood causes discoloration, which varies depending on the host tree species. The initial rot is usually pale yellow and develops into a light brown rot, which in the advanced stage becomes a white pocket rot with black spots [23].
The spread of Heterobasidion root rot on peat soils is a new study by Gaitnieks et al. [69,70]. The authors investigated the effects of root colonization of Norway spruce by H. annosum on peat soils and showed that despite a reduction in the growth performance of the trees and an altered supply of photosynthetic products to the roots as a result of root rot infestation, there were no changes in the fungal communities inhabiting the roots of the infested trees.

7. Measures to Protect Plantations from Heterobasidion spp.

Current strategies to control Heterobasidion root rot include silvicultural, chemical, and biological methods. Since the rot occurs inside the tree, measures to control root rot at this stage are not possible; therefore, the focus must be on preventive measures to contain the spread of the disease and significantly minimize economic losses. Such measures aim to prevent H. annosum from depositing, germinating, and multiplying through basidiospores [23].
Silvicultural measures to protect conifers from root rot include sanitary cutting, which should be carried out in winter [71]. Stump removal and the careful removal of all roots is an effective control strategy against Heterobasidion root and butt rot [72,73]. However, it is an expensive and time-consuming control method that requires the use of machinery and is therefore not practical for most forest stands.
In addition to removing stumps and roots to control Heterobasidion [74], the digging of trenches to sever root connections is a technique used to control oak wilt (Ceratocystis fagacearum (Bretz) Hunt) in urban environments [75]. This procedure is called the “artificial gap method” and seems to be an effective prophylactic measure. However, it is also expensive and labor-intensive, and it is only recommended for high-value trees in residential neighborhoods.
It is significant to note that losses caused by the disease are lower in mixed stands than in pure stands [76]. Moreover, by choosing appropriate planting (preferably wide spacing) and mixtures (avoiding monocultures of susceptible species), thinning can be delayed, and a better yield can be achieved than in pure stands [37].
Chemical control methods include the application of fertilizers and the use of fungicides. The effect of nutrients on the incidence of H. annosum root rot was variable [77], with studies finding that the use of compound fertilizers (N, P, K) increased the resistance of pine to H. annosum [78,79]. To suppress infection in active disease foci, fungicidal preparations (Benomil) have been tested. Studies of Vasiliauskas et al. [80] have shown that the use of these agents has a positive effect at specific concentrations.
Protecting tree stumps from infection by airborne spores is one of the most important control strategies. Stumps remain susceptible to infection for varying lengths of time depending on the season, location, and host, with susceptibility rarely lasting longer than a month due to changes in nutrient chemistry on the tops of stumps and competition from other microorganisms [58].
A large number of chemicals have been tested as stump protectants over the last 50 to 60 years. The use of copper sulfate, ferrous sulfate, ground sulfur, and urea proved ineffective; preparations based on these elements suppressed the vital activity of beneficial microflora and reduced the resistance in pines [79].
Of the chemical agents, urea and borate are the most commonly used in practice and have the best effect [23,81]. The results of the investigations indicate that urea per se is not toxic to H. annosum, not even in the concentrations achieved by treatment with quantities intended for practical use. Hydrolysis of the urea produces ammonia, which raises the pH at the surface of the stump to a range toxic to H. annosum, so that the spores cannot germinate and the mycelium cannot survive [82,83]. An important side effect is that borate and urea solutions cause severe damage to common terrestrial vegetation species [82]. Processing also causes temporary changes in the chemical composition of the soil.
Organisms (fungi, bacteria) with antagonistic properties are often used as biological control agents (BCAs) to control Heterobasidion spp. The colonization of fresh tree stumps with root fungal antagonists is a preventive measure that has been used successfully in many countries around the world [84]. One of the best studied biological protective agents against root fungi is the fungus Peniophora gigantea (Fr.) [84,85,86]. Commercial preparations containing P. gigantea spores have been used throughout Europe.
The hyphae of P. gigantea oppose the hyphae of Heterobasidion spp. on contact. This phenomenon is called hyphal interference. When the hyphae of these fungi come into contact, the Heterobasidion hyphae are rapidly destroyed locally [87].
The effectiveness of inoculation of P. gigantea in pine stands is determined by the age of the plantation and the severity of the disease. Preventive measures implemented in young stands during the first thinning can significantly reduce the risk of spreading the disease throughout the plantations [2].
Studies [88] on commercial preparations (Rotstop®, PgIBL®) containing P. gigantea spores demonstrate the efficacy of their application in pine plantations against Heterobasidion conidiospore and basidiospore infection in spruce wood.
Latvian studies by Zaluma et al. [89] performed on former agricultural lands have shown that colonization rates of tree stumps by Heterobasidion spp. treated with the native strain of P. gigantea or with Rotstop® or urea were similar, especially when the stumps were not covered. However, covering the stumps with moss favored colonization by the Latvian strain of P. gigantea and Rotstop®, resulting in a significantly lower relative area colonized by Heterobasidion spp. Covering tree stumps seems to limit Heterobasidion colonization and may be a practical solution for forest owners if applied on a small scale. However, they should also consider applying Rotstop® without covering the stumps.
While the use of P. gigantea has been established in European forest practice, other wood-destroying fungi still require more detailed investigation for their antagonistic effect against Heterobasidion spp., such as Trichaptum abietinum, Dichomitus squalens, Diplomitoporus flavescens, Hirshioporus abietinus, fungi of Trametes spp. [90,91,92,93], Bjerkandera adusta (Polyporales, Coriolaceae) [94,95], Fomitopsis pinicola [96], Resinicium bicolor [96]. Ascomycetes such as Trichoderma spp. have antagonistic properties toward H. annosum [97,98].
Piri et al. [99] tested the effects of P. gigantea and urea in Scots pine and Norway spruce stands after silvicultural treatments (thinning, topping, clearcutting) on drained peatlands in Central Finland. The effectiveness of urea was higher (average 85.8 and 99.5, respectively), while the effectiveness of P. gigantea was very different for both tree species and ranged from full protection to negative control.
In addition to fungi, bacteria of the genus Bacillus have been found to be antagonistic to Heterobasidion spp. [100,101,102].
Raffa et al. [103] have proposed and implemented several approaches to risk assessment for the management of preventive measures aimed at preventing the spread of infectious pathogenic species.
The control methods outlined above vary in their effectiveness and longevity of effect, depending upon the vigor of the trees and the vigor of the pathogen. Therefore, the protection of forest plantations against diseases should not be considered as a temporary measure but rather as a complex of long-term measures aimed at increasing the sustainability of the forest.

8. Selection of Trees Resistant to H. annosum

Scots pine L., Norway spruce and other conifers are the economically most important tree species in Europe. However, they are very susceptible to the root rot fungus H. annosum. Climate change will favor the pathogen as the tree host is weakened by e.g., prolonged drought [104].
Breeding can improve forest health, and several genetic markers for root rot are proposed to improve resistance in these species [22,105,106,107,108]. In the study [105], the resistance (defined here as necrosis length) of spruce families and genotypes to two strains of H. parviporum was compared under different water availability. The results showed that family and genotype within the family influenced necrosis length, which was related to the aggressiveness of the fungal strains. Under low water conditions, necrosis increased only in the horizontal direction in the phloem and sapwood. Growth (seedling height) was also not affected by abiotic stress (less water), indicating that the stress level (drought) was too low in this situation. The knowledge gained in this study could improve forest health under climate change by understanding the response of spruce to pathogenic attacks under additional stress at the family level. This knowledge could be used strategically in forest breeding to improve spruce resistance to root rot.
Similar results were obtained by Terhonen et al. [85], who conducted inoculation studies on three-year-old seedlings in a greenhouse. The seedlings were treated as high or low water level groups: The high water level group received double the amount of water of the low water level group. Necrosis observed after pathogen inoculation was measured and analyzed. Seedling growth was negatively affected in the lower water group. In addition, water availability increased the necrosis length of H. parviporum in phloem and sapwood (vertical length) in the low water group. H. annosum benefited only in horizontal length in the phloem. Disturbances related to water availability, especially at low water levels, could have a negative impact on the tree host and favor the infectivity of the pathogens in the host.
Despite 200 years of experience in studying the problem of the spread of the root fungus in coniferous forests, the mechanisms of resistance of pine to damage by the pathogen have not yet been completely explained [41].
In southern Sweden, deep stem inoculations with H. annosum were carried out on 34 clones (five to nine ramets) in a 17-year-old spruce field trial by Swedjemark et al. [109]. A hole (one-third of the boot diameter) was drilled and filled with H. annosum infected sawdust. Eight months later, the trees were felled and the trunks were cut into 5 cm thick slices, 2 m above the inoculum point. The slices were examined for the presence of the conidia stage of H. annosum, and the length of the lesion in the inner bark was measured. The infection success was 98.4%. The linear extension of the colonized xylem was large (140 cm on average), and in 32% of the trees, the extension of the fungus was longer than the collected stem (>2 m). Fungal expansion varied significantly between clones with heritability in the broader sense (H 2) being 0.18. A significant positive phenotypic and genotypic correlation was found between tree size and fungal growth. There was no significant genotypic correlation between fungal growth and the length of lesions in the inner bark.
Early diagnosis of the disease is complicated, because external signs appear rather late, the fungus is characterized by weak pathogenicity aboveground, and it mainly attacks the roots. The complex of infection control measures includes various methods to increase the ecological stability of the stands and measures to prevent the development of the disease. The selection of tree species plays an important role. By selecting stable forms, ecotypes, and elite trees in nature, managers can emphasize both high productivity and resistance to diseases, pests, and unfavorable climatic factors under local ecological conditions. These resistant trees can then produce seed material for future afforestation.
Little is known, however, about whether homokaryons of H. parviporum can infect trees under field conditions. In the study by Kerio et al. [110], 40-year-old clonal spruce stems and roots were inoculated with a homokaryotic isolate of H. parviporum under field conditions. After four months, the frequency of infection and the length of necrotic lesions were recorded. Among the spruce genotypes studied, a Russian clone had the smallest necrotic lesions, while a Finnish clone developed the largest necrotic lesions. Clones with higher growth rates were more susceptible to fungal infection and wound damage. On microscopic observation, H. parviporum grew on the cell walls of the lumen, colonized the tracheids adjacent to the rays, and induced lignification of the cell walls near the site of inoculation.
Resistant forms can be propagated both vegetatively and by seed, which makes it possible to enhance the most positive characteristics of the plants. Research [111] found that only 30%–40% of the selected trees confirm their elite traits in the seed progeny. Similar results [22,112] suggest that the strategy of mass selection of trees in affected areas to obtain seed material will not create future forests resistant to disease or other biotic disturbances.
In separate centers of drying plantations affected by the H. annosum, there are viable trees without external signs of damage next to the obviously infected trees. Such trees that maintain a satisfactory condition for a long time despite a high level of infection and do not show external signs of the disease are called “conditionally resistant” [41,113,114]. The proportion of trees falling into this “conditionally stable” category in the plantations is usually small. The increased resistance of such trees appears to be related to the morphological and anatomical structure of the roots and trunk [106], metabolic properties [22,107], and physiological properties [115].
Several researchers [39,116] established that the progeny of trees from old disease foci is characterized by genetically determined resistance to damage by Heterobasidion spp. A comparison of pine seedlings grown from the seeds of “conditionally resistant” trees with seedlings from elite seeds collected in the clonal seed orchards (CSOs) shows better (2 times higher) survival of the former [117]. The effectiveness of using seeds from trees with increased resistance to root fungal damage in silviculture is discussed in the work of many scientists [22,112].
However, selecting trees with increased resistance to damage by Heterobasidion spp. before the appearance of the first disease symptoms is complicated by the lack of simple and effective diagnostic methods. Such methods, ranging from visual assessment to modern molecular genetic methods [118,119], vary in their performance and usually trade simplicity and speed for accuracy. At the same time, a large number of researchers usually employ criteria that only indicate the actual spread of infection in the plantation or the degree of virulence of the pathogen [108,120]. Techniques using signs that indirectly indicate the potential resistance of trees to a particular disease are practically non-existent.
In Europe, researchers have focused on studying the genetic basis of resistance. In Ukraine, the diagnosis of pine resistance based on allozyme loci of genotype frequencies often found in pathogen-resistant trees was developed and patented [121]. The author found that increased heterozygosity for the entire set of loci is not a determining factor for the resistance of pines to root fungi. Instead, trees with increased resistance are characterized by lower genetic diversity than natural populations but have values of average heterozygosity that are close to them.
Studies of genotypic differences between families of pine half-sibs [22,122] suggest that the resistance of individual half-sibs is based on a combination of enhanced constitutive and induced mechanisms of phenolic protection. Despite the high informative value of biochemical traits, their use for diagnosis is hampered by the high variability of indicators and the difficulty of determination, and the results obtained are often contradictory.
The studies [123,124] of resin productivity, considered a genetically inherited trait, and its positive role in ensuring the resistance of pine to root fungi has been extensively reviewed. Researchers believe resin productivity can be used as a positive biochemical marker for diagnosing the resistance of Scots pine to damage by the root fungus. The indicator of inherited resin productivity determined by resin yield is greater in seed progeny than in clones (51% and 79%, respectively) [125,126]. In Ukraine, scientists developed and patented a method for diagnosing and selecting trees with increased resistance based on the ratio of the content of resinous substances in the fruiting tissue [127].
Methods based on the determination of bioelectric potentials (BEP), impedance of the cambial complex, and temperature parameters of tree trunks are also used to diagnose the physiological state of conifers in the natural environment. The parameters of bioelectric potentials (bioelectric potential, moisture of needles and shoots, speed of water flow, osmotic potential, impedance of the cambial complex of tissues, stem temperature) can be meaningful indicators for determining the degree of stability of trees in a plantation. Using these traits even allows an early diagnosis of trees regarding their stability and productivity [128,129].
Anatomical and cytological studies have confirmed the advantages of “conditionally stable” trees over “diseased” trees [106,130]. Cytological studies showed the stability of mitotic activity in seedlings grown from the seeds of “conditionally stable” trees and confirmed their greater survival [111,131]. Studies show a positive role for latewood stability in the radial growth of trees. At an early age (up to 20 years), trees susceptible to the disease are characterized by a greater rate of growth in diameter and height in contrast to resistant trees [106].
Poplavskaya and Rebko [132] found that trees with increased resistance fructify better in the centers of desiccation, have a higher proportion of female reproductive organs, and are characterized by broadly shaped cones with a predominance of pyramidal and hooked apophyses. The studies did not confirm the relationship between cones and seeds’ shape and pine’s resistance to the root fungus [133]. Seedlings grown from black and brown seeds are better maintained and more adaptable [134]. Morphological methods for evaluating trees based on characteristics of the generative sphere proved to be insufficiently reliable, since phenotypic characteristics vary considerably due to self-regulatory processes and under the influence of environmental conditions. The use of a complex of genetic and morphological markers for conifer resistance to Heterobasidion spp. could allow a clearer identification of resistant genotypes and their degree of disease susceptibility [108,135].
Researchers in Ukraine [114,133] proposed using several traits that indicate increased resistance in addition to control traits and health status traits when assessing trees for resistance to root rot. Such signs include peculiarities in the development of the conductive system of the needles, the intensity of the accumulation of layers of latewood in the radial growth of the trees, and the release of resin after the micro wounding of the trunk. In Lithuania, researchers have proposed using a “stability index” to predict the overall stability of plantations [108]. This index derives from the ratio between living and infested trees in the plantation, taking into account the distance between the infested tree and the center of the cell.

9. Conclusions

  • The selection of trees in disease centers is one of the most effective selection methods, as “conditionally resistant” trees are a product of natural selection. The initial growth of the pathogen in the wood causes discoloration that varies according to the host tree species. The initial rot is usually pale yellow and develops into a light brown rot, which in the advanced stage becomes a white pocket rot with black spots.
  • An effective approach to increase the biological resistance of forests is to select trees resistant to Heterobasidion spp. based on a wide range of their natural variability in resistance to pathogen damage. The use of a complex of genetic and morphological markers for conifer resistance to Heterobasidion spp. could allow a clearer identification of resistant genotypes and their degree of disease susceptibility.
  • Researchers recommend using high-quality and root rot-resistant planting material to reduce the spread of the root fungus in conifer plantations. However, given the cost and unreliability of more technical methods of assessing tree resistance to pathogens, scientists are better served by focusing on commonly accepted practices such as testing several generations of plants, selection, and controlled crossing to achieve their goals.
  • Recently, PCR-based methods have been developed to identify all fungi present in a sample using universal primers. With the development of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), the genomes of H. irregulare and H. annosum have already been sequenced.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.O., V.D. and P.B.; methodology, O.K. and V.D.; software, P.B.; validation, P.B., S.Ś. and A.O.; formal analysis, P.B., S.Ś. and A.O.; investigation, O.K. and V.D.; resources, T.O.; data curation P.B.; writing—original draft preparation, T.O., O.K. and V.D.; writing—review and editing, T.O., P.B. and W.K.M.; visualization, P.B.; supervision, T.O.; project administration, T.O.; funding acquisition, T.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially supported by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. The results presented in this paper were obtained as part of a comprehensive study 410 financed by the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn (grant No. 30.610.009.110).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Artur Rutkiewicz and Cynthia F. Moser for their help in revising the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The findings and conclusions in this publication are those of the authors and should not be construed to represent any official USDA or U.S. Government determination or policy. This publication reports research involving pesticides. It does not contain recommendations for their use, nor does it imply that the uses discussed here have been registered. All uses of pesticides must be registered by appropriate State and/or Federal agencies before they can be recommended. CAUTION: Pesticides can be injurious to humans, domestic animals, desirable plants, and fish or other wildlife—if they are not handled or applied properly. Use all pesticides selectively and carefully. Follow recommended practices for the disposal of surplus pesticides and pesticide containers.

References

  1. Piri, T.; Vainio, E.J.; Nuorteva, H.; Hantula, J. High seedling mortality of Scots pine caused by Heterobasidion annosum ss. Forests 2021, 12, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sierota, Z. Heterobasidion root rot in forests on former agricultural lands in Poland: Scale of threat and prevention. Sci. Res. Essays 2013, 8, 2298–2305. [Google Scholar]
  3. Stirling, G.; Hayden, H.; Pattison, T.; Stirling, M. Soil Health, Soil Biology, Soilborne Diseases and Sustainable Agriculture: A Guide; Csiro Publishing: Clayton, Australia, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  4. Schoenholtz, S.H.; Van Miegroet, H.; Burger, J. A review of chemical and physical properties as indicators of forest soil quality: Challenges and opportunities. For. Ecol. Manag. 2000, 138, 335–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Larson, W.E.; Pierce, F.J. The Dynamics of Soil Quality as a Measure of Sustainable Management; SSSA Special Publications; Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy: Madison, WI, USA, 2015; pp. 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sewerniak, P. Survey of some attributes of post-agricultural lands in Polish State Forests. Ecol. Quest. 2016, 22, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Smykala, J. Historia, rozmiar i rozmieszczenie zalesień gruntów porolnych w Polsce w latach 1945–1987. Sylwan 1990, 134, 03-12. [Google Scholar]
  8. Maňkovská, B.; Godzik, B.; Badea, O.; Shparyk, Y.; Moravcik, P. Chemical and morphological characteristics of key tree species of the Carpathian Mountains. Environ. Pollut. 2004, 130, 41–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Crișan, V.E.; Dincă, L.C.; Oneț, A.; Bragă, C.I.; Enescu, R.E.; Teușdea, A.C.; Oneț, C. Impact of Windthrows Disturbance on Chemical and Biological Properties of the Soils from Romania. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. (EEMJ) 2021, 20, 1163–1172. [Google Scholar]
  10. Dimitrov, S.; Georgiev, G.; Mirchev, P.; Georgieva, M.; Iliev, M.; Doychev, D.; Bencheva, S.; Zaemdzhikova, G.; Zaphirov, N. Integrated model of application of remote sensing and field investigations for sanitary status assessment of forest stands in two reserves in West Balkan Range, Bulgaria. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2019), Paphos, Cyprus, 18–21 March 2019; SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2019; Volume 11174, pp. 18–30. [Google Scholar]
  11. Estivalet, D.; Perrin, R.; Le Tacon, F. Investigations on the telluric microbiological features of forest dieback in Vosges. In Proceedings of the Air Pollution and Ecosystems, Grenoble, France, 18–22 May 1987; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1988; pp. 852–858. [Google Scholar]
  12. Estivalet, D. Contribution à l’étude du dépérissement des forêts: Mise en évidence du rôle de la microflore tellurique sur le jaunissement de l’Epicea commun (Picea abies KARST) [Contribution of the Study about the Decline of the Forests: Evidence of the Role of Soil Microflora on the Yellowing of Spruce]. Ph.D. Thesis, ANRT, Paris, Fance, 1989. (In French). [Google Scholar]
  13. Alriksson, A.; Olsson, M. Soil changes in different age classes of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) on afforested farmland. Plant Soil 1995, 168, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Otrosina, W.J.; Garbelotto, M. Heterobasidion occidentale sp. nov. and Heterobasidion irregulare nom. nov.: A disposition of North American Heterobasidion biological species. Fungal Biol. 2010, 114, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Garbelotto, M.; Gonthier, P. Biology, epidemiology, and control of Heterobasidion species worldwide. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2013, 51, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Garbelotto, M.; Guglielmo, F.; Mascheretti, S.; Croucher, P.; Gonthier, P. Population genetic analyses provide insights on the introduction pathway and spread patterns of the North American forest pathogen Heterobasidion irregulare in Italy. Mol. Ecol. 2013, 22, 4855–4869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Garbelotto, M.; Friedman, M.; Bedell, W.; Henkel, T. First report of Heterobasidion occidentale on Sequoia sempervirens in Northern California. Plant Dis. 2017, 101, 2152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Korhonen, K. Intersterility groups of Heterobasidion annosum. Metsäntutkimuslaitos Commun. Inst. Forest. Fenn 1978, 94, 6. [Google Scholar]
  19. Capretti, P.; Korhonen, K.; Mugnai, L.; Romagnoli, C. An intersterility group of Heterobasidion annosum specialized to Abies alba. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 1990, 20, 231–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stenlid, J.; Karlsson, J.O. Partial intersterility in Heterobasidion annosum. Mycol. Res. 1991, 95, 1153–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Klavina, D.; Bruna, L.; Zaluma, A.; Burnevica, N.; Polmanis, K.; Gaitnieks, T.; Piri, T. Infection and spread of root rot caused by Heterobasidion parviporum in Picea abies stands after thinning: Case studies on former pasture and meadow lands. Forests 2021, 12, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marčiulynas, A.; Sirgedaitė-Šėžienė, V.; Žemaitis, P.; Baliuckas, V. The resistance of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) half-sib families to Heterobasidion annosum. Forests 2019, 10, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Asiegbu, F.O.; Adomas, A.; Stenlid, J. Conifer root and butt rot caused by Heterobasidion annosum (Fr.) Bref. sl. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2005, 6, 395–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Łakomy, P.; Werner, A. Distribution of Heterobasidion annosum intersterility groups in Poland. For. Pathol. 2003, 33, 105–112. [Google Scholar]
  25. Lygis, V.; Vasiliauskas, R.; Stenlid, J. Planting Betula pendula on pine sites infested by Heterobasidion annosum: Disease transfer, silvicultural evaluation, and community of wood-inhabiting fungi. Can. J. For. Res. 2004, 34, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Piri, T. Early development of root rot in young Norway spruce planted on sites infected by Heterobasidion in southern Finland. Can. J. For. Res. 2003, 33, 604–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zaļuma, A.; Muižnieks, I.; Gaitnieks, T.; Burņeviča, N.; Jansons, Ā.; Jansons, J.; Stenlid, J.; Vasaitis, R. Infection and spread of root rot caused by Heterobasidion spp. in Pinus contorta plantations in Northern Europe: Three case studies. Can. J. For. Res. 2019, 48, 969–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Puddu, A.; Luisi, N.; Capretti, P.; Santini, A. Environmental factors related to damage by Heterobasidion abietinum in Abies alba forests in Southern Italy. For. Ecol. Manag. 2003, 180, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Scirè, M.; D’amico, L.; Motta, E.; Annesi, T. North American P type of Heterobasidion annosum shows pathogenicity towards Pinus halepensis in Italy. For. Pathol. 2008, 38, 299–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Giordano, L.; Gonthier, P.; Lione, G.; Capretti, P.; Garbelotto, M. The saprobic and ruiting abilities of the exotic forest pathogen Heterobasidion irregulare may explain its invasiveness. Biol. Invasions 2014, 16, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gonthier, P.; Nicolotti, G.; Linzer, R.; Guglielmo, F.; Garbelotto, M. Invasion of European pine stands by a North American forest pathogen and its hybridization with a native interfertile taxon. Mol. Ecol. 2007, 16, 1389–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stenlid, J.; Swedjemark, G. Differential growth of S-and P-isolates of Heterobasidion annosum in Picea abies and Pinus sylvestris. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 1988, 90, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Piri, T.; Korhonen, K.; Sairanen, A. Occurrence of Heterobasidion annosum in pure and mixed spruce stands in southern Finland. Scand. J. For. Res. 1990, 5, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sukhomlyn, M. Distributio of Heterobasidion annosum in Ukraine. In Methodology of Forest Insect and Disease Survey in Central Europe, Proceedings of the Second Workshop of the IUFRO Working Party 7.03. 10, Sion, Switzerland, 20–23 April 1999; Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research: Sion, Switzerland, 1999; Volume 2, p. 211. [Google Scholar]
  35. Porta, N.; Apostolov, K.; Korhonen, K. Intersterility groups of Heterobasidion annosum and their host specificity in Bulgaria. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 1998, 28, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Doğmuş-Lehtijärvi, H.; Lehtijärvi, A.; Korhonen, K. Heterobasidion abietinum on Abies species in western Turkey. For. Pathol. 2006, 36, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lygis, V.; Vasiliauskas, R.; Stenlid, J.; Vasiliauskas, A. Silvicultural and pathological evaluation of Scots pine afforestations mixed with deciduous trees to reduce the infections by Heterobasidion annosum ss. For. Ecol. Manag. 2004, 201, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ronnberg, J.; Vollbrecht, G.; Thomsen, I.M. Incidence of butt rot in a tree species experiment in northern Denmark. Scand. J. For. Res. 1999, 14, 234–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Swedjemark, G.; Stenlid, J.; Karlsson, B. Genetic variation among clones of Picea abies in resistance to growth of Heterobasidion annosum. Silvae Genet. 1998, 46, 369–373. [Google Scholar]
  40. Rieger, S. Infection of Norway spruce (Picea abies) by Heterobasidion annosum in relation to tree age. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 1995, 25, 357–365. [Google Scholar]
  41. Negrutskiy, S.F. Kornevaya gubka [Pine Fungus]. Agropromizdat 1973, 200, 196. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  42. Ustskiy, I.; Mikhailichenko, O. Dynamika patolohichnykh protsesiv u lisakh Kharkivskoi oblasti za period 1992–2012. [Dynamics of pathologicalprocesses in forests of Kharkiv region for the period of 1992–2012]. For. For. Melior. 2018, 133, 149–156. (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
  43. Sadowska, A.; Sawicka, D.; Godlewska, K.; Guzińska-Ustymowicz, K.; Zapora, E.; Sokołowska, E.; Car, H. Beneficial Proapoptotic Effect of Heterobasidion Annosum Extract in Colorectal Cancer Xenograft Mouse Model. Molecules 2023, 28, 1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gaitnieks, T.; Bruna, L.; Zaluma, A.; Burnevica, N.; Klavina, D.; Legzdina, L.; Jansons, J.; Piri, T. Development of Heterobasidion spp. fruit bodies on decayed Piecea abies. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 482, 118835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ihrmark, K.; Stenström, E.; Stenlid, J. Double-stranded RNA transmission through basidiospores of Heterobasidion annosum. Mycol. Res. 2004, 108, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kurkela, T. Crown condition as an indicator of the incidence of root rot caused by Heterobasidion annosum in Scots pine stands. Silva Fenn. 2002, 36, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Pitkänen, T.P.; Piri, T.; Lehtonen, A.; Peltoniemi, M. Detecting structural changes induced by Heterobasidion root rot on Scots pines using terrestrial laser scanning. For. Ecol. Manag. 2021, 492, 119239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mykhaylichenko, O. Zmina biometrychnykh pokaznykiv khvoyi sosny zvychaynoyi v oseredkakh korenevoyi hubky. [Biometrical indices variation for scots pine needles in annosum root rot foci]. For. For. Melior. 2015, 127, 187–192. (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
  49. Szczepkowski, A.; Kowalczuk, W.; Sikora, K.; Damszel, M.; Sierota, Z. Fungi Occurring in Norway Spruce Wood Decayed by Heterobasidion parviporum in Puszcza Borecka Stands (Northeastern Poland). Forests 2022, 13, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Oszako, T.; Borowik, P.; Tarakowski, R.; Ślusarski, S.; Tkaczyk, M.; Wacławik, P.; Nowakowska, J.A. Application of a Low-Cost Electronic Nose for the Detection of Forest Tree Pathogens. Eng. Proc. 2022, 21, 19. [Google Scholar]
  51. Johannesson, H.; Stenlid, J. Molecular markers reveal genetic isolation and phylogeography of the S and F intersterility groups of the wood-decay fungus Heterobasidion annosum. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2003, 29, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Krüger, M.; Stockinger, H.; Krüger, C.; Schüßler, A. DNA-based species level detection of Glomeromycota: One PCR primer set for all arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 2009, 183, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Meyer, W.; Irinyi, L.; Hoang, M.T.V.; Robert, V.; Garcia-Hermoso, D.; Desnos-Ollivier, M.; Yurayart, C.; Tsang, C.C.; Lee, C.Y.; Woo, P.C.; et al. Database establishment for the secondary fungal DNA barcode translational elongation factor 1α (TEF1α). Genome 2019, 62, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sillo, F.; Garbelotto, M.; Friedman, M.; Gonthier, P. Comparative genomics of sibling fungal pathogenic taxa identifies adaptive evolution without divergence in pathogenicity genes or genomic structure. Genome Biol. Evol. 2015, 7, 3190–3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Choi, J.; Lee, G.W.; Kim, K.T.; Jeon, J.; Détry, N.; Kuo, H.C.; Sun, H.; Asiegbu, F.O.; Lee, Y.H. Comparative analysis of genome sequences of the conifer tree pathogen, Heterobasidion annosum ss. Genom. Data 2017, 14, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Oliva, J.; Stenlid, J. Validation of the Rotstand model for simulating Heterobasidion annosum root rot in Picea abies stands. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 261, 1841–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kuo, H.C.; Détry, N.; Choi, J.; Lee, Y.H. Potential roles of laccases on virulence of Heterobasidion annosum ss. Microb. Pathog. 2015, 81, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Redfern, D. Spore dispersal and infection. In Heterobasidion Annosum. Ecology, Impact and Control; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1998; pp. 105–124. [Google Scholar]
  59. Gaitnieks, T.; Zaļuma, A.; Kenigsvalde, K.; Kļaviņa, D.; Brauners, I.; Piri, T. Susceptibility of small-Diameter Norway Spruce Understory stumps to Heterobasidion spore infection. Forests 2019, 10, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Morrison, D.; Redfern, D. Long-term development of Heterobasidion annosum in basidiospore-infected Sitka spruce stumps. Plant Pathol. 1994, 43, 897–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Möykkynen, T. Liberation of Heterobasidion annosum conidia by airflow. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 1997, 27, 283–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Piri, T. The spreading of the S type of Heterobasidion annosum from Norway spruce stumps to the subsequent tree stand. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 1996, 26, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Kelley, M.; Fierke, M.; Stephen, F. Identification and distribution of Armillaria species associated with an oak decline event in the Arkansas Ozarks. For. Pathol. 2009, 39, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Bruhn, J.; Wetteroff, J., Jr.; Mihail, J.; Kabrick, J.; Pickens, J. Distribution of Armillaria species in upland Ozark Mountain forests with respect to site, overstory species composition and oak decline. For. Pathol. 2000, 30, 43–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Woodward, S.; Stenlid, J.; Karjalainen, R.; Huttermann, A. Heterobasidion Annosum: Biology, Ecology, Impact and Control; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  66. Bendz-Hellgren, M.; Brandtberg, P.O.; Johansson, M.; Swedjemark, G.; Stenlid, J. Growth rate of Heterobasidion annosum in Picea abies established on forest land and arable land. Scand. J. For. Res. 1999, 14, 402–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Huse, K.J.; Venn, K. Vertical spread of Heterobasidion annosum in stems of Norway spruce. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Root and Butt Rots, Uppsala, Sweden, 9–16 August 1993; Sveriges Lantbruksuniv.: Uppsala, Sweden, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  68. Ross, E.W. Fomes Annosus in the Southeastern United States: Relation of Environmental and Biotic Factors to Stump Colonization and Losses in the Residual Stand; US Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1973; p. 1459.
  69. Gaitnieks, T.; Klavina, D.; Muiznieks, I.; Pennanen, T.; Velmala, S.; Vasaitis, R.; Menkis, A. Impact of Heterobasidion root-rot on fine root morphology and associated fungi in Picea abies stands on peat soils. Mycorrhiza 2016, 26, 465–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Gaitnieks, T.; Silbauma, L.; Muižnieks, I.; Zaļuma, A.; Kļaviņa, D.; Burņeviča, N.; Grosberga, M.; Lazdiņš, A.; Piri, T. Spread of Heterobasidion genotypes in Norway spruce stands on drained peat soil in Latvia. Can. J. For. Res. 2022, 52, 499–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Möykkynen, T.; Miina, J. Optimizing the management of a butt-rotted Picea abies stand infected by Heterobasidion annosum from the previous rotation. Scand. J. For. Res. 2002, 17, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Cleary, M.; Arhipova, N.; Morrison, D.J.; Thomsen, I.M.; Sturrock, R.; Vasaitis, R.; Gaitnieks, T.; Stenlid, J. Stump removal to control root disease in Canada and Scandinavia: A synthesis of results from long-term trials. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 290, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Garbelotto, M.; Gonthier, P.; Nicolotti, G. Ecological constraints limit the fitness of fungal hybrids in the Heterobasidion annosum species complex. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 6106–6111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Vasaitis, R.; Stenlid, J.; Thomsen, I.M.; Barklund, P.; Dahlberg, A. Stump removal to control root rot in forest stands. A literature study. Silva Fenn. 2008, 42, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Koch, K.A.; Quiram, G.L.; Venette, R.C. A review of oak wilt management: A summary of treatment options and their efficacy. Urban For. Urban Green. 2010, 9, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Lindén, M.; Vollbrecht, G. Sensitivity of Picea abies to butt rot in pure stands and in mixed stands with Pinus sylvestris in southern Sweden. Silva Fenn. 2002, 36, 467–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Piri, T. Effects of vitality fertilization on the growth of Heterobasidion annosum in Norway spruce roots. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 1998, 28, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hesterberg, G.A.; Jurgensen, M.F. The relation of forest fertilization to disease incidence. For. Chron. 1972, 48, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Piri, T. Response of compensatory-fertilized Pinus sylvestris to infection by Heterobasidion annosum. Scand. J. For. Res. 2000, 15, 218–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Vasiliauskas, R.; Lygis, V.; Thor, M.; Stenlid, J. Impact of biological (Rotstop) and chemical (urea) treatments on fungal community structure in freshly cut Picea abies stumps. Biol. Control 2004, 31, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Nicolotti, G.; Gonthier, P. Stump treatment against Heterobasidion with Phlebiopsis gigantea and some chemicals in Picea abies stands in the western Alps. For. Pathol. 2005, 35, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Westlund, A.; Nohrstedt, H.Ö. Effects of stump-treatment substances for root-rot control on ground vegetation and soil properties in a Picea abies forest in Sweden. Scand. J. For. Res. 2000, 15, 550–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Johansson, S.; Pratt, J.; Asiegbu, F. Treatment of Norway spruce and Scots pine stumps with urea against the root and butt rot fungus Heterobasidion annosum—Possible modes of action. For. Ecol. Manag. 2002, 157, 87–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Blomquist, M.; Herrera, S.L.; Hofmann, J.; Beram, R.C.; Cleary, M.; Rönnberg, J. Size matters but is big always better? Effectiveness of urea and Phlebiopsis gigantea as treatment against Heterobasidion on Picea abies stumps of variable size. For. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 462, 117998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Terhonen, E.; Sun, H.; Buee, M.; Kasanen, R.; Paulin, L.; Asiegbu, F. Effects of the use of biocontrol agent (Phlebiopsis gigantea) on fungal communities on the surface of Picea abies stumps. For. Ecol. Manag. 2013, 310, 428–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Berglund, M.; Rönnberg, J. Effectiveness of treatment of Norway spruce stumps with Phlebiopsis gigantea at different rates of coverage for the control of Heterobasidion. For. Pathol. 2004, 34, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Żółciak, A.; Sikora, K.; Wrzosek, M.; Damszel, M.; Sierota, Z. Why Does Phlebiopsis gigantea not Always Inhibit Root and Butt Rot in Conifers? Forests 2020, 11, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Bruna, L.; Klavina, D.; Zaluma, A.; Kenigsvalde, K.; Burneviča, N.; Nikolajeva, V.; Gaitnieks, T.; Piri, T. Efficacy of Phlebiopsis gigantea against Heterobasidion conidiospore and basidiospore infection in spruce wood. iForest-Biogeosci. For. 2020, 13, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zaluma, A.; Sherwood, P.; Bruna, L.; Skola, U.; Gaitnieks, T.; Rönnberg, J. Control of heterobasidion in Norway spruce stands: The impact of stump cover on efficacy of urea and Phlebiopsis gigantea and implications for forest management. Forests 2021, 12, 679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Domanski, S. Wood-inhabiting fungi of Bialowieza virgin forests in Poland. XIII. Two species of Diplomitoporus gen. nov. Acta Soc. Bot. Pol. 1970, 39, 191–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Périé, F.H.; Gold, M.H. Manganese regulation of manganese peroxidase expression and lignin degradation by the white rot fungus Dichomitus squalens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991, 57, 2240–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Kauserud, H.; Schumacher, T. Regional and local population structure of the pioneer wood-decay fungus Trichaptum abietinum. Mycologia 2003, 95, 416–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Witomski, P.; Olek, W.; Bonarski, J.T. Changes in strength of Scots pine wood (Pinus silvestris L.) decayed by brown rot (Coniophora puteana) and white rot (Trametes versicolor). Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 102, 162–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Burnevica, N.; Klavina, D.; Lione, G.; Pellicciaro, M.; Silbauma, L.; Zaluma, A.; Nikolajeva, V.; Gonthier, P. In vitro screening of Latvian isolates of Bjerkandera adusta and Sistotrema brinkmannii as potential biocontrol agents against Heterobasidion root and butt rots. Balt. For. 2022, 28, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Heinfling, A.; Bergbauer, M.; Szewzyk, U. Biodegradation of azo and phthalocyanine dyes by Trametes versicolor and Bjerkandera adusta. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997, 48, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Mounce, I.; Macrae, R. Interfertility phenomena in Fomes pinicola. Can. J. Res. 1938, 16, 354–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nicolotti, G.; Varese, G.C. Screening of antagonistic fungi against air-borne infection by Heterobasidion annosum on Norway spruce. For. Ecol. Manag. 1996, 88, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Malewski, T.; Borowik, P.; Olejarski, I.; Berezovska, D.; Dyshko, V.; Behnke-Borowczyk, J.; Pusz, W.; Matic, S.; Oszako, T. Mycobiome of Post-Agricultural Soils 20 Years after Application of Organic Substrates and Planting of Pine Seedlings. Forests 2022, 14, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Piri, T.; Saarinen, M.; Hamberg, L.; Hantula, J.; Gaitnieks, T. Efficacy of Biological and Chemical Control Agents against Heterobasidion Spore Infections of Norway Spruce and Scots Pine Stumps on Drained Peatland. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Mesanza, N.; Crawford, B.D.; Coulson, T.J.; Iturritxa, E.; Patten, C.L. Colonization of Pinus radiata D. don seedling roots by biocontrol bacteria Erwinia billingiae and Bacillus simplex. Forests 2019, 10, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Azeem, M.; Barba-Aliaga, M.; Borg-Karlson, A.K.; Terenius, O.; Broberg, A.; Rajarao, G.K. Heterobasidion-growth inhibiting Bacillus subtilis A18 exhibits medium-and age-dependent production of lipopeptides. Microbiol. Res. 2019, 223, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Pellicciaro, M.; Lione, G.; Giordano, L.; Gonthier, P. Biocontrol potential of Pseudomonas protegens against Heterobasidion species attacking conifers in Europe. Biol. Control 2021, 157, 104583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Raffa, K.F.; Brockerhoff, E.G.; Grégoire, J.C.; Hamelin, R.C.; Liebhold, A.M.; Santini, A.; Venette, R.C.; Wingfield, M.J. Approaches to Forecasting Damage by Invasive Forest Insects and Pathogens: A Cross-Assessment. Bioscience 2023, 73, 85–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Terhonen, E.; Langer, G.J.; Bußkamp, J.; Rǎscuţoi, D.R.; Blumenstein, K. Low water availability increases necrosis in Picea abies after artificial inoculation with fungal root rot pathogens Heterobasidion parviporum and Heterobasidion annosum. Forests 2019, 10, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Durodola, B.; Blumenstein, K.; Terhonen, E. Genetic variation of Picea abies in response to the artificial inoculation of Heterobasidion parviporum. Eur. J. For. Res. 2023, 142, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Dyshko, V.; Torosova, L. Osoblyvosti morfometrychnykh ta anatomichnykh oznak sosny zvychaynoyi [Peculiarities of morphometric and anatomical characteristics of scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in the stand affected by annosum root rot]. For. For. Melior. 2016, 129, 153–161. (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
  107. Nagy, N.E.; Kvaalen, H.; Fongen, M.; Fossdal, C.G.; Clarke, N.; Solheim, H.; Hietala, A.M. The pathogenic white-rot fungus Heterobasidion parviporum responds to spruce xylem defense by enhanced production of oxalic acid. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2012, 25, 1450–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Rieksts-Riekstiņš, R.; Zeltiņš, P.; Baliuckas, V.; Brūna, L.; Zaļuma, A.; Kāpostiņš, R. Pinus sylvestris breeding for resistance against natural infection of the fungus Heterobasidion annosum. Forests 2019, 11, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Swedjemark, G.; Karlsson, B. Genotypic variation in susceptibility following artificial Heterobasidion annosum inoculation of Picea abies clones in a 17-year-old field test. Scand. J. For. Res. 2004, 19, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Keriö, S.; Niemi, S.; Haapanen, M.; Daniel, G.; Asiegbu, F. Infection of Picea abies clones with a homokaryotic isolate of Heterobasidion parviporum under field conditions. Can. J. For. Res. 2015, 45, 227–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Krynytskyi, G.; Voytiuk, V.; Andreeva, V. Novi pidkhody v rozrobtsi metodu rann’oyi diahnostyky rostu potomstv plyusovykh derev sosny zvychaynoyi [New Approaches in Groundwork of Early Diagnostic Method of Growth of Posterities of Plus Trees of Scotch Pine]. In Proceedings of the Nature of the Western Polissia and Adjacent Territories; College of Science Volyn National Lesya Ukrainka University: Lutsk, Ukraine, 2010; Volume 7, pp. 107–117. (In Ukrainian). [Google Scholar]
  112. Arnerup, J.; Swedjemark, G.; Elfstrand, M.; Karlsson, B.; Stenlid, J. Variation in growth of Heterobasidion parviporum in a full-sib family of Picea abies. Scand. J. For. Res. 2010, 25, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Swedjemark, G.; Karlsson, B.; Stenlid, J. Exclusion of Heterobasidion parviporum from inoculated clones of Picea abies and evidence of systemic induced resistance. Scand. J. For. Res. 2007, 22, 110–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Dyshko, V.; Ustskyi, I.; Mykhailichenko, O. Morfolohichni ta biokhimichni vidminnosti derev iz riznoyu stiykistyu do korenevoyi hubky [Morphological and biochemical differences of trees with different resistance to root fungus]. For. For. Melior. 2015, 126, 218–224. (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
  115. Maksimov, V. Sozdaniye ustoychivykh k kornevoy gubke nasazhdeniy sosny obyknovennoy s uchetom sostava efirnogo masla khvoi [Development of Scots Pine Stands Resistant to Pine Fungus Based on Composition of Needle Volatile Oil]. News High. Educ. Inst. For. J. 2004, 5, 136–140. (In Russion) [Google Scholar]
  116. Chen, Z.Q.; Lundén, K.; Karlsson, B.; Vos, I.; Olson, Å.; Lundqvist, S.O.; Stenlid, J.; Wu, H.X.; García Gil, M.R.; Elfstrand, M. Early selection for resistance to Heterobasidion parviporum in Norway spruce is not likely to adversely affect growth and wood quality traits in late-age performance. Eur. J. For. Res. 2018, 137, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Napierała-Filipiak, A.; Filipiak, M. Higher resistance of the offspring of Scots pine trees resulting from natural regeneration in old foci of Heterobasidion annosum root rot. Scand. J. For. Res. 2012, 27, 794–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Runova, E.M.; Garus, I.A.; Mukhacheva, A.N. Primeneniye instrumental’nykh metodov pri otsenke sostoyaniya stvolov Pinus sylvestris L. [Application of instrumental methods in trunks assessment of Pinus sylvestris L.]. For. Eng. J. 2020, 10, 72–85. (In Russion) [Google Scholar]
  119. Dasgupta, P. A Review On Defence Responses And Resistance Breeding In Forest Tree Species. Int. J. Innov. Res. Adv. Stud. 2020, 7, 227–235. [Google Scholar]
  120. Zeltiņš, P.; Katrevičs, J.; Gailis, A.; Maaten, T.; Desaine, I.; Jansons, Ā. Adaptation capacity of Norway spruce provenances in Western Latvia. Forests 2019, 10, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Korshikov, I.; Demkovich, A. Geneticheskiye osobennosti ustoychivoy k kornevoy gubke sosny obyknovennoy v iskusstvennykh nasazhdeniyakh stepnoy zony Ukrainy [Genotypic peculiarities of resistant to root fungus scotch pine plants in artificial stands of the Ukrainian steppe-zone]. Cytol. Genet. 2008, 5, 41–46. (In Russion) [Google Scholar]
