Figure 1.
Gene map of Podocarpus lambertii chloroplast genome.
Genes drawn inside the circle are transcribed clockwise, and genes drawn outside are counterclockwise. Genes belonging to different functional groups are color-coded. The darker gray in the inner circle corresponds to GC content, and the lighter gray corresponds to AT content.
Table 1.
List of genes identified in Podocarpus lambertii chloroplast genome.
Figure 2.
Dot-plot analyses of eight sampled conifer chloroplast DNAs against Podocarpus lambertii.
A positive slope denotes that the two compared sequences are in the same orientation, whereas a negative slope indicates that the compared sequences can be aligned, but their orientations are opposite. Graphs represents comparisons between Podocarpus lambertii (axis X) and Podocarpus totara (A), Taxus mairei (B), Pinus thunbergii (C), Cryptomeria japonica (D), Cephalotaxus wilsoniana (E), Cephalotaxus oliveri (F), Taiwania flousiana (G), and Taiwania cryptomerioides (H) in axis Y.
Figure 3.
Comparison of IR and genome structure in 5 cupressophytes.
Five cupressophyte species from top to bottom are Taiwania cryptomerioides, Cryptomeria japonica, Cephalotaxus oliveri, Cephalotaxus wilsoniana and Podocarpus lambertii. Genes are represented by boxes extending above or below the baseline, according to the direction of transcription; genes with the same function have the same color. Transfer RNA genes are abbreviated as the type of one letter. Dashed boxes represent the retained IR region, and arrows indicate the short IR on each species. Adapted from Yi et al. (2013).
Table 2.
List of simple sequence repeats identified in Podocarpus lambertii chloroplast genome.
Table 3.
Distribution of tri-, tetra-, penta-, and hexapolymer simple sequence repeats (SSRs) loci in Podocarpus lambertii chloroplast genome.
Table 4.
Distribution of tandem repeats in Podocarpus lambertii chloroplast genome.