Skip the header
Open access
Technical Factsheet
Basic
16 November 2021

Sphaeropsis sapinea (Sphaeropsis blight)

Identity

Preferred Scientific Name
Sphaeropsis sapinea (Fr.) Dyko & B. Sutton 1980
Preferred Common Name
Sphaeropsis blight
Other Scientific Names
Botryodiplodia pinea (Desm.) Petr. 1922
Diplodia conigena Desm. 1846
Diplodia pinastri Grove 1916
Diplodia pinea (Desm.) J. Kickx F. 1867
Granulodiplodia sapinea (Fr.) M. Morelet & Lanier 1973
Macrophoma pinea (Desm.) Petr. & Syd. 1926
Macrophoma sapinea (Fr.) Petr. 1962
Phoma pinastri Lév.
Sphaeria pinea Desm. 1842
Sphaeropsis ellisii Sacc. 1884
Sphaeropsis pinastri (Lév.) Sacc. 1884
International Common Names
English
dieback: pine
Diplodia blight
Diplodia canker
Diplodia shoot blight
Diplodia tip blight
shoot blight: conifers
shoot dieback: conifers
Sphaeropsis canker
Sphaeropsis shoot blight
Sphaeropsis tip blight
tip blight: conifers
twig blight: conifers
whorl canker: pine
Spanish
marchitez de los brotes del pino
French
deperissement des pousses du pin
Local Common Names
Germany
Triebspitzenkrankheit: Kiefer
EPPO code
DIPDPI (Diplodia pinea)

Pictures

Sphaeropsis sapinea (Sphaeropsis blight); symptoms, showing blighted new growth and resin on Austrian pine (Pinus nigra). Virginia, USA.
Symptoms
Sphaeropsis sapinea (Sphaeropsis blight); symptoms, showing blighted new growth and resin on Austrian pine (Pinus nigra). Virginia, USA.
©Elizabeth Bush/Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University/Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Sphaeropsis sapinea (Sphaeropsis blight); symptoms, showing blighted new growth and resin on Austrian pine (Pinus nigra). Virginia, USA.
Symptoms
Sphaeropsis sapinea (Sphaeropsis blight); symptoms, showing blighted new growth and resin on Austrian pine (Pinus nigra). Virginia, USA.
©Elizabeth Bush/Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University/Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Sphaeropsis sapinea (Sphaeropsis blight); symptoms, showing tip blight on Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) Virginia, USA.
Symptoms
Sphaeropsis sapinea (Sphaeropsis blight); symptoms, showing tip blight on Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) Virginia, USA.
©Elizabeth Bush/Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University/Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Sphaeropsis sapinea (Sphaeropsis blight); symptoms, showing pycnidia on needles of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) Virginia, USA.
Symptoms
Sphaeropsis sapinea (Sphaeropsis blight); symptoms, showing pycnidia on needles of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) Virginia, USA.
©Elizabeth Bush/Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University/Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Sphaeropsis sapinea (Sphaeropsis blight); symptoms, showing pycnidia on cone scales of Austrian pine (Pinus nigra). Czech Republic.
Symptoms
Sphaeropsis sapinea (Sphaeropsis blight); symptoms, showing pycnidia on cone scales of Austrian pine (Pinus nigra). Czech Republic.
©Petr Kapitola/Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture/Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Sphaeropsis sapinea (Sphaeropsis blight); field symptoms, showing main stem infection on red pine (Pinus resinosa). The bark has been peeled back to expose dark discoloration of canker face. USA.
Symptoms
Sphaeropsis sapinea (Sphaeropsis blight); field symptoms, showing main stem infection on red pine (Pinus resinosa). The bark has been peeled back to expose dark discoloration of canker face. USA.
©Joseph O'Brien/USDA Forest Service/Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US
Sphaeropsis sapinea (Sphaeropsis blight); field symptoms, showing shoot blight on red pine (Pinus resinosa). Wisconsin, USA.
Symptoms
Sphaeropsis sapinea (Sphaeropsis blight); field symptoms, showing shoot blight on red pine (Pinus resinosa). Wisconsin, USA.
©Joseph O'Brien/USDA Forest Service/Bugwood.org - CC BY 3.0 US

Distribution

This content is currently unavailable.

Host Plants and Other Plants Affected

HostHost statusReferences
Abies balsamea (balsam fir)Other 
Abies concolor (Rocky Mountain white fir)Other 
Abies procera (noble fir)Other 
Arceuthobium americanum (lodgepole pine dwarf mistletoe)Other 
Cedrus atlantica (Atlas cedar)Other 
Cedrus deodara (Himalayan cedar)Other 
Cedrus libani (cedar of Lebanon)Unknown
Oskay et al. (2018)
Chamaecyparis lawsoniana (Port Orford cedar)Other 
Corylus avellana (hazel)Unknown 
Cupressus lusitanica (Mexican cypress)Other 
Cupressus macrocarpa (Monterey cypress)Other 
Cupressus sempervirens (Mediterranean cypress)Other 
Juniperus communis (common juniper)Other 
Juniperus deppeana (alligator juniper)Other 
Juniperus horizontalis (creeping juniper)Other 
Juniperus scopulorum (Rocky Mountain juniper)Other 
Juniperus virginiana (eastern redcedar)Other 
Larix decidua (common larch)Other 
Larix laricina (American larch)Other 
Picea abies (common spruce)Other 
Picea glauca (white spruce)Other 
Picea mariana (black spruce)Other 
Picea pungens (blue spruce)Other 
Picea rubens (red spruce)Other 
Picea sitchensis (Sitka spruce)Other 
Pinus banksiana (jack pine)Main
Blodgett et al. (2003)
Wet et al. (2000)
Stanosz et al. (2007)
Pinus brutia (brutian pine)Other
Ong et al. (2007)
Pinus canariensis (Canary pine)Other 
Pinus caribaea (Caribbean pine)Other 
Pinus cembra (arolla pine)Other
Oblinger et al. (2009)
Pinus cembroides (Mexican pine)Other 
Pinus contorta (lodgepole pine)Other 
Pinus coulteri (big-cone pine)Other 
Pinus culminicola (sierra Potosí pinyon pine)Other 
Pinus douglasianaOther 
Pinus echinata (shortleaf pine)Other 
Pinus edulis (pinyon)Other 
Pinus elliottii (slash pine)Other
Paez and Smith (2018)
Pinus flexilis (limber pine)Other 
Pinus greggii (Gregg's pine)Other
Wet et al. (2000)
Pinus halepensis (Aleppo pine)Other 
Pinus heldreichii (heldreich's pine)Other
Milijaevic (2004)
Pinus jeffreyi (Jeffrey pine)Other 
Pinus kesiya (khasya pine)Other 
Pinus massoniana (masson pine)Other 
Pinus michoacana (Michoacan pine)Other 
Pinus monophylla (single-leaf pinyon pine)Other 
Pinus montezumae (montezuma pine)Other 
Pinus mugo (mountain pine)Other
Markovskaja et al. (2016)
Pinus muricata (bishop pine)Other 
Pinus nigra (black pine)Main
Blodgett et al. (2007)
Whitehill et al. (2007)
Oliva et al. (2013)
Markovskaja et al. (2016)
Georgieva and Marković (2018)
Ong et al. (2007)
Hanso and Drenkhan (2009)
Pinus oocarpa (ocote pine)Other 
Pinus palustris (longleaf pine)Other
Stanosz et al. (2009)
Pinus patula (Mexican weeping pine)Main
Wet et al. (2000)
Bihon et al. (2011)
Pinus peuce (macedonian pine)Other
Georgieva and Marković (2018)
Pinus pinaster (maritime pine)Other
Linaldeddu et al. (2008)
Pinus pinea (stone pine)Other 
Pinus ponderosa (ponderosa pine)Main
Wet et al. (2000)
Pinus pseudostrobus (pseudostrobus pine)Other 
Pinus radiata (radiata pine)Main
Burgess et al. (2001)
Wet et al. (2000)
Manzanos et al. (2017)
Linaldeddu et al. (2008)
Pinus resinosa (red pine)Main
Blodgett et al. (2003)
Blodgett et al. (2005)
Wet et al. (2000)
Stanosz and Smith (1996)
Stanosz et al. (2001)
Pinus rigida (pitch pine)Other 
Pinus roxburghii (chir pine)Other 
Pinus sabiniana (Digger pine)Other 
Pinus strobus (eastern white pine)Other 
Pinus sylvestris (Scots pine)Main
Müller et al. (2019)
Oliva et al. (2013)
Markovskaja et al. (2016)
Pinus tabuliformis (chinese pine)Unknown
Li et al. (2016)
Pinus taeda (loblolly pine)Other
Stanosz et al. (2009)
Pinus thunbergii (Japanese black pine)Other 
Pinus virginiana (scrub pine)Other 
Pinus wallichiana (blue pine)Other 
Platycladus orientalis (Chinese arborvitae)Other 
Prunus persica (peach)Unknown
Damm et al. (2007)
Pseudotsuga macrocarpa (large-coned Douglas fir)Other 
Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir)Other
Kaya et al. (2014)
Thuja occidentalis (Eastern white cedar)Other 
Tsuga canadensis (eastern hemlock)Other 

Symptoms

A variety of symptoms are exhibited by cones, seed and young seedlings in response to colonization by S. sapinea. Female cones may be killed before full development, becoming dark, shrunken and deformed. Symptoms resulting from in vitro inoculation range from reduced germination to death of seed of several Central American pine species (Rees and Webber, 1988). Radicles of germinants were shortened, thickened and discoloured, and if killed became flaccid and brown. Similarly, Fisher (1941) noted reduced germination and radicle decay for Pinus resinosa and P. ponderosa.Palmer and Nicholls (1985) noted shoot blight of 1-year-old red pine seedlings evidenced by dead terminal buds and upper needles and symptoms on older seedlings including death of new shoots during shoot expansion and needle elongation. Exudation of resin droplets may be the first symptom of infection on either needles or succulent stems. Needles become discoloured and are often killed without elongating beyond fascicle sheaths. Water-soaked, purplish-brown stem lesions may expand as stems become stunted, curled, hardened, resin-encrusted and necrotic (Chou, 1976). Seedlings in nurseries and recently planted seedlings and saplings may be killed by Sphaeropsis collar rot (Palmer and Nicholls, 1985; Stanosz and Cummings Carlson, 1996), characterized by discoloured, necrotic bark and dark discoloration of wood in the lower stem and root collar. Foliage on the entire seedling or sapling becomes chlorotic, desiccated and brown as the stem is girdled.Initial symptoms of shoot blight on established trees resemble those on seedlings, but symptoms become more severe as colonization progresses. The fungus proceeds from killed shoot tips or diseased cones into woody stems to cause cankers (Waterman, 1943; Chou, 1976). Exudation of resin may be copious and dead needles are often retained. On younger stems, smooth bark may be depressed and turn brown as it dies. The underlying wood may be stained green to brown to blue to black and be resin-soaked. Older cankers may be bounded by callus. Entire branches or whorls of branches may be killed as the pathogen progressively invades, and substantial dieback or dead tops can result. Subsequent forking or branching of diseased leaders may result in substantial defect (Currie and Toes, 1978).Severe crown symptoms and tree death may follow hailstorms, drought or pruning. Zwolinski et al. (1990b) estimated loss of as much as half the live foliage, death of 50-80% of leaders, and up to almost 20% tree mortality in Pinus radiata plantations in South Africa in the months after a hail event. Chou (1987) described crown wilt of P. radiata associated with the colonization and killing of inner bark, the extensive invasion and blue staining of wood, and subsequent desiccation. Grey to blue to black staining of wood may occur in freshly cut logs and green lumber (Young, 1937; Kreber et al., 2001) and also in roots colonized by S. sapinea (Wingfield and Knox-Davies, 1980).

List of Symptoms/Signs

Symptom or signLife stagesSign or diagnosis
Plants/Fruit/abnormal shape  
Plants/Fruit/discoloration  
Plants/Fruit/lesions: black or brown  
Plants/Fruit/ooze  
Plants/Fruit/reduced size  
Plants/Growing point/dieback  
Plants/Growing point/discoloration  
Plants/Growing point/distortion  
Plants/Growing point/lesions  
Plants/Growing point/wilt  
Plants/Leaves/necrotic areas  
Plants/Leaves/ooze  
Plants/Leaves/wilting  
Plants/Leaves/yellowed or dead  
Plants/Roots/soft rot of cortex  
Plants/Seeds/discolorations  
Plants/Seeds/distortion  
Plants/Seeds/rot  
Plants/Seeds/shrivelled  
Plants/Stems/canker on woody stem  
Plants/Stems/dieback  
Plants/Stems/discoloration  
Plants/Stems/discoloration of bark  
Plants/Stems/gummosis or resinosis  
Plants/Stems/internal discoloration  
Plants/Stems/necrosis  
Plants/Stems/ooze  
Plants/Whole plant/discoloration  
Plants/Whole plant/plant dead; dieback  
Plants/Whole plant/seedling blight  

Prevention and Control

Phytosanitary Measures

Specific information is lacking regarding the effectiveness of measures to disinfest seed, or treat logs or lumber, to prevent movement of S. sapinea.

Cultural Control and Sanitary Methods

The removal and destruction of colonized shoots, branches and cones can prevent further invasion of a diseased tree and reduce the availability of inoculum for further spread. Host species should not be used for windbreaks in nurseries and it may be desirable to remove significantly damaged trees from production areas. Excessive pruning should be avoided and pruning and shearing should be limited to dry weather when inoculum is less available. The association of disease with water stress (Nicholls and Ostry, 1990; Blodgett et al., 1997a, b) and altered nutrition (De Kam et al., 1991; Van Dijk et al., 1992; Stanosz and Trobaugh, 1996) suggests that maintaining favourable moisture status and avoiding excesses in nitrogen may reduce the incidence and/or severity of disease. Less susceptible or non-host species should be considered for sites with a history of unacceptable damage.

Host-Plant Resistance

The incidence and severity of symptoms varies among host species. The most damaged species are found among the two- and three-needled 'hard pines' (subgenus Diploxylon); five-needled 'soft pines' (subgenus Haploxylon) and non-pine hosts are generally less susceptible. Within the former group, non-wounded Pinus resinosa seedlings inoculated with conidia in greenhouse trials exhibited a lower incidence and less severe symptoms than Pinus banksiana seedlings (Blodgett and Stanosz, 1997). Ranked from greatest to least severity of symptoms in response to wounding and inoculation of terminal shoots with S. sapinea were Pinus sylvestris, P. resinosa, Picea pungens, Pinus mugo, Pseudotsuga menziesii and Abies balsamea (Blodgett and Stanosz, 1999). Differences in responses of pine species cultivated in South Africa to inoculation with S. sapinea were quantified by Swart et al. (1988). In a growth chamber experiment, inoculated seedlings of Pinus kesiya, P. pinaster and P. radiata exhibited greater frequencies of dead shoots than those of P. elliottii, P. patula and P. taeda. On trees inoculated in the field, a greater frequency of shoot death and longer cambial lesions occurred for P. radiata than for P. elliottii and P. pinaster.Variation in host response to S. sapinea has also been observed within species. Burdon et al. (1982) studied responses of inoculated progenies of parents selected for freedom from S. sapinea-associated shoot dieback on a site of very high disease incidence. As a group these progenies showed a lower incidence of disease than control seedlots, and there was also considerable variation among these progenies. Gerhold et al. (1994) noted differences in response to inoculation among varieties of P. sylvestris seedlings. Variation in disease tolerance between provenances and among families of Pinus greggii following natural infection by S. sapinea has also been reported (Smith et al., 2002).

Chemical Control

Fungicide applications have reduced the incidence of shoot blight and may be appropriate for nurseries, Christmas tree plantations, ornamental plantings and windbreaks (Van Der Westhuizen, 1968; Schweitzer and Sinclair, 1976; Peterson, 1977; Palmer et al., 1986; Stanosz and Smith, 1996). Stanosz and Smith (1996) found similar efficacy of thiophanate methyl and chlorothalonil on Pinus resinosa seedlings. However, asymptomatic persistence of virulent strains of S. sapinea can occur on or in hosts in spite of fungicide use (Stanosz et al., 1997). Proliferation of S. sapinea in raw logs and freshly sawn lumber has been suppressed by treatment with methyl bisthiocyanate and 2-n-octyl-4-isothiazolin-3-one (Kreber et al., 2001).

Impact

Whether or not losses have been expressed in economic terms, significant damage has been caused by S. sapinea in a variety of situations. Palmer and Nicholls (1985) reported loss of 35% of 1-year-old red pine seedlings in a Wisconsin nursery (loss of more than 1 million seedlings). In the same state, mortality of newly planted or established red pine saplings during a drought year was as great as 95% in some plantations. Lower stems and root collars frequently yielded S. sapinea, which proliferates to rapidly girdle and kill many trees under these conditions (Stanosz and Cummings Carlson, 1996; Stanosz et al., 2001). Nicholls and Ostry (1990) reported tree mortality in Pinus banksiana and P. resinosa plantations ranging from 2 to 51% in Minnesota and Wisconsin, and indicated that S. sapinea was consistently associated with dead trees. Trees in windbreaks also have been severely damaged in central USA (Peterson and Wysong, 1968).Losses in the production of Pinus radiata in the southern hemisphere have been reported in more detail. Zwolinski et al. (1990a) quantified the losses resulting from a post-hail outbreak of dieback induced by S. sapinea affecting approximately 2000 ha of mostly P. radiata in the Cape Province of South Africa. The timber loss in compartments prematurely harvested was about 28% of the volume and 55% of the value of potential production. The percentage volume loss increased with plantation age, with the greatest losses recorded on good quality sites. Great losses were also documented for a P. radiata stand affected by S. sapinea in New Zealand (Currie and Toes, 1978). There was a close association between the severity of dieback, tree malformation, and loss in merchantable tree volume. A reduction of 63% in merchantable tree volume was estimated. In contrast, despite a high incidence of top death in some (usually younger) stands of P. radiata in north-eastern Victoria, Australia, the overall effect on tree growth and on volume and value of merchantable wood was small (Wright and Marks, 1970). The volume of degraded wood in this study ranged from 0.5 to 5.5% of the possible volume.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

History

Published online: 16 November 2021

Language

English

Authors

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

VIEW ALL METRICS

SCITE_

Citations

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.

EXPORT CITATIONS

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login Options

Restore your content access

Enter your email address to restore your content access:

Note: This functionality works only for purchases done as a guest. If you already have an account, log in to access the content to which you are entitled.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media

Related Articles

Skip the navigation