  122. Hietala, A.M.; Eikenes, M.; Kvaalen, H.; Solheim, H.; Fossdal, C.G. Multiplex real-time PCR for monitoring Heterobasidion annosum colonization in Norway spruce clones that differ in disease resistance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 4413–4420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Chong, J.; Poutaraud, A.; Hugueney, P. Metabolism and roles of stilbenes in plants. Plant Sci. 2009, 177, 143–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Mukrimin, M.; Kovalchuk, A.; Ghimire, R.P.; Kivimäenpää, M.; Sun, H.; Holopainen, J.K.; Asiegbu, F.O. Evaluation of potential genetic and chemical markers for Scots pine tolerance against Heterobasidion annosum infection. Planta 2019, 250, 1881–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Lai, M.; Dong, L.; Yi, M.; Sun, S.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, L.; Xu, Z.; Lei, L.; Leng, C.; Zhang, L. Genetic variation, heritability and genotype× environment interactions of resin yield, growth traits and morphologic traits for Pinus elliottii at three progeny trials. Forests 2017, 8, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Korostelev, A.S.; Zalesov, S.V.; Godovalov, G.A. Nedrevesnaya Produktsiya Lesa [Non-Timber Forest Products]; Ural State Forest Engineering University: Ekaterinburg, Russia, 2010; p. 480. [Google Scholar]
  127. Ladejshchikova, Y. O znachenii smolistosti, smoloproduk¬tivnosti i sostava zhivitsy kak diagnosticheskikh pokazateley ustoychivosti sosny k kornevoy gubke [On the importance of resin content, resin production and resin composition as diagnostic indicators of pine resistance to root fungus]. Collect. Sci. Work. 1984, 7, 95–104. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  128. Wang, A.F.; Di, B.; Repo, T.; Roitto, M.; Zhang, G. Responses of parameters for electrical impedance spectroscopy and pressure–volume curves to drought stress in Pinus bungeana seedlings. Forests 2020, 11, 359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Karasev, V.; Karaseva, M.; Romanov, E.; Mukhortov, D. Termoekspress-metod ranney diagnostiki fiziologicheskogo sostoyaniya sosny obyknovennoy [Rapid thermal method for early diagnosis of the physiological state of Scots pine trees]. Russ. J. Ecol. 2017, 48, 109–115. (In Russian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Dyshko, V.A.; Ustskyy, I.; Torosova, L. Rannya diahnostyka stiykosti derev sosny zvychaynoyi do urazhennya korenevoyu hubkoyu [Early diagnosis of Scots pine trees for resistance to annosum root rot]. For. For. Melior. 2022, 141, 52–58. (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
  131. Butorina, A.; Cherkashina, O.; Chernodubov, A.; Avdeeva, I. Yzmenchyvost’ tsytolohycheskykh pokazateley semyan sosny obychnoho unykal’noho Khrenovskoho bora [Variability of the cytological parameters of Pinus sylvestris L. seeds from the unique Hrenovskoy pine forest]. Russ. J. Genet. 2005, 41, 630–634. (In Russion) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Poplavskaya, L.; Rebko, S. Selektsionnaya kharakteristika derev’yev sosny obyknovennoy razlichnoy ustoychivosti k kornevoy gubke [The breeding characteristics of Scots pine trees with different resistance to root fungus]. In Proceedings of the Current State and Prospects for the Protection and Protection of Forests in the System of Sustainable Development: Mater. International Scientific and Practical Conference; Gomel, Belarus, 9–11 October 2013, Forest Institute of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus: Gomel, Belarus, 2013; pp. 310–314. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  133. Dyshko, V.A.; Ustskyy, I.; Mykhaylichenko, O. Osoblyvosti morfolohichnykh ta biometrychnykh kharakterystyk sosny zvychaynoyi riznoho stanu v nasadzhenni urazhenomu korenevoyu hubkoyu [Featuresof morphological and biometric characteristics of reproductive organs of Scots pine trees with different resistance in stands affected by Heterobasidion annosum]. For. For. Melior. 2019, 135, 58–67. (In Ukrainian) [Google Scholar]
  134. Rosochacka, J.; Grzywacz, A. The colour of Pinus silvestris L. seeds and their susceptibility to damping-off. II. Colour of seed coats and their chemical composition. Eur. J. For. Pathol. 1980, 10, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Jansson, G.; Hansen, J.K.; Haapanen, M.; Kvaalen, H.; Steffenrem, A. The genetic and economic gains from forest tree breeding programmes in Scandinavia and Finland. Scand. J. For. Res. 2017, 32, 273–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) The fruiting bodies of the H. annosum on a Scots pine stump. (b) The fruiting bodies of the H. annosum in the zone of the root neck of Scots pine. (c) The trunk of an Scots pine affected by H. annosum. (d) Dead trees at the center of a mortality pocket of Scots pine in a plantation affected by H. annosum. (e) The crowns of Scots pine trees affected by H. annosum.
Figure 1. (a) The fruiting bodies of the H. annosum on a Scots pine stump. (b) The fruiting bodies of the H. annosum in the zone of the root neck of Scots pine. (c) The trunk of an Scots pine affected by H. annosum. (d) Dead trees at the center of a mortality pocket of Scots pine in a plantation affected by H. annosum. (e) The crowns of Scots pine trees affected by H. annosum.
Forests 14 00954 g001
Figure 2. Number of publications by year in Scopus database queried for “Heterobasidion” search key. In total, there were 937 items from 1975 to 2022.
Figure 2. Number of publications by year in Scopus database queried for “Heterobasidion” search key. In total, there were 937 items from 1975 to 2022.
Forests 14 00954 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oszako, T.; Kukina, O.; Dyshko, V.; Moser, W.K.; Ślusarski, S.; Okorski, A.; Borowik, P. Afforestation of Land Abandoned by Farmers Poses Threat to Forest Sustainability Due to Heterobasidion spp. Forests 2023, 14, 954. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14050954

AMA Style

Oszako T, Kukina O, Dyshko V, Moser WK, Ślusarski S, Okorski A, Borowik P. Afforestation of Land Abandoned by Farmers Poses Threat to Forest Sustainability Due to Heterobasidion spp. Forests. 2023; 14(5):954. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14050954

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oszako, Tomasz, Olga Kukina, Valentyna Dyshko, Warren Keith Moser, Sławomir Ślusarski, Adam Okorski, and Piotr Borowik. 2023. "Afforestation of Land Abandoned by Farmers Poses Threat to Forest Sustainability Due to Heterobasidion spp." Forests 14, no. 5: 954. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14050954

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop