Skip the header
Open access
Technical Factsheet
Basic
17 November 2021

Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline)

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name
Leptographium procerum W.B. (Kendr.) M.J. Wingf. 1985
Preferred Common Name
white pine root decline
Other Scientific Names
Verticicladiella procera W.B. Kendr. 1962
International Common Names
English
Leptographium root decline
Procerum root disease
white pine root disease
white pine wilt
EPPO code
LEPGPR (Leptographium procerum)

Pictures

Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Characteristic wedge-shaped discoloration in cross-section of trunk on eastern white pine (Pinus strobus).
Symptoms
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Characteristic wedge-shaped discoloration in cross-section of trunk on eastern white pine (Pinus strobus).
©Elizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University/via Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Black stain on Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana). Selma, Alabama, USA.
Symptoms
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Black stain on Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana). Selma, Alabama, USA.
©Paul A. Mistretta, USDA Forest Service/via Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Diffuse canker behind resinosis at root collar of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus).
Symptoms
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Diffuse canker behind resinosis at root collar of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus).
©Manfred Mielke, USDA Forest Service/via Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Resin flow on trunk on eastern white pine (Pinus strobus).
Symptoms
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Resin flow on trunk on eastern white pine (Pinus strobus).
©Elizabeth Bush, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University/via Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Resinosis on eastern white pine (Pinus strobus).
Symptoms
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Resinosis on eastern white pine (Pinus strobus).
©Manfred Mielke, USDA Forest Service/via Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Basal canker.
Basal canker
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Basal canker.
©Robert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service/via Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Basal canker.
Basal canker
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Basal canker.
©Robert L. Anderson, USDA Forest Service/via Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Fungi culture.
Culture
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Fungi culture.
©Edward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services/via Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Conidiphore and conidia.
Conidiphore and conidia
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Conidiphore and conidia.
©Edward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services/via Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Conidiphore and conidia.
Conidiphore and conidia
Leptographium procerum (white pine root decline); Conidiphore and conidia.
©Mary Ann Hansen, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University/via Bugwood.org - CC BY-NC 3.0 US

Distribution

This content is currently unavailable.

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

Symptoms

White pine root decline was first reported in eastern USA and L. procerum was later found to be consistently isolated from diseased trees (Kendrick, 1962; Dochinger, 1967). However, the role of the fungus in causing this disease has been a matter of considerable debate (Lackner and Alexander, 1982; Harrington and Cobb, 1983; Wingfield, 1983, 1986). The disease is commonly referred to as a root decline but in most cases manifests itself as a wilt (Lackner and Alexander, 1982). The symptoms of the disease are similar to those caused by infestation by the root-collar weevil (Hylobius radicis) (Wingfield, 1983), for which it can be easily mistaken.In inoculation studies using Leptographium isolated from western white pine (Pinus monticola), symptoms appeared about 25-35 days after inoculation and tree death occurred 35-40 days after inoculation (Hubert, 1953). One of the first symptoms to appear, in both inoculation studies and natural infections, is a reduction in height growth, followed by crown discoloration. A dark stain can be observed in the roots of the diseased trees, which rapidly progresses upwards in the tree (Leaphart, 1960; Alexander et al., 1988). In severe infections, marked resin exudation is observed (Alexander et al., 1988). Symptoms associated with white pine root decline include extended periods of bud break, retardation of shoot elongation, crooking of growing shoots, loss of turgour in older needles, wilting of younger needles (Hubert, 1953; Dochinger, 1967; Halambek, 1976; Pest Alert, 1977; Smith, 1991), retention of needles, needle wilt, browning of needles, and resin-soaked, black-streaked wood at the base of stems and basal cankers (Houston, 1969; Pest Alert, 1977; Towers, 1977; Anderson and Alexander, 1979; Mackenzie and Dick, 1984; Alexander et al., 1988; Smith, 1991; Otrosina et al., 1997). The basal cankers are at first circular to irregular, reddish, sunken areas, which in some cases enlarge and coalesce to form larger flattened cankers (Houston, 1969). Colonized roots are resin-soaked and cross-sections of the stems reveal prominent wedges of blue-stained wood. Discoloration of the sapwood is consistent with the patterns and physiology of blue-stain fungi (Alexander et al., 1988). In some cases the roots show diffuse black streaking (Livingston and Wingfield, 1982).L. procerum acts in a similar way to wilt pathogens. It occurs in the vascular system, where it erodes the cell walls and travels from cell to cell through the pits (Kilbertus et al., 1980). White pine infected with L. procerum showed greater vascular occlusion, lower moisture content and reduced hydraulic conductivity than non-infected trees (Butnor et al., 2000). The water in the stem is reduced, leading to desiccation of the sapwood and foliage and ultimately premature death (Butnor et al., 2000).Reduced water potential in symptomatic trees supports the notion that this root disease is associated with xylem dysfunction (Horner et al., 1987). Tree death occurs when the xylem is blocked by resin (Alexander et al., 1988). Symptoms were found to vary between Pinus strobus and P. sylvestris; it takes longer for symptoms to appear on P. sylvestris (Horner and Alexander, 1983b).Red pine decline disease is characterized by circular regions of dead and dying trees that expand gradually. The root systems of these trees show high levels of mortality and several fungi (L. terebrantis, L. procerum and Ophiostoma ips) can be isolated from stained areas (Klepzig et al., 1995; Erbilgin and Raffa, 2002).

List of Symptoms/Signs

Symptom or signLife stagesSign or diagnosis
Plants/Growing point/wilt  
Plants/Leaves/wilting  
Plants/Leaves/yellowed or dead  
Plants/Roots/rot of wood  
Plants/Stems/discoloration  
Plants/Stems/gummosis or resinosis  
Plants/Stems/internal feeding  
Plants/Stems/mould growth on lesion  
Plants/Whole plant/plant dead; dieback  
Plants/Whole plant/wilt  

Prevention and Control

Procerum root disease can be controlled by planting trees on sites suitable for the species, controlling weevils and bark beetles, removing slash in and around the plantation, and controlling weeds (Alexander et al., 1988). It is advisable to allow sites to lie fallow for 1 year or to consider planting non-susceptible trees (Lewis, 1985). Salmon et al. (1996) found that some natural compounds (e.g. R (-) carvone, S (-) carvone and limonin) could inhibit the germination of L. procerum conidia. However, these compounds only suppressed germination of the conidia and did not affect the growth of the fungus (Salmon et al., 1996).

Impact

White pine root decline is now known to occur in various parts of the world in a number of ecosystems, and is not restricted to forest trees (Livingston and Wingfield, 1982; Morelet, 1986; Alexander et al., 1988; Morrison and Hunt, 1988; Smith, 1991). The extent of damage associated with the disease has not been fully assessed (Towers, 1977; Meyer et al., 1983).

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 17 November 2021

Language

English

Authors

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation