Skip to main content

Management of Hypospadias Cripple

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hypospadiology

Abstract

Hypospadias surgery is a complex one, having more chances of complications. The number, final outcome of repair, and extent of adulthood complications of the hypospadias repair during childhood are poorly defined. When multiple surgeries fail, it will lead to functional loss of the penis, landing in the problem of “hypospadias cripple.” The initial repair goals are to reconstruct an adequate size and straight penis for successful intercourse and a forward-directed projectile urinary stream. This can be achieved by chordee correction, urethroplasty, meatoplasty/glansplasty, scrotal transposition repair, and skin coverage. It is more difficult to treat patients with multiple complications hypospadias repair and are likely to leave with significant deformities worse than the primary congenital anomaly itself. The complications are considerably more significant in redo surgeries than for primary repairs with the same surgical technique. These facts guide us to think about careful patient selection, modification in the techniques, adding supportive and healthy tissue cover, designing skin flaps for skin cover, and choosing a procedure that may not commonly be used for primary repair.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bhat A. General considerations in hypospadias surgery. Indian J Urol IJU: J Urol Soc India. 2008;24(2):188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aldamanhori R, Chapple CR (2017) Management of the patient with failed hypospadias surgery presenting in adulthood. F1000Research. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barbagli G, De Angelis M, Palminteri E, Lazzeri M. Failed hypospadias repair presenting in adults. Eur Urol. 2006;49(5):887–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stecker JF Jr, Horton CE, Devine CJ Jr, McCraw JB. Hypospadias cripples. Urol Clin North Am. 1981;8(3):539–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Horton CE, Devine CJ Jr. A one-stage repair for hypospadias cripples. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1970;45(5):425–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bracka A. Hypospadias repair: the two-stage alternative. Br J Urol. 1995;76(6):31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Craig JR, Wallis C, Brant WO, Hotaling JM, Myers JB. Management of adults with prior failed hypospadias surgery. Transl Androl Urol. 2014;3(2):196.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Hensle TW, Tennenbaum SY, Reiley EA, Pollard J. Hypospadias repair in adults: adventures and misadventures. J Urol. 2001;165(1):77–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Barbagli G, Fossati N, Larcher A, Montorsi F, Sansalone S, Butnaru D, Lazzeri M. Pd60-04 predictive factors of success in adult patients treated for urethral stricture after primary hypospadias repair failure: a multivariable analysis of a single-surgeon series. J Urol. 2017;197(4S):e1184.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Myers JB, McAninch JW, Erickson BA, Breyer BN. Treatment of adults with complications from previous hypospadias surgery. J Urol. 2012;188(2):459–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Barbagli G, Perovic S, Djinovic R, Sansalone S, Lazzeri M. Retrospective descriptive analysis of 1,176 patients with failed hypospadias repair. J Urol. 2010;183(1):207–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kiss A, Sulya B, Szász AM, Romics I, Kelemen Z, Tóth J, Merksz M, Kemény S, Nyírády P. Long-term psychological and sexual outcomes of severe penile hypospadias repair. J Sex Med. 2011;8(5):1529–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fam MM, Hanna MK. Resurfacing the penis of complex hypospadias repair (“Hypospadias Cripples”). J Urol. 2017;197(3 Part 2):859–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhat A, Singh V, Bhat M. Penile torsion. In: Surgical techniques in pediatric and adult urology. 1st ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2020. p. 207–22.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Snodgrass WT, Bush N, Cost N. Algorithm for a comprehensive approach to hypospadias reoperation using 3 techniques. J Urol. 2009;182(6):2885–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Soto-Aviles OE, Santucci RA. Management of recurrent urethral strictures. In: Practical tips in urology. Springer; 2017. p. 179–90.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Cordon BH, Zhao LC, Scott JF, Armenakas NA, Morey AF. Pseudospongioplasty using periurethral vascularized tissue to support ventral buccal mucosa grafts in the distal urethra. J Urol. 2014;192(3):804–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Radojicic ZI, Perovic SV, Djordjevic ML, Vukadinovic VM, Djakovic N. ‘Pseudospongioplasty’ in the repair of a urethral diverticulum. BJU Int. 2004;94(1):126–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chertin B, Pollack A, Farkas A. Surgical management of hypospadias cripples. J Pediatr Urol. 2007;3:S53–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Snodgrass W, Elmore J. Initial experience with staged buccal graft (Bracka) hypospadias reoperations. J Urol. 2004;172(4 Part 2):1720–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Barbagli G, Fossati N, Larcher A, Montorsi F, Sansalone S, Butnaru D, Lazzeri M. Correlation between primary hypospadias repair and subsequent urethral strictures in a series of 408 adult patients. Eur Urol Focus. 2017;3(2–3):287–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Li L-C, Zhang X, Zhou S-W, Zhou X-C, Yang W-M, Zhang Y-S. Experience with the repair of hypospadias using bladder mucosa in adolescents and adults. J Urol. 1995;153(4):1117–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fichtner J, Filipas D, Fisch M, Hohenfellner R, Thüroff JW. Long-term followup of buccal mucosa onlay graft for hypospadias repair: analysis of complications. J Urol. 2004;172(5):1970–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mittermayr R, Wassermann E, Thurnher M, Simunek M, Redl H. Skin graft fixation by slow clotting fibrin sealant applied as a thin layer. Burns. 2006;32(3):305–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Foster K, Greenhalgh D, Gamelli RL, Mozingo D, Gibran N, Neumeister M, Abrams SZ, Hantak E, Grubbs L, Ploder B. Efficacy and safety of a fibrin sealant for adherence of autologous skin grafts to burn wounds: results of a phase 3 clinical study. J Burn Care Res. 2008;29(2):293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hayashi Y, Kojima Y, Kurokawa S, Mizuno K, Nakane A, Kohri K. Scrotal dartos flap to prevent the urethrocutaneous fistula on hypospadias urethroplasty. Int J Urol. 2005;12(3):280–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ehrlich RM, Alter G. Split-thickness skin graft urethroplasty and tunica vaginalis flaps for failed hypospadias repairs. J Urol. 1996;155(1):131–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sharma N, Bajpai M, Panda SS, Verma A, Sharma M. Tunica vaginalis flap cover in hypospadias cripples our experience in a tertiary care center in India. Nigerian J Surg Sci. 2014;24(1):7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mir T, Simpson RL, Hanna MK. The use of tissue expanders to resurface the penis for hypospadias cripples. Urology. 2011;78(6):1424–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Weiss DA, Smith ZL, Taylor JA, Canning DA. Old tools, old problems, new solution: the use of a modified Cecil-Culp concept in the trauma setting. Urology. 2017;106:196–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Weiss D, Long C, Frazier J, Shukla A, Srinivasan A, Kolon T, DiCarlo H, Gearhart JP, Canning D. Back to the future: the Cecil-Culp technique for salvage penile reconstructive procedures. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(4):328.e321–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Chang C, White C, Katz A, Hanna MK. Management of ischemic tissues and skin flaps in re-operative and complex hypospadias repair using vasodilators and hyperbaric oxygen. J Pediatr Urol. 2020;16(5):672.e671–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Morrison SD, Shakir A, Vyas KS, Kirby J, Crane CN, Lee GK. Phalloplasty: a review of techniques and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(3):594–615.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bhat, A. (2022). Management of Hypospadias Cripple. In: Bhat, A. (eds) Hypospadiology . Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8395-4_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8395-4_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-8394-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-8395-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